Developing a Conceptual Model for the Drivers of inter-Organizational Collaboration Using the Meta-Synthesis Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Finance, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Financial Engineering, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 PhD. Candidate, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
In today’s world, interorganizational collaboration—especially in addressing public issues—is essential. However, due to its inherent complexities and challenges, some organizations are hesitant to engage in such collaborations. Identifying the drivers that encourage organizations to collaborate and facilitate effective partnerships is thus crucial for designing and establishing successful collaborations. This study aims to identify the drivers of interorganizational collaboration within the existing literature and to develop a conceptual model based on these drivers. Interorganizational collaboration drivers are often presented in a scattered and disorganized manner within the literature. Therefore, this study attempts to compile, categorize, and create a conceptual model of these drivers using the meta-synthesis method. Following the steps of meta-synthesis, an initial search yielded 268 articles related to interorganizational collaboration from various sources. Based on input criteria, this number was narrowed down through two stages to 83 articles and subsequently 32 articles, which were then subjected to meta-synthesis. After initial coding and secondary categorization of the articles using MAXQDA software, 44 drivers were identified across three main categories: environment, issue, and participants. These were organized into a three-tiered hierarchical framework. Additionally, overlapping drivers among the categories were identified to further clarify the topic. The identification of interorganizational collaboration drivers from numerous fragmented sources and their categorization into three levels, as well as the description of overlap among main categories, constitute the innovation of this study and provide a necessary foundation for future research in this area.
Introduction
The new world is characterized by complexity, dynamism, uncertainty, and ambiguity. Actors excel in implementing standard policies but struggle with unconventional challenges, especially "wicked problems." Participation and collaboration are key to addressing these issues. Inter-organizational collaboration is a response to the failure of various sectors in solving public problems. This research aims to identify the drivers of inter-organizational collaboration and present a conceptual model of these components using the meta-synthesis method and MAXQDA software.
Case study
This study draws on a corpus of scholarly literature as its empirical case. Using three predefined search strategies, a total of 268 articles published between 1978 and 2024 were initially identified in the field of inter-organizational coordination. From this pool, articles that made explicit reference to the concept of “drivers” were screened, resulting in 83 relevant studies. Subsequently, a secondary evaluation was conducted to retain only those articles that discussed coordination drivers in a sufficiently independent, detailed, and analytical manner. This process yielded 32 articles that constituted the final case set. These selected studies provided the qualitative evidence base upon which the synthesis and interpretation were conducted.
Materials and Methods
This study aims to provide a comprehensive and cohesive framework on inter-organizational coordination and its driving factors. The research employs the meta-synthesis method, which integrates findings from existing qualitative studies to offer a new interpretation of the phenomenon. Following Erwin et al.’s six-step model—posing a research question, literature search, evaluation of inputs, synthesis of results, presentation of findings, and reflection—the study investigates the motivations and drivers of inter-organizational coordination. A total of 268 relevant articles were collected, of which 180 were thoroughly reviewed and 83 advanced to the second stage of qualitative synthesis. Using open coding in MAXQDA, 32 articles were coded into 44 code categories, and the resulting findings are presented in the subsequent section.
 
 
Discussion and Results
In today’s complex and dynamic environment, inter-organizational collaboration is essential for addressing public issues and designing effective policies. The findings of this study identify forty-four drivers of collaboration, organized into environment, problem, and partner/organization factors. Environmental drivers, such as complexity, technological change, legal and institutional pressures, previous failures, and social or political support, create external incentives and often act as a form of “soft compulsion” for organizations to engage.
Partner and organizational characteristics, including access to resources, risk reduction, performance improvement, legitimacy, alignment of goals, prior networks, and organizational capacity, create perceived value and encourage participation. At the same time, resource dependence, policy limitations, and misaligned expectations can hinder engagement. The nature of the problem, particularly issues with high complexity, wide geographic or demographic scope, or cross-sectoral dimensions, also imposes structural necessity for collaboration.
A key insight is the interdependence of these drivers: environmental, organizational, partner, and problem-related factors operate as a network rather than in isolation. For example, problem complexity can amplify stakeholder pressure, reveal capacity gaps, and increase expectations for social outcomes. This highlights the importance of managing collaboration drivers as an integrated system.
By synthesizing dispersed findings into a coherent framework, this study provides a foundation for future research to examine relationships among drivers and develop process-oriented models. Practically, it emphasizes the need for systematic assessment of drivers, capacity building, trust and network development, and adaptive mechanisms to sustain effective collaboration over time.
Conclusion
In today’s complex and diverse society, effective inter-organizational collaboration is essential for addressing public issues and implementing policies. Partnerships require key drivers and preconditions, which, if absent, can hinder participation. Understanding and managing these factors enhances partnership formation, effectiveness, and stakeholder engagement.
This study, based on a meta-synthesis of over 268 articles, identifies 44 drivers across environmental, problem-related, participant, and organizational factors. The framework provides a foundation for future research to examine the interactions among these drivers, their effects on participation outcomes, and mechanisms to sustain and adapt partnerships over time, recognizing that incentives may require careful design and periodic adjustment.

Keywords


Refrences
Atkinson, M., Doherty, P., & Kinder, K. (2005). Multi-agency working: Models, challenges and key factors for success. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7-17.
Ambrose, G., & Siddiki, S. (2024). Assessing drivers of sustained engagement in collaborative governance arrangements. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(4), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae005
Ansell, Chris, & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Ansell, Chris, & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
Ansell, Christopher. (2006). Collaboration : key concepts. In Collaboration in public service delivery (pp. 20–38).
Aunger, J., Millar, R., Rafferty, A. M., Mannion, R., Greenhalgh, J., Faulks, D., & McLeod, H. S. T. (2022). How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(4), Article e0266899. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266899
Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 1581–1589.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(SUPPL. 1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432.Designing
Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2012). Designing Public Participation Processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x.Designing
Bryson, J. M., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164
Bourn, J. (2001). Joining Up to Improve Public Services. LONDON: House of Commons.
Campion, A., Gascó-Hernández, M., Jankin, S., & Esteve, M. (2020). Overcoming the challenges of collaboratively adopting artificial intelligence in the public sector. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320979953
Chen, B. (2010). Antecedents or processes? Determinants of perceived effectiveness of interorganizational collaborations for public service delivery. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.524836
Colgan, A., Kennedy, L. A., & Doherty, N. (2014). A Primer on Implemennng Whole of Government Approaches. Dublin: Centre for Effective Services.
Davies, B., & Hentschke, G. (2006). Public-private partnerships in education: Insights from the field. School Leadership and Management, 26(3), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430600736977
Davis, S. D. (2018). Why Local Governments Collaborate : Perspectives from Elected Officials and Local Government Managers on Regional Collaboration Part of the Public Administration Commons. Virginia Commonwealth University.
Duggan, C., & Corrigan, C. (2009). a Literature Review of Inter-Agency Work With a Particular Focus on Children'S Services. Work Research Co-operative Social & Economic Consultants LTD.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Erwin, e., Brotherson, m., & Summers, J. (2011). Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Eraly Childhood Intervention Research. Journal of Early Intervention, 186-200.
Flynn, J. O. (2009). The Cult of Collaboration in Public Policy. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00616.x
Gibson, R. F. (2014). Collaborative governance in rural regions: an examination of ireland and newfoundland and labrador (Issue May). Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Graddy, E. A., & Chen, B. (2006). Influences on the size and scope of networks for social service delivery. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj005
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
Ishida, S. (2022). Drivers and challenges in municipal SDGs from collaborative governance perspective. Socialis Series in Social Science, 3, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.20319/socv3.1939
Klipsch, J. M. (2011). What works in collaboration: A case study of a facilities partnership between a public school district and a nonprofit organization. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 235. http://proxy.library.vcu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/879631115?accountid=14780%0Ahttp://vcu-alma-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/VCU/vcu_services_page?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dis
Kożuch, B., Sienkiewicz, K., & Małyjurek, M. (2016). Title of the article. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 47(E), 97-115.
Leary, R. O., & Vij, N. (2012). Collaborative Public Management : Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going ? The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012445780
Lima, V. (2021). Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Development. In Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Encyclopaedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 433–453). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2016.64037
Mahlangu, P., Goudge, J., & Vearey, J. (2019). Towards a framework for multisector and multilevel collaboration: case of HIV and AIDS governance in South Africa. Global Health Action, 12(1).
     https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1617393
Mentzer, J. T., & Golicic, S. (2005). Exploring the drivers of interorganizational relationship magnitude. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(2), 47-71.
McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative Public Management : Assessing What We Know and How We Know It. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43.
Moseley, A., & James, O. (2008). Central State Steering of Local Collaboration : Assessing the Impact of Tools of Meta-governance in Homelessness Services in England. Public Organization Review, 8, 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0055-6
Nielsen, R. Ø., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2024). Drivers of collaborative governance for the green transition. Public Management Review, 26(12), 3715–3740. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2358321
Provan, K. G., & Lemaire, R. H. (2012). Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice. Public Administration Review, 638-648.
Sandelowski, M. (2008). Reading, writing and systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(1), 104-10.
Scott, T. A., & Thomas, C. W. (2017). Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox: Why and When Do Public Managers Choose Collaborative Governance Strategies? Policy Studies Journal, 191-214.
Serrano, R. (2003). What Makes Inter-Agency Coordination Work? Insights from the Literature and Two Case Studies (Issue August). https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/3745/What Makes Inter-Agency Coordination Work%3F%3A  Insights from the Literature and Two Case Studies.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Sloper, P. (2004). Facilitators and barriers for co-ordinated multi-agency services. Child Care, Health and Development, 571-580.
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review, December.
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
Trein, P., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2019). The Integration and Coordination of Public Policies: A Systematic Comparative Review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2018.1496667
Ulibarri, N., Imperial, M. T., Siddiki, S., & Henderson, H. (2023). Drivers and Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Environmental Management. Environmental Management, 495-504.
Varda, D., Shoup, J. A., & Miller, S. (2012). A Systematic Review of Collaboration and Network Research in the Public Affairs Literature : Implications for Public Health Practice.
Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G., & Zhu, D. (2018). Public–private partnership in Public Administration discipline: a literature review. Public Management Review, 20(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445
Weiss, J. A. (1987). Pathways to Cooperation among Public Agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3323353