ارائه چهارچوب مفهومی عوامل موثر بر تدوین خط مشی های کارآفرینانه در بانک سپه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزکوه، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزکوه، فیروزکوه، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزکوه، ایران

4 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزکوه، ایران

چکیده

     هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، ارائه تحلیل پیرامون آثار عوامل محیطی بر تدوین خط مشی‌های کارآفرینانه در بانک سپه است. الگوی ارائه‌شده در قالب دو دسته عوامل بیرونی  شامل عامل فرهنگی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، سیاسی و عوامل درونی شامل عامل حمایت‌های مالی، تکنولوژی، ساختار و فرآیند مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روش تحقیق حاضر از نظر هدف بنیادی و از نظر روش اکتشافی است. جامعه خبرگی پژوهش اساتید دانشگاهی متخصص در حوزه‌ی مربوطه، خبرگان و کارشناسان بانکی آگاه به حوزه‌ی کارآفرینی هست که به علت محدود بودن جامعه خبرگی، نمونه‌گیری انجام نشد و از روش سرشماری، تعداد 15 نفر به عنوان نمونه تعیین گردید. در این تحقیق از تکنیک دلفی فازی به منظور تعیین مؤلفه‌ها و ابعاد عوامل محیطی برای تدوین خط مشی‌های کارآفرینانه در بانک سپه استفاده شده است. برای این کار پرسشنامه‌ای تهیه و برای اعضای جامعه خبرگی فرستاده شد که در مجموع 7 بعد اصلی، 21 بعد فرعی و 40 مؤلفه را به عنوان عوامل محیطی موثر بر تدوین خط مشی‌های کارآفرینانه در بانک سپه شناسایی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Present a conceptual framework of factors affecting the development of entrepreneurial policies in Bank Sepah

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Daraei Ghadikolei 1
  • Ali Mehdizadeh Ashrafi 2
  • Toroj Mojibi Mikalaei 3
  • Farshad Haj Alian 4
1 PhD Student in Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh Branch, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Management,Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University,Firoozkooh Branch, Firoozkooh, Iran.t
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh Branch, Iran.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh Branch, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to provide an analysis of the effects of environmental factors on the development of entrepreneurial policies in Bank Sepah. The proposed model was examined in the form of two categories of external factors including cultural, social, economic, political and internal factors including financial support, technology, structure and process. The method of the present study is a fundamental research in terms of purpose and an exploratory research in terms of method. The expert population of the study is university professors specializing in the relevant field, experts and banking experts aware of the field of entrepreneurship. Due to the limited expert population, sampling was not done and 15 people were selected as the expert sample by the census method. In this research, fuzzy Delphi technique has been used to determine the components and dimensions of environmental factors to formulate entrepreneurial policies in Bank Sepah. For this purpose, a questionnaire was prepared and sent to members of the expert population, which identified a total of 7 main dimensions, 21 sub-dimensions and 40 components as environmental factors affecting the development of entrepreneurial policies in Bank Sepah.
Introduction
In recent decades, entrepreneurship has been considered as one of the key issues in the field of policy (Nurbek et al., 2014). Entrepreneurship is considered as the engine of economic growth and social development, and policymakers are currently looking for how to create a dynamic and competitive entrepreneurial economy (Tessi et al., 2011). Economic development is growth along with increasing productive, physical, human and social capacities. The purpose of economic development is to increase the wealth and well-being of the people of the society and create employment. The trend of economic development in developed countries reflects the fact that the economy is influenced by entrepreneurship, so that entrepreneurs play a pivotal role in the economic development of developed countries (OECD, 2017).
In recent decades, governments have strongly encouraged entrepreneurship. Governments by formulating strategies, policies and practical programs to promote entrepreneurial spirit and behavior, education and consulting, creating a suitable environment for entrepreneurs in various socio-economic areas, removing barriers, establishing communication and cooperation between them And facilitating their access to global markets play an effective role in entrepreneurship development in providing the necessary conditions and facilities for entrepreneurs to start their activities (Lindstrom and Stevenson, 2005).
This study aims to fill this gap in knowledge and for the development of this phenomenon in the bank, looking for answers to these questions:
What are the environmental factors and components affecting the formulation of entrepreneurial policies in Bank Sepah?
Case study
The population of the preparation of the questionnaire consisted of experts is that the two groups of scientific experts, including professors, policy making and academic entrepreneurship consists of 5 members and experts in the organization, including senior management of Bank Sepah, which on entrepreneurship necessary information and in formulating policies for the banks involved , which numbers 10 people. We also do not have sampling in this study.
Theoretical framework
In this research, through library studies and research background, the primary environmental factors of entrepreneurial policies in Bank Sepah were identified. Subsequently, during interviews with experts within the organization, these components were classified into two categories, internal and external, and unrelated components were removed. Finally, the conceptual framework of the research was designed using the performed classification, which includes 7 dimensions in the form of 40 components. In order to identify and reach an agreement to identify the final environmental factors, I will use the scientific technique, ie the fuzzy Delphi method. A questionnaire was designed and distributed among the community of experts, which included 15 university professors and senior managers of Bank Sepah. After collecting the questionnaires and collecting information from the fuzzy Delphi technique, we will identify and rank the factors.
Methodology
The present study is a fundamental research in terms of purpose because it seeks to develop a new model of the policy-making process with an entrepreneurial approach for Bank Sepah. Also, considering that there is not much information about Bank Sepah policy model and it seeks to explore the effective components in developing a policy model, so in terms of nature, it is also an exploratory research. This research has an integrated approach that is used simultaneously qualitatively and quantitatively by deductive and inductive methods. In this research, first, the initial content was prepared based on the existing literature in the field of entrepreneurial policies with a systematic approach. Then, a number of experts and managers with banking experience, as well as experienced employees of Bank Sepah (queue and headquarters) along with a qualitative description of entrepreneurial policies with systemic approach and a description of mental conditions about the people in question, the options that The basis of the extracted literature is selected according to their compliance with the conditions of Bank Sepah.
Discussion and Results
According to the research results, it can be concluded that according to the values, average Likert score, fuzzy numbers, average acceptance threshold, component rank and agreement percentage, members of the expert population 40 components and 7 cultural, social, economic, political dimensions. , Identified financial support, technology, structure and process as environmental dimensions influencing the development of entrepreneurial policies.
Conclusion
In this article, we identified the environmental factors affecting the development of entrepreneurial policies in Bank Sepah. First, a conceptual framework for the influential environmental factors of the research was prepared through previous studies and interviews with experts in the field of entrepreneurship. Then, in order to identify and reach an agreement to identify the final environmental factors, we used the scientific technique, ie the fuzzy Delphi method. A questionnaire was designed and distributed among the community of experts, which included 15 university professors and senior managers of Bank Sepah. After collecting the questionnaires and collecting information, the fuzzy Delphi technique was performed in two rounds.
Finally, members of the Delphi panel consisting of 15 experts in the field of entrepreneurship, the bank had a total of 7 dimensions and 40 factors as dimensions and parameters affecting policy entrepreneurial Bank Sepah have identified that a comprehensive model process for policy Entrepreneurship is in the field of banking and can be a reference for future studies of entrepreneurship researchers in the field of banking. The second advantage of this research is in discussing the method, which is a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative analysis appropriate to the organizational environment of Bank Sepah.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurship
  • Entrepreneurial Policy
  • Environmental Factors
  • Fuzzy Delphi Method
1-Alvani, S. M., Moghimi, S. M., Adel, A., Rahmati, M. H. (2011). Policy-making in the entrepreneurship education system in Iran. Work and Society, 140. (In Persian).
2-Anderson, A.R., Starnawska, M., (2008),”Research practices in entrepreneurship; problems of definition, description and meaning”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 9(4), 221-230.
3- Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P. (1991). A conceptual model ofentrepreneurship as firm behavior,Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice,16(1), 7-25.
4- Dare, C. (2006). The UK tour-operating industry: A competitive analysis. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 6(4), 357-367.
5-Davari, A. (2012) Presenting the Model of Entrepreneurship Development Policy-Making System, Public Management Perspective, Vol. 16, (In Persian).
6-Eneanya, A.N. (2010). Policy Research, Analysis and Effective Policy- Making in Nigeria. Lagos: Concept Publications Ltd.
7-Faghihi, A., Gholipour, A., Abooyee Ardakan, M., Ghalibaf Asl, H., Asadi, A. (2019). Validation of Dimensions and Component of Risk Culture: Using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Management Researches, 11(42), 5-31. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2019.4514.(In Persian).
8-Hill, T.L., Kothari, T. H., Shea, M. (2010). Patterns of Meaning in the Social Entrepreneurship Literature: A Research Platform. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 5-31
9-Hosseini, S. A., Mojibi; T., Mehdizadeh Ashrafi, A., Vazifehdoost, H. (2018). Designing a Policy Model in Small and Medium Business Development (SMEs) with Emphasis on Innovation (Case Study: Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare), Quarterly Journal of Economics and Urban Management 7 ( 25), (In Persian).
