تدوین هستی‌شناسی فاز درک کسب و‌کار پروژه‌های داده‌کاوی با تمرکز بر حوزه پشتیبانی مشتری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

2 دانشیار ، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

3 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

4 دانشیار، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

     علی‌رغم پیشرفت در قابلیت‌های الگوریتم‌های داده‌کاوی، خروجی‌ این الگوریتم‌ها نیازمند پالایش و تحلیل فراوان است تا بتواند مبنایی برای تصمیم‌گیری مدیران باشد. شناسایی مسایل کسب‌و‌کاری رایج در حوزه پشتیبانی مشتری که به کمک تکنیک‌های داده‌کاوی می‌توان به حل آن‌ها پرداخت و تدوین هستی‌شناسی درک کسب‌و‌کار حوزه پشتیبانی مشتری، هدف اصلی این تحقیق است. از این رو، مسایل کسب‌‌و‌کار حوزه پشتیبانی مشتری، ابتدا، از طریق مصاحبه با خبرگان این حوزه شناسایی شده‌اند و سپس به کمک مرور ادبیات مرتبط، هستی‌شناسی مسایل کسب‌وکاری حوزه پشتیبانی مشتری توسعه یافته است. به عنوان نتایج تحقیق، اهداف کسب‌و‌کار حوزه پشتیبانی مشتری که منجر به ایجاد ارزش و سودآوری می‌شوند به همراه فعالیت‌ها و خروجی‌های کلیدی هر فعالیت و گام‌های تحلیلی مورد نیاز براساس تکنیک‌های داده‌کاوی برای تحقق هر هدف کسب‌و‌کاری شناسایی شده است. در نهایت، بر مبنای مدل داده‌کاوی CRISP-DM ، هستی‌شناسی درک کسب‌وکار حوزه پشتیبانی مشنری ارائه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Formulating Business Understanding of Data Mining Projects in Customer Support Domain

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamidreza Nazari 1
  • Mohammad Taghi Taghavifard 2
  • Iman Raeesi Vanani 3
  • Mohammad Reza Taghva 4
1 Faculty of Accounting and Management, Allameh Tabataba’I University
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Allameh Tabataba’I University
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Allameh Tabataba’I University
4 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Allameh Tabataba’I University
چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
Abstract
Despite advances in the capabilities of data mining algorithms, the knowledge extracted by these algorithms require a great deal of refinement to become actionable for business executives. The main objective of this research is to identify common business problems of customer support domain that can be solved with the help of data mining techniques and to formulate an ontology of business understanding. Hence, customer support business problems are first identified through interviews with the domain experts, and then, with the review of related literature, the ontology of customer support problems is developed. As results of the research, the business objectives of the customer support domain that lead to value creation and profitability are identified along with key activities and outputs of each activity and the analytical steps required based on data mining techniques to achieve each business objective. Finally, based on CRISP-DM data mining model, the ontology of business understanding is introduced.
Introduction
Customer support is the establishment of a set of processes and systems aimed at achieving customer satisfaction and loyalty and ultimately creating a profitable and lasting business relationship. Customer-related data and information technology tools are the foundation of a successful customer support strategy. Today, the rapid growth of information technologies and the Internet have opened up new opportunities to create profitable and successful customer relationship through data mining.
Business decision makers expect the output of the data mining process to be easily interpreted and applied. Therefore, data mining techniques should provide actionable knowledge to these people. The lack of focus on business understanding in formulating the data mining problem and the lack of knowledge of the business domain is the root of this problem (Cao, 2017. Li, 2014). So far, data mining has been seen as a data-driven process that has little focus on the context and knowledge of the business domain. The main purpose of this article is to model key customer support business problems, goals, and activities that can be solved by data mining techniques.
In this regard, ontology is used as a tool for structuring and displaying knowledge of customer support. The ontology is a detailed and transparent explanation of a common conceptualization (Gruber, 1993). Cao argues that if the ontology integration between the framework and the methodology of data mining and organization/business can be established, the actionability of data mining output can be assured.
Methods
This study presents a model and method that facilitates business understanding of customer support for data mining problem and actioable knowledge discovery. To this end, first by interviewing software support experts in the software industry, the key concepts that are essentially business problems addressed by data mining algorithms are identified and presented in the form of basic artifacts. In the next step, related literature has been reviewed to generalize the basic artifact to the field of consumer support domain. The final artifact has been reconciled with the help of experts.
Accordingly, the interview questions were formulated by experts.
1-What are the key activities in the area of ​​customer support?
2- What are the main goals in customer support?
3-What kind of data is stored in customer support?
The purpose of the above questions is to identify the leading business goals in the area of ​​customer support first. Then, to reach each goal, data analysis steps must be made on specific data, and finally the outputs of the steps identified.
The following five queries were searched through Google Scholar for literature review. The reason for choosing Google Scholar is to index all the databases in the world by the search engine's search algorithm. The last ten years date range, between 2009 and 2019, was considered as the search time limit.
- Customer relationship + Literature review
- Customer support + Literature review
- Customer service + Literature review
- Customer experience + Literature review
- Customer journey + Literature review
The reason for the literature search query in the search query is that identifying relevant concepts in the domain of customer support and building the ontology of understanding customer support business as the research goal is pursued.
Discussion and Results
Customer support business objectives were identified. Each goal has analytical steps that must be applied to specific customer support data. For example, two analytical steps have been identified for the purpose of optimizing revenue from existing customers, including finding the relationship between features and needs and matching the service portfolio to customer needs. These analytical steps are meant to classify customers based on similar features and assign customers to the product based on similar features. For this purpose, background data and client transaction databases should be used. The formulated artifact of the research acts like this.
Conclusion
Most efforts to improve the data mining process have so far focused on improving data mining modeling, processes, and algorithms. There is a profound semantic gap between what a knowledge engineer deduces from data mining algorithms and what a business user pursues for profitability and business metrics.
There are two major limitations to an approach that overcomes knowledge engineering: first, business requirements are not considered correctly, and second, the business user does not have the technical and statistical knowledge needed to perform the data mining process himself. Current ontologies of data mining are generally focused on the modeling and technical evaluation of data mining outputs. There is no evidence of a business-centric system modeling and architecture review among data mining ontologies. The artifact of this research has not only provided understanding of customer support business problems to begin the data mining process but also provided the basis for producing architectures for recording and sharing the extracted knowledge and production of a learning system.
Future research should focus on the prototype production of a learning system that also characterizes the data mining process modeling step associated with any problem identified in the research artifact. In other words, data mining ontologies first need to be scrutinized, and then the mapping or integration between data mining ontologies and ontology business support ontologies defined in which the user identifies the problem and other stages of the data mining process can be proposed.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Data Mining
  • Ontology
  • Business Understanding
  • Customer Support
  • Actionable Knowledge
1-Adhikari, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). Appraisal of literature on customer experience in tourism sector: review and framework. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(4), 296-321.
2-Antunes, C., & Silva, A. (2014, April). New Trends in Knowledge Driven Data Mining. In ICEIS (1) (pp. 346-351)
3-Baumann, C., Elliott, G., & Burton, S. (2012). Modeling customer satisfaction and loyalty: survey data versus data mining. Journal of services marketing, 26(3), 148-157.
4-Cannataro, M., & Comito, C. (2003). A data mining ontology for grid programming. Proceedings of (SemPGrid2003), 113-134.
5-Cao, L. (2009). Actionable Knowledge Discovery
6-Cao, L. (2010). Domain-driven data mining: Challenges and prospects. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 22(6), 755-769.
7-Cao, L. (2017). Data science: a comprehensive overview. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(3), 43.
8-Cao, L., & Zhang, C. (2006, April). Domain-driven actionable knowledge discovery in the real world. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 821-830). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
9-Cao, L., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., Luo, D., Zhang, C., & Park, E. K. (2009). Flexible frameworks for actionable knowledge discovery. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(9), 1299-1312.
10-Carvalho, D. R., Freitas, A. A., & Ebecken, N. (2005, October). Evaluating the correlation between objective rule interestingness measures and real human interest. In European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 453-461). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
11-Charest, M., Delisle, S., Cervantes, O., & Shen, Y. (2008). Bridging the gap between data mining and decision support: A case-based reasoning and ontology approach. Intelligent Data Analysis, 12(2), 211-236.
12-Dahan, H., Cohen, S., Rokach, L., & Maimon, O. (2014). Proactive data mining using decision trees. In Proactive Data Mining with Decision Trees (pp. 21-33). Springer New York
13-Diamantini, C., Potena, D., & Storti, E. (2009). Ontology-driven KDD process composition. In Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis VIII (pp. 285-296). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
14-Diamantini, C., Potena, D., & Storti, E. (2018). Data Semantics Meets Knowledge Discovery in Databases. In A Comprehensive Guide Through the Italian Database Research Over the Last 25 Years (pp. 391-405). Springer, Cham.
15-Dou, D., Wang, H., & Liu, H. (2015, February). Semantic data mining: A survey of ontology-based approaches. In Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on(pp. 244-251). IEEE.
16-Fatma, S. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of customer experience management-a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 3(6).
17-Følstad, A., & Kvale, K. (2018). Customer journeys: a systematic literature review. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(2), 196-227.
18-Freitas, A. A. (2006). Are we really discovering interesting knowledge from data. Expert Update (the BCS-SGAI Magazine), 9(1), 41-47.
19-Frow, P. E., & Payne, A. F. (2009). Customer relationship management: a strategic perspective. Journal of business market management, 3(1), 7-27.
20-Geng, L., & Hamilton, H. J. (2006). Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 38(3), 9.
21-Ghosh, M. (2018). Contextual Customer Support-An Outlook. International Journal of Business Analytics and Intelligence, 6(1), 4.
22-Gil D., Hobson S., Mojsilović A., Puri R., Smith J.R. (2020) AI for Management: An Overview. In: Canals J., Heukamp F. (eds) The Future of Management in an AI World. IESE Business Collection. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
23-Gómez-Pérez, A., & Corcho, O. (2002). Ontology languages for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent systems, 17(1), 54-60.
24-Goyal, K., & Kar, A. K. (2020). Determinants of Customer Satisfaction in Telecommunication. In Proceedings of ICETIT 2019 (pp. 754-761). Springer, Cham.
25-Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.
26-He, Z., Xu, X., & Deng, S. (2005). Data mining for actionable knowledge: A survey. arXiv preprint cs/0501079.
27-Hevner, A. R. (2004). DESIGN SCIENCE IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-1
28-Hilario, M., Kalousis, A., Nguyen, P., & Woznica, A. (2009, September). A data mining ontology for algorithm selection and meta-mining. In Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD09 Workshop on 3rd generation Data Mining (SoKD-09) (pp. 76-87).
29-Hirsh, H. (2008). Data mining research: Current status and future opportunities. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, 1(2), 104-107.
30-Jain, R., Aagja, J., & Bagdare, S. (2017). Customer experience–a review and research agenda. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(3), 642-662.
31-Kaddouri, A. (2011). The Role of Human Expertise in Enhancing Data Mining.ProQuest LLC.
32-Kandampully, J., Zhang, T., & Jaakkola, E. (2018). Customer experience management in hospitality: A literature synthesis, new understanding and research agenda. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 21-56.
33-Kietz, J. U., Serban, F., Fischer, S., & Bernstein, A. (2014). “Semantics Inside!” But Let’s Not Tell the Data Miners: Intelligent Support for Data Mining. In The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges (pp. 706-720). Springer International Publishing.
34-Kracklauer, A. H., Mills, D. Q., & Seifert, D. (2004). Customer management as the origin of collaborative customer relationship management. - taking CRM to the next level, 3–6.
35-Li, Y. (2014). New artifacts for the knowledge discovery via data analytics (KDDA) process.
36-Liao, S. H., Chu, P. H., & Hsiao, P. Y. (2012). Data mining techniques and applications–A decade review from 2000 to 2011. Expert systems with applications, 39(12), 11303-11311
37-Marinica, C. (2010). Association Rule Interactive Post-processing using Rule Schemas and Ontologies-ARIPSO(Doctoral dissertation, Université de Nantes).
38-Mariscal, G., Marbán, Ó., & Fernández, C. (2010). A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery process models and methodologies. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 25(02), 137-166.
39-McGarry, K. (2005). A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. Knowledge Eng. Review, 20(1), 39-61.
40-Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104, No. 9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41-Ngai, E. W., Xiu, L., & Chau, D. C. (2009). Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 2592-2602.
42-Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach.
43-Palmer, A. (2010). Customer experience management: a critical review of an emerging idea. Journal of Services marketing, 24(3), 196-208.
44-Pinto, F. (2009). Database marketing intelligence methodology supported by ontologies and knowlegde discovery in databases.
45-Rageh Ismail, A., Melewar, T. C., Lim, L., & Woodside, A. (2011). Customer experiences with brands: Literature review and research directions. The Marketing Review, 11(3), 205-225.
46-Ras, Z. W., Dardzinska, A., Tsay, L. S., & Wasyluk, H. (2008, December). Association action rules. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (pp. 283-290). IEEE.
47-Ristoski, P., & Paulheim, H. (2016). Semantic Web in data mining and knowledge discovery: A comprehensive survey. Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web, 36, 1-22
48-Schoefer, M. (2015). Processes and Methods for Interdisciplinary Problem Solving and Technology Integration in Knowledge-Intensive Domains (Doctoral dissertation, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris).
49-Seng, J. L., & Chen, T. C. (2010). An analytic approach to select data mining for business decision. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8042-8057
50-Sharma, S., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2015). A novel Method for Formulating the Business objectives of Data Mining Projects. Knowledge Discovery Process and Methods to Enhance Organizational Performance, 55.
50-Soltani, Z., & Navimipour, N. J. (2016). Customer relationship management mechanisms: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 667-688.
51-Sun, T., Peng, W., & Li, T. (2011). Mining actionable knowledge for domain-driven and customer-centric decision support. In Proccedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE’11).
52-Tsai, C. F., & Lu, Y. H. (2009). Customer churn prediction by hybrid neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(10), 12547-12553
53-Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., & Zorgios, Y. (1998). The enterprise ontology. The knowledge engineering review, 13(01), 31-89.