طراحی الگوی پایش بهره‌وری صنایع خودرو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد زاهدان، زاهدان، ایران.

2 استادیارگروه حسابداری دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

3 استادیار گروه حسابداری دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

4 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد زاهدان، زاهدان، ایران.

10.22111/jmr.2020.34279.5077

چکیده

     هدف از این مقاله طراحی الگوی پایش بهره‌وری صنایع خودرو ایران است در این مقاله درباره شاخص‌های تأثیرگذار بر بهره‌وری صنایع خودرو  صحبت شده و راهی را ارائه می‌دهد که بتوان این بهره‌وری را مدام پایش کرد.در پژوهش حاضر جامعه­ی آماری شامل 11 نفر از مدیران و متخصصان فن در دو شرکت سایپا و ایران‌خودرو می‌باشند.  برای تعیین نمونه‌ها از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند استفاده شد. روش پژوهش آمیخنه  بوده و  اطلاعات در این پژوهش از طریق پرسش­نامه محقق ساخته کسب و جمع­آوری شدند. روایی و پایایی پرسشنامه از طریق روایی محتوایی و هولستی مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. داده­ های پژوهش با استفاده از مدل ساختاری تفسیری تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. با استفاده از دیتای جمع‌آوری‌شده و نظرات خبرگان شانزده شاخص برای بیشتر شدن بهره‌وری تعیین شد. نتیجه مقاله بر روی اخذ گواهینامه‌ های صنعتی و پایش دوره‌ای آن‌ها و اهمیت آموزش کارکنان و سیستم تهیه مواد اولیه تأکید دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Model for Monitoring the Productivity of the Automotive Industry

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Hirad 1
  • Mehdi Faghani 2
  • Ahmad Pifeh 3
  • Ali Payan 4
1 Ph.D Student, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
4 Department of Mathematical, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to design a model for monitoring the productivity of Iran's automotive industry. The research population of this research includes 11 managers and strategists of industrial companies in the field of research subject (automotive industry). In this article, an attempt has been made to identify the most effective indicators affecting the productivity of the automotive industry, and by using an interpretive structural approach, the importance of each in comparison with each other is determined and finally a model for continuous monitoring of their productivity is presented. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed through content and Holstie validity. To identify the indicators affecting the productivity of the automotive industry and to provide a practical model to achieve the desired level of it, two companies Saipa and Iran Khodro have been studied and as a result, using studies related to the productivity of those companies and using Opinions of experts working in it, sixteen indicators to increase production productivity in five dimensions were identified and reviewed. The relationships between these indicators have been determined based on an interpretive structural model and a new model has been systematically formulated and presented. The result of the article indicates the significant importance of obtaining certificates and standards related to the introduced industry and their periodic monitoring.
 
 
Introduction
The automotive industry is a collection of the country's industries that use the most advanced technologies in the world. The automotive industry in our country can be a driving force for various economic sectors. Because this industry has a back and forth connection with many other industries. In terms of texture and structure of production and market formation; Automotive manufacturing in Iran is completely isolated from the global market competition and is over-supported by the government, and it can be said that automotive manufacturing in the world has all these possibilities. This has led to a bilateral monopoly on buying and selling, high car prices, low quality of products, pollution and high consumption of energy carriers in the country. Currently, transnational companies have full dominance in the global car market, and the automotive industry in the world is in the hands of a large number of major automakers. These transnational companies have reached their current position with the purchase and merger of other automakers in the world, as well as the establishment of assembly or parts manufacturing units in other countries, and in this competitive environment, many important and well-known global companies have not stopped competing. So it seems difficult to separate the car from this set. The most important reason for the integration and focus of the automotive industry is the economic scale; Because no other automaker with a low production scale is able to cover the costs of design and development, marketing and sales, and other items in this industry, and this issue has been considered in recent years in a way that is considered by the Iranian automotive industry; But it is not enough. Given that the increase in productivity and efficiency of this industry can lead to an increase in industrial production as a result of economic growth; Based on what has been said, this research will help us to develop effective long-term and medium-term strategies to improve productivity and ultimately the performance of these companies. Since in previous studies, the productivity of the automotive industry from an economic and accounting point of view has been studied, so the present research has addressed this issue from a managerial point of view.
Case study
The research community includes 11 managers and strategists of industrial companies selected in the field of research (automotive industry).
Materials and Methods
The method of data collection is structured by a questionnaire. Content validity (CVR) was used to ensure the validity of the questionnaire. This index is designed by Laushe. In this study, Holsti's method was used to calculate reliability. Structural-interpretive equation method was used to analyze the data.
 
Discussion and Results
Obtaining standards and certificates including OHSAS and ISO and certificates related to quality and environmentally friendly and ... Also, monitoring these standards and certifications in the automotive industry is the most basic and most influential indicator in productivity, while according to Figure (2), this index has the highest influence and least dependence and its position is at the highest level of the chart. (1) is located.
After that, the other two indicators, entitled Optimal Planning for Raw Materials Supply and Training of Personnel in this industry, are at the next level, and at its lower levels, the optimal choice of suppliers is to increase the ratio of construction projects that have been approved for the first time. May their influence gradually diminish. In the last level of ranking indicators, there are factors called customer satisfaction, reducing the amount of returned product from the customer, increasing the level of sales and increasing employee satisfaction and increasing the ability to succeed in tenders, which have been influenced by higher level indicators. These indicators in Figure (2) have a very high dependence on other indicators and are the result of achieving all indicators of levels higher than themselves.
Conclusion
In order to understand the relationships between levels and indicators that are extracted from the structural and interpretive modeling method, both output of the penetration power analysis chart - the dependence of the indicators and the final model should be considered. The above results do not mean that indicators or processes such as customer satisfaction and reducing the amount of returned product are less important than other indicators, but rather indicate their significant impact on other processes in the organization. Proper planning and optimal principles of supply and preparation of raw materials and goods and the use of standard production methods, which are constantly monitored and maintained, and having a trained and expert force and advanced machinery in itself cause significant customer satisfaction, Decreasing the amount of returned product from the customer, increasing the level of sales, increasing the level of employee satisfaction and ultimately increasing the success of tenders will be.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Productivity Index
  • Structural-Interpretive Modeling
  • Automotive Industries
1-Abolhassani, A. Harner, J. Jaridi, M. & Gopalakrishnan, B. (2018). Productivity enhancement strategies in North American automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research, 56(4), 141-173.‏ (In Persian).
2-Amiri, M. Hadinejad, F. (2016). Assessment and Analysis of Productivity Indicators in Manufacturing Industries by Using PROMETHEE Technique. The Journal of Productivity Management, 4(35), 7-38. (In Persian).
3-Abimanyu, A. And G.Xie (2014), Indonesia Competition Policy; Industrial Competitiveness and Effects of Deregulation (For internal circulation only), East Asia and Pacific region journal, 33(5), 51-73.
4-Andrew Sharpe. (2013). the Productivity Performance of Atlantic Canada: An Overview, Centre for the Study of Living Standards. Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5B5.
5-Arnold. Jens Matthias and Hussinger Katrin. (2014). Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing a firmlevelanalysis.Newyork: hibako.
6-Disnay.Richard, Haskel. Jonathan, Heden. Ylva (2013), Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. The economic journal, 11(3), 666-694.
7-Ernesto López-Córdova.j (2012), NAFTA and Mexico’s Manufacturing Productivity: An Empirical Investigation using Micro-level Data, Industreial journal, 11(3),55-68.
8-Estanesti, S., & Sholibour, A. (2020). Investigation of the Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Creativity with Staff Productivity (Case Study: Iranshahr Steam Power Plant). Management Researches, 12(46), 305-328.‏
9-Idson Todd L. and Walter y.o1 (1999), ((Workers are more Productivity Theory)), Third Edition, London: McGraw- HillBook Company.
10-Jahangard, E(2006). A Quantitative Analysis of Importance of Vehicle Industry in Iran's Economy, Journal of Economic Research, 32(4): 183-206. (In Persian).
11-Khodadad Kashi, F; Khiabani, Nasser; Jani, Sh (2012). Analyzing the effect of market structure on the productivity of Iran's industries, research and economic policies (63): 32-5. (In Persian (.
12-Krueger, Anne, O, and Tancer, Bran (1982); ((Growth of Factor Productivity in Turkish Manufanturing Industries)), Journa1 of Development Economics, 11 (3):307-25.
13- Latifian, Ahmad, Doaei, & Habibullah. (2013). drawing a conceptual model of employee productivity using an interpretive structural modeling approach (Case study: Vice Chancellor for Planning and Program of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. General Management Research, 6(20),20-33.
14- Lefophane, M. H. & Kalaba, M. (2020). Estimating effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on the productivity of manufacturing industries in South Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(7), 813-830.‏
15-Molaei, M (2004). A Study and Comparison of Productivity of Various Small and Large Industrial Groups of Iran, Quarterly Journal of Iranian Economic Research, 7 (22): 176-157. (In Persian).
16-Nasr Esfahani, M; Razavi, S. A. (2010). Investigating and comparing the efficiency and productivity of car companies with data envelopment analysis method, Tomorrow's Management, 25, 108-97. (In Persian).
17-Okada.Yosuke (2014), Competition, R&D and Productivity in Japanese Manufacturing Industries.Tokiyo: okada.
18-Pilat, Drik (1995), Comparative Productivity of Korea Manufacturing: 1967-1987, Journal of Developmint Economics, 46(3), 56-65.
19-Seshaiah, S. Venkata. & Reddy, V.K. (1993), (Productivity Trends in Some Industries of Anthrapradesh Manufacturing Sector, the Indian Economic Journa1, 41(2), 33-56.
20-Shestalova, Victoria (2013), Sequential Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth: An Application to OECD Industrial Activities, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2): 211-226.
21-Samadi,R.  Moazen Jamshidi, M.H.(2016). A Survey on the Relationship between Aggressive Strategies İn Working Capital Management and Productivity İn Listed Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Administrative Management, Education and Training (JAMET), 12(2):120-129.
22-Salimian, A; Khadem, F (2007). Investigating the effect of car import on productivity (Case study: Iran Khodro Company), Economic Research Journal: 363-333(In Persian).
23- Tsao, Y. (1982). Growth and productivity in Singapore: A supply side analysis: Harvard University.
24-Yousefi, H.R. (2012). Evaluating the productivity of all factors of production in Iran's factory industries, Journal of Economic Policy Research, 8 (15): 175-154 (In Persian).