بررسی نقش میانجی جو اخلاقی در اثر رهبری اصیل و مدیریت منافقانه بر رفتارهای ضدشهروندی سازمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

بررسی ها نشان می دهد علیرغم آنکه مطالعات متعددی در خصوص رفتارهای فرانقش، رفتارهای ضدشهروندی و عواملی که در شکل گیری آنها می توانند مؤثرباشند، کمتر موردتحقیق واقع شده اند. براین اساس، تحقیق حاضر به دنبال بررسی اثری که دو سبک اصیل و منافقانه می توانند بر رفتار ضدشهروندی از طریق جو اخلاقی سازمان داشته باشند، است. نمونه آماری تحقیق شامل 151 نفر از کارکنان بخش اداری اداره کل آموزش و پرورش خراسان جنوبی و سازمان های تابعه آن در سطح 11 شهرستان استان بوده که با روش نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای انتخاب شده اند. برای جمع آوری اطلاعات موردنیاز از پرسشنامه رهبری اصیل آوولیو و همکاران،(۲۰۰۶)، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته ی مدیریت منافقانه مبتنی بر مؤلفه های رفتار منافقانه کریسپ و کوتون(1994)، پرسشنامه جو اخلاقی ویکتور و کالن (1988) و پرسشنامه رفتار ضدشهروندی سازمانی اسپکتور و فاکس(2002) استفاده شدند. از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری برای آزمون و تحلیل فرضیه ها استفاده شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که اگرچه رهبری اصیل و مدیریت منافقانه بصورت مستقیم بر رفتار ضدشهروندی سازمانی اثر معناداری دارد. اما تاثیر آنها بر این رفتار از طریق فضای اخلاقی سازمان بیشتر است. رهبری اصیل از طریق ایجاد فضای اخلاقی مثبت می تواند منجر به تعدیل این رفتار شده، در حالیکه مدیریت منافقانه با شکل دادن به فضای اخلاقی ابزاری این نوع رفتار را تقویت می کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Mediating Role of Ethical Climate in the Effect of Authentic leadership and Hyprosity Management on Anti-Organizational Citizenship Behaviour

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Shirazi
  • Mohammad Mohammadi
Assistant Professor at Department Management, Faculty of Human Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Birjand Branch, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
Studies show that anti-citizenship behaviors can cause many problems in the organization. However, anti-citizenship behaviors and the impact of leadership style on them have been less studied. Accordingly, the effect that both styles of authenticity and hypocrisy can have on anti-citizenship behavior through the ethical climate of the organization has been investigated in the present study.  The population of the study consisted of 285 administrative staff, among which 151 were selected by stratified sampling method. Tools used to collected data authentic leadership questionnaire of Avolio et.al(2006), researcher-made hypocritical management questionnaire based on the hypocritical behavior components of Crisp and Cotton (1994), ethical climate questionnaire developed by Victor and Cullen(1988) and anti- organizational citizenship behavior questionnaire of Gholipour et.al(2008) that content validity structures and reliability of their approval reached. The results of the research indicated that leadership styles of authenticity and hypocrisy through ethical climate significantly affect organizational anti-citizenship behaviors. But the significant direct effect of these two styles on anti-citizenship behaviors was not confirme.
