Designing a Citizen-Centric Smart City Dashboard within the Framework of Digital Government: A Meta-Synthesis Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Faculty of Management and Economic,, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Professor of Management, Faculty of Management and Economic, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

10.22111/jmr.2025.52296.6394

Abstract

Abstract
In recent decades, the emergence of digital government and the advancement of new technologies have fundamentally transformed urban governance and citizen engagement. In this context, urban dashboards have emerged as key tools for monitoring, analysis, and smart decision-making in smart cities. The aim of this study was to design and implement a citizen-centric smart urban dashboard within the framework of digital government, capable of enhancing the quality of urban management through data integration and analysis. This applied research employed an exploratory approach and was conducted using the meta-synthesis method. The statistical population comprised scholarly articles published between 2020 and 2025 in international databases (Scopus, Emerald, Web of Science). Through a content analysis of 68 selected articles, a comprehensive categorization of the dashboard’s key components was extracted. The findings led to the identification of 26 core components grouped into eight key dimensions: smart participation and digital governance; sustainable environment and intelligent resource management; smart mobility and sustainable transportation; smart infrastructure and integrated urban services; smart health and social welfare; smart security and digital privacy; smart economy and digital tourism; and intelligent analytics and urban management decision-making. The results indicated that the proposed dashboard, leveraging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, machine learning, and cloud computing, provides an interactive platform for analysis, prediction, and decision support for both city managers and citizens. This model not only enhances transparency, improves public services, and strengthens citizen participation, but also offers a dynamic tool for performance evaluation, resource management, and strategic planning toward achieving sustainable smart cities.
Introduction
Recent decades have witnessed rapid advancements in information and communication technologies, profoundly transforming various aspects of daily life and public governance. One of the most significant outcomes of this transformation is the emergence of digital government, which leverages modern technologies to enhance public service delivery, promote transparency, and facilitate citizen engagement. In this context, smart cities have emerged as an innovative response to growing urban challenges such as climate change, environmental crises, and rapid population growth. By integrating ICT, IoT, big data, and AI, smart cities aim to optimize resource management and improve the quality of urban life. A key component of smart cities is the urban dashboard—a platform for real-time data visualization, monitoring, and informed decision-making. Despite significant progress in this area, existing dashboards often lack interoperability, data integration, and predictive capabilities. This study aims to design and implement a comprehensive smart urban dashboard that addresses these gaps by providing a unified, data-driven, and citizen-centric decision-support system. The proposed model not only integrates various urban data sources but also incorporates machine learning for future trend analysis, supporting strategic planning and sustainable urban development.
Materials and Methods
This research employed a qualitative meta-synthesis approach to identify the key components of a smart city dashboard within the framework of digital government. To address the central research question—what are the essential dimensions of a smart city dashboard in the context of digital governance?—relevant studies on smart cities, digital government, and urban dashboards were systematically reviewed. The meta-synthesis was conducted based on the seven-step model proposed by Sandelowski and Barroso (2006). Initially, a comprehensive document analysis was carried out, during which scientific papers were selected using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The literature review focused on studies published between 2020 and 2025 in databases such as Web of Science, Emerald, and Scopus, resulting in an initial pool of 1286 articles. Through a systematic screening process involving multiple stages—title review, abstract filtering, and full-text analysis—only high-quality and relevant articles were retained. Advanced keyword strategies including terms like “smart governance,” “citizen-centricity,” and “digital government” were applied to refine the search. Ultimately, the selected studies were synthesized to identify patterns and critical variables necessary for the development of an integrated smart city dashboard. This methodological framework ensures the reliability of findings and provides a solid foundation for constructing a dashboard aligned with the principles of digital governance.
Discussion and Results
With the global rise of digital government policies—particularly in countries like China and Belgium—modern technologies now play a central role in enhancing public service quality, accountability, and transparency. Governments are shifting from traditional service providers to facilitators of social, economic, and environmental development. In this context, the smart city serves as a testing ground for technological innovations aimed at broader societal goals. A key enabler of this vision is the smart city dashboard—a comprehensive, analytical tool for integrating and visualizing urban data. Such a dashboard not only interprets historical and real-time data but also forecasts trends, supports data-driven policymaking, and fosters citizen participation and transparency. Within its framework, smart participation and digital governance act as a cornerstone, promoting interaction between urban authorities and citizens via data-based platforms, transparent algorithms, and civic monitoring tools. Digital participation—through electronic voting, interactive feedback, and social sentiment analysis—advances multi-level governance, with a focus on equity and inclusive access. Simultaneously, the sustainable environment and smart resource management dimension enables real-time tracking of environmental metrics, energy use, and urban agriculture. This facilitates timely, informed decisions in response to climate dynamics and crises. Technologies such as sensor networks, renewable energy systems, and precision agriculture contribute significantly to urban resilience. In smart transportation, digital tools integrated with sustainability principles improve traffic flow, parking, and shared mobility systems—reducing emissions and boosting urban efficiency. Coordinated, intelligent infrastructures further enable rapid responses to urban demands. The smart health and social welfare component leverages telemedicine, real-time health monitoring, and crisis response tools to ensure inclusive access and build social resilience. Meanwhile, smart security and digital privacy, through encryption, identity management, and cyber protection policies, uphold a secure and trustworthy urban digital ecosystem. Finally, the smart economy and digital tourism sector, supported by augmented reality, data analytics, and business intelligence, enhances user experiences and economic activity. These tools allow for sustainable growth and evidence-based economic decision-making. By integrating these dimensions, the smart city dashboard becomes a strategic mechanism for advancing digital governance and sustainable urban development.
Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that the design and implementation of a citizen-centered smart city dashboard is an effective tool for improving urban management. By leveraging big data and advanced analytics, it strengthens the connection between citizens and city officials, enabling more intelligent decision-making. With extensive capabilities to analyze traffic, environmental, energy, and infrastructure data, this dashboard contributes to better planning and optimal resource allocation, enhancing service quality and reducing urban issues. Additionally, the system plays a significant role in increasing public participation and social oversight and can be effective in forecasting future challenges and reducing costs. Based on the findings, implementing smart systems in cities should be a priority in urban development. The study recommends that future research focus on improving system capabilities, enhancing accessibility and user experience, utilizing emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things and advanced data analytics, as well as examining the impact of dashboards on citizen engagement and addressing security challenges. These efforts will pave the way for sustainable development and better management of smart cities.

Keywords

References

منابع فارسی
ابراهیم زاده، عیسی؛ براری، معصومه؛ دهانی، ابراهیم. (۱۳۹۷). تحلیلی بر میزان تحقق‌پذیری شاخص‌‌های توسعۀ پایدار شهری در شهرهای میانی مطالعۀ موردی: شهر ایرانشهر. مجله جغرافیا و توسعه، ۱۶(۵۰)، ۲۲-۱. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.3549
تقوا، محمد رضا؛ تقوی فرد، محمدتقی؛ رئیسی وانانی، ایمان؛ یعقوبی، نورمحمد؛ کرد، حامد. (۱۴۰۲).  شناسایی پیشران‌های کیفیت خدمات دولت سیار. پژوهش های مدیریت منابع سازمانی، ۱۳ (۲)، ۷۵-۱۰۴. DOR: 10.48309/jopm.2023.234625.2191
کرد، حامد؛ تقوا، محمدرضا؛ تقوی فرد، محمدتقی؛ رئیسی وانانی، ایمان؛ یعقوبی، نورمحمد. (۱۴۰۲). مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری کیفیت خدمات دولت سیار مبتنی بر قابلیت های وب 3. پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، ۱۶(۶۱)، ۹۴-۶۵.. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2023.44629.5943
یعقوبی، منصور؛ صالحی نودز،  اسماء . (1405). طراحی الگوی استقرار حکمرانی دیجیتال در سازمان های دولتی ایران با رویکرد فراترکیب. حکمرانی و توسعه، 6(1)، 135-152.
     doi: 10.22111/jipaa.2025.52061.1051
صالحی نودز، اسما؛ یعقوبی، نورمحمد. (1402). طراحی الگوی دولت باز با استفاده از رویکرد فراترکیب. حکمرانی و توسعه، 3(3)، 65-78. doi: 10.22111/jipaa.2024.425717.1144
 
References
Aboalmaali, F. S., Daneshfard, K., & Pourezzat, A. A. (2020). Designing a Pattern of Administrative Reform with Digital Governance Approach. Public Organizations Management, 8(3), 11-32. DOI: 10.30473/IPOM.2020.50344.3932
Ali, M. A., Hoque, M. R., & Alam, K. (2018). An empirical investigation of the relationship between e-government development and the digital economy: the case of Asian countries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1176-1200.
