شناسایی و اولویت بندی راهبردهای استقرار تکنولوژی های دومنظوره در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

10.22111/jmr.2020.35556.5179

چکیده

     این پژوهش با هدف ارایه الگوی خط ­مشی ­های استقرار تکنولوژی دومنظوره در ایران صورت گرفته است. بر این مبنا، مساله­ی اصلی، شناسایی خط­ مشی ­ها و اولویت ­بندی اجرای خط ­مشی ­های مذکور است. در پژوهش حاضر، با روش آمیخته (کیفی-کمّی)، از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه ­ای، و کاربست روش نمونه­ گیری نظری، منابع مرتبط شناسایی و سپس با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون، ابتدا به 85 مضمون پایه، سپس 58 مضمون سازمان ­دهنده و در نهایت 21 مضمون فراگیر در قالب خط­مشی­های استقرار تکنولوژی­ های دومنظوره منتج گردید. در مرحله دوم، از طریق استفاده از نمونه ­گیری گلوله برفی، 22 خبره شناسایی گردید و بر مبنای نظرات آنان، با استفاده از روش تحلیل اهمیت عملکرد، خط ­مشی ­های شناسایی شده، اولویت ­بندی شدند. پژوهش نشان می ­دهد که خط ­مشی ­((چابک ­سازی ساختار سازمانی و کاهش بوروکراسی اداری بخش نظامی)) در اولویت اول، خط مشی ((سرمایه ­گذاری و تسهیل انجام معاملات و پرداخت­های مالی در حوزه دومنظوره سازی)) در اولویت دوم، خط مشی ((یکپارچه­ سازی سیستم­های پیچیده در بخش نظامی)) در الویت ماقبل آخر­ و خط مشی­ ((افزایش سطح داخلی سازی تجهیزات نظامی و کاهش وابستگی به خارج از کشور)) علیرغم دارا بودن بیشترین اهمیت از نظر خبرگان، با توجه به عملکرد مطلوب کشور، در اولویت آخر برای تمرکز و بهبود قرار گرفت. پژوهش حاضر، برای کشورهایی که درصدد استقرار تکنولوژی دو منظوره هستند، می­ تواند مفید باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Prioritizing Policies for Deploying Dual-Purpose Technologies in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amirmohammad Sharifi 1
  • Alireza Moeini 2
  • Mahdi Abdolhamid 3
1 PhD Student of Technology Management, School of Management, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Prof. , School of Management, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Prof. School of Management, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

 Extended Abstract
Abstract
The aim of the current research is to present a model of dual-use technology policies in Iran. Thus the main problem to be stated and explained in this research is to identify the aforementioned policies and then to prioritize their implementation. In the present study, the relevant literature was explored using a mixed research design (qualitative-quantitative) through library studies, and the application of theoretical sampling method, related sources were identified and then Using the content analysis method, first resulted in 85 basic themes, then 58 organizing themes and finally 21 comprehensive themes in the form of dual-purpose technology deployment policies. In the second stage, using the method of performance importance analysis using the opinion of experts, the identified policies were prioritized. The statistical population includes experts in the field of military and civilian industries, from which 22 people were selected as experts in this field using the snowball method. To receive the opinions of experts, the extracted indicators in the form of performance importance questionnaire along with a summary of goals, questions and explanations were emailed to the experts and they were asked to express their opinions about the importance and performance of each indicator. And the average of experts' opinions was considered as the final coefficients. In the second step, the identified policies were prioritized by using the importance-performance analysis. The findings suggest that the policy "agilization of organizational structure and reduction of administrative bureaucracy of the military sector ranked as the first priority, and 'increasing the level of internal production of military equipment and reducing the dependence on abroad", despite having being the most important policy from the experts’ perspective, ranked as the last priority for concentration and improvement due to the good status of Iran in this field.
Introduction
Today's dynamic and changing world has required the change for the military industries. These changes have led to that opportunities and threats be emerged for defense industries. The challenges below reflect the situation face by the defense industries: The need to maintain the capacity of restructuring in case of occurrence of future threats; The need to be competitive in the commercial sector through development and introducing the product more rapidly; Increasing the global access to advance defense technologies.
Given the above-mentioned challenges and the high costs of defense technologies and studies on the one hand and the budget cuts in the centralized economic systems on the other hand, defense industries require taking serious measures in order to deal with this problem. One of these measures is to transfer and share the defense expenditures with the common needs of society.
Case study
 A case study is Sadra Marine Industries Company.
Theoretical framework
 The dual-use policies help the defense contractors and commercial producers to control costs, improve technology and shorten the time it takes to develop new products. Considering the reduction in the defense budget, public policymakers are attempting to save industrial jobs, technology, and infrastructure in the defense industrial base by converting them into a flexible, commercial infrastructure capable of supporting both defense and non-defense needs
Methodology
In this research, a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used. First, the required data were collected through a review of library resources. Then, the dual-use policies were identified by applying the thematic analysis method. During the thematic analysis process, firstly 85 basic themes, secondly 58 organizing themes and finally 21 global themes were identified. In the next stage, these policies were examined and evaluated by using an importance-performance analysis.
Discussion and Results
The first priority is to focus on the improvement of: Agilization of organizational structure and reduction of administrative bureaucracy of the military; Investment and facilitation of financial transactions and payments in the dual-use area (including: encouraging companies to invest in this area, establishing a fund for venture investment, and cooperation with the well-known institutions in order to set up investment funds for science and technology, etc; Enactment of incentive laws and providing various facilities for the civilian sector in order to engage in the dual-use area; Identification, recruitment and education of talents in the area of dual-use and innovation through connection with universities, providing grounds for temporary cooperation, partial-time projects, etc; Providing stimulus for the military sector’s personnel and managers to deploy dual-use policies; Instruction and communication in order to foster a recognition of the importance and awareness about the dual-use plans by senior military managers and personnel; Establishing well-defined centers, mechanisms and processes of technology transfer and innovation in the area of dual-use technologies. The second priority is: Supporting dual-use studies and investigations; Dual-using the equipment with high performance, high importance, surplus  capacity,  high added value, high technology, capital-intensive, having export market, lacking an alternative, and required for future of the military and civilian industries; Providing stability in managing the different military and civilian sectors; Increasing the level of internal production of military equipment and reducing the dependence on abroad.
The third is: Cooperation and openness of the military sector with/to the civilian sectors; Establishing the Department of Codification of Laws and Regulations, standardization and coordination and laws binding and evaluating the military units and their collaborating civilian companies, intellectual property in the area of dual-use in military industries and legislative bodies; Increasing the the science and technology level, capability and risk coverage of civilian sector in order to allow for the satisfaction of the military sector’s needs with the priority of small and medium-sized companies; Developing a system for identification and screening of the end user (final consumer) and the consumption place; Extraction and announcement of the capabilities and needs of civilian and military sectors for dual-use; Promoting competition between the civilian and military companies and sectors in the dual-use area. The forth priority is: Establishing a strategic alliance and win-win relationships with friendly countries and the large companies involving in the maritime and military industries; Concentration on a group of similar and common technologies in the military and civilian sectors; Integration of the complex systems in the military sector for dual-use purposes; Privatization in the military sectors.
Conclusion
   The current research attempted to extract a model of dual-use technology policies in Iran by using the expert opinion. The findings suggest that from among the 21 global policies, the policy "agilization of organizational structure and reduction of administrative bureaucracy of the military sector ranked as the first priority, and 'increasing the level of internal production of military equipment and reducing the dependence on abroad", despite having being the most important policy from the experts’ perspective, ranked as the last priority for concentration and improvement due to the good status of Iran in this field.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dual-use technology
  • Policy
  • Technology transfer
  • Military industries
1-Abbaszadeh, M., (2012). Reflections on Credibility and Reliability in Qualitative Research, Applied Sociology, Twenty-Third Year, Consecutive Issue 45, First Issue, Spring 2012 (In Persian).
2-Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrandiz, E., Marin, M. R., & Moreno, P. J. (2018). Patents and Dual-use Technology: An Empirical Study of the World's Largest Defence Companies. Defence and Peace Economics,29(7), 821-839.‏
3-Alic, J. A. (1994). The dual use of technology: Concepts and policies. Technology in society,16(2),155-172.‏
4-Azulay, I., Lerner, M., & Tishler, A. (2002). Converting military technology through corporate entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 31(3), 419-435.‏
5-Bacon, D. R. (2003). A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 1-15.‏
6-Bellais, R., & Guichard, R. (2006). Defense innovation, technology transfers and public policy. Defence and peace economics, 17(3), 273-286.‏
7-Bitzinger, R. A. (2011). China's defense technology and industrial base in a regional context: Arms manufacturing in Asia. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(3),425-450.‏
8-Bitzinger, R. A. (2016). Reforming China’s defense industry. Journal of Strategic Studies,39(56),762.789.‏
9-Bitzinger, R. A. (2017). Asian arms industries and impact on military capabilities. Defence Studies,17(3),295-311.‏
10-Blasko, D. J. (2011). ‘Technology Determines Tactics’: The Relationship between Technology and Doctrine in Chinese Military Thinking. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(3), 355-381.‏          
11-Bojnec, Š. (2016). Dual-use products export multipliers with the indirect effects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 287-296.‏
12-Enger, S. G. (2013). Dual-Use Technology and Defence–Civilian Spillovers: Evidence from the Norwegian Defence Industry (Master's thesis).
13-Francis, E., & Puska, S. M. (2010). Contemporary Chinese Defense Industry Reforms and Civil–Military Integration in Three Key Organizations. SITC, 2010(Policy Brief 5).‏
14-Guichard, R. (2003). Dual-use policies in the French and European perspectives.‏ conference in honor of keith Pavitt, “what do we know about innovation?”
15-Gutierrez, J. J., & Correa, P. (2012). Commercialization of publicly funded research and development (R&D) in Russia: scaling up the emergence of spinoff companies. The World Bank.
16-Hougui, S. Z., Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., & Tishler, A. (2002). Defense conversion in small companies: Risk, activities, and success Assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer,27(3),245-261.
17-Hughes, C. W. (2011). The slow death of Japanese techno-nationalism? Emerging comparative lessons for China's defense production. The Journal of Strategic Studies,34(3),451-479.
18-Jahromi Amin and Poor Karimi Javad (2015), Commercialization of Military Achievements: Concepts, Models and Framework for Analysis, The Second Conference on Economics and Applied Management with a National Approach, Babolsar (In Persian).
19-Jian, H. U., Jingping, F. E. N. G., & Rong, H. U. (2018). Research on the Deep Development of Military and Civilian Integration in Mianyang Technological City. Canadian Social Science, 14(4), 64-73.
20-Kelley, M., & Watkins, T. A. (1997). Are defense and non-defense manufacturing practices all that different?. In Second Klein Symposium on the Management of Technology.‏
21-Kelty, R., & Segal, D. R. (2007). The civilianization of the US military: Army and navy case studies of the effects of civilian integration on military personnel. In Private Military and Security Companies (pp.213239). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.‏
22-Khoobroo, M.T., Alvani, S.M., Rahmati, M.H & jandaghi, Gh.R (2018), Defense and Non-Defense Integration Industries: A Line Biography in the Defense Industry, Journal of Management Improvement, Volume 12, Number 4, Winter, pp. 49-96.
23-Lee, B. K., & Sohn, S. Y. (2017). Exploring the effect of dual use on the value of military technology patents based on the renewal decision. Scientometrics, 112(3),1203-1227.‏
24-Mashhadi Haji Ali F., Alvani S.M., Kamli M.J. & G. Memarzadeh Tehran (2020), Analysis of the Types of Collaboration Networks in the Defense Innovation Process, Public Management Reserches. 13(1), 5-30 (In Persian).
25-Matzler, K., Sauerwein, E., & Heischmidt, K. (2003). Importance-performance analysis revisited: the role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 112-129.‏
26-Mérindol, V., & Versailles, D. W. (2010). Dual-use as knowledge-oriented policy: France during the1990_2000s. International Journal of Technology Management,50(1), 80-98.
27-MOLAS-GALLART, J. O. R. D. I., & MCDONNELL, D. (2008). A demand-led, network-based approach to Technology transfer. Pathways to High-Tech Valleys and Research Triangles: Innovative Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Transfer and Cluster Formation in Europe and the United States, 24, 139.
28-Oh, H. (2001). Revisiting importance–performance analysis. Tourism management, 22(6), 617-627.
29-Mohammadpur, A (2013). Qualitative Research Method Counter Method 2, The practical stages and procedures in qualitative methodology, Tehran, Scocioligists
30-Patton, Michael Quinn (2001); Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 1 rd edition, Utilization-Focused Evaluation, Saint Paul, MN
31-Pestana Barros, C. (2004). Measuring performance in defense-sector companies in a small NATO member country. Journal of Economic Studies, 31(2), 112-128.‏
32-Pike, S., & Larkin, I. (2010). Longitudinal evaluations of student satisfaction with a postgraduate unit using importance-performance analysis. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 10(3), 215-231.‏
33-Ramzanpour D., Abdolhamid M., Rezaeian A. (2019). Presentation of a Model for Factors Affecting the Participation of Elites in the Process of Formulation of the Public Policymaking of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Public Management Reserches. 12(4), 37-67 (In Persian).
34-Sangbor M.A., Safi M., Azar A. (2019), Application of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCM’s) to Analysis and Design the Causal Structure of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Enabler’s in the Petrochemical Industry, Public Management Reserches. 12(1), 5-29 (In Persian).
35-Seyoum, B. (2017). Export Controls and International Business: A Study with Special Emphasis on Dual-Use Export Controls and Their Impact on Firms in the US. Journal of Economic Issues,51(1), 45-72.‏      
36-Silva, F. H., & Fernandes, P. O. (2011). Importance-performance analysis as a tool in evaluating higher education service quality: the empirical results of ESTiG (IPB). In In the17th International Business Information Management Association Conference (pp. 306-315). Khalid S. Soliman.‏
37-Te Kulve, H., & Smit, W. A. (2003). Civilian–military co-operation strategies in developing new technologies. Research Policy,32(6),955970.
38-Xiaoge, W., & Wenbo, Z. (2014). THE STUDY ON CHINESE DEFENSE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT INNOVATION IN THE POLICY OF CIVIL-MILITARY INTEGRATION. Review of the Air Force Academy, (1), 81.‏
39-Ren, Xin, Wu, T. Y., Li, Y., Qu, S., & Ma, L. (2017). Study on the development of civil military integration equipment procurement. In 2017 5th International Conference on Machinery, Materials and Computing Technology (ICMMCT 2017). Atlantis Press.‏   
40-Zhang, H. Q., & Chow, I. (2004). Application of importance-performance model in tour guides’ performance: evidence from mainland Chinese outbound visitors in Hong Kong. Tourism management, 25(1), 81-91.