Introduction
Most studies suggest that a key characteristic of organizational leadership is "integrity".  Eisenhower went even further and claiming that it is not only a key characteristic, but also the most important characteristic of leadership, and without it, leadership success would not be possible in any field, including the football field, the army, or at the organizations (Covey, 2005). Also, the results of a survey show the more than 70% leaders of top companies of S&P index have believed that honesty is one of their core values (Guiso, Sapienza & Zingales, 2015). Hence, Avolio & Gardner (2005) have emphasized "integrity" as one of the principle values of leadership in the development of authentic leadership. This type of leadership become reality in the allingment between words and deeds, the allingement between words and values, and the stability of behavior in various situations, which is referred to as behavioral courage(Simons, Leroy, Collewaert & Masschelein, 2015). Peterson & Seligman suggesteded integrity as one of the dimensions of moral courage and it equivalented as "authenticity". According to them, being authentic means integrity in words, integrity in appearance, integrity in behavior and integrity in responsibility (Rego, Cunha & Clegg 2014). On the other hand, deceitful and hypocritical behavior is opposite to leaders integrity behaviors (Shareef Younus, Ahmmad, & Radrakrishnan, 2019). A hypocritical manager is one whose behavior and actions aren't alignment with the beliefs he or she has expressed (Zamulinski, 2015). Baston et al.(1997) defined it as pretend of morality without payment(Jauernig, 2019). The ethical behavior of organizational leaders is important because they are the creators of the organization's social behaviors. If employees feel that the managers of the organization are integrity in their social exchange, they will also tend to positive behaviors, and vice versa, if they witness the hypocritical behavior of their managers, they will behave accordingly. Meanwhile, they are able to direct employee behavior by shaping the ethical environment of the organization (Cheng & Wang, 2015). Hence, the present study search to explain the mediating role of the ethical climate as a result of authenticity and hypocritical leadership on organizational anti-citizenship behavior.
Case study
The statistical population of the study included 285 employees of the headquarters of education adminstration of south khorasan province and its affiliated units in 11 cities of the province. According to Morgan table, 163 people were selected as the sample size and selected using stratified random sampling method. Among the distributed questionnaires, 151 items were returned and used for statistical analysis.
Materials and Methods
This study is an applied research in terms of its objective, is descriptive in nature, and is of survey type in terms of its data collection and method. the required information was collected using questionnaires. To test the research hypotheses, structural equation modeling has been used.
 
Discussion and Results
The results of hypothesis testing showed that of between 8 proposed hypotheses, 6 hypotheses have been confirmed and 2 other hypotheses not approved. As a result of this test, was not confirmed the direct and significant effect of authentic leadership and hypocritical management on anti-citizenship behaviors. But, was confirmed the effect of authentic leadership style and hypocritical management on the ethical climate as a mediating variable and the effect of this variable on anti-citizenship behaviors. In this regard, was confirmed the mediating role of the ethical climate. Authentic leadership have a positive effect on ethical climate; hence, decrease anti-citizenship behaviors. Vice versa, hypocritical management increased anti-citizenship behaviors; because, it have a negative effect on ethical climate.
Conclusion
Aim of present research was to examine the role of authentic and hypocritical leadership styles on anti-citizenship behavior through the ethical climate of the organization. Anti-citizenship behaviors can very impact on organizations. Hence, hypotheses (1) and (2) predicted that authentic and hypocritical leadership styles would directly direct anti-citizen behavior. But the findings of the study, did not confirm this prediction contrary to the results of studies by Choi et al. (2020), Peng and Wei (2019) and Pierce and Gikalon (2003), because the behavior of people derive from their perception of organizational variables such as ethical climate. Nevertheless, the results of hypotheses (3) and (4) were similare to research findings of Quincy et al. (2019) and Simmons et al. (2015) showed that authentic and hypocritical leadership can affect the ethical climate of a organization. Because, the manager's leadership style plays an important role in the set of employees' cognitive interpretations of the organization, including the ethical climate. On the other hand, like the findings of Newman et al. (2017) and Zeinali Soomeh and Pourezat (2012), hypotheses (5) and (6) confirmed the significant effect of ethical climate influenced by management style on anti-citizen behavior. As mentioned, the ethical climate refers to behaviors that are thought to be morally correct and indicate response against how to deviate from those behaviors (Shacklocki, Manning, Hort, 2011). But, the examination and confirmation of the mediating role of the ethical climate as a result of impact authentic leadership and hypocritical management on anti-citizenship behaviors within the framework of Hypotheses (7) and (8) was distinctive charactristic of present study compared with previous research. According to Litvin and Escheringer (1968), organizational climate is a filter through which the expectations of leaders and the characteristics of the organization are understood and create appropriate behaviors in the organization. Therefore, is suggested to managers that be adopting ethical styles such as authentic leadership and avoiding hypocrisy in order to reduce the scope and severity of destructive behaviors such as their employees anti-citizenship behaviors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Authentic Leadership
  • hypocritical management
  • organizational climate
  • anti-citizenship behaviors
1-Alicke, M., Gordon, E., & Rose, D.,. (2013). Hypocrisy: What counts? Philosophical Psychology, 26(5), 673-701.
2-Allen, P. (2015). Authentic spiritual leadership: The mega church corporate model of the new millennium. Bloomington, United States: AthurHouse.
3-Appelbaum, S.H., Deguire, K.J. and Lay, M. (2005), "The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behaviour", Corporate Governance, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 43-55.
4-Ayça, B. (2019). The impact of authentic leadership behavior on job satisfaction: A research on hospitality enterprises. 3rd World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (WOCTINE). 158, pp. 790–801. Procedia Computer Science.
5-Barahooyi, S.A., & Nastiezaie, N. (2019). The effect of work alienation on incidents organizational anti-citizenship behaviors through the mediating role of job burnout(Case study:principals of Zahedan high schools). Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 20(3), 77-90.
6-Cheng, M., & Wang, L. (2015). The mediating effect of ethical climate on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and team identification: A team-level analysis in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics(129), 639–654.
7-Chernyak-Hai, L., Kim, S. K., & Tziner, A. . (2018). Gender profiles of workplace individual and organizational deviance. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(1), 46-55.
8-Choi, Y., Yoon, D.J., & Kim, D.,. (2020). Leader behavioral integrity and employee in-role performance: The roles of coworker support and job autonomy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 1-14.
9-Covey, S. R. (2005). The 8th habit: From effectiveness to greatness . New Yourk: Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
10-Cox, J. F., & Sims, H. P. (1996). Leadership and team citizenship behavior: A model and measures. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, vol. 3, pp. 1-4 1.
11-Crisp, R., & Cowton, C. (1994). Hypocrisy and moral seriousness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(4), 343-348.
12-Davari, A. & Rezazadeh, A. (2014), Modeling structural equations with PLS Software (ThirdPrinting), Tehran: Jahad University Press. (In Persian)
13-Demont-Biaggi, F. (2019). How ethical leadership is related to authenticity. Leadership, Education, Personality: An Interdisciplinary Journal(1), 15–28.
14-Fladerer, M.P., & Braun, S.,. (2020). Managers’ resources for authentic leadership – a multi‐study exploration of positive psychological capacities and ethical organizational climates. British Journal of Management, 31, 325–343.
15-Ghiselli, R. & lsmail, J.A.,. (1995). Gauging employee theft and other unacceptable behaviors in food service operations. FIU Hospitality Review, 13(2), 15-23.
16-Gholipour, A., PourEzzat, A., A., & Saedinezhad M.,. (2008). Antecedents of anti-citizenship behavior in organizations. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 2(8), 1-29. (In Persian)
17-Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2015). The values of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 60-76.
18-Hale, W.J. & Pillow, D.R. (2015). Asymmetries in perceptions of self and others’ hypocrisy: Rethinking the meaning and perception of the construct. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 88-98.
19-Ibarra, H. (2015). The Authenticity paradox. Harvard Business Review, 93(January–February), 52-59.
20-Jagacinski, C.M., Kumar,Sh., & Keith, M.G., . (2019). Expanding the nomological network of work avoidance: Antecedents and consequences across contexts. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(2), 221-244.
21-Jauernig, J., & Valentinov, V.,. (2019). CSR as hypocrisy avoidance: A conceptual framework. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(1), 2-25.
22-Jelinek, R. & Ahearne, M.,. (2006). The ABC’s of ACB: Unveiling a clear and present danger in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management(35), 457 – 467.
23-Kilicoglu, G. (2017). Consistency or discrepancy? Rethinking schools from organizational hypocrisy to integrity. Management in Education, 3(13), 118-124.
24-Kuenzi, M., Mayer, D.M., & Greenbaum, R.l.,. (2019). Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 43-71.
25-Mburu, L. (2020). Significance of authenticity in developing a successful leadership practice. African Research Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 7(1), 108-116.
26-Miao, Q., & Zhou, J.,. (2020). Corporate hypocrisy and counterproductive workBehavior: A moderated mediation model of organizational identification and perceived importance of CSR. Sustainability, 12(1847), 1-20.
27-Moghtadaie, L. (2017). Relationship between professional ethics and anti-citizenship behaviors (Case: Staff Members of University of Isfahan). Applied Sociology, 28(1), 145-158.
28-Mubarak, E. (2014). Leadership behaviors and its effects on employees’ happiness. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(10), 622-624.
29-Naiyananont, P., & Smuthranond, T.,. (2017). Relationships between ethical climate, political behavior, ethical leadership, and job satisfaction of operational officers in a wholesale company, Bangkok Metropolitan region. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 345-351.
30-Newman, A., Round, H., Bhattacharya, S., & Roy, A. (2017). Ethical climates in organizations: A review and research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly(27), 475–512.
31-Pacheco, E., Cunha, M., & Duarte, J.,. (2016). Violence, aggression and fear in the workplace. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioral Science, 2nd International Conference on Health and Health Psychology;.
32-Pearce, C., & Giacalone, R. (2006). Teams behaving badly: factors associated with anti‐citizenship behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 58-75.
33-Pearce, C., Giacalone, R.,. (2003). Teams behaving badly: factors associated with anti‐citizenship behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Social Psychology., 33(1), 58-75.
34-Peng, H., & Wei, F,. (2019). How and when does leader behavioral integrity Influence employee voice? The roles of team iIndependence climate and corporate ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics(25 January), 1-17.
35-Qiu, Sh., Alizadeh, A., Dooley, L.M., Zhang, R.,. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders,organizational citizenship behavior,and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management(40), 77-87.
36-Rayisi, A., & Nastiezaee, N.,. (2019). The Relationship between organizational cynicism and organizational anti-citizenship behavior with the mediating role of organizational envy. Quarterly Journal of Career & Organizational Counseling, 11(38), 109-126.
37-Rego, A., E Cunha, M.P., & Clegg, S.R.,. (2014). The virtues of leadership: contemporary challenges for global managers. London: Oxford University Press.
38-Schat, A.C.H., & Frone, M.R.,. (2011). Exposure to psychological aggression at work and job performance: The mediating role of job attitudes and personal health. Work & Stress, 25(1), 23-40.
39-Schumann, K. & Ross, M.,. (2010). The benefits, costs, and paradox of revenge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1193-1205.
40-Setiono, S., Sudjadi,A., & Anggraeni, I.,. (2019). The influence of competence and integrity on performance with work climate as a moderating variable. International Conference on Rural Development and Enterpreneurship 2019 :Enhancing Small Busniness and Rural Development Toward Industrial Revolution 4.0, (pp. 97-103).
41-Shacklock, A., Manning, M., Hort, L. (2011). Dimensions and types of ethical climate within public sector human resource management. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 9(1), 51-66.
42-Shareef Younus, T., Ahmmad, R., Radrakrishnan, l.,. (2019). The relationship between administrative hypocrisy and the organization disorder: Diagnostic Approach. HexaTech, 2(1), 1-10.
43-Simons, T., Leroy, H. L., Collewaert, V., & Masschelein, S. (2015). How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics(132), 831–844.
44-Walumbwa, F.O., Avalio, B.J., Gardner, W.L. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
45-Way, S. A., Simons, T., Leroy, H., & Tuleja, E. A. (2018). What is in it for me? Middle manager behavioral integrity and performance. Journal of Business Ethics(150), 765–777.
46-Webber, S. (2007). Ethical climate typology and questionnaire: A discussion of instrument modifications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship(33), 567-580.
47-Zainali Someh, P., & Pourezzat, A.A., (2012). The effects of unethical climate in working environment on organizational anti-citizenship behaviors. Ethics in science and Technology, 6(4), 32-41.
48-Zamulinski, B. (2015). Hypocrisy and the nature of  belief. Ratio, 28(2), 175-189.