ارزیابی اثرگذاری مدیریت تسهیمی بر موفقیت کسب وکار با نقش میانجی اشتراک دانش، انسجام تیمی و تعدیلگری اعتماد (مورد مطالعه: شرکت هیمالیا)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران.

10.22111/jmr.2026.50014.6265

چکیده

برای تعیین موفقیت کسب وکار، به طور سنتی بر سه بعد هزینه، برنامه و عملکرد تمرکز می شد. در تحقیق حاضر به ارزیابی اثرگذاری مدیریت تسهیمی بر موفقیت کسب وکار با نقش میانجی اشتراک دانش، انسجام تیمی و تعدیلگری اعتماد در شرکت هیمالیا پرداخته شد. تحقیق فوق از نظر هدف، کاربردی واز منظر روش، توصیفی- پیمایشی می­باشد. تعداد نمونه، 281 نفر از مدیران و کارشناسان شرکت هیمالیا در دفتر مرکزی  در تهران  که به صورت تصادفی ساده و براساس فرمول کوکران انتخاب شد.روش تجزیه و تحلیل تحقیق حاضر با استفاده از آزمون کلومروف اسمیرینوف، آزمون تحلیل عاملی و معادلات ساختاری با نرم افزار Smart Pls و سوبل به بررسی تاثیر بین فرضیه ها پرداخته شد. نتایج تحقیقات نشان می دهد که قدرت رابطه محاسبه شده در تمامی متغیرها مقدار قابل قبولی محسوب می‌شود. همچنین آماره آزمون t بزرگتر از مقدار بحرانی t در سطح خطای 5% یعنی 96/1 بوده و نشان می‌دهد بین مدیریت تسهیمی بر موفقیت کسب وکار رابطه معنادار وجود دارد و بنابراین نقش میانجی اشتراک دانش، انسجام تیمی و تعدیلگری اعتماد بین مدیریت تسهیمی و موفقیت کسب وکار در شرکت هیمالیا تایید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Impact of Shared Management on Business Success with the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing, Team Cohesion, and Trust Moderation (Case study: Himalaya Company)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Behrouz Eskandarpoor 1
  • Mohammad Hamed Almasi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Master's student, University of Payame Noor University, Center of South Tehran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
To determine business success, traditionally, the focus was on three dimensions: cost, plan, and performance. In the present study, the effect of shared management on business success was evaluated with the mediating role of knowledge sharing, team cohesion, and trust moderation in Himalaya Company. The above study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of method. The sample size was 281 managers and experts of Himalaya Company at the head office in Tehran, who were selected by simple random sampling based on the Cochran formula. The analysis method of the present study was to examine the effect between the hypotheses using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, factor analysis test, and structural equations with Smart Pls and Sobel software. The research results show that the strength of the relationship calculated in all variables is considered an acceptable value. Also, the t-test statistic is greater than the critical value of t at the 5% error level, i.e. 1.96, indicating that there is a significant relationship between shared management and business success, and therefore the mediating role of knowledge sharing, team cohesion, and trust between shared management and business success in Himalaya Company was
Introduction
To determine business success, the focus has traditionally been on three dimensions: cost, plan, and performance (Cooper, 2016), while the technical aspects of business such as cost, risk, time, and management have been largely neglected, with this ratio reportedly even higher in developing countries than in developed countries (Nomir et al., 2018; Gazder and Khan, 2018). One contributing factor to business failure is the neglect of the human role in business management, which, despite its strategic importance in businesses, lacks specific and detailed research. Therefore, the role of leadership is also crucial in achieving business results (Yang et al., 2012). Changes in the type, size, scope, and context of businesses require unique leadership styles to deal with many complex and stressful situations and decision-making scenarios, as there is a direct relationship between leadership and the success of a business (Jiang, 2014).
Himalaya Company is one of the largest manufacturers of home appliances in Iran and its field of activity is the production of home appliances. Himalaya Company sells through an agency network. The company provides after-sales services to its customers, which include training, technical support and handling customer complaints. The development and growth of any manufacturing company depends on having satisfied and loyal customers. Also, in the current conditions (stagflation) and the existence of a competitive market in the country, companies have tried to maintain their market share using various tools, which requires satisfied and loyal customers. One of these tools used to achieve the goal of customer satisfaction is providing after-sales services in compliance with the organization's code of ethics. As mentioned, the existing competitive environment requires organizations to pay special attention to how to provide these services. Himalaya Company is no exception to this rule and is looking for tools to attract customer satisfaction and, as a result, loyalty. Therefore, the main issue of the research is to answer the question: What is the impact of shared management on business success by mediating knowledge sharing, team cohesion, and moderation in Himalaya Company?
Case study
The present study evaluated the impact of shared management on business success with the mediating role of knowledge sharing, team cohesion, and the moderating role of trust in Himalaya Company.
Materials and Methods
The above research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of method. The sample size was 281 managers and experts of Himalaya Company in the head office in Tehran, who were selected by simple random sampling based on the Cochran formula. The analysis method of the present research was to examine the effect between the hypotheses using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, factor analysis test and structural equations with Smart Pls and Sobel software.
Discussion and Results
The research results show that the strength of the calculated relationship in all variables is an acceptable value. Also, the t-test statistic is greater than the critical value of t at the 5% error level, i.e. 1.96, indicating that there is a significant relationship between shared management and business success, and therefore the mediating role of knowledge sharing, team cohesion, and the moderating role of trust between shared management and business success in Himalaya Company was confirmed.
Conclusion
Based on the results of the research, it is suggested that the attention of managers and officials of Himalaya Company to the welfare of personnel will increase the reputation of the organization as the first organization to improve performance. They should strive to provide facilities to produce products to increase revenue generation. The management of the organization will use working conditions to improve the enthusiasm of personnel to work. They should use modern technology to provide better services to citizens. They should participate in reputable exhibitions to introduce and display the company's new achievements. The managers of the organization should try to reduce staff turnover and job satisfaction in the workplace by involving them in decision-making. It is also suggested that they attract specialist personnel to provide services to citizens. Personnel participation in decision-making will improve the organization's performance. Managers should provide the necessary infrastructure to encourage citizens to use. Supporting customers in complaints can increase their satisfaction. Establishing long-term relationships with current customers will improve customers' mental image of the brand. Adhering to customer-oriented principles will make consumers willing to use it. Competition with competing companies will make your company willing to adopt new ideas and lead to brand popularity. Competition with rival companies leads to the production of new products. And ultimately, competition with rival companies leads to the identification of new opportunities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Shared management
  • business success
  • knowledge sharing
  • team cohesion
  • trust
  • Himalaya Company
منابع فارسی
تقی‌پور الگویی، سعید. (1398). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت کسب‌وکارهای عمرانی شهر خمینی‌شهر. مطالعات جغرافیا، عمران و مدیریت شهری، 5(3)، 14–18.
صارمی، سهیلا؛ تقی‌پور بیرگانی، فاطمه. (1393). توانایی‌های مدیریتی مدیران کسب‌وکار به‌عنوان یکی از عوامل موفقیت کسب‌وکار. سومین همایش ملی علوم مدیریت نوین، گرگان.
قلیچ‌لی، بهروز؛ اسدی قراباغی، مهدی. (1394). تأثیر نیت و شایستگی‌های تسهیم دانش بر عملکرد شغلی مدیران سازمان‌های پروژه‌محور. پژوهش‌های مدیریت در ایران، 19(4)، 23–31.
منافی شرف‌آباد، قاسم. (1399). نقش نظام مدیریت دانش در برون‌رفت از پیچیدگی‌های مدیریت کسب‌وکار. نخبگان علوم و مهندسی، 26، 32–44.
نایب‌اصل، سیدرامین. (1399). تأثیر ابعاد مدیریت دانش بر موفقیت کسب‌وکار و استراتژی‌های کسب‌وکار. چشم‌انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 3(25)، 46–53.
یاقوتی، محسن؛ موسوی، سیده آناهیتا؛ موحدی‌فر، عرفان. (1394). دانش مشتری و تأثیر آن بر مدیریت دانش با نقش میانجی ساختار سازمانی. دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های نوین در مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع.
References
Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2000). Knowledge transfer in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1–8.. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2883
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 332–345 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x
Byrne, A., & Barling, J. (2009). Leadership and project teams. In F. Chiocchio, J. R. Kelloway, & B. Hobbs (Eds.), The psychology and management of project teams (pp. 137–163). Oxford University Press.
Chiang, S.-J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2014). Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.16
Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. In J. DeLamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 61–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_3
Cooper, R. G. (2016). Agile–stage-gate hybrids. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 20–34 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.006
Daspit, J. J., Justice Tillman, C., Boyd, N. G., & McKee, V. (2013). Cross-functional team effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 19(1/2), 34–56.
DeOrtentiis, S. P., Summers, K. J., Ammeter, A. P., Douglas, C., & Ferris, G. R. (2013). Cohesion and satisfaction as mediators. Career Development International, 18(5), 521–543..https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2013-0035
Fausing, M. S., Joensson, T. S., Lewandowski, J., & Bligh, M. (2015). Antecedents of shared leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(3), 271–291 .https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2013-0075
Fletcher, J. K., & Kaufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership (pp. 21–47). Sage Publications.
Gazder, U., & Khan, R. (2018). Effect of organizational structures on project failure. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 37(1), 127–138.
Jiang, H. (2014). Strategic leadership and organizational performance: The mediating role of organizational learning. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 889–896.
Gholichli, B., & Asadi Gharabaghi, M. (2015). The effect of intention and competency of knowledge sharing on job performance of project-based organization managers. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 19(4), 23–31. (In Persian)
Craig, E. (Ed.). (2013). Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge.
Horwitz, S. K. (2015). Functional diversity in project teams. In F. Chiocchio, J. R. Kelloway, & B. Hobbs (Eds.), The psychology and management of project teams (pp. 329–362). Oxford University Press.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.002
   https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591311312131
Huang, C.-H. (2013). Shared leadership and team learning. Journal of International Management Studies, 8(1), 124–133.
Imam, H., & Zaheer, M. K. (2021). Shared leadership and project success. International Journal of Project Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.006
Koops, L., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Coman, L., Hertogh, M., & Bakker, H. (2016). Perspectives of public project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 874–889 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.009
Manafi Sharaf Abad, G. (2020). The role of knowledge management systems in overcoming business management complexities. Journal of Science and Engineering Elites, 26, 32–44. (In Persian)
Moradi, A., & Miralmasi, S. (2020). Evaluation and validation of predictive models in behavioral and social sciences. Journal of Research in Management Studies, 12(3), 85–104. (In Persian)
Meese, K. A., & Borkowski, N. M. (2017). Team-based performance. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 124(5), 1717–1720. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002003
Nayeb Asl, S. R. (2020). The impact of knowledge management dimensions on business success. Accounting and Management Outlook, 3(25), 46–53. (In Persian)
Neumeier, A., Radszuwill, S., & Garizy, T. Z. (2018). Modeling project criticality. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.04.007
Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12690298
Paris, C. R. (2004). Facilitative leadership and team effectiveness. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 247–270). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10690-011
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with Scrum. Prentice Hall.
Ghanbari, S., & Beheshti Rad, R. (2016). The role of effective teams in organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies, 5(2), 45–62.
Saremi, S., & Taghipour Beirgani, F. (2014). Management capabilities of business managers as a factor in business success. Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Modern Management Sciences. (In Persian)
Scott-Young, C. M., Georgy, M., & Grisinger, A. (2019). Shared leadership in project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 37(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.008
Stephens, J. P., & Carmeli, A. (2016). Expressing negative emotions. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 862–873 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.003
Taghipour Algooee, S. (2019). Identification and prioritization of factors affecting the success of construction businesses in Khomeinishahr. Journal of Geography, Civil Engineering and Urban Management, 5(3), 14–18. (In Persian)
Webber, S. S., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Trust and loyalty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 997–1013.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.275
Wiewiora, A., Murphy, G., Trigunarsyah, B., & Brown, K. (2014). Knowledge sharing mechanisms. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21412
Yaghouti, M., Mousavi, S. A., & Mohedi Far, E. (2015). Customer knowledge and its impact on knowledge management. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Modern Research in Management and Industrial Engineering. (In Persian)
Yang, L.-R., Chen, J.-H., & Wang, H.-W. (2012). IT and project success. Automation in Construction, 22, 182–191. 
Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206 .https://doi.org/10.1086/651257