مروری بر پژوهش‌های حوزه پایداری شرکتی: تحلیل کتاب‌شناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت استراتژیک، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پایداری شرکتی، یکی از مهم‌ترین ارکان توسعه اقتصادی و اجتماعی کشورهاست و موضوعی در حال رشد میان پژوهشگران است. بررسی تولیدات علمی و پژوهش‌های صورت گرفته در زمینة پایداری شرکتی می‌تواند نقشه راهی جهت پژوهش‌های آینده فراهم کند. در این پژوهش سعی بر آن می‌باشد تا با بهره‌گیری از رویکردهای کتاب‌شناختی حوزه‌های کلان این موضوع در میان مقالات علمی بررسی گردد؛ لذا هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل کتاب‌شناختی تولیدات علمی منتشر شده در این حوزه است. پژوهش از نظر هدف بنیادی و از نظر ماهیت توصیفی - تحلیلی است. جامعه پژوهش شامل کلیه تولیدات علمی در حوزه پایداری شرکتی می‌باشد که در پایگاه علمی وب آف ساینس نمایه شده و نمونه پژوهش نیز  2246 اثر علمی است که از سال 2001 تا سال 2022 در این پایگاه وجود دارد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل و خوشه‌بندی مقالات با استفاده از کلیدواژه‌های موجود از طریق نرم‌افزار VOSviewer صورت گرفت. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که روند کلی انتشار مقالات صعودی است و به‌طورکلی 8 خوشه اصلی در حوزه مقالات پایداری شرکتی وجود دارد که شامل پایداری شرکتی و کارآفرینی، استراتژی‌های پایداری شرکتی، شاخص‌های اندازه‌گیری پایداری شرکتی، پایداری شرکتی و مدیریت تحول کسب‌وکار، اهداف و گزارش‌های پایداری شرکتی، پایداری شرکتی و تأثیر آن بر عملکرد مالی، اخلاق و مسئولیت اجتماعی و تئوری‌ها و نظریه‌های پایداری شرکتی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Corporate Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Mohammad Colabi 1
  • Fatemeh Sharaei 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economic, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D student of Strategic Management, Faculty of Management and Economic, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
This article reviews the literature on articles in corporate sustainability. By reviewing the authors, citation structure, publications, and nations, this study reviews the progress of this field and summarizes the research process. This bibliographic analysis examines the literature on corporate sustainability and shows the structure of articles and research trends. The information gathered is extracted from the primary collection of the Web of Science database from 2001 up to 2022. The number of articles obtained is 2246 articles. VOSviwer software is used to perform initial analysis and citation analysis, co-citations, bibliographic coupling, co-authoring, among others. Generally, there are eight main clusters of articles on corporate sustainability: (1) corporate and entrepreneurial sustainability; (2) corporate sustainability strategies; (3) corporate sustainability measurement indicators, (4) corporate sustainability and business transformation management; (5) corporate sustainability and sustainable development goals and reports; (6) corporate sustainability and its effect on financial efficiency; (7) ethics and social responsibility and (8) theories of corporate sustainability. The research contribution is to show the evolution of this issue so that researchers can use it in their theoretical and research frameworks.
Introduction
Today, the concept of corporate sustainability has become an important and debatable topic in many industries and businesses because of increasing awareness of its benefits and positive effects on the survival of companies. To survive in a turbulent environment and a competitive market, corporate executives must not only focus on economic aspects, but also on the sustainable performance of companies (Colabi, Sharaei and Alipour, 2022:119). Because companies are the foundation of an advanced economic life and turn land resources into wealth, there is a need to review their activities with respect to the health of the land, society and individuals. Corporate sustainability refers to meeting the direct and indirect needs of a company and its stakeholders without compromising the ability to meet the future needs of stakeholders. corporate sustainability is defined as the company's voluntary activities that reflect social and environmental concerns in the business. Corporate sustainability is considered an integrated and systematic approach that leads to the optimal use of social, economic, and natural capital; Corporate sustainability also leads to value creation for the company and society, balance of financial and non-financial resources, and accountability for the company's activities through the creation of social responsibility (Ioannou and Serafeim, 2019:3). As companies influence society, the importance of corporate sustainability for businesses, consumers, and researchers is increasing. Companies are now fully aware of the competitive advantage of corporate sustainability. Thus, they focus on the role of corporate sustainability and value creation not only in making a profit, but also in all aspects of ethics and society and the environment and stakeholder issues (Galvao et al, 2019:291). Bibliometric analysis is a suitable method for reviewing scientific works and assessing the performance of authors, publications, and countries in a particular subject, which also shows how their cooperation networks work. In addition, bibliometric analysis can reveal the directions and controversial issues in a research field and make it possible to identify existing gaps in the study area (Yang et al, 2019:15). The diversity and variety of topics in a field can indicate the diversity of subjects and the multidisciplinary nature of that field of research, a diverse field encompassing a variety of subjects. As mentioned in recent decades, the concept of corporate sustainability and sustainability strategies has grown significantly and investors have recently become more aware of corporate sustainability. This research has been done with the aim of analyzing the bibliography of corporate sustainability and reviewing the authors, countries and developments in this field. Authors' co-citation analysis was also performed using maps. An analysis of the progress of corporate sustainability studies is also provided.
Methodology
Bibliometric analysis has been introduced as a scientific method for understanding the temporal evolution of a research field. Bibliometric analysis is performed because of its ability to create an intellectual structure without mental bias (Xue and Wang, 2018:479). Bibliometric technique is an interdisciplinary method that enables effective mapping of the studied subjects during the development of a research field (Khanra and Dhir, 2020:739). The present study conducts a bibliometric analysis of the studies that incorporate sustainability and is descriptive-analytic research. The study population consists of all the scientific productions incorporating sustainability scope indexed in the Web of Science database to be able to perform the bibliometric analysis; the primary database of the Web of Science (WoS) database was consulted. The following search equation was used: topic: ("corporate sustainability") or topic: ("business sustainability") or topic: ("Sustainable company") or topic: ("sustainable start-up"). The search was refined, and the most helpful article or review file types were considered. The timeframe was from 2001 to 2022. The SSCI index was used. Based on this experience, with the aid of search refine with the above equation, 2246 documents have been determined.
Discussion and Results
According to the conceptual map, eight clusters related to corporate sustainability were identified: (1) corporate and entrepreneurial sustainability; (2) corporate sustainabil-ity strategies, (3) corporate sustainability measurement indicators, (4) corporate sustainability and business transformation management, (5) corporate sustainability and sus-tainable development goals and reports; (6) corporate sustainability and its effect on financial efficiency; (7) ethics and social responsibility  and (8) theories of corporate sustainability. The results of the research and cluster analysis show that one of the most important as-pects of corporate sustainability is its relationship to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is considered a strategy for the development of countries, creating social welfare and rec-ognizing suitable opportunities to increase production.
Conclusion
In general, studies in the field of corporate sustainability have focused on entrepreneurial and innovative activities, changing the business model and creating a sustainable business model, sustainable supply chain management, corporate sustainability strategies, corporate sustainability metrics and ethics and social responsibility. Since entrepreneurial activities and how to change the business model are very important in creating corporate sustainability, future research should develop models to facilitate the innovation mechanism in the business model to create corporate sustainability. Researchers can also change their corporate processes to achieve development goals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • corporate sustainability
  • business sustainability
  • bibliometric analysis
  • bibliographic coupling
  • citation
منابع فارسی
سبزیانی، فریدون؛ غلامی چنارستان علیا، عبدالخالق؛ تمیمی، محمد. (1403). ارائه الگوی توسعه پایداری شرکتی بر مبنای اخلاق حرفه‌ای مدیران و کارکنان بانک صادرات ایران. حکمرانی و توسعه، 4(1)، 93-114.
کلابی، امیرمحمد. (1399). مدلسازی عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری مدل‌های کسب‌وکار. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 13(47)، 111-134.
کلابی، امیرمحمد؛ شراعی، فاطمه. (1402). ارائه مدل اکوسیستم نوسازی استراتژیک با تأکید بر پایداری شرکتی، مدیریت بازرگانی، 15(2)، 248-272.
 
References
Antolín, R., Delgado, J., & Montiel, I. (2016). Deconstructing corporate sustainability: a comparison of different stakeholder metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136(3), 5-17.
Ashrafi, M., Adams, M., Walker, T. R., & Magnan, G. (2018). How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationships, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(8), 672-682.
Assefa, G., & Frostell, B. (2007). Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies. Technology in society29(1), 63-78.
Benn, S., Edwards, M., & Williams, T. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge.
Broccardo, L., Truant, E., & Zicari, A. (2019). Internal corporate sustainability drivers: What evidence from family firms? A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 1-18.‏
Colabi, A. M. (2020). Modeling Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Business model. Public Management Researches13(47), 111-134. (in persian)
Colabi, A. M., & Sharaei, F. (2023). Proposing a Model of a Strategic Renewal Ecosystem with an Emphasis on Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Management15(2), 248-272. (in persian)
Colabi, A. M., Sharaei, F., & Alipour, S. (2022). The relationship between Gamification and Sustainability of small and medium enterprise: Explaining the role of digital transformation in open innovation and value co-creation. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14(4), 118-137.
Dalal-Clayton, B. (2014). Sustainability appraisal: A sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. Routledge.
Di Martino, G., Miglietta, F. (2022). The Impact of ESG Score on the Value Relevance of Fair Value Hierarchy: Evidence from European Banks. Journal of business ethics, 14(2), 1-23.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business strategy and the environment11(2), 130-141.
Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment29(2), 156-174.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science60(11), 2835-2857.
Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate governance: an international review14(6), 522-529.
Engert, S., Rauter, R., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: a literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 112(3), 2833-2850.
Galvão, A., Mendes, L., Marques, C., & Mascarenhas, C. (2019). Factors influencing students’ corporate social responsibility orientation in higher education. Journal of cleaner production, 215(3), 290-304.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics148(2), 235-248.
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate Sustainability: A Strategy?, Harvard Business School Accounting & Management. 19(3), 1-57.
Khanra, S., Dhir, A. (2020). Big data analytics and enterprises: a bibliometric synthesis of the literature. Enterprise Information Systems, 14(6), 737-768.
Kitsios, F., Kamariotou, M., & Talias, M. A. (2020). Corporate Sustainability Strategies and Decision Support Methods: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability12(2), 521-534.
Landrum, N. E., & Ohsowski, B. (2018). Identifying worldviews on corporate sustainability: A content analysis of corporate sustainability reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 128-151.
Liu, S. (2017). Sustainable livelihood development: A case study measuring social capital and its role in sustainable livelihood development in Zoucheng, China, Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato.
Martinuzzi, A., & Schönherr, N. (2019). Introduction: The Sustainable Development Goals and the Future of Corporate Sustainability. In Business and the Sustainable Development Goals. Palgrave Pivot, Cham.
Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management32(1), 108-131.
Pellizzoni, E., Trabucchi, D., & Landoni, P. (2020). Co-design of Sustainability Models: The Process. In Universities as Drivers of Social Innovation. Springer, Cham.
Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business strategy and the environment15(5), 296-308.
Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2015). The association between sustainability governance characteristics and the assurance of corporate sustainability reports. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory34(1), 163-198.
Russo, M. V. (2003). The emergence of sustainable industries: building on natural capital. Strategic Management Journal24(4), 317-331.
Sabziani, F., Gholami Chenarestan Olia, A., & Tamimi, M. (2024). Presenting a Corporate Sustainability Development Model Based on the Professional Ethics of Managers and Employees of Bank Saderat Iran. Governance and Development Journal, 4(1), 93-114. (in persian)
Salzmann, A. J. (2013). The integration of sustainability into the theory and practice of finance: an overview of the state of the art and outline of future developments. Journal of business economics83(6), 555-576.
Searcy, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. Journal of business ethics, 107(3), 239-253.‏
Sharma, G., & Gupta, S. (2020). Modelling the impact of corporate sustainability on economic performance with reference to Indian financial industry. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development16(3), 317-328.
Sharma, S. (2002). Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Swarnapali, R. M. N. C. (2017). Corporate sustainability: A Literature review. Journal for Accounting Researchers and Educators (JARE), 1(1), 1-16.‏
Székely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal23(6), 628-647.
Townsend, A. K. (2017). Business ecology: the future of green business?. In New Horizons in Research on Sustainable Organisations, 12(1), 187-213.
Van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business ethics44(2-3), 107-119.
Van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety science, 108(2), 248-258.
Xue, X., Wang, L. (2018). Exploring the science of resilience: critical review and bibliometric analysis. Natural Hazards90, 477-510.
Yang, Y., Reniers, G., Chen, G., & Goerlandt, F. (2019). A bibliometric review of laboratory safety in universities. Safety Science, 120(3), 14-24.
Yilmaz, A. K., & Flouris, T. (2010). Managing corporate sustainability: Risk management process-based perspective. African journal of business management4(2), 162-171.