ارائه الگوی عملکرد نوآوری شرکت های دانش بنیان: رهیافت فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران.

2 گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران.

3 کارشناس ارشد طراحی صنعتی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

4 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

اتکاء به اقتصاد دانش ­بنیان یکی از استراتژی های کشورهای در حال توسعه بوه و در این میان چشم امید به نوآوری شرکت­های دانش­ بنیان بعنوان یکی از مهم­ترین بازیگران این عرصه دوخته شده است. هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی عوامل تعیین­ کننده عملکرد نوآوری شرکت ­های دانش­ بنیان با استفاده از روش فراترکیب است. در راستای این روش پس از پالایش مقالات، در نهایت تعداد 140 مقاله علمی که بطور مستقیم به موضوع عملکرد نوآوری شرکت­ها پرداخته بودند وارد مرحله تحلیل در نرم ­افزار MAXQDA شدند. پس از مرحله تلفیق تعداد 110 کد متمایز شناسایی، و از بین کدهای شناسایی شده کدهای ظرفیت جذب با 10 ارجاع؛ مدیریت دانش با 9 ارجاع، شبکه­ های سازمانی با 8 ارجاع و یادگیری سازمانی با 7 ارجاع به ترتیب بالاترین تعداد ارجاعات را در متون پژوهشی داشتند. در سطوح انتزاع بالاتر کدها در قالب 13 مفهوم و در نهایت در قالب 7 موضوع زمینه نوآوری، دولت، شبکه ­سازی، راهبری دانش سرمایه­ های فکری، دوسوتوانی سازمانی، راهبرد هم­ رقابتی و نظام علم، فناوری و نوآوری بنگاه (STI) تقسیم ­بندی و در چارچوب مدل سه­ شاخگی ارائه شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Introducing the Innovation Performance Model of Knowledge-based Companies: A meta-Synthesis Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Roya Shakeri 1
  • Rafigh Hasani 2
  • Mehdi Abdolmaleki 3
  • Mohammad Reza Azhang 4
1 Department of Management, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 Department of Educational Sciences, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
3 Master of Industrial Design, Lecturer of the Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Kurdistan University, Sanandaj, Iran.
4 Master of Business Management, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Relying on the knowledge based economy of the developing countries is the escape route, and in the meantime, the hope for the innovation of the knowledge-based companies as one of the most important actors in this field has been hoped for. The aim of this study is to identify the determinants of innovation performance of knowledge-based companies using a meta-synthesis method. In line with this method, after filtering the articles, 140 researchers who directly addressed the issue of innovation performance of these companies finally entered the analysis stage in Maxqda software. After the integration step, 110 distinct codes are identified, and among the identified codes, codes; Absorption capacity with 10 references; Knowledge management with 9 citations, organizational networks with 8 citations and organizational learning with 7 citations had the highest number of citations in research texts, respectively. At higher abstraction levels, codes are in the form of 13 concepts and ultimately in the form of 7 topics (innovation context, government, networking, knowledge capital management, organizational dichotomy, competitive strategy and firm science, technology and innovation system (STI). Division and were presented in the framework of three-dimensional model.
Introduction
Since companies are the main platform for innovation in a country, they are always considered as one of the most important pillars of economic growth in countries. This irreplaceable role has led policymakers to pay special attention to removing barriers to innovation and preparing the ground for corporate growth and prosperity. Therefore, recognizing the factors affecting the innovation performance of the enterprise is very important. However, despite a number of experimental studies to identify the specific characteristics of innovative companies In most of the research conducted in this field, researchers have only considered one or more limited factors to investigate their effects on enterprise innovation. More limited research has attempted to provide more general frameworks and models for classifying the many factors that can affect enterprise innovation, and the results do not converge. However, research is ongoing, and researchers are emphasizing the nature of innovation-related contexts (both internal and external contexts) and recommending models with contextual requirements that naturally describe the more limited power conditions.
Theoretical foundations and background of innovation performance
research findings by Wei and colleagues (2020) show that manufacturing companies with higher welfare than employees have better innovation performance, which is measured by the number of patents, and this positive relationship is mainly reflected in the quality of innovation and not in its quantity.