      https:// doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0477
Arduin, P. E., Negre, E., & Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (2016, March). Knowledge and decision for smart cities initiatives: Cases of Paris and Nice. In 2016 International conference on industrial informatics and computer systems (CIICS) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICCSII.2016.7462421
Arora, A., Jain, A., Yadav, D., Hassija, V., Chamola, V., & Sikdar, B. (2023). Next generation of multi-agent driven smart city applications and research paradigms. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 4, 2104-2121.
     DOI: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2023.3310528
Anthony Jnr, B., Abbas Petersen, S., Helfert, M., Ahlers, D., & Krogstie, J. (2021). Modeling pervasive platforms and digital services for smart urban transformation using an enterprise architecture framework. Information Technology & People, 34(4), 1285-1312. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2020-0511
Batty, M. (2015). A perspective on city dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.987540
Badii, C., Bellini, P., Difino, A., & Nesi, P. (2019, August). Privacy and security aspects on a Smart City IoT Platform. In 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) (pp. 1371-1376). IEEE. DOI:10.1109/SMARTWORLD-UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00250
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable cities and society, 31, 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73981-6
Bayat, A., & Kawalek, P. (2023). Digitization and urban governance: The city as a reflection of its data infrastructure. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211033205
Birkinshaw, M., & Taraporevala, P. (2023). Social Media as E-governance. Digital Lives of Indian Municipal Bodies and Smart Cities. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, (30). https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.8855
Bibri, S. E., & Allam, Z. (2022). The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart urbanism: On post-pandemic governance through the prism of the logic of surveillance capitalism. Smart Cities, 5(2).
      https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5020037
Butot, V., Bayerl, P. S., Jacobs, G., & de Haan, F. (2020). Citizen repertoires of smart urban safety: Perspectives from Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120164.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120164
Bencke, L., Cechinel, C., & Munoz, R. (2020). Automated classification of social network messages into smart cities dimensions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 109, 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.03.057
Brown, W., King, M., & Goh, Y. M. (2023). UK smart cities present and future: An analysis of British smart cities through current and emerging technologies and practices. Emerald Open Research, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-05-2023-0003
Balletto, G., Borruso, G., & Donato, C. (2018). City dashboards and the Achilles’ heel of smart cities: putting governance in action and in space. In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2018: 18th International Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, July 2–5, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 18 (pp. 654-668). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_44
Chen, K., Li, Q., Shoaib, M., Ameer, W., & Jiang, T. (2024). Does improved digital governance in government promote natural resource management? Quasi-natural experiments based on smart city pilots. Resources Policy, 90, 104721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104721
Contreras-Figueroa, V., Montané-Jiménez, L. G., Cepero, T., Benítez-Guerrero, E., & Mezura-Godoy, C. (2021, October). Information visualization in adaptable dashboards for smart cities: A systematic review. In 2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT) (pp. 34-43). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0361768822080072
Cepero, T., Montané-Jiménez, L. G., & Maestre-Góngora, G. P. (2025). A framework for designing user-centered data visualizations in smart city technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123855
Choi, Y. J., & Kenney, L. (2024). A conceptual framework to explore considerations of the social implications in internet of things and smart city governance and policy: the case of Thailand. Policy & Internet, 16(2), 242-27.
      https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.401
Dameri, R. P., & Dameri, R. P. (2017). Urban smart dashboard. Measuring smart city performance. Smart City Implementation: Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems, 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45766-6_4
Das, P., Woods, O., & Kong, L. (2024). Human sensors in the city of super apps: mobilizing people as infrastructure for smart city development in Jakarta, Indonesia. City, 28(5-6), 812-834. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2024.2427954
Das, D., & Kwek, B. (2024). AI and data-driven urbanism: The Singapore experience. Digital Geography and Society, 7, 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100104
Das, D. K., & Chadchan, J. (2023). A proposed framework for an appropriate governance system to develop smart cities in India. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2023.2229872
de Oliveira, R. C. D. A., & Patterson, M. (2024). Performative place branding and Brazilian smart cities: the strategic character of smart city positioning. Journal of Place Management and Development, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-09-2023-0096
D’Amico, G., Arbolino, R., Shi, L., Yigitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. (2022). Digitalisation driven urban metabolism circularity: A review and analysis of circular city initiatives. Land Use Policy, 112, 105819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105819
Deng, T., Zhang, K., & Shen, Z. J. M. (2021). A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. Journal of management science and engineering, 6(2), 125-134.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.003
Esposito, G., Terlizzi, A., Guarino, M., & Crutzen, N. (2024). Interpreting digital governance at the municipal level: Evidence from smart city projects in Belgium. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231167538
Esposito, G., Clement, J., Mora, L., & Crutzen, N. (2021). One size does not fit all: Framing smart city policy narratives within regional socio-economic contexts in Brussels and Wallonia. Cities, 118, 103329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103329
Ebrahimzadeh, I., Barari, M., & Dehani, E. (2018). An analysis of the feasibility of urban sustainable development indicators in medium-sized cities: A case study of Iranshahr City. Geography and Development Journal, 16(50), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2018.3549 (In Persian)
Falk, S., Römmele, A., & Silverman, M. (2017). Digital Government. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38795-6
Furtado, L. S., da Silva, T. L. C., Ferreira, M. G. F., de Macedo, J. A. F., & Cavalcanti, J. K. D. M. L. (2023). A framework for Digital Transformation towards Smart Governance: using big data tools to target SDGs in Ceará, Brazil. Journal of Urban Management, 12(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.01.003
Gonzalez, R. A., Ferro, R. E., & Liberona, D. (2020). Government and governance in intelligent cities, smart transportation study case in Bogotá Colombia. Ain shams engineering journal, 11(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.05.002
Gabrys, J. (2014). Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and planning D: Society and space, 32(1), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1068/d16812
Große-Bley, J., & Kostka, G. (2021). Big data dreams and reality in Shenzhen: An investigation of smart city implementation in China. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 20539517211045171. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211045171
Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Alarabiat, A., & Altarawneh, N. (2023). Examining the antecedents and outcomes of smart government usage: An integrated model. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101783
He, W., Li, W., & Deng, P. (2022). Legal governance in the smart cities of China: Functions, problems, and solutions. Sustainability, 14(15), 9738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159738
Hu, Q., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Smart city initiatives: A comparative study of American and Chinese cities. Journal of urban affairs, 43(4), 504-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1694413
Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Raman, K. R. (2019). Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. International journal of information management, 47, 88-100.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004
Islam, M. A., & Sufian, M. A. (2023). Employing AI and ML for data analytics on key indicators: Enhancing smart city urban services and dashboard-driven leadership and decision-making. In Technology and Talent Strategies for Sustainable Smart Cities (pp. 275-325). Emerald Publishing Limited.
      https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-022-920231013
Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2023). The contextualization of smart city technologies: An international comparison. Journal of Urban Management, 12(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.09.001
Jing, C., Du, M., Li, S., & Liu, S. (2019). Geospatial dashboards for monitoring smart city performance. Sustainability, 11(20), 5648. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205648
Khatibi, H., Wilkinson, S., Dianat, H., Baghersad, M., Ghaedi, K., & Javanmardi, A. (2022). Indicators bank for smart and resilient cities: design of excellence. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), 5-19.
      https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2020-0122
Kitchin, R., & McArdle, G. (2017). Urban data and city dashboards: Six key issues. In Data and the City (pp. 111-126). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315407388-9
Kirimtat, A., Krejcar, O., Kertesz, A., & Tasgetiren, M. F. (2020). Future trends and current state of smart city concepts: A survey. IEEE access, 8, 86448-86467. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992441
Kashef, M., Visvizi, A., & Troisi, O. (2021). Smart city as a smart service system: Human-computer interaction and smart city surveillance systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106923
Karvonen, A., Cook, M., & Haarstad, H. (2020). Urban planning and the smart city: Projects, practices and politics. Urban Planning, 5(1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2936
Kuzior, A., Pakhnenko, O., Tiutiunyk, I., & Lyeonov, S. (2023). E-governance in smart cities: Global trends and key enablers. Smart Cities, 6(4), 1663-1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040078
Kraiwanit, T., Jangjarat, K., Sonsuphap, R., Moolngearn, P., & Charoenporn, C. (2023). Smart City Transformation: A Lesson Learnt from a Developing Economy. Charoenporn, C., Moolngearn, P., Jangjarat, K., Kraiwanit, T., & Sonsuphap, 83-93.https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv4i2art8
Khanna, P., & Khanra, S. (2023). Citizen empowerment through smart surveillance: evidence from Indian smart cities. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(4), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2022-0141
Kaluarachchi, Y. (2022). Implementing data-driven smart city applications for future cities. Smart Cities, 5(2), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5020025
Kim, C., & Kim, K. A. (2021). The institutional change from E-Government toward Smarter City; comparative analysis between royal borough of Greenwich, UK, and Seongdong-gu, South Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010042
Kord, H., Taghva, M. R., Taghavi Fard, M. T., Raeisi Vanani, I., & Yaghoobi, N. M. (2023). Structural–interpretive modeling of mobile government service quality based on Web 3 capabilities. Journal of Public Management Research, 16(61), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2023.44629.5943 (In Persian)
Liu, Z., Jiang, C., Jin, H., & Zhang, W. (2025). Digital innovation diffusion of local government under public crisis: An event history analysis based on the City brain. Cities, 160, 105811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105811
Lock, O., Bednarz, T., Leao, S. Z., & Pettit, C. (2020). A review and reframing of participatory urban dashboards. City, Culture and Society, 20, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100294
Lytras, M. D., & Visvizi, A. (2021). Information management as a dual-purpose process in the smart city: Collecting, managing and utilizing information. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102224.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102224
Li, L., Lin, X., Yang, X., Luo, Z., & Wang, M. (2024). Digital Governance and Urban Government Service Spaces: Understanding Resident Interaction and Perception in Chinese Cities. Land, 13(9), 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091403
Lim, J., & Hwang, J. (2024). Exploring diverse interests of collaborators in smart cities: A topic analysis using LDA and BERT. Heliyon, 10(9).
       DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30367
Liu, J., Liu, X., & Yang, J. (2024). TOE Configuration Analysis of Smart City Construction in China Under the Concept of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(23), 10708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310708
Löfgren, K., & Webster, C. W. R. (2020). The value of Big Data in government: The case of ‘smart cities’. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720912775. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720912775
Lekkas, C. K., & Souitaris, V. (2023). Bureaucracy meets digital reality: The unfolding of urban platforms in European municipal governments. Organization Studies, 44(10), 1649-1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221130857
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550
Marsal-Llacuna, M. L. (2020). The people's smart city dashboard (PSCD): Delivering on community-led governance with blockchain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120150
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Maheshwari, D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101284. 10.1108_dprg-11-2022-0141_e9ph_2.pdf
Mosannenzadeh, F., Bisello, A., Vaccaro, R., D'Alonzo, V., Hunter, G. W., & Vettorato, D. (2017). Smart energy city development: A story told by urban planners. Cities, 64, 54-65.10.1108_dprg-11-2021-0151_svah.pdf
Margetts, H., & Dorobantu, C. (2019). Rethink government with AI. Nature, 568(7751), 163-165. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01099-5
Manfreda, A., & Mijač, T. (2024). Highlighting gaps in technology acceptance research: A call for integrating happiness and well-being into smart city development. Journal of innovation & knowledge, 9(4), 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100585
Ma, Z., & Wu, F. (2022). Smart city, digitalization and CO2 emissions: evidence from 353 cities in China. Sustainability, 15(1), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010225
Mora, L., Gerli, P., Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2023). Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda. Technovation, 123, 102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717
Mantovani Ribeiro, D. M. N., Hourneaux Junior, F., Lara Cunha, C. L., Kaetsu, P. T., Dionizio-Leite, P. F., & Machado Junior, C. (2021). Digital sustainability: How information and communication technologies (ICTs) support sustainable development goals (SDGs) assessment in municipalities. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(3), 229-247. DOI: 10.1108/DPRG-11-2020-0159
Mortaheb, R., & Jankowski, P. (2023). Smart city re-imagined: City planning and GeoAI in the age of big data. Journal of Urban Management, 12(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.001
Nederhand, J., Avelino, F., Awad, I., De Jong, P., Duijn, M., Edelenbos, J. & Van Stapele, N. (2023). Reclaiming the city from an urban vitalism perspective: critically reflecting smart, inclusive, resilient and sustainable just city labels. Cities, 137, 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104257
Nathansohn, R., & Lahat, L. (2022). From urban vitality to urban vitalisation: Trust, distrust, and citizenship regimes in a Smart City initiative. Cities, 131, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103969
Orchi, H., Diallo, A. B., Elbiaze, H., Sabir, E., & Sadik, M. (2025). A Contemporary Survey on Multisource Information Fusion for Smart Sustainable Cities: Emerging Trends and Persistent Challenges. Information Fusion, 114, 102667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102667
Pluto-Kossakowska, J., Fijałkowska, A., Denis, M., Jaroszewicz, J., & Krzysztofowicz, S. (2022). Dashboard as a platform for community engagement in a city development—a review of techniques, tools and methods. Sustainability, 14(17), 10809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710809
Patrão, C., Moura, P., & Almeida, A. T. D. (2020). Review of smart city assessment tools. Smart Cities, 3(4), 1117-1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3040055
Prakash, D. (2025). Why do smart city projects fail to create impact? Understanding decision-making in smart city policy implementation. Urban Governance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.02.004
Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101907
Pratama, A. B., Amber, H., Shershunovich, Y., & De Castro, A. B. R. (2023). Do smart cities perform better in governing the COVID-19 crisis? Empirical evidence from Indonesian cities. Urban Governance, 3(1), 58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ugj.2023.02.003
Penmetsa, M. K., & Bruque Camara, S. J. (2022). Building a super smart nation: scenario analysis and framework of essential stakeholders, characteristics, pillars, and challenges. Sustainability, 14(5), 2757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052757
Panori, A., Kakderi, C., Komninos, N., Fellnhofer, K., Reid, A., & Mora, L. (2021). Smart systems of innovation for smart places: Challenges in deploying digital platforms for co-creation and data-intelligence. Land use policy, 111, 104631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104631
Pašalić, I. N., Ćukušić, M., & Jadrić, M. (2021). Smart city research advances in Southeast Europe. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102127
Quek, H. Y., Sielker, F., Akroyd, J., Bhave, A. N., von Richthofen, A., Herthogs, P. & Kraft, M. (2023). The conundrum in smart city governance: Interoperability and compatibility in an ever-growing ecosystem of digital twins. Data & Policy, 5, e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.1
Rojas, E., Bastidas, V., & Cabrera, C. (2020). Cities-board: a framework to automate the development of smart cities dashboards. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(10), 10128-10136. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3002581
Raza, S. S., & Reeves, E. (2024). Starting from Scratch: The Articulated Development of a Smart City in Limerick, Ireland. Sustainability, 16(24), 11157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411157
Redondo, E., Giménez, L., Navarro, I., & Fonseca, D. (2020). “Gamification” for teaching collaborative urban design and citizen participation. In Graphical Heritage: Volume 3-Mapping, Cartography and Innovation in Education (pp. 431-441). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47987-9_36
Rahouti, M., Xiong, K., & Xin, Y. (2020). Secure software-defined networking communication systems for smart cities: Current status, challenges, and trends. IEEE Access, 9, 12083-12113. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047996
Ribeiro, P., Dias, G., & Pereira, P. (2021). Transport systems and mobility for smart cities. Applied System Innovation, 4(3), 61. DOI: 10.3390/asi4030061
Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable cities and society, 38, 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
Sobey, A. (2023). Obliged smart freedom: The Singaporean experience of advanced neoliberal-developmental governance. Urban Studies, 60(16), 3336-3352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231169206
Styrin, E., Mossberger, K., & Zhulin, A. (2022). Government as a platform: Intergovernmental participation for public services in the Russian Federation. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101627
Streitz, N. (2019). Beyond ‘smart-only’cities: redefining the ‘smart-everything’paradigm. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(2), 791-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0824-1
Sheikh, H., Foth, M., & Mitchell, P. (2023). From legislation to obligation: Re-thinking smart urban governance for multispecies justice. Urban Governance, 3(4), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.09.003
Soe, R. M., Ruohomäki, T., & Patzig, H. (2022). Urban open platform for borderless smart cities. Applied Sciences, 12(2), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020700
Sancino, A., & Hudson, L. (2020). Leadership in, of, and for smart cