واکاوی بازدارنده های پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی (هیبرید) در نظام آموزش عالی با تمرکز بر اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری کارآفرینی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت و کارآفرینی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.

چکیده

کارآفرینی، اهرمی استراتژیک برای توسعۀ اقتصادی است و پرورش کارآفرینان، پیش‌شرط رشد و توسعۀ اقتصادی جوامع می‌باشد. در این میان کارآفرینان ترکیبی (هیبرید) با توجه به بالابودن احتمال موفقیت‌شان و شانس بالای کسب‌وکار آنها برای بقا، در سال‌های اخیر مورد توجه پژوهشگران قرار گرفته‌اند. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر شناسایی موانع پرورش کارآفرینان ترکیبی در نظام آموزش عالی با تمرکز بر اعضای هیئت علمی بود. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی انجام گرفته و راهبرد آن نظریه‌پردازی داده‌بنیاد با رویکرد ظاهرشونده گلیزر (Glaser) بود. مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختاریافته به‌عنوان ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. به‌منظور گردآوری داده‌ها و با به‌کارگیری روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، با 17 نفر از اعضای هیئت علمی کارآفرین و صاحب کسب‌وکار مصاحبه صورت گرفت. برای بررسی استحکام پژوهش نیز چهار معیار قابلیت اعتبار، انتقال‌پذیری، قابلیت اطمینان و تأییدپذیری به‌کار گرفته شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها در دو مرحلۀ کدگذاری حقیقی و کدگذاری نظری انجام گرفت. نتایج حاکی از ظهور 90 کد و نیز احصاء 13 مفهوم از مصاحبه‌ها بوده که در قالب 5 مقولۀ اصلی شامل "چالش‌های قانونی"، "ضعف‌های فرهنگی"، "ضعف‌های ساختاری-نهادی"، "چالش‌های اقتصادی-محیطی" و "موانع شغلی" به‌عنوان موانع پرورش کارآفرین ترکیبی در نظام آموزش عالی شناسایی گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Barriers for Nurturing Hybrid Entrepreneurs in the Higher Education System, Focusing on University Faculty Members

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fataneh Baharvand 1
  • Bijan Rezaee 2
  • Nader Naderi 2
  • Yousef Mohamadifar 2
1 PhD. Student of Entrepreneurship, Department of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Entrepreneurship is a strategic lever for economic development and nurturing entrepreneurs is a prerequisite for the economic growth and development of societies. Recently, hybrid entrepreneurs have attracted the attention of researchers due to their high probability of success in their businesses. The main objective of the present study was to identify nurturing hybrid entrepreneurs in the higher education system among faculty members. This study was conducted with a qualitative approach base on Grounded Theory with Glaser's strategy. Semi-structured interviews were used as data collection tool. In order to collect data, 17 faculty members who are entrepreneurs and business owners were interviewed using purposive sampling. To examine the robustness of the study, four criteria including validity, transferability, reliability, and acceptability were also used. Data analysis was conducted in two stages: actual coding and theoretical coding. The results indicated the emergence of 90 codes and the identification of 13 concepts from the interviews, which were identified in the form of 5 main categories including "legal challenges", "cultural weaknesses", "structural-institutional weaknesses", "economic-environmental challenges", and "career barriers" were identified as obstacles to nurturing hybrid entrepreneurs in the higher education system.
Introduction
Recent empirical studies show that more than 50% of budding entrepreneurs start their businesses while receiving salaries in public or private jobs. This combination of salaried employment and entrepreneurship has attracted the attention of policy makers and researchers who called it "hybrid entrepreneurship" (Luc et al., 2018). Reviewing literatures shows that hybrid entrepreneurs have characteristics such as access to financial resources supported by a previous job; access to the already developed social networks of the companies in which they work; attaining higher levels of education that equip them with the conceptual skills needed in business; and acquiring a level of skill in management and finance (Chalwe, 2022). Most of the faculty members of the universities have these characteristics and are not legally prohibited to have a second job. Because of this, they have more potential to become hybrid entrepreneurs than other people. It is necessary to identify the obstacles to nurturing this type of entrepreneurs, so that by removing these obstacles, the country can benefit more from the faculty members' capacities. Therefore, the current study is trying to answer this question: "What are the obstacles to nurturing hybrid entrepreneurs in higher education system?"
Case study
In this research, those faculty members who have a business with a history of at least 3 years are considered as the studied community.
Materials and Methods
The current study is qualitative in nature and developmental-applicative in terms of purpose. The strategy used is Grounded Theory (Glaser method) and the data collection tool is semi-structured interview. A targeted snowball method was used to select the sample members. In order to analyze the data, coding was used based on the classical grounded theory strategy. MAXQDA 20 software was used to analyze the data.
Discussion and Results
In the open coding stage, more than 90 codes were extracted, after combining similar codes and removing duplicate codes, 63 codes were identified. In the second step and selective coding stage, 90 primary codes were categorized into 13 concepts and 5 categories. The third step is theoretical coding, which combines the categories by a communication model.
Conclusion
The main topic in this study is the obstacles to nurturing hybrid entrepreneurs among academic faculty members. According to the findings, there are 5 main challenges that can be explained in the form of 13 concepts in the way of nurturing hybrid entrepreneurs among faculty members. One of the most important identified challenges is the legal challenges. This category includes the two concepts of "weakness in university rules and regulations" and "cumbersome rules of the business environment". Another important challenge indicates cultural weaknesses which are presented in the form of 4 concepts as "weakness of entrepreneurial culture among faculty members", "being anti-value", "unhealthy competitions" and "non-entrepreneurial public culture". Another main challenge is structural-institutional weaknesses. This means that the structures governing the higher education system (universities and higher education centers) as well as the education system at schools do not encourage people's tendency towards entrepreneurship. Another main obstacle includes economic-environmental challenges. According to the opinion of the experts in this research, the high initial costs related to starting a business, such as the cost of providing equipment, skilled manpower, and a suitable place for starting a business, are considered as significant obstacles. Also, the uncertainty condition in the country's business environment, the existence of high inflation rates in recent years, and the instability of prices have prevented investors from trusting businesses and their profitability. They have reduced the tendency of people towards entrepreneurship. Another main obstacle is due to the job conditions. This means that doing two jobs and playing two different roles leads to a kind of interference between the tasks in terms of moral and time and may reduce the productivity of one or both jobs

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nurturing Entrepreneurs
  • Hybrid Entrepreneurs
  • Higher Education System
  • Challenges

مراجع

منابع فارسی
آشنا، ملیحه؛ وثوقی، سهیل؛ هشیارمقدم، اسماعیل (1402). نقش عوامل کلان اقتصادی بر توسعه کارآفرینی. مطالعات زیست­بوم اقتصاد نوآوری، 3(4)، 53- 37.
ادیمی، سلطانعلی؛ شهریاری، جلیل؛ آزادیخواه، ام‌البنین؛ رضایی، مریم (1399). بررسی موانع کارآفرینی آموزش‌دیدگان فنی و حرفه‌ای (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان زاهدان). فصلنامه علمی مهارت آموزی، 9(34)، 146-125.
باقری، مسعود؛ نمازیان، مریم (1391). موانع کارآفرینی در ایران، نقش بومی‌سازی و راهکارها. کنفرانس ملی کارآفرینی و مدیریت کسب و کارهای دانش بنیان، بابلسر.
حسنوی, رضا؛ رمضان، مجید (1390). افزایش سرمایۀ فکری در سازمان: بررسی نقش یادگیری سازمانی. بهبود مدیریت، 5(2)، 39-25.
حسنی، ملاحت؛ مهدی­زاده، حسین (1398). مقایسه­ی شایستگی­های کارآفرینانة کارآفرینان حقوق­بگیر با سایر کارآفرینان و حقوق­بگیران. توسعه کارآفرینی، 12(4)، 560-541.
خاشعی، وحید؛ هرندی، عطاءالله (1394). تبیین مدل کنترل راهبردی در صنعت توزین: با استفاده از تئوری داده بنیاد کلاسیک. مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی، 6 (22)، 80-61.
خدادوستی، میثم؛ محمدی‌فر، یوسف؛ نادری، نادر (1402). مفهوم‌پردازی مدل موفقیت کارآفرینان هیبرید در ایران. توسعه کارآفرینی، 16(5 ویژه‌نامه)، 367-347.
دانش‌نیا، محمد؛ صمدی، علی حسین؛ هادیان، ابراهیم؛ مرزبان، حسین (1400). راهبرد اقتصادی، 10(1)، 108-71.
دائی نبی، میلاد؛ ابراهیمی، مهدی (1400). تحلیل تطبیقی رویکرد‌های نظریۀ داده‌بنیاد. فصلنامه علمی تخصصی فرصت، 2021401(5)، 113-87.
دهقانان، حامد؛ رحمان­سرشت، حسین؛ خاشعی ورنامخواستی، وحید؛ وکیلی، محمد (1399). کاوشی بر شایستگی­های مشاوران مدیریت و سازمان، پژوهش­های مدیریت منابع انسانی، 10(3)، 66-47.
رحیمی، حمید؛ آقابابایی، راضیه (1401). تحلیل استراتژی‌های خودرهبری و ارتباط آن با کارآفرینی اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه کاشان، پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی، 19(4)، 177-161.
شریعت­نژاد، علی؛ عسگری ذهابی، صبا (1401). پایش تأثیر کارآفرینی ترکیبی بر موفقیت مسیر شغلی: تبیین نقش میانجی جهت­گیری مسیر شغلی متنوع. مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، 20(65)، 216-185.
قادرزاده، امید؛ فرجی، سیروان (1393). تحلیل تجربه­های معلمان از دو شغله بودن. راهبرد فرهنگ، 26، 141-121.
کیخا، احمد؛ عزتی، میترا (1400). شناسایی عوامل بازدارنده توسعه زیست‌بوم کارآفرینی دانشگاه کارآفرین. مدیریت نوآوری، 10(2)، 55-97.
محمدپور، سمانه؛ سالارزهی، حبیب الله؛ وظیفه، زهرا؛ کمالیان, امین رضا (1401). طراحی الگوی استراتژیک دانشگاه کارآفرین با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی در آموزش عالی. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 15(56)، 75-102.
محمدی‌پور، رحمت الله؛ حسنی، سیده فاطمه؛ یوسفی، مریم؛ دارابی، افروز (۱۳۹۲). موانع پیش روی کارآفرینی و نقش کارآفرینی در توسعه اقتصادایران. اولین همایش ملی مدیریت کسب و کار، همدان.
مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی (1401). بررسی و آسیب‌شناسی نظام ارتقای اعضای هیئت علمی.
معتقد، مهسا؛ یعقوبی فرانی، احمد؛ کریمی، سعید (1398). تأثیر عوامل محیطی بر قصد کارآفرینانه دیجیتالی دانشجویان علوم کامپیوتر (مورد مطالعه: دانشگاه­های دولتی استان همدان، نامه آموزش عالی، 12 (46)، 175- 147.
ملکی، مژده؛ فاطمی، مهسا؛ رضائی مقدم، کورش؛ حیاتی، داریوش؛ نصیری، سید مهدی (1402). واکاوی مؤلفه­های پذیرش کارآفرینی هیبریدی در بین کارکنان سازمان­­های دولتی، مورد مطالعه: استان فارس. آموزش و مدیریت کارآفرینی، 2(4)، 95-123.
مهدی، رضا؛ شفیعی، مسعود (1399). الگو و چارچوب راهنما برای دانشگاه نوآور و ارزش آفرین. نوآوری و ارزش آفرینی، 17 (9): 14-1.
نادری­فر، مهین؛ گلی، حمیده؛ قلجایی، فرشته (1396). گلوله برفی، روشی هدفمند در نمونه­گیری تحقیقات کیفی. گام­های توسعه در آموزش پزشکی، 14(3)، 179- 171.
References
Adimi, S. A., Shahryari,  J., Azadikhah, O., &  Rezaei, M. (2021).  Investigating the entrepreneurship of technical and vocational trainees (case study of Zahedan). Journal of Skill Training, 9(34), 125-146. (In Persian)
Aladejebi, O. (2020). Hybrid entrepreneurship: combining employment and self-employment in Nigeria. Archives of Business Research, 8(7), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.87.8725
Alshebami, A., Al-Jubari, I., Alyoussef, I., & Raza, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial education as a predicator of community college of Abqaiq students’ entrepreneurial intention. Management Science Letters, 10(15), 3605-3612.
Ashena, M., Vosoughi, S., & Hoshyarmoghadam, E. (2023). The role of macroeconomic factors on the development of entrepreneurship. Innovation Economic Ecosystem Studies, 3(4), pp, 37-53. doi: 10.22111/innoeco.2023.44081.1041 (In Persian)
Astebro, T. (2004). Key success factors for technological entrepreneurs’ R&D projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 314-321.
Atsan, N. (2016). Failure experiences of entrepreneurs: causes and learning outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.054
Ayuo, A. O., Kibas, P., & Auka, D. (2017). Entrepreneurship education, personality traits, and entrepreneurial intention of engineering students in technical and vocational education and training institutions in Kenya. Science Journal of Education, 4(2), 57-64.
Bagheri, M., & Namazian, M. (2012). Barriers to entrepreneurship in Iran, the role of localization and solutions, National Conference on Entrepreneurship and Management of Knowledge-Based Businesses, Babolsar. (In Persian)
Baumol, W. (2005). Small firms: why market-driven innovation can't get along without them, Office of Advocacy, 183-206.
Brandle, L., & Kuckertz, A. (2022). Staged entrepreneurship: the formation of hybrid and spawning entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Economics, 92, 955–996.
Chalwe, F. (2022). Hybrid entrepreneurship a viable route for development of more resilient enterprises: a case of Ndola. Thesis, The University of Zambia. http://dspace.unza.zm/handle/123456789/7407
Choo, S., & Wong, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial intention: triggers and barriers to new venture creations in Singapore, Singapore management review, 28(2).
Crider, C. J., Aghaey, A., Lortie, J., Peake, W. O. & Digan, S. (2024). Hybrid entrepreneurship, job satisfaction and the spillover effect of creativity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(5), 1197-1223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2022-0629
Daei Nabi, M. & Ebrahimi, M. (2022). Comparative analysis of Grounded Theory approaches. Opportunity Scientific Journal, 2021401(5), 87-113. (In Persian)
Daneshniya, M., Samadi, A. H., Hadiyan, E., &  Marzban, H. (2021). Investigating the institutional barriers to entrepreneurship development and the role of government in moderating them; The case of Iran.  Economic Strategy, 10 (1), 71-108. (In Persian)
Dehghanan, H., Rahmanseresht, H., Khashei, V., & Vakili, M. (2021). Exploring the competencies of an organization's strategy consultant. Organizational Resources Management Researches, 10(3), 47-66. (In Persian)
Demir, C., Werner, A., Kraus, S., & Jones, P. (2022). Hybrid entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 34(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1764738.
Denkenberger, D., Way, J., & Pearce, J. M. (2015). Educatinal pathways to remote employment in isolated communities . Journal of Human Security,11(1), 34-44.
Dvouletý, O., & Bögenhold, D. (2022). Exploring individual and family-related characteristics of hybrid entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2021-0154
Dzomonda, O., & Fatoki, O. (2018). Demystifying the motivations towards hybrid entrepreneurship among the working populace in South Africa. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 24(4), 1–9.
Ezzerhouni, A., & El Malki, T. (2022). Transitory hybrid entrepreneurship: a path to full-time entrepreneurship. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 3(6–1), Article 6–1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7378240
Ferrandiz, J., Fidel, P., & Conchado, A. (2018). Promoting entrepreneurial intention through a higher education program integrated in an entrepreneurship ecosystem. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2017-0089
Ferreira, C., Robertson, J., Blair, A., McMullan, K., & Morrison, S. (2017). Look before you leap: an analysis of factors driving the transition from hybrid to full-time entrepreneurship. Conference of Society for Marketing Advances, Kentucky.
Folta, T. B., Delmar, F., & Wennberg, K. (2010). Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1094
Glaser B. G., & Holton J. (2007). Remodeling grounded theory, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 32, 47-68.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2005). Staying open: The use of theoretical codes in grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 5(1), 1-20.
Hasani, M., & Mahdizadeh, H. (2020). A comparison study on entrepreneurial competencies of hybrid entrepreneurs, wageworkers and other entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 12(4), 541-560. doi: 10.22059/jed.2020.289506.653127 (In Persian)
Haug, H. M., & Pardy W. (1999). Community entrepreneurship in north eastland, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 5(4).
Hayter, C. S., Nelson, A. J., Zayed, S., & O’Connor, A. C. (2018). Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: A review, analysis and extension of the literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4),1039-1082.
Hoppe, M. (2016). Policy and entrepreneurship education. Small Business Economics, 46(1), 13-29.
Hosnavi, R. & Ramezan, M. (2011). Measuring the impact of learning levels on the intellectual capital in the industrial organizations: an empirical assessment. Journal of Improvement Management, 5(2), 25-39. (In Persian)
Indudewi , Y. (2015). Success Factors of Hybrid Entrepreneurs: Case Study of Universitas Ciputra Academician. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5 S5), 90-84.
Islamic Parliament Research Center (2022). Examination and pathology of the faculty member promotion system.
Jayathilaka, G., & Sachitra, V. (2020). Examine the drivers to engage in hybrid entrepreneurship in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 102-131.  http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9117
Keykha, A., & Ezati, M. (2021). Identifying factors hindering ecosystem development, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial university. Innovation Management Journal, 10(2), 55-97. (In Persian)
Khashei, V., & Harandi, A. O. (2015). Explaining strategic control model in weight industry: Discourse exploration using Grounded Theory strategy. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 6(22), 61-80. (In Persian).
Khodadosti, M., Mohamadifar, Y., & Naderi, N. (2024). Conceptualization of hybrid entrepreneurs' success model in Iran. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 16(5), 347-367. doi: 10.22059/jed.2024.356514.654159. (In Persian)
Kurczewska, A., Mackiewicz, M., Doryń, W., & Wawrzyniak, D. (2020). Peculiarity of hybrid entrepreneurs – revisiting Lazear’s theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21, 277–300. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11959
Lahikainen, K., Kolhinen, J., Ruskovaara, E., & Pihkala, T. (2019). Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: The case of a Finnish university campus. Industry and Higher Education, 33(2), 96-107.
Leibenstein, H. (1968). Entrepreneurship and development, The American economic review, 58(2), 72-83.
Liu, Y., Li, Y., Hao, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Narcissism and learning from entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 496-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.003
Luc, S., Chirita, G., Delvaux, E., & Kepnou, A. (2018). Hybrid entrepreneurship: employees climbing the entrepreneurial ladder. International Review of Entrepreneurship.
Mahdi, R., & Shafiee, M. (2020). Model and guiding framework for innovative and entrepreneurial university. Innovation and Value Creation, 17(9), 1-14. (In Persian)
 Maleki, M.,  Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Hayati,  D., & Nassiri, S. M. (2024). An exploration of the components of hybrid entrepreneurship acceptance among public sector employees: a case study of Fars province. Education and Management of Entrepreneurship, 2(4), 95-124. DOI: 10.22126/eme.2024.10054.1078. (In Persian)
Maritz, A., Nguyen, Q., & Ismail, A. (2023) Hybrid entrepreneurs as the neoteric driver of skill variety and economic prosperity. Administrative Sciences, 13(6), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ admsci13060140
Marshall, D. R. (2017). Entrepreneurship inside and out: Three essays exploring the interplay between hybrid entrepreneurs and their organizational employee roles. Dissertation, The University of Mississippi.
Mohammadipour, R., Hasani, S. F., Yousefi, M., & Darabi, A. (2013). Obstacles to entrepreneurship and the role of entrepreneurship in the development of Iran's economy, The First National Conference on Business Management, Hamedan. (In Persian)
Mohammadpour, S., Salarzehi, H., Vazifeh, Z., & Kamalian, A. R. (2022). Designing strategic model of entrepreneurial university based on approach future studies in higher education. Public Management Researches, 15(56), 75-102. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2022.40190.5627 (In Persian)
Motaghed, M., Yaghoubi Farani, A., & Karimi, S. (2019). The influence of environmental factors on digital entrepreneurial intentions among computer science students (case study: public universities in Hamedan province). Higher Education Letter, 12(46), 147-175. (In Persian).
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: a purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research, Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 171-179. (In Persian)
Qaderzadeh, O., & Faraji, S. (2014). An analysis of experience of dual-job teachers; a qualitative study of reasons and consequences. Strategy for Culture, 7(26), 119-146. (In Persian)
Raffiee, J., & Feng, J. (2014). Should I quit my day job?: a hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 936–963. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0522
Rahimi, H. & Aghababaei, R. (2023). The analysis of self leadership strategies and its relationship with faculty members' entrepreneurship in University of Kashan. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 19(4), 161-177. (In Persian)
Salamzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Daraei, M. R. (2011). Toward a systematic framework for an entrepreneurial university: a study in Iranian context with an IPOO model. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 3(1), 30- 37.
Sansone, G., Battaglia, D., Landoni, P., & Paolucci, E. (2021). Academic spinoffs: the role of entrepreneurship education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(1), 369-399.
Schulz, M., Urbig, D., & Procher, V. (2016). Hybrid entrepreneurship and public policy: the case of firm entry deregulation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.01.002
Shariat nejad, A., & Asgari zahabi, S. (2022). The survey of the impact of hybrid entrepreneurship on career success; Explain the mediating role of diverse career path orientation (Case study: Businesses located in industrial states of Lorestan province). Industrial Management Studies, 20(65), 185-216. doi: 10.22054/jims.2022.65543.2747 (In Persian)
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72 https://doi.org./10.1111/etap.12167
Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. (2012). Entrepreneurial ecosystem: case study on the influence of environmental factors on entrepreneurial success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), 95-102.
Tejero, A., Pau, I. & León, G. (2019). Analysis of the dynamism in university  driven innovation ecosystems through the assessment of entrepreneurship role. IEEE Access, 7, 89869-89885.
Volchek, D., Saarenketo, S., & Jantunen, A. (2015). Structural Model of Institutional Environment Influence on International Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. In: Institutional Impacts on Firm Internationalization (190-216), London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of  Small Business Management, 49 (1), 107–125.
Yusof, M., Siddiq, M. S., & Nor, L. M. (2009). An integrated model of a university’s entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Asia entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 5(1), 57.
پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی
دوره 18، شماره 67 - شماره پیاپی 67
(علمی - پژوهشی)
فروردین 1404
صفحه 119-150

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار