طراحی مدل حسابرسی هوشمند در دیوان محاسبات کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 استاد، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهراء،‌ تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

افزایش فزاینده اطلاعات و پیچیده‌تر شدن سازمان‌ها و ابعاد مسائل سازمانی از سویی و محدودیت‌های جدی نیروی انسانی و منابع مالی با وجود ماموریت و نقش نظارتی بی­بدیل در نظر گرفته شده برای دیوان محاسبات کشور از سوی دیگر، اتخاذ رویکردهای نوین در نظارت از جمله هوشمندسازی بخش مهمی از فرآیندها و استفاده از ظرفیت‌های فناوری اطلاعات را برای چنین سازمان‌هایی به ضرورتی انکارناپذیر تبدیل کرده است. بر این اساس شناسایی عناصر حسابرسی هوشمند برای دیوان محاسبات کشور و مدل‌سازی نگاشت شناختی این عناصر، به عنوان هدف اساسی این پژوهش در نظر گرفته شد. اما مسئله اول و بسیار اساسی برای چنین تحولی، نامشخص بودن مفهوم، ابعاد و اجزای آن بود. بدین منظور در این پژوهش با استفاده از رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری-تفسیری به عنوان روش اصلی پژوهش و بهره‌گیری از روش‌شناسی سیستم‌های نرم به عنوان روش فرعی و تکمیلی، پس از تبیین مفهوم حسابرسی هوشمند، اجزاء و عناصر هوشمندسازی حسابرسی در سطح دیوان محاسبات کشور و مدل نگاشت شناختی آن طراحی گردید. در نهایت پس از سطح‌بندی عناصر، چهارده عنصر شناسایی شده در سه دسته کلی «پیشران‌ها و الزامات»، «عناصر طراحی و اجرا» و «خروجی‌ها» دسته‌بندی شدند و روابط بین آن‌ها تحلیل گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing the Model of Intelligent Audit in the Supreme Audit Court of Iran with an Interpretive-Structural Modeling Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Motallebi Korbekandi 1
  • Adel Azar 2
  • Amene Khadivar 3
  • Abbas Moghbel Baarz 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Management and Economics Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Management and Economics Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Management and Economics Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The increasing growth in information and the complexity of organizations and the dimensions of organizational issues on the one hand and the serious limitations of human resources and financial resources despite the unique mission and supervisory roles considered for the Supreme Audit Court of Iran, on the other hand, the adoption of new approaches in supervision including the intelligentization of the remarkable portion of processes and the use of information technology capacities have made it an undeniable necessity for such organizations. Based on this, in recent years, the discussion of intelligentization is raised as a basic necessity in many organizations. But the first and very basic issue for such a development is the uncertainty of its concept, dimensions, and components, which have been neglected to a large extent. For this purpose, in this research, using the Interpretive-Structural modeling approach as the main research method and using the soft systems methodology as a secondary and supplementary method, after explaining the concept of intelligent audit, the components and elements of intelligent audit at the level of the Supreme Audit Court and the model of Its cognitive mapping was designed. Finally, after leveling the elements, the fourteen identified elements were categorized into three general categories: "drivers and requirements", "design and implementation elements" and "outputs" and the relationships between them were analyzed.
 
 
Introduction
With the ever-increasing changes and the formation of new needs, revising processes, including regulatory processes, is an undeniable necessity, and using new tools and methods is of fundamental importance for regulatory organizations, including the Supreme Audit Court. Because, on the one hand, the increasing growth of information and the complexity of organizations and the dimensions of organizational issues, and on the other hand, the serious limitations of human resources and financial resources, despite the unique mission and supervisory role considered for the National Audit Office in the laws and regulations, the importance of updating the processes of this supreme supervisory body and the use of new supervisory tools have doubled.
Case study
In this research, the Supreme Audit Court of Iran has been selected as the subject of study due to its position and basic duties. According to the laws and regulations, the Supreme Audit Court, as a supreme supervisory body, has the duty of monitoring, reviewing and controlling the resources and expenses of the entire country's budget, the properties and assets of the executive bodies, and in general the protection of funds, properties and assets subject to public ownership.
Materials and Methods
In order to identify the elements of intelligent auditing, along with semi-structured interviews, Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) was used. For this purpose, more than 40 hours of interviews were conducted with 29 experts. After implementing Soft Systems Methodology, intelligent audit elements were extracted, modified, and finalized with the help of experts in a round-trip process. In the next step, to model and prepare the cognitive mapping of elements, an Interpretive-Structural Modeling (ISM) questionnaire was designed and distributed among experts, and finally, the outputs were summarized and analyzed based on 15 completed questionnaires.
Discussion and Results
The identified elements of intelligent auditing in the Supreme Audit Court are: 1. Integration of information and financial systems of executive bodies 2. Online or timely access to data of executive bodies and information systems 3. Validation of systems of executive bodies 4. Design and use of artificial intelligence tools 5. Training and recruitment of required specialists 6. Redesigning the structure and processes of the court based on the requirements of intelligence 7. Timely warning of violations, crimes and malfeasance 8. Automated processes as much as possible 9. Change management 10. Designing and using data analysis tools 11. Knowledge Management (accumulation, classification and presentation) 12. Systematic management of audit processes 13. Country governance monitoring dashboard 14. Systematic identification of control weaknesses of executive bodies. The cognitive mapping of these elements was determined during the structural-interpretive modeling steps, and finally, these elements were categorized into three general categories: "drivers and requirements", "design and implementation elements" and "outputs", and the relationships between them were analyzed. Also, the graph of influence and dependence of elements was drawn.
Conclusion
"Education and recruitment of required specialists" and "redesigning the structure and processes of the Court based on the requirements of intelligence" are considered the most basic matters and perhaps it can be said that the starting points of audit intelligence in the Supreme Audit Court. Also, "change management" plays an essential role in the process of intelligence and will somehow facilitate this process. In general, without the implementation of drivers and requirements, the success of intelligent audit in the Supreme Audit Court of Iran seems unlikely.
The design and implementation elements of the intelligent audit are all placed on the same level, and the mutual communication of these elements with each other indicates the necessity of their joint implementation to form an intelligent audit. The mentioned elements form the main part of the intelligent audit in the Supreme Audit Court and their collection forms the expected outputs of the intelligent audit.
Also, the four elements of the first to fourth levels show the outputs of intelligent auditing. With the correct execution of the previous items, these outputs are expected to be achieved.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intelligent audit
  • continuous monitoring
  • Interpretive-Structural modeling
  • artificial intelligence

منابع فارسی

آذر، عادل؛ خسروانی، فرزانه؛ جلالی، رضا (1395)، تحقیق در عملیات نرم: رویکردهای ساختاردهی مسئله، تهران: سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
الفت، لعیا؛ بامداد صوفی، جهانیار؛ امیری، مقصود؛ براتی، مسعود (1392)، "مدل تعاملی روابط زنجیره تامین در شرکت­های کوچک و متوسط صنعت قطعه‌سازی خودرو" کاوشهای مدیریت بازرگانی،10: 70-47.
رازینی، روح‌اله؛ آذر، عادل؛ محمدی، مهدی (1392)، "ارائه مدل سنجش عملکرد سازمان‌های چابک: رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری-تفسیری" چشم‌انداز مدیریت صنعتی، 12: 109-87.
روزبهانی، ناصر؛ اسدی، مرتضی (1397)، آشنایی با دیوان محاسبات کشور، تهران: مرکز آموزش و برنامه‌ریزی دیوان محاسبات کشور.
قانون دیوان محاسبات کشور، مجلس شورای اسلامی، مصوب 11/11/1361
گنتز، استفن د. (1400)، مبانی حسابرسی فناوری اطلاعات، ترجمه ملیحه قدرتی  مرکز آموزش و برنامه‌ریزی دیوان محاسبات کشور، تهران.
ویلیامز، باب؛ هاملبرونر، ریچارد (1395)، روش‌های کاربردی در تفکر سیستمی، ترجمه عادل آذر و سعید جهانیان، تهران: صفار.

References

American Accounting Association, Committee on Basic Auditing Concepts (1973). A Statement of Basic Auditing Concepts, Sarasota, Fla.
Azar, A., F. Khosravani and R. Jalali (2016). Soft operational research: Problem structuring approaches. Tehran: Industrial Management Organization. (In Persian)
Baldwin, A. A., C. Brown and Brad S. Trinkle. (2006) “Opportunities for artificial intelligence development in the accounting domain: the case for auditing.” Intelligent Systems Accounting Finance and Management. 14: 77-86.
Bellman, R. E. (1978) An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence: Can Computers Think?, San Francisco: Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company.
Bizarro, Pascal A., Emily Crum and Jake Nix. (2019) “The Intelligent Audit” ISACA Journal, 6: 23-29.
Charniak, E., and D. McDermott. (1985) Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley.
Checkland, P. (1999) “Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty-Year Retrospective Systems.” Research and Behavioral Science, 17: S11-S58.
Gentz, S. (2020). The Basics of IT Audit. Translated by Malihe Ghodrati. Tehran:Training and planning center of Supreme Audit Court. (In Persian)
Gray, Glen L. and R. Debreceny. (2014) “A taxonomy to guide research on the application of data mining to fraud detection in financial statement audits.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 15: 357-380.
Haugeland, J. (1985) Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. MIT Press.
Huang, Feiqi and M. Vasarhelyi. (2019) “Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: A framework.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 35.
Issa, Hussein, Ting Sun and M. Vasarhelyi. (2016) “Research Ideas for Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: The Formalization of Audit and Workforce Supplementation.” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. 13: 1-20.
Kirkos, Efstathios, Charalambos Spathis and Y. Manolopoulos. (2007) “Data Mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements.” Expert systems with applications. 32: 995-1003.
Kokina, Julia and T. Davenport. (2017) “The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence: How Automation is Changing Auditing.” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. 14: 115-122.
Kurzweil, R. (1990) The Age of Intelligent Machines. MIT Press.
Law of the Supreme Audit Court, Islamic Consultative Assembly.(In Persian)
Moffitt, K., Rozario, A.M., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2018) “Robotic Process Automation for Auditing” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15, 1-10.
Nilsson, N. J. (1998) Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann.
Olfat, L., J. Bamdad, M. Amiri & M. Barati (2013) “An Interaction Model for Supply Chain Relationships in small and medium-sized enterprises.” Journal of business administration researches, 10: 47-70. (In Persian)
Omoteso, K. (2012) “The application of artificial intelligence in auditing: Looking back to the future.” Expert Systems with Applications. 39: 8490-8495.
Phua, C., V. C. Lee, K. Smith-Miles and R. Gayler (2007). “A Comprehensive Survey of Data Mining-based Fraud Detection Research.” ArXiv abs/1009.6119.
Poole, D., A. K. Mackworth, and R. Goebel (1998). Computational intelligence: A logical approach. Oxford University Press.
Razini, R., A. Azar & M. Mohammadi (2013) “Presentation an Agile Organization Performance Measurement Model: an Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach” Journal of industrial management perspective, 12: 87-109. (In Persian)
Rich, E., and K. Knight. )1991(. Artificial Intelligence.
Roozbehani, Nasser and Morteza Asadi (2018). Familiarity with Supreme Audit Court. Tehran: Training and planning center of Supreme Audit Court. (In Persian)
Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Third Ed. New Jersey: Pearson
Sah, Neelesh Kumar (2016). "Leveraging technology for enhancing Public Audit" Asian journal of government audit, 10-18.
Sharma, Anuj and P. Panigrahi (2013). “A Review of Financial Accounting Fraud Detection based on Data Mining Techniques.” ArXiv abs/1309.3944.
Tajinoa, A., Robert, Jamesb, and Kyoichi Kijima (2005). “Beyond needs analysis: Soft systems methodology for meaningful collaboration in EAP course design” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27-42.
Thiprungsri, Sutapat and M. Vasarhelyi (2011). “Cluster Analysis for Anomaly Detection in Accounting Data: An Audit Approach 1.” The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research. 11: 69-84.
Vasarhelyi, Miklos A. (2020). “Smart Audit: the digital transformation of audit” ECA Journal, 1: 27-32.
Williams, B. and R. Hummelbrunner (2016). Systems Concepts in action: apractitioner’s toolkit. Translated by Adel Azar and Saeed Jahanian. Tehran: Saffar.(In Persian)
Winston, P. H. (1992). Artificial Intelligence. Third Ed. Addison-Wesley.