Using data from advanced Chinese manufacturing companies from 2016 to 2018, Douan et al. (2020) found that with the help of the panel data model, the innovation performance increased by increasing the potential surplus capacity and available surplus capacity. Advanced technology firms show an initial upward trend and then a downward trend. Conversely, by increasing the recoverable surplus capacity, the performance of innovation in these firms shows a downward trend and then a growing trend. In addition, the mediating role of adsorption capacity variable in this study has been tested. The findings showed that the excess capacity available could affect the innovation performance of manufacturing companies with advanced technology through the realized (actual) absorption capacity.
Research Methodology
The present research is analytical-descriptive in terms of the research method and the research data are collected and analyzed using a Meta synthesis method. The statistical population of the present study is all research published in reputable domestic and foreign scientific databases that have been surveyed based on keywords defined to achieve an example that leads to theoretical saturation. Thus, the sampling method in this study was theoretical sampling. The main steps of the transcendental technique from the point of view of Sandlowski and Barlows (2007).
Findings and presentation of research model
In the final stage of the analysis, the results of the analysis and the extraction pattern are presented. As mentioned, in this study, 13 concepts and at a higher level, 7 categories were identified as determinants of innovation performance of knowledge-based companies and their quality test was also confirmed. In this step, the resulting research model is presented at the level of topics (categories) and with the expansion at the level of concepts. Due to the compatibility and semantic and conceptual compatibility of the extracted categories with the Mirzaei three-branch model, therefore, the proposed model is presented in the form of Figure (2). In the proposed model, 7 identified issues are shown separately in three branches (texture, structure and behavior). Innovative contextual context with two concepts (internal contextual factors and external contextual factors) in contextual context; Government issues with the concept (macro policy) and networking with the concept (networking and open innovation) in the branch of structure, and in the branch of behavior; Knowledge Leadership Intellectual Capital with Concepts (Strategic Management of Knowledge, and Leadership and Management of Intellectual Capital) And the firm's science, technology, and innovation systems are embedded in concepts (innovation management, research and development management, and strategic management of technological capabilities.
Discussion and conclusion
In the present study, all published research was searched until 2020. Finally, 140 appropriate researches were selected as the analysis source and after the analysis process with Max Kioda software, 110 distinct codes were identified. Among these codes, absorption capacity with 10 references; Knowledge management with 9 citations, organizational networks with 8 citations, and organizational learning with 7 citations had the highest number of citations, respectively. The codes identified at the higher level formed the concepts that identified 13 distinct concepts. Among these concepts, strategic knowledge management with 16 codes was identified, as well as internal contextual and leadership factors and strategic management of intellectual capital with 12 codes had the highest number of codes. Eventually, concepts formed at a higher level of abstraction of subjects (categories). In this research, 7 categories were identified, which are presented in the final model of the research in the form of Mirzaei three-branch model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Innovation Performance
  • Knowledge-Bsed Firms
  • Meta Synthesis Approach

مراجع

منابع فارسی
برومند، م.، و رنجبری، م. (1389). اقدامات راهبردی مدیریت منابع انسانی و عملکرد نوآوری با تاکید بر نقش مدیریت دانش. توسعه انسانی پلیس دو ماهنامه، 24، 41-54.
دانیالی ده حوض، م.، حاتمی نسب، س.ح.، و زارعی، ه. (1391). تأثیر کارآفرینی دانش بر نوآوری و عملکرد سازمانی. فصلنامه مدیریت بازرگانی، 10، 103-130.
رستگار، ع.ا.، دهقانی سلطانی، م.، و فارسی زاده، ح. (1396). تأثیر سرمایه اجتماعی خریدار- فروشنده بر عملکرد نوآوری با بکارگیری توسعه دانش مشتریان و تعهد به نوآوری. فصلنامه نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، 9، 63-82.
قلیچ لی، ب.، و مکانی، ع. (1396). قابلیت­های کارآفرینی، نوآوری و عملکرد شرکت­های دانش بنیان. مطالعات مدیریت استراتژیک، 27، 89-106.
قنبری­نژاد اسفقن سری، م.، و محمدی المانی، ع. (1392). بررسی تأثیر تحقیق و توسعه و مدیریت فناوری (مدیریت جامع نوآوری) بر عملکرد سازمانی از نظر نوآوری و کیفیت. خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 2، 2.
کوزازی، ا.، و شول، ا. (1392). تأثیر مدیریت کیفیت جامع (TQM) بر عملکرد نوآوری: نقش تعدیل­کننده یادگیری سازمانی، مطالعات مدیریت. بهبود و تغییر، 71، 1-17.
میر فخرالدینی، س.ح.، حاتمی نسب، س.ح.، طالعی فر، ر.، و کنجکاوه منفرد، ع.ر. (1389). مدیریت دانش، نوآوری دانش و عملکرد نوآوری در شرکت های کوچک و متوسط ​​(SME). چشم انداز مدیریت تجاری، 35(2)، 103-118.
References
Adams, P., Bodas Freitas, I.M., & Fontana, R. (2019). Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management. Journal of Business Research, 97, 129-140.
Aloini, D., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R. & Pellegrini, L. (2017). IP, openness, and innovation performance: an empirical study. Management Decision,55(6), 1307-1327.
Aloini, D., Pellegrini, L., Lazzarotti, V. & Manzini, R. (2015). Technological strategy, open innovation and innovation performance: evidences on the basis of a structural-equation-model approach. Measuring Business Excellence,19(3), 22-41.
Anderssona, M., Moen, O., Brett, P.O. (2020). The organizational climate for psychological safety: Associations with SMEs' innovation capabilities and innovation performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55, 101554.
Arvanitis, S., Lokshin, B., Mohnen, P., & Woerter, M. (2015). Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation: a comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data. Rev. Ind. Organ, 46 (4), 359–382.
Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information & Management, 55 (1), 131-143.
Berraies, S. (2019). Effect of middle managers’ cultural intelligence on firms’ innovation performance: Knowledge sharing as mediator and collaborative climate as moderator. Personnel Review, 49 (4)1015-1038.
Boroumand, M., & Ranjbari, M. (2010). Strategic actions of human resource management and innovation performance with emphasis on role of knowledge management. police human development bi monthly, 24, 41-54. (In Persian)
Bort, S., Oehme, M. & Zock, F. (2014). Regional Networks, Alliance Portfolio Configuration, and Innovation Performance. Understanding the Relationship Between Networks and Technology, Creativity and Innovation. Technology, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Competitive Strategy, 13, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 229-256.
Burcharth, A., Præst Knudsen, M. & Søndergaard, H.A. (2017). The role of employee autonomy for open innovation performance. Business Process Management Journal, 23 (6)1245-1269.
Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C. & Guzelsoy, E. (2013). Impacts of learning orientation on product innovation performance. The Learning Organization, 20 (3), 176-194.
Cao, Y. & Zhao, L. (2013). Analysis of patent management effects on technological innovation performance. Baltic journal of Management, 8 3, 286-305.
Chen, C.J., & Huang, J.W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance — The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62, (1), 104-114.
Chen, X., Zhao, K., Liu, X. & Dash Wu, D. (2012). Improving employees' job satisfaction and innovation performance using conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23 (2), 151-172.
Chen,C.J., & Huang, Y.F. (2010). Creative workforce density, organizational slack, and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 411-417.
Cheng, C.C.J. & Shiu, E.C. (2015). The inconvenient truth of the relationship between open innovation activities and innovation performance. Management Decision, 53 (3), 625-647.
Cheng, H., Song, F. & Li, D. (2017). How middle managers’ participation in decision-making influences firm innovation performance: Evidence from China Employer–Employee Survey Data. Chinese Management Studies, 11 (1), 72-89.
Curado, C., Muñoz-Pascual, L., & Galende, J. (2018). Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: a mixed methods approach. Journal of Business Research, 89, 206–215.
Dahms, S., Cabrilo, S., & Kingkaew, S. (2020). The role of networks, competencies, and IT advancement in innovation performance of foreign-owned subsidiaries. Industrial Marketing Management. (Article in press)
Daniali deh hoz, M., Hatami nasab, S.H., & zarei, E. (2012). The impact of knowledge entrepreneurial on innovation and organizational performance. business management quarterly, 10, 103-130. (In Persian)
De Beule, F., & Van Beveren, I. (2019). Sources of open innovation in foreign subsidiaries: An enriched typology. International Business Review, 28(1), 135-147.
De Luca, L.M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95-112.
Dedahanov, A., Rhee, C. & Yoon, J. (2017). Organizational structure and innovation performance: Is employee innovative behavior a missing link?. Career Development International, 22 (4), 334-350.
Diaz-Fernandez, M., Bornay-Barrachina, M. & Lopez-Cabrales, A. (2017). HRM practices and innovation performance: a panel-data approach. International Journal of Manpower, 38 (3), 354-372.
Dogbe, C., Tian, H., Pomegbe, W., Sarsah, S. & Otoo, C. (2020). Effect of network embeddedness on innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: The moderating role of innovation openness. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13 (2), 181-197.
Duan, Y., Wang, W., & Zhou, W. (2020). The multiple mediation effect of absorptive capacity on the organizational slack and innovation performance of high-tech manufacturing firms: Evidence from Chinese firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 229. (Article in press)
Escrig-Tena, A.B., Segarra-Ciprés, M., García-Juan, B., & Beltrán-Martín, I. (2018). The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 1-14.
Estrada, I., Faems, D., de Faria, P. (2016). Coopetition and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 56-65.
Fang, G., Zhou, Q., Wu, J. & Qi, X. (2019). The relationship between network capabilities and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119 (8), 1638-1654.
Ferraris, A., Devalle, A., Ciampi, F., & Couturier, J. (2019). Are global R&D partnerships enough to increase a company's innovation performance? The role of search and integrative capacities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, Article 119750.
Fosfuri, A., Tribo, & Josep A. (2008). Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega, 36 (2), 173–187.
Gammelgaard, J., McDonald, F., Stephan, A., Tüselmann, H., & Dörrenbächer, C. (2012). The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance. International Business Review, 21(6), 1158–1172.
Gao, S., Chen, J., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Relationship between Team Knowledge Heterogeneity and Corporate Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study in Coastal Areas of East China, Journal of Coastal Research, Special  98: Recent Developments in Practices and Research on Coastal Regions: Transportation. Environment and Economy, 320-324.
Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van de Ven, A.H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academic Management Annovation, 7 (1), 775–819.
Gerlach, F., Hundeling, M. & Rosing, K. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation performance: a longitudinal study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108 /LODJ-07-2019-0321. (article in press)
Ghanbari nezhad asfeghn seri, M., & Mohammadi almani, A. (2013). A survey of the impact of R&D and technology management (comprehensive innovation management) on organizational performance in terms of innovation and quality. creativity in human sciences, 2, 2. (In Persian)
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Calic, G. (2020). Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data. Journal of Business Research, 108, 147-162.
Gholich li, B., & Makani, A. (2017). Entrepreneurial capabilities, innovation and performance of knowledge-based firms. strategic management studies, 27, 89-106. (in Persian)
Gloet, M. & Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15 (5), 402-409.
Greco, M., Grimaldi, M. & Cricelli, L. (2015). Open innovation actions and innovation performance: A literature review of European empirical evidence. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18 (2), 150-171.
Guan, J.C., Kam Mok, C., Yam, R.C.M., Chin, K.S., & Fai Pun, K. (2006). Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, (6), 666-678.
Guo, J., Guo, B., Zhou, J., & Wu, X. (2020). How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155. (Article in press)
Hanifah, H., Abdul Halim, H., Ahmad, N. and Vafaei-Zadeh, A. (2019a). Can internal factors improve innovation performance via innovation culture in SMEs?. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27 (1), 382-405.
Hanifah, H., Abdul Halim, H., Ahmad, N. & Vafaei-Zadeh, A. (2019b). Emanating the key factors of innovation performance: leveraging on the innovation culture among SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13 (4), 559-587.
Hernandez‐Espallardo, M., Molina‐Castillo, F. & Rodriguez‐Orejuela, A. (2012). Learning processes, their impact on innovation performance and the moderating role of radicalness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (1), 77-98.
Hoarau, H. (2014). Knowledge acquisition and assimilation in tourism-innovation processes. Scand. J. Hospit. Tourism, 14 (2), 135–151.
Hong, J., Liao, Y., Zhang, Y., & Yu, Z. (2019). The effect of supply chain quality management practices and capabilities on operational and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 227-235.
Hong, J., Zheng, R., Deng, H., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Green supply chain collaborative innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 20, Article 118377.
Huang, D., Chen, S., Zhang, G. & Ye, J. (2018). Organizational forgetting, absorptive capacity, and innovation performance: A moderated mediation analysis. Management Decision, 56 (1), 87-104.
Huang, E.Y. & Lin, S. (2006). How R&D management practice affects innovation performance: An investigation of the high‐tech industry in Taiwan. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106 (7), 966-996.
Huang, J. & Li, Y. (2009). The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 30 (3), 285-301.
Hutzschenreuter, T., & Matt, T. (2017). MNE internationalization patterns, the roles of knowledge stocks, and the portfolio of MNE subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(9), 1131–1150.
Iddris, F. (2019). Innovation capability and product innovation performance: the case of low-tech manufacturing firms. European Business Review, 31 (5), 646-668.
Inauen, M. & Schenker‐Wicki, A. (2011). The impact of outside‐in open innovation on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14 (4), 496-520.
Inkinen, H.T., Kianto, A. & Vanhala, M. (2015). Knowledge management practices and innovation performance in Finland. Baltic Journal of Management, 10 (4), 432-455.
Ismaeel Jabbouri, N., Siron, R., Zahari, I., & Khalid, M. (2016). Impact of Information Technology Infrastructure on Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study on Private Universities In Iraq. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 861-869.
Jiang, H., Liu, W., Zhao, S. & Chen, Y. (2019). Technology standardization, competitive behavior, and enterprises’ performance of innovation: A conceptual model. Library Hi Tech, 38 (1), 251-269.
Jiang, Z., Wang, Z., & Li, Z. (2018). The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on innovation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 482-491.
Kähkönen, A., Lintukangas, K., Ritala, P. & Hallikas, J. (2017). Supplier collaboration practices: implications for focal firm innovation performance. European Business Review, 29 (4), 402-418.
Kim, B., Kim, E., Miller, D.J., & Mahoney, J.T. (2016). The impact of the timing of patents on innovation performance. Research Policy, 45 (4), 914-928.
Kim, K.-T., Lee, J.S. & Lee, S.-Y. (2017). The effects of supply chain fairness and the buyer’s power sources on the innovation performance of the supplier: a mediating role of social capital accumulation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32 (7), 987-997.
Ko, W.W.J., Liu, G., Ngugi, I.K. & Chapleo, C. (2018). External supply chain flexibility and product innovation performance: A study of small- and medium-sized UK-based manufacturers. European Journal of Marketing, 52 (9-10), 1981-2004.
Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I.M. (2019). More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, 48(1), 1-10.
Kozazi, A., & Shoul, A. (2014). The impact of total quality management (TQM) on innovation performance: the moderating role of organizational learning, management studies. improvement and change, 71, 1-17. (In Persian)
Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P. & Garza-Reyes, J. (2020). Learning orientation and innovation performance: the mediating role of operations strategy and supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2019-0209.
Laforet, S. (2016). Effects of organisational culture on organisational innovation performance in family firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23 (2), 379-407.
Lau, A.K.W., & Lo, W. (2015). Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 99-114.
Laursen, K., & Foss, N.J. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 243-263.
Lennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2019). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002. (Article In press).
Li, P.-Y. & Huang, K.-F. (2019). The antecedents of innovation performance: the moderating role of top management team diversity. Baltic Journal of Management, 14 (2), 291-311.
Liu, W., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2018). Enhancing product innovation performance in a dysfunctional competitive environment: The roles of competitive strategies and market-based assets. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 7-20.
Liu, X., Shen, M., Ding, W. & Zhao, X. (2017). Tie strength, absorptive capacity and innovation performance in Chinese manufacturing industries. Nankai Business Review International, 8 (4), 475-494.
Medase, K. & Barasa, L. (2019). Absorptive capacity, marketing capabilities, and innovation commercialisation in Nigeria. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22 (5), 790-820.
Mir fakhredini, S.H., Hatami nasab, S.H., Talei far, R., & Konjkawe monfared, A.R. (2011). Knowledge management, knowledge innovation and innovation performance in small and medium sized enterprises (SME). commercial management vision,  35(2), 103-118. (in Persian)
Mooi, E., Rudd, J. & de Jong, A. (2020). Process innovation and performance: the role of divergence. European Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 741-760.
Nguyen, V. & Chau, N. (2017). Research framework for the impact of total quality management on competitive advantage: The mediating role of innovation performance. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(3), 335-351.
Niu, P., Xie, F. & Leonard, T. (2010). Empirical study of the relations between the knowledge base and innovation performance of an economy. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 2 (2), 171-185.
Nurjannah, E., & Nurjannah, N. (2020). Effects of environmental characteristics and business partner relationships on improving innovation performance through the mediation of knowledge management practices. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2019-0137.
Oke, A. (2013). Linking manufacturing flexibility to innovation performance in manufacturing plants. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(2), 242-247.
Pan, X., Song, M., Zhang, J. & Zhou, G. (2019). Innovation network, technological learning and innovation performance of high-tech cluster enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23 (9), 1729-1746.
Park, G., Shin,S.S., & Choy, M. (2020). Early mover (dis)advantages and knowledge spillover effects on blockchain startups’ funding and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 109, 64-75.
Rastegar, A.A., Dehghani soltani, M., & Farsi zadeh, H. (2017). Impact of buyer-seller’s social capital on innovation performance with applying development of customers knowledge and commitment to innovation. innovation and value creation quarterly, 9, 63-82. (In Persian)
Sattayaraksa, T. & Boon-itt, S. (2018). The roles of CEO transformational leadership and organizational factors on product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21 (2), 227-249.
Savrul, M., & Incekara, A. (2015). The Effect of R&D Intensity on Innovation Performance: A Country Level Evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 388-396.
Seo, R. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation performance: insights from Korean ventures. European Journal of Innovation Management, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2019-0023.
Serrano‐Bedia, A.M., Concepción López‐Fernández, M. & García‐Piqueres, G. (2012). Complementarity between innovation activities and innovation performance: Evidence from Spanish innovative firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23 (5), 557-577.
Shahzad, F., Xiu, G.Y., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Organizational culture and innovation performance in Pakistan's software industry. Technology in Society, 51, 66-73.
Song, H., Zhang-Zhang, Y., Tian, M., Rohlfer, S. & Sharkasi, N. (2019). Culture and regional innovation performance: an exploration in China. Chinese Management Studies, 13 (2), 397-420.
Song, J., Wei, Y., Wang, R. (2015). Market orientation and innovation performance: The moderating roles of firm ownership structures. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 319-331.
Sun, W., Zhao, Y., & Sun, L. (2020). Big Data Analytics for Venture Capital Application：Towards Innovation Performance Improvement. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 557-565.
Susanty, A., Yuningsih, Y. & Anggadwita, G. (2019). Knowledge management practices and innovation performance: A study at Indonesian Government apparatus research and training center. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10 (2), 301-318.
Szambelan, S., Jiang, Y., & Mauer, R. (2019). Breaking through innovation barriers: Linking effectuation orientation to innovation performance. European Management Journal. (Article In press).
Tian, H., Dogbe, C., Pomegbe, W., Sarsah, S. & Otoo, C. (2020). Organizational learning ambidexterity and openness, as determinants of SMEs' innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2019-0140.
Tien, W.-P. & Cheng, C.C.J. (2017). Managing online creativity for improving innovation performance. Internet Research, 27 (3), 670-690.
Tojeiro-Rivero, D., & Moreno, R. (2019). Technological cooperation, R&D outsourcing, and innovation performance at the firm level: The role of the regional context. Research Policy, 48(7), 1798-1808.
Tsai, K.H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765-778.
Tsai, Y.H., Joe, S.W., Ding, C.G., & Lin, C.P. (2013). Modeling technological innovation performance and its determinants: An aspect of buyer–seller social capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1211-1221.
Tseng, C. & Tseng, C.-C. (2019). Corporate entrepreneurship as a strategic approach for internal innovation performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13 (1), 108-120.
Tseng, C., Chang Pai, D. & Hung, C. (2011). Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in KIBS. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (6), 971-983.
Tsou, H.-T., Chen, J.-S. & Yu, Y.-W. (2019). Antecedents of co-development and its effect on innovation performance: A business ecosystem perspective. Management Decision, 57 (7), 1609-1637.
Ur Rehman, N. (2016). Innovation performance of Chilean firms, a bivariate probit analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 8 (2), 204-224.
Vega‐Vázquez, M., Cossío‐Silva, F. & Martín‐Ruíz, D. (2012). Does the firm's market orientation behaviour influence innovation's success?. Management Decision, 50 (8), 1445-1464.
Wang, C., Yi, J., Kafouros, M., & Yan, Y. (2015). Under what institutional conditions do business groups enhance innovation performance?. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 694-702.
Wang, L., Li, J. & Huang, S. (2018). The asymmetric effects of local and global network ties on firms’ innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33 (3), 377-389.
Wang, M.C., Chen, P.C., & Fang, S.C. (2018). A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms' knowledge integration capability. Journal of Business Research, 88, 222-233.
Wang, X., Zou, H., Zheng,Y., & Jiang, Z. (2019). How will different types of industry policies and their mixes affect the innovation performance of wind power enterprises? Based on dual perspectives of regional innovation environment and enterprise ownership. Journal of Environmental Management, 251, Article 109586.
Wei, Y., Nan, H., & Wei, G. (2020). The impact of employee welfare on innovation performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing corporations. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 1-20.
Wu, J., Ma, Z., Liu, Z., & Kwok Lei., C. (2019). A contingent view of institutional environment, firm capability, and innovation performance of emerging multinational enterprises. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 148-157.
Wu, S.-M. & Ding, X.-H. (2020). Unpacking the relationship between external IT capability and open innovation performance: evidence from China. Business Process Management Journal, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2019-0242. (article in press)
Wu, Y., Gu, F., Ji, Y., Guo, J., & Fan, Y. (2020). Technological capability, eco-innovation performance, and cooperative R&D strategy in new energy vehicle industry: Evidence from listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 10, Article 121157.
Xie, X. (2012). Cooperative Factors, Cooperative Innovation Effect and Innovation Performance for Chinese Firms: an Empirical Study. Physics Procedia, 24, Part B, 1086-1091.
Xie, X., Wu, Y. & Zeng, S. (2016). A theory of multi-dimensional organizational innovation cultures and innovation performance in transitional economies: The role of team cohesion. Chinese Management Studies, 10 (3), 458-479.
Yeşil, S., Koska, A., & Büyükbeşe, T. (2013). Knowledge Sharing Process, Innovation Capability and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75(3), 217-225.
 Yi, J., Hong, J., Chung Hsu, W., & Wang, C. (2019). Reprint of The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation. (In press).
Yildiz, H.E., Murtic, A., Klofsten, M., Zander, U., & Richtnér, A. (2020). Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective. Technovation. In press, corrected proof Available online 9 April 2020, Article 102130.
Yildiz, O., Çetinkaya Bozkurt, O., Kalkan, A., & Ayci, A. (2013). The Relationships between Technological Investment, Firm Size, Firm Age and the Growth Rate of Innovational Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99(6), 590-599.
Yu Yuan Hung, R., Ya-Hui Lien, B., Yang, B., Wu, C.M., & Kuo, Y.M. (2011). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213-225.
Zeng, S.X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30, 3, 181-194.
Zhang, F., Zhu, L. & Wei, L. (2020). Shareholder involvement and firm innovation performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms. Chinese Management Studies, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108 /CMS-01-2019-0029. (article in press).
Zhang, G., Wang, X., & Duan, H. (2019). How does the collaboration with dominant R&D performers impact new R&D employees' innovation performance in different cultural contexts? A comparative study of American and Chinese large firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, Article 119728.
Zhang, G., & Zhou, J. (2016). The effects of forward and reverse engineering on firm innovation performance in the stages of technology catch-up: An empirical study of China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 212-222.
Zhang, J. & Duan, Y. (2010). Empirical study on the impact of market orientation and innovation orientation on new product performance of Chinese manufacturers. Nankai Business Review International, 1 (2), 214-231.
Zhao, L., Xiang, Y. & Yi, Q. (2017). Fuzzy front end patent management and innovation performance: Mediating role of patent commercialization and moderating effect of technological lock-in. Management Decision, 55 (6), 1143-1162.
Zhao, S., Jiang, Y., Peng, X. & Hong, J. (2020). Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations: Do absorptive capacity and individual creativity matter?. European Journal of Innovation Management, ahead-of-print ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0244. (article in press)
Zhou, H., Yao, Y. & Chen, H. (2018). How does open innovation affect firms’ innovative performance: The roles of knowledge attributes and partner opportunism. Chinese Management Studies, 12 (4), 720-740.
پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی
دوره 15، شماره 55 - شماره پیاپی 55
(پژوهشی)
خرداد 1401
صفحه 125-154

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار