ارائه مدل ارزیابی هماهنگی در خط‌مشی های اداری جمهوری اسلامی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی و علوم سازمانی، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه رهبری و سرمایه انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت دولتی و علوم سازمانی، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

3 استاد تمام دانشکده حکمرانی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.

4 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و مدیریت، دانشگاه امام صادق علیه‌السلام، ایران.

10.22111/jmr.2025.51194.6340

چکیده

هماهنگی‌ خط‌مشی یک اصطلاح تخصصی جدید اما دارای قدمتی دیرینه در اطلس مفهومی خط‌مشی‌گذاری و حکمرانی عمومی است. این مهم بر اساس بند 14 سیاست‌های کلی نظام اداری (31/01/1389) مبنی بر «کل‌نگری، همسوسازی، هماهنگی و تعامل اثربخش دستگاه­های اداری»، یکی از اهداف اساسی نظام حکمرانی و اداری کشور قلمداد می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر با استراتژی آمیخته اکتشافی ابتدا با مطالعه چند موردی و تحلیل تجانس دو خط‌مشی مهم و اثرگذار در نظام اداری شامل قانون مدیریت خدمات کشوری (مصوب 1386) و نقشه‌راه و برنامه‌های جامع اصلاح نظام اداری (1392 الی 1400) توانست مقوله‌ها و مولفه‌های هماهنگی را شناسایی کند و سپس در مرحله کمی با استفاده از روش ترکیبی مدل‌سازی ساختاری و تفسیری(ISM) و دلفی فازی(DF) درصدد ارائه مدلی برای ارزیابی هماهنگی در خط‌مشی‌های جمهوری اسلامی ایران برآمده است. این مدل در دو محور شامل محور عمودی که حاوی چهار سطح برای هماهنگی از هماهنگی سلبی به سمت هماهنگی ایجابی است و محور افقی که مقوله‌های هماهنگی به ترتیب اثرگذاری کمتر به اثرگذاری بیشتر چینش شده‌اند، طراحی شده است. مدل ارائه شده در مجموع دارای 1000 امتیاز و شامل ۸ مقوله اصلی و ۲۶ مؤلفه فرعی هماهنگی است که امتیازدهی و  ترتیب‌گذاری آن‌ها بر اساس منطق دلفی فازی بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Coordination Evaluation Model in the Administrative Policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Vaseghi Body 1
  • Abbas Nargesian 2
  • Ali asghar Pourezzat 3
  • Meysam Latifi 4
1 PhD graduated, Department of Public Management and Organizational Sciences, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Leadership and Human Capital, Faculty of Public Management and Organizational Sciences, University of Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor of the School of Governance, University of Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Public Management, Faculty of Islamic Knowledge and Management, Imam Sadiq University, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
This research employs a mixed exploratory strategy, beginning with a multi-case study to conduct congruence analysis between two significant and influential policies in the administrative system: the Management of Civil Services Act (approved in 2016) and the comprehensive roadmap and programs for the reform of the administrative system (2013–2014). Through this analysis, it identifies the categories and components of coordination. In the quantitative phase, the study utilizes a combined approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and fuzzy Delphi (FD) methods to propose a model for assessing coordination in the policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Introduction
“Policy coordination” is a new specialized term, yet it has deep historical roots in the conceptual framework of policymaking and public governance (Bouckaert et al., 2016). In the public sector, the issue of coordination arises due to the widespread adoption of New Public Management in various countries and the resulting increase in specialization within government. This has led to the phenomenon of siloing and compartmentalization of services and policies (Gregory, 2006; Pollitt, 2003; Lægreid et al., 2016). Developing a model for assessing coordination in the public sector requires scientific innovations that take into account prevailing conditions and demands (Bianchi & Peters, 2018). This research aims to enhance and improve coordination and collaboration within the administrative system, which has been overlooked due to an inefficient focus on performance evaluation at the organizational level (the New Public Management approach) and a lack of attention to the policy level (or, in other words, the governance network level) (Bouckaert et al., 2016). In this study, “policy coordination” refers to the appropriate level of cooperation among stakeholders and integration in the public policymaking process, such that it continuously and simultaneously enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of the policy network.
Case study
The subjects of this research are two significant and influential policies within the administrative system: the Management of Civil Services Act (approved in 2016) and the comprehensive roadmap and programs for the reform of the administrative system (2013–2014).
Materials and Methods
In the qualitative phase, purposeful theoretical sampling was conducted through interviews with 23 experts in the administrative system. Subsequently, the categories and components of coordination were extracted using congruence analysis. In the quantitative phase, a closed-ended questionnaire based on ISM and FD was completed with the participation of 22 administrative experts. The items identified in the qualitative section were then ranked and weighted.
Discussion and Results
The Coordination Evaluation Model is designed along two axes: the horizontal axis, which contains four levels of coordination ranging from negative coordination to positive coordination, and the vertical axis, where the categories of coordination are arranged in order of decreasing impact. The proposed model has a total of 1,000 points and includes eight main categories and 26 sub-components of coordination. The scoring and ranking of these categories and components are based on fuzzy Delphi logic.
Conclusion
The model presented in this research is applicable at three levels: organizational, network, and governmental. By evaluating the relevant entity and determining the acquired score, the level of coordination of that system can be identified. Based on this assessment, a path for the improvement and enhancement of coordination can be planned and pursued.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • policy coordination
  • policy integration
  • administrative policies
  • evaluation model

مراجع

منابع فارسی
آذر، عادل، خسروانی؛ فرزانه. جلالی، رضا. (1398). تحقیق در عملیات نرم (رویکردهای ساختاردهی مسئله). چاپ چهارم. تهران: سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
پولادی، حسن؛ کشاورزیان، محمد مهدی. (1396). تحلیل و بررسی قانون مدیریت خدمات کشوری. مرکز پژوهشی آراء: تهران.
حبیبی، آرش؛ آفریدی، صنم. (1401)، تصمیم‌گیری چند‌ شاخصه (قطعی و فازی)، انتشارت نارون دانش، تهران.
رفیع زاده بقرآبادی، علاء الدین؛ عفتی داریانی، محمد علی؛ رونق، مریم. (1389). مدیریت عملکرد، ویراست سوم. تهران: انتشارات فرمنش.
عسکری آزاد، محمود. (1392). نقشة راه اصلاح نظام اداری. تهران: معاونت توسعة مدیریت و سـرمایة انسـانی رئیس جمهور.
فوکویاما، فرانسیس. (1401) نظم و زوال سیاسی، مترجم: قهرمانپور، رحمن، چاپ 5، تهران: انتشارات روزنه.
قاسمی، مبینا. (1394). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی موانع اجرای خط‌مشی عمومی؛ موردمطالعه: قانون مدیریت خدمات کشوری. پایان نامه ارشد، گروه مدیریت. دانشکده علوم انسانی.دانشگاه شاهد.
قانون مدیریت خدمات کشوری (مصوب 1386)
نرگسیان، عباس. (1402). روش تحقیق در مدیریت، چاپ اول، تهران: نگاه دانش.
نقشه‌راه و برنامه‌های جامع اصلاح نظام اداری(1392-1400)
نیومن، ویلیام لاورنس. (1393) روش‌های پژوهش اجتماعی رویکردهای کمی و کیفی. ترجمه: فقیهی، ابوالحسن. آغاز. عسل. تهران: انتشارات ترمه با همکاری انجمن علوم مدیریت ایران.
 
References
Askari Azad, M. (2013). Roadmap for Reforming the Administrative System. Tehran: Vice Presidency for Management Development and Human Capital of the President. (In Persian)
Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2019). Soft Operations Research (Problem Structuring Approaches), 4th Edition, Tehran: Industrial Management Organization. (In Persian)
Bevir, M. (2007). Governance: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford.
Bianchi, C. (2015). Enhancing Joined‐Up Government and Outcome‐Based Performance Management through System Dynamics Modelling to Deal with Wicked Problems: The Case of Societal Ageing. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(4), 502-505.
Bianchi, C., & Peters, B. G. (2018). Measuring Coordination and Coherence: Assessing Performance across the Public Sector. In Outcome-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector (pp. 143-159). Springer, Cham.
Bianchi, C., Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2017). Applying a Dynamic Performance Management Framework to Wicked Issues: How Coproduction Helps to Transform Young People’s Services in Surrey County Council, UK. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(10), 833-846.
Blatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2022). Policy design for policy coordination. In Research handbook of policy design (pp. 351-370). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Braun, D. (2008). Organizing the Political Coordination of Knowledge and Innovation Policies. Science and Public Policy, 35, 227–239.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, G. R. (2016). Toward a Processual Understanding of Policy Integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231.
Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing Fragmented Government Action: Coordination, Coherence, and Integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745-767.
Currie, G., & Bromley, L. (2005, August). Developing Measures of Public Transport Schedule Coordination Quality. In 28th Australasian Transport Research Forum.
Drever, E. (1995). Using Semi-Structured Interviews in Small-Scale Research. A Teacher’s Guide.
Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2007). Case Study Methodology in Business Research. Routledge.
Fukuyama, F. (2022). Political Order and Political Decay, translated by Ghahramanpour, Rahman, 5th Edition, Tehran: Rozaneh Publications. (In Persian)
Ghasemi, M. (2015). Identification and Prioritization of Barriers to the Implementation of Public Policy: A Case Study of the Civil Service Management Law. Master’s Thesis, Management Group, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid University. (In Persian)
Habibi, Arash, and Afridi, Sanam. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (Deterministic and Fuzzy), Narvan Danesh Publications, Tehran. In Persian.
Hood, C. (2005). The Idea of Joined-Up Government: A Historical Perspective. In V. Bogdanor (ed.), Joined-Up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
James, O., & Nakamura, A. (2015). Shared Performance Targets for the Horizontal Coordination of Public Organizations: Control Theory and Departmentalism in the United Kingdom’s Public Service Agreement System. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(2), 392-411.
Johnston, W. J., Leach, M. P., and Liu, A. H. (1999). Theory Testing Using Case Studies in Business-to-Business Research. Industrial Marketing Management, 28, 201–213.
Kapucu, N., & Demiroz, F. (2011). Measuring Performance for Collaborative Public Management Using Network Analysis Methods and Tools. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(4), 549–579. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576340406
Kapucu, N., & Hu, Q. (2020). Network Governance: Concepts, Theories, and Applications. Routledge.
Kelchtermans, S., & Santos, A. M. (2025). The study of policy coordination: an approach to integrate expert assessment with automated content analysis. Science and Public Policy, 52(2), 222-235.
Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2020). Policy Integration: Challenges for Public Administration. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Koliba, C., Meek, J. W., & Zia, A. (2017). Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Routledge.
Kroll, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2018). The Design and Practice of Integrating Evidence: Connecting Performance Management with Program Evaluation. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 183-194.
Lægreid, P., Sarapuu, K., Rykkja, L., & Randma-Liiv, T. (Eds.). (2016). Organizing for Coordination in the Public Sector: Practices and Lessons from 12 European Countries. Springer.
Leichsenring, K. (2004). Developing Integrated Health and Social Care Services for Older Persons in Europe. Integrated Journal of Health Care, 4. http://www.ijic.org/articles/107/
Metcalfe, L. (1994). International Policy Co-ordination and Public Management Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 60(2), 271-290.
Nargesian, Abbas. (2023). Research Methods in Management, 1st Edition, Tehran: Negah Danesh Publications. (In Persian)
Newman, W.L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, translated by Faqihi, Abolhasan. Aghaz, Asal. Tehran: Termeh Publications in collaboration with the Iranian Management Science Association. (In Persian)
OECD. (2020). Improving Governance with Policy Evaluation: Lessons From Country Experiences. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/89b1577d-en​)
Peters, B. G. (2014). Toward Policy Coordination: Alternatives to Hierarchy. In Rethinking Policy and Politics (pp. 139-158). Policy Press.
Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing Horizontal Management: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination. University Press of Kansas.
Peters, B. G. (2018). The Challenge of Policy Coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1-11.
Pollitt, C. (2003). ‘Joined-up Government: A Survey’, Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34–49.
Provan, K., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.
Rafizadeh Baqraabadi, A., Ifti Dariyani, M.A., & Ronaq, M. (2010). Performance Management, 3rd Edition. Tehran: Farminash Publications. (In Persian)
Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Understanding research philosophies and approaches. Research Methods for Business Students, 4, 106–135
Senninger, R., Finke, D., & Blom‐Hansen, J. (2021). Coordination inside government administrations: Lessons from the EU Commission. Governance, 34(3), 707-726.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications.
Tanaka, M., Chen, Y., & Siddiqui, A. S. (2020). Regulatory jurisdiction and policy coordination: A bi-level modeling approach for performance-based environmental policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(3), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1843980​
Trein, P., Fischer, M., Maggetti, M., & Sarti, F. (2023). Empirical research on policy integration: A review and new directions. Policy Sciences, 56(1), 29-48.
Trein, P., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2019). The Integration and Coordination of Public Policies: A Systematic Comparative Review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), 332-349

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار