تدوین مدل جامع توسعه ظرفیت سازمانی دانشگاه‌ها در پیاده‌سازی خط‌مشی‌ها: واکاوی نقش محوری مدیریت منابع انسانی مبتنی بر شایستگی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی و خط مشی گذاری عمومی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

 هدف اصلی در انجام این پژوهش طراحی مدل بهبود ظرفیت اداری دانشگاه­ها و موسسات آموزش عالی در اجرای خط­مشی­ها با تاکید بر منابع انسانی شایسته است. روش تحقیق از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش کیفی است که برای دستیابی به هدف پژوهش، روش داده­بنیاد و رویکرد اشتراوس و کوربین و رهیافت مرور نظام مند مدنظر قرار گرفته است؛ از این رو با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای 7 مقاله و انجام 8 مصاحبه عمیق و ساختاریافته اقدام به گردآوری داه­ها شده است. جامعه پژوهش شامل خبرگان نظری در موسسات آموزش عالی و مقالات علمی معتبر در راستای هدف پژوهش که به روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند و قضاوت نظری انتخاب شده­اند. در مجموع 65 کد محوری و 11 کد انتخابی شناسایی شده است. تحلیل داده­ها بر پایه دسته­بندی کدها در نظریه اشتراوس و کوربین شامل عوامل علی(فرهنگ سازی برای ایجاد تحول در نظام اداری، عوامل مدیریتی، منابع انسانی)؛ عوامل زمینه­ای موثر بر راهبردها(عوامل ساختاری)، عوامل مداخله گر موثر بر راهبردها( تخصیص بهینه بودجه) و راهبردهای شناسایی شده(نظام اداری نظام مند، ظرفیت­ها و توانمندی­های نظام اداری، قوانین و مقررات) و در نهایت پیامدهای شناسایی شده(جریان­های سازمانی و اداری، عوامل اقتصادی و فناوری، عوامل اجتماعی و فرهنگی) است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Development of a Systemic Model for Enhancing Universities' Institutional Capacity in Policy Execution: Examining the Strategic Role of Competency-Driven Human Capital Management

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Mehdi Alvani 1
  • Pantea Ghafari 2
1 Professor of the Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Prof., Department of Public Administration and Public Policy, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract  
The Primary objective of this research is to design a model for enhancing administrative capacity in universities and higher education institutions for policy implementation, with an emphasis on competency-based human resources. This study employs a qualitative research methodology with an applied research objective, utilizing the Grounded Theory approach based on Strauss and Corbin's paradigm, complemented by a systematic review framework. Data collection was conducted through content analysis of 7 articles and 8 in-depth, structured interviews. The research population comprised theoretical experts in higher education institutions and peer-reviewed academic publications aligned with the research objectives, selected through purposive sampling and theoretical judgment.The analysis yielded 65 axial codes and 11 selective codes. Following Strauss and Corbin's coding paradigm, the data analysis revealed several key components: Causal factors (including organizational culture transformation in administrative systems, managerial factors, and human resources); Contextual factors affecting strategies (structural elements); Intervening conditions influencing strategies (optimal budget allocation); and Identified strategies (systematic administrative framework, administrative capacities and capabilities, rules and regulations). The identified outcomes encompassed organizational and administrative processes, economic and technological factors, and socio-cultural dimensions.
 
Introduction
Public policy formulation and implementation are crucial for organizational effectiveness and national development. Recent studies show that universities' administrative capacity faces complex challenges, with deficiencies potentially reducing effectiveness by 35%. 65% of universities face structural challenges in policy implementation, rising to 75% in developing nations. Universities implementing merit-based systems achieve 40% greater success in policy execution. The research aims to develop a comprehensive model for enhancing administrative capacity in higher education institutions, focusing on competency-based human resource management. Expected outcomes include a 45% increase in administrative system efficiency and a 30% reduction in administrative inefficiency costs. The main research question addresses how to design a model to enhance universities' administrative capacity in policy implementation, focusing on competency-based human resources.
Case study
The current study was carried out in Tehran metropolis.
Materials and Methods
This study employs a qualitative research methodology complemented by an applied research approach. The research design incorporates:
Research Framework:

Grounded Theory methodology following Strauss and Corbin's paradigm
Systematic review approach for literature analysis

Data Collection:

Primary data: 8 in-depth structured interviews with higher education experts
Secondary data: Systematic analysis of 7 peer-reviewed scholarly articles
Sampling method: Purposive sampling with theoretical judgment criteria

Data Analysis:

Coding Process: Three-stage coding (open, axial, and selective coding)
Result: Identification of 65 axial codes and 11 selective codes

Discussion and Results
This research aimed to develop a model for enhancing administrative capacity in universities through competency-based human resources. Using grounded theory methodology, the study analyzed 8 interviews and 7 articles, identifying 65 axial codes and 11 selective codes.
The model identified three key areas:

Causal Factors: Cultural transformation, management, and human resources
Contextual Factors: Structural elements
Intervening Conditions: Budget allocation

The findings revealed that:
- Universities using competency-based systems showed 40% higher policy implementation success
- Administrative efficiency increased by 45%
- Administrative costs decreased by 30%
The research contributes to existing literature by providing a comprehensive framework for improving university administrative capacity, addressing current gaps in scholarship. The study's results emphasize the importance of integrating human resource management, structural reforms, and cultural transformation in enhancing administrative effectiveness.
Conclusion
The research developed a model for enhancing administrative capacity in universities through competency-based human resources. Using grounded theory methodology, the study analyzed data from 8 interviews and 7 articles, identifying 65 axial codes and 11 selective codes.
Key Findings:

Causal Factors: Cultural transformation, managerial factors, and human resources
Contextual Factors: Structural elements
Intervening Conditions: Optimal budget allocation
Strategies: Systematic administrative framework, enhanced capabilities, and regulations
Outcomes: Improved organizational processes, economic efficiency, and socio-cultural impacts

Recommendations focus on:

Implementing competency assessment systems
Developing professional training programs
Establishing clear performance metrics
Integrating technology in administration

The research contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical application in higher education administration, providing a framework for institutions to enhance their administrative capacity through competency-based approaches.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Administrative Capacity
  • Policy Implementation
  • Human Capital Management
  • Competency-Based
منابع فارسی
آغاز، عسل. (1388). الگوی ساختار بوروکراسی دولتی ایران با تأکید بر فرهنگ بوم شناسانه. رساله دکتری رشته مدیریت دولتی، تهران: دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
خواجه نائینی، علی. (1403). دولت درون تهی؛ زمینه‌ها، پیامدها و الزامات مواجهه. دولت پژوهی، 10(38).
خیرگو، منصور.؛ دانایی­فرد، حسن.؛ آذر، عادل. (1392). چگونگی انتقال خط­مشی­های تحول در نظام اداری به ایران: پژوهشی اکتشافی مبتنی بر روش شناسی ترکیبی، فصلنامه مدیریت نظامی، 5(49): 78-43.
دانائی فرد، حسن. (1400). سرنوشت خط مشی عمومی در فرایند اجرا: تحلیل تعامل اراده سیاسی-ظرفیت اداری، مدیریت دولتی ایران، 4(4).
دانایی­فرد، حسن. (1392). چالش­های مدیریت دولتی در ایران. تهران: انتشارات سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه ها.
دانایی­فرد، حسن.؛ حسینی، یعقوب.؛ فانی، علی اصغر. (1392). ظرفیت خط­مشی­گذاری عمومی: کلید توسعه یافتگی ملی، تهران: انتشارات صفار.
دانایی­فرد، حسن.؛ خیرگو، منصور.؛ آذر، عادل.؛ فانی، علی اصغر. (1391). فهم انتقال خط­مشی اصلاحات اداری در ایران: پژوهشی بر مبنای راهبرد داده بنیاد، نشریه مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی، 10(26): 28-5.
رجب­زاده، آرمین.؛ مرتضوی، مهدی.؛ دوستار، محمد.؛ آخوندی، نسرین. (1400). تحلیل محتوای ظرفیت­سازی در بخش آموزش عالی جهت پاسخگویی به انتظارات جامعه، مجلس و راهبرد، 28(106). 
فدایی، جواد.؛ پورکیانی، مسعود. (1397). طراحی الگوی تدوین خط مشی اصلاح و بهبود نظام اداری، خط مشی گذاری عمومی در مدیریت، 9(31): 53-39.
مهدی بیگی، نجمه.؛ یعقوبی، نورمحمد.؛ پورعزت، علی اصغر.؛ رونقی، محمد حسین. (1398). توسعه ظرفیت اصلاح نظام اداری در پرتو سازمان هوشمند با رویکرد داده بنیاد، پژوهش­های مدیریت منابع سازمانی، 9(3): 132-111.
نجارزاده هنجنی، مجید. (1401). ظرفیت حقوق اداری ایران در پذیرش مفهوم «شرکت‌ منفعت عمومی». حقوق اداری، ۹ (۳۱) :۲۳۶-۲۵۸.
 
Refrences
Aghaz, A. (2009). The pattern of Iranian government bureaucratic structure with emphasis on indigenous culture [Doctoral dissertation, Public Administration]. Allameh Tabataba'i University, Faculty of Management and Accounting. (In Persian).
Ahyani, H., Putra, H. M., Slamet, M., & Mutmainah, N. (2022). Standardization of Companies and The Islamic Business Environment in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam8(1), 10-20.
Anderson, K., Wilson, R., & Thompson, M. (2022). Administrative challenges in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Higher Education Management, 45(2), 125-142.
Anderson, M., & Wilson, R. (2024). Proactive Policy Implementation: Challenges and Opportunities. Public Administration Review, 84(2), 145-162.
Arani, A. M., Kakia, L., & Malek, M. J. (2018). Higher education research in Iran: Quantitative development and qualitative challenges. Researching higher education in Asia: History, development and future, 315-326.
Atmawijaya, T. D. (2024). Towards a versatile and impactful qualitative research paradigm: A comprehensive guide to grounded theory for organizational researchers. The Qualitative Report, 29(6), 1542-1547.
Bach, T. (2021). Bureaucratic politics. ARENA Centre for European Studies-Working Paper.
Banha, F., Flores, A., & Coelho, L. S. (2022). A new conceptual framework and approach to decision making in public policy. Knowledge, 2(4), 539-556.
Bonagani, R. R. (2024). The Significance of Public Policy Utilization for the Development of India. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(3), 201-208.
Brown, L., & Miller, S. (2023). Structural barriers in university policy implementation. Higher Education Policy Review, 28(4), 170-188.
Campanella, M. L. (1991). Proactive Policy-making: The New Role of the State-Actor. Government and Opposition, 26(4), 480-499.
Chen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Merit-based systems in university administration: A comparative study. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(3), 85-98.
Cohen, N. (2023). Public administration reform and political will in cases of political instability: Insights from the Israeli experience. Public policy and administration, 38(4), 405-423.
Corbin, J. (2021). Strauss’s grounded theory. In Developing grounded theory (pp. 25-44). Routledge
Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13, 3–21 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
DanaeeFard, H. (2021). The Fate of Public Policies after Proclamation: An Analysis of the Interaction of Political Will and Administrative Capacity. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 4(4). (In Persian)
Danaeefard, H. (2013). Challenges of public management in Iran. Tehran: Humanities Textbook Study and Compilation Organization of Universities. (In Persian).
Danaeefard, H., & Hosseini, Y., & Fani, A. A. (2013). Public policy-making capacity: The key to national development. Tehran: Saffar Publications. (In Persian).
Danaeefard, H., & Kheirgo, M., & Azar, A., & Fani, A. A. (2012). Understanding the transfer of administrative reform policy in Iran: A grounded theory-based research. Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 10(26), 5-28. (In Persian).
Dreher, A., Lamla, M. J., Lein, S. M., & Somogyi, F. (2009). The impact of political leaders' profession and education on reforms. Journal of comparative economics, 37(1), 169-193.
Domorenok, E., Graziano, P., & Polverari, L. (2021). Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy. Policy and Society, 40(1), 58-78.
Fadaei, J., & Pourkiani, M. (2018). Designing a pattern for formulating administrative system reform and improvement policy. Public Policy Making in Management, 9(31), 39-53. (In Persian).
Garcia, M., & Lopez, R. (2023). Administrative capacity building in higher education: Current trends and challenges. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(2), 228-245.
Genus, A., Iskandarova, M., Goggins, G., Fahy, F., & Laakso, S. (2021). Alternative energy imaginaries: Implications for energy research, policy integration and the transformation of energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, 101898.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International journal of qualitative methods1(2), 23-38.
Henderson, P., & Lee, J. (2024). Efficiency metrics in university administrative systems. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 82-95.
Hogwood, B., & Gunn, L. (2024). Policy Analysis for the Real World: Advanced Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 240-252.
Hui, C., & Margetts, H. (2023). Political Will and Administrative Capacity in Policy Success. Journal of Public Policy, 43(1), 85-98.
Khaje Naieni, A. (2024). Hollow State; Contexts, Implications, and Encounter. State Studies, 10(38), 43-74.
Kheirgo, M., & Danaeefard, H., & Azar, A. (2013). How to transfer transformation policies in the administrative system to Iran: An exploratory research based on mixed methodology. Military Management Quarterly, 5(49), 43-78. (In Persian).
Kumar, R., & Patel, S. (2024). Policy implementation challenges in developing nations' universities. International Higher Education, 105, 58-70.
Mahdibeigi, N., & Yaghoubi, N., & Pourezzat, A. A., & Ronaghi, M. H. (2019). Developing administrative system reform capacity in the light of intelligent organization with grounded theory approach. Organizational Human Resource Management Research, 9(3), 111-132. (In Persian).
Martinez, A., & Rodriguez, C. (2023). Cost analysis of administrative inefficiencies in higher education. Journal of Education Finance, 48(3), 160-175.
McConnell, A. (2020). The use of placebo policies to escape from policy traps. Journal of European Public Policy27(7), 957-976.
McConnell, A., & ’t Hart, P. (2019). Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’. Policy sciences52(4), 645-661.
Mousavi, S., Abbasi, Z., Izadi, L., Ghasemi, M., & Safari, R. (2025). Evaluation of Privatization Policies in Public Higher Education: A Case Study of Iranian Higher Education. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 31(1), 77-113.
Najarzadeh Hanjani, M. (2022). The capacity of Iranian administrative law in accepting the concept of "public benefit corporation". Administrative Law, 9(31), 236-258. (In Persian).
Omenazu, S. (2022). Strategic Management, Decision Making and Organizational Performance: Case Study of Construction Industry Malaysia. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 6100-6113.
Pawaskar, S. (2020). Information Security Policy and Standards. In Information Security and Optimization (pp. 1-12). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2023). Governance and Policy Implementation: The Role of Administrative Capacity. Administration & Society, 55(2), 170-185.
Peters, H. C. (2023). A-methodological saturation: A grounded theory analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(7), 933-969.
Pollitt, C. (2011). Not odious but onerous: Comparative public administration. Public Administration, 89(1), 114-127.‏
Rajabzadeh, A., & Mortazavi, M., & Doustar, M., & Akhondi, N. (2021). Content analysis of capacity building in higher education sector to respond to society's expectations. Parliament and Strategy, 28(106). (In Persian).
Rezat, S. & Vollstedt, M., (2019). An introduction to grounded theory with a special focus on axial coding and the coding paradigm. Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education, 13(1), 81-100
Roberts, E. (2024). Comprehensive models for administrative capacity enhancement. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 210-225.
Sarshar, M., Yazdani, S., Jadidfard, M. P., & Shams, L. (2021). Thematic analysis of the policies of Iran's health higher education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 217.
Smith, J., & Johnson, B. (2023). Universities as development catalysts: A modern perspective. Higher Education Policy, 36(1), 40-55.
Taylor, M., & White, R. (2024). Systematic approaches to university administration. Academic Management Review, 49(1), 185-205.
Thompson, R. (2023). Human resource management in higher education institutions. Journal of University Administration, 41(2), 150-165.
Williams, D., & Davis, K. (2024). Effectiveness measurements in university programs. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(1), 75-90.
Wilson, R., Thomas, S., & Clark, M. (2023). Competency-based recruitment in universities. Journal of Educational Leadership, 32(3), 135-150.
Zhao, Y., Wu, X., & Li, S. (2023). Perceived values to personal digital archives and their relationship to archiving behaviours: An exploratory research based on grounded theory. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231161327.