طراحی الگوی باز آفرینی شغلی براساس مدل یابی ساختاری تفسیری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیارگروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه پیام نور، کرمان، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

چکیده

بازآفرینی شغلی مفهوم ساختارشکنانه­ای است که دیدگاه سنتی دانش منابع انسانی را درخصوص طراحی شغل درنوردیده که در آن کارکنان نقش فعالی در نحوه و دگرگون­سازی شغل خود دارند . هدف پژوهش حاضر، طراحی الگوی ساختاری تفسیری بازآفرینی شغلی می­ باشد. پس از شناسایی پیشایندهای بازآفرینی شغلی و گنجاندن آن­ها در پرسش­نامه­ی نیمه بسته، پرسش­نامه میان 18 نفر از رؤسای واحدها و کارشناسان خبره شرکت ملی نفت استان کرمان توزیع شد که با استفاده از نمونه­گیری­های مفهومی و گلوله برفی شناسایی شدند. نتایج داده­ ها، از طریق نرم­افزار متلب 9 و میک مک 2 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. در نهایت، 16متغیر در 8 سطح، شامل جهت­ گیری کارآفرینانه، خودکارآمدی و مهارت اجتماعی، اشتیاق شغلی، استقلال شغلی، امنیت شغلی و هویت سازمانی، جایگاه شغل و حمایت سازمانی ادراک شده، سرمایه روان­شناختی، رهبری تحول­آفرین، رهبری خدمتگزار، رهبری کارمندمدار، رهبری توانمندساز، رهبری دو سو توان، شخصیت پویا، به عنوان پیشایندهای بازآفرینی شغلی شناسایی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Job Crafting Model Based on Interpretive Structural Modeling

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Taboli 1
  • Mahboobeh Askari Bagher Abadi 2
  • MohebAli Rahdar 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Payame Noor University, Kerman, Iran.
2 PhD Student in Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, School of Management, Sistan and Baluchestan University, Zahedan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
Job crafting is a deconstructive concept that transcends the traditional view of human resource knowledge about job design. It is process through which employees play an active role in how their work is transformed. The objective of the present study is to design an interpretive structural model of job crafting. After identifying the preconditions for job crafting and including them in the semi-closed questionnaire, the questionnaire was distributed among 18 heads of units and experts of the National Oil Company of Kerman Province who were identified through conceptual sampling and snowballs. The data were analyzed through MATLAB 9 and Mick Mac 2 software. Finally, 16 variables at 8 levels, including entrepreneurial orientation, self-efficacy and social skills, job motivation, job independence, job security and organizational identity, job position and perceived organizational support, psychological capital, transformational leadership, servant leadership, employee leadership, leadership empowerment, two-way leadership, dynamic personality, were identified as preconditions for job crafting.
Introduction
In the recent past, a person's relationship with his job was analyzed based on job design theories. The prevailing perception is that employees perform their duties according to the managers' definition of the job, and employees in similar jobs perform their duties in the same way and do not play an active role in how their jobs are transformed. So far, no complete research has been done on the preconditions of job crafting and how it is formed in the employees of the organizations.
 
Case study
National Company for Distribution of Petroleum Products in Kerman Province
Materials and Methods
This research is applied in terms of research orientation, descriptive in terms of purpose, and mixed in terms of research philosophy. To select the team of experts—since the purpose of generalizing the results was not mentioned—purposeful sampling method was used. The criteria for selecting experts were theoretical mastery, practical experience, willingness and ability to participate in research and access. Considering these criteria and also achieving theoretical saturation in the data coding process, eventually the number of experts with whose cooperation the research process was conducted, reached 18 people. Data collection was obtained through library studies, review of documents, in-depth interviews and questionnaires. The data were also analyzed by MATLAB 9 software and Mick Mac 2 analysis
Discussion and Results
In this study, 8 levels were introduced as preconditions for job crafting: the first level of entrepreneurial orientation, the second level of self-efficacy and social skills, the third level of job enthusiasm, the fourth level of job independence, job security and organizational identity, the fifth level of job position and organizational support Perceived, the sixth level of psychological capital, the seventh level of transformational leadership, servant leadership, employee-centered leadership, empowered leadership and mutual leadership, the eighth level of dynamic personality were identified as the preconditions of job crafting. Based on the research results, job creation preconditions are divided into individual and organizational factors and job factors and form demand. Motivations such as improving job performance, improving skills, as well as adapting work to other aspects of life, seem to be much more real and related to performance, and are more important than the psychological motivation found in previous research.
Another important personality finding is that job characteristics and work environment play an important role in job crafting. In other words, job crafting is not only due to personal desire to improve one's job, sometimes unfavorable working conditions such as conflict, role overload and ... causes a person to have a job crafting, which is stated that the mismatch between the job and the employee causes the job crafting. In this study, like other studies that refer to organizational and contextual factors affecting job crafting, motivational and psychological drivers and organizational factors affecting job crafting are mentioned. In addition, these organizational and contextual factors are considered as the most important prerequisite for employees' active behavior for job crafting. Because these conditions and organizational factors can be the most important motivation for employees to monitor their surroundings and find job crafting opportunities. A very important achievement of the present study, which can be a breakthrough in the process of job recruitment analysis, is to pay attention to the individual and personality traits of individuals in the job recruitment process, which can help us understand why the results of job crafting in some Positive cases and in some cases negative. If reinforcing personality factors such as social skills, self-efficacy are consistent with job crafting, job crafting will have positive results, and if inhibitory personality factors such as weak personal abilities are associated with the job crafting process, job crafting will not have positive results.
Conclusion
In this study, 16 variables in 8 levels, including the first level: entrepreneurial orientation, the second level: self-efficacy and social skills, the third level: job motivation, the fourth level: job independence, job security and organizational identity, the fifth level: job position and perceived organizational support, Level 6: Psychological Capital, Level 7: Transformational Leadership, Servant Leadership, Employee Leadership, Empowering Leadership, Two-Powerful Leadership Level 8: Dynamic personality were identified as a precondition for job crafting and then the final model was drawn.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Job Crafting
  • Interpretive Structural Modeling
  • Oil Company
منابع فارسی
قاسمی، فرزانه؛ قلی پور، آرین؛ ابویی اردکان، محمد (1401). شناسایی و اولویت بندی معیارهای مشاغل استراتژیک (مورد مطالعه : شرکت همراه اول)، پژوهش­های مدیریت عمومی، 15(57)، 34-5.
سنگی، محمد؛ آذر، عادل؛ شفیعی نیک آبادی، محسن؛  مقدم، علیرضا (1396). ارائه مدل سنجش تناسب شغل و شاغل مبتنی بر استعدادها ) مورد مطالعه: مرکز آمار ایران(، پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، 10(35)، 34-5.
 
Refrenses
Aktouf, O.(1992). Management and theories of organizations in the 1990s: Toward a critical radical humanism? Academy of Management Review, 17, 407-431.
Bakker, A. B.,  Tims, M.,  & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378.
Bavik, A., Bavik, Y.L., & Tang, P.M.(2017). Servant Leadership, Employee Job Crafting, and Citizenship Behaviors: A Cross-Level Investigation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(4), 364-373.
Bizzi, L.(2017). Network characteristics: When an individual’s job crafting depends on the jobsof others.Human Relations, 70, 436-460.
Davenport, T. H. (2013). Thinking for a living: How to get better performances and results fromknowledge workers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Demerouti, E. (2014). Design your own job through job crafting. European Psychologist, 19,237-247.
Demerouti, E., Hewett. R., Haun, V. C., Gieter, S. D., & Rodriguez-Sanchez, A. (2020). From job crafting to home crafting: A daily diary study among six European countries. human relations, 73(7),1010-1.35.
Ghasemi, F., Gholi Pour, A., & Abooyee Ardakan, M. (2022). Identifying and Prioritizing the Criteria of Strategic Jobs (Case study: Hamrahe aval Company). Public Management Researches, 15(57), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2022.38847.5500.(In  Persian).
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of atheory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
Haemi, K., Jinyoung I., & Hailin, Q. (2018). Exploring antecedents and consequences of job crafting, International Journal of Hospitality Management 75 (2018) 18–26.
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., &Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top-downand bottom-up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journalof Organizational Behavior, 31, 187-215.
Kim, H.Im, J.Qu, H., & NamKoong, J. (2018). Antecedent and consequences of job crafting: an organizational level approach.  International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 3(30),  1863-1881.
Li, H., & Yang, X. (2018). When a calling is living Job, crafting mediates the relationships between living a calling and work engagement. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 9(2), 77-106.
Liqun,Zh., HaiRong, L., & Feng, L.(2018). Proactive personality and mental health: The role of job crafting .PsyCh Journal, 7(3), 154-155.
Lichtenthaler, P.W., & Fischbach, A. (2018). Leadership, job crafting, and employee health and performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 50(39), 620-632.
Lotta, K.H.,  Wilmar, B., Schaufeli, J. (2017). A multilevel study on servant leadership, job boredom and job crafting.Journal of Managerial Psychology, Emerald Publishing Limited 0268-3946.
Luu, T.T., Dinh, K., & Qian, D. (2019). Ambidextrous leadership, entrepreneurial orientation and job crafting.  European Business Review, 2(31),  260-282.
Marijntje, Z.,  Mari, P., & Jari, H.(2018). Workaholism versus work engagement and job crafting: What is the role of self‐management strategies?Hum ResourManag, 1–17.
Oldham, G. R., & Fried, Y. (2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20-35.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., &Cordery, J. L. (2001). Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Occupational and OrganizationalPsychology, 74, 413-440.
Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., & Johns, G. (2017). One hundred years of work design research:Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 403-420.
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2016). Regular Versus Cutback-Related Change: The Role of Employee Job Crafting in Organizational Change Contexts of Different Nature. International Journal of Stress Management. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/str0000033
Philipp, W.L., &  Andrea, F. (2018). Leadership, job crafting, and employee health and performance;Leadership& Organization Development Journal© Emerald Publishing Limited 0143-7739
Roberto, C., Guido, A., & Laura, B. (2017). Psychological Capital and Career Success Over Time: The Mediating Role of Job Crafting. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,24(3),107-118.
Rofcanin, Y., Bakker, A. B., Berber, A.,Golgeci, I., & Heras, M. L. (2018). Relational job crafting: Exploring the role of employee motives with a weekly diary study. Human relations, 72(4), 1-28.
Sangi, M., Azar, A., Shafiee Nikabadi, M., & Moghadam, A. R. (2017). Introduce the Person-Job fitness model According to the Talents‏ ‏‎‎‎(Case Study: Statistics Center of Iran). Public Management Researches, 10(35), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2017.3251.(In Persian)
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the Job Crafting Scale.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 173-186.
Tomoki, S., Jie, L., & Masaki, H. (2017). Predicting Job Crafting From the Socially Embedded Perspective: The Interactive Effect of Job Autonomy, Social Skill, and Employee Status. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.
Tung,F.C.(2016). Does transformational, ambidextrous, transactional leadership promote employee creativity? Mediating effects of empowerment and promotion focus. International Journal of Manpower, 37(8), 1251-1263
Wang , H.J., Demerouti, E., &  Blanc, P.L.(2017). Transformational leadership, adaptability, and job crafting: The moderating role of organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, (100), 185-195.
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J.E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
Zhang, L., Lu, H., & Li, F. (2018). Proactive personality and mental health: The role of job crafting . PsyCh Journal.