10-Imani, A.M., Yaghoubi, N.M., mobaraki, M. (2017). Identification and Prioritization of the Cooperative Sector’s Policies of Entrepreneurship Development. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 10(1), 21-39. doi: 10.22059/jed.2017.62289, (In Persian).
11-Langer, J., Feeney, M.K., Lee, S. E. (2017), Employee Fit and Job Satisfaction in Bureaucratic and Entrepreneurial Work Environments. Segepub, 12(1), 1-21.
11-Lundström, A. and Stevenson, L. (2005) Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice, Springer, New York
12-Manakandan, S. K., Rosnah I., Mohd Ridhuan J., & Priya R. (2017). Pesticide applicators questionnaire content validation: A fuzzy delphi method. Med J Malaysia, 72(4), 228-235.
13-Monavarian, A., Ayubi Ardakan, M., Irvani, M. j., Zandi Manesh, M. R. (2013). Designing a Policy Model for Improving the Business Environment of the Islamic Republic of Iran Using Data Theory Foundation of Public Management. Journal of Public Administration, Volume 5, Issue 2, 142-125, (In Persian).
14-Monavvarian, M., Moghimi, M., Movahedi, M., Hoseinzadeh, H. (2012). Explanation of Policy-making for SMEs Export Promotion with Using Grounded Theory Strategy. Journal of Public Administration, 4(11), 123-144. doi: 10.22059/jipa.2012.35536. (In Persian).
15-Norback, Pehr-Johan, Lars Persson, and Robin Douhan. (2014). Entrepreneurship policy and glabalization. Journal of Development Economics 110:22–38.
16-Kuratko. D. F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., Hornsby, J. S. (2009).Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy.Academy ofManagement Executive,16(4), 5–20.
17-Rahman Seresht, H.,  Habibi Badrabadi, M., Ghodratian, S. A. (2013) Systematic Model of Strategic Management of National Identity. Public Management Research, Vol. 21, 23-5(In Persian).
18-Rahmati, Mohammad H.,  Moghimi, S. M., Alvani, S. M.(2010). Policy Analysis for Informal Entrepreneurship Education in Iran. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 3(3), 7-35(In Persian).
19-Richardson, J. J. V. (2006). The library and information economy in Turkmenistan. IFLA Journal, 32(2), 131-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0340035206066410
20-Safari Dashtaki, M., Zare, R., Nikbakhsh, M. A. (2018).  Explaining the Structural Factors Influencing the Formation of Policy Networks; (A Survey on Iranian Entrepreneurship System). Journal of Public Administration, 10(1), 109 – 136, (In Persian).
21-Sangbor, M., Safi, M., Azar, A. (2019). Application of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCM’s) to Analysis and Design the Causal Structure of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Enabler’s in the Petrochemical Industry. Management Researches, 12(43), 5-29. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2019.4741
22-Shafizadeh, H., Mohseni, H, S., Jamshidi, L. (2011). Cultural bedrock for entrepreneurship development in universities and higher education institutions. Cultural Engineering Quarterly, 6(57), (In Persian).
23-Shamsi Goushki, M., Ziaiee, M., Rezghi shirsavar, H., Mosleh, M. (2019). Rating the Entrepreneurial Components of Resilient Economy by AHP: Designing Appropriate Entrepreneurial Model for Resistive Economy. Management Researches, 12(45), 237-260. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2019.25402.4013. (In Persian).
24 -Sharifzadeh, F., Ghorbani Zadeh, V., Seyyed Naghavi, M., Hosseinpouri, M. (2016). Evaluating the Components Affecting Policy Making in the Oil and Gas Industry from the Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 4(3), 133-145, (In Persian).
25-Sidi, H., Taghikhani, A. (2011). Barriers to Entrepreneurship Development and the Role of Government in Facilitating Entrepreneurship Development. Work and society journal. (In Persian).
26-Stewart. J, Ayres. R (2001), Systems theory and policy practice: An exploration. Springer,  34(1), 79–94.
27-Tsai, W. and Kuo, H. (2011), “Entrepreneurship policy evaluation and decision analysis for SMEs”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8343-8351.
28-Yadollahi Farsi, J., Aghajani, A. A., Mohammadi, M. (2007). Presenting a System Model of the Effective Role of Entrepreneurship Centers in the Entrepreneurship Life Cycle among University Students. The First National Conference on Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Future Organizations (In Persian).
29-Yüksel, I. (2012). Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for PESTEL Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management 7(24). DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v7n24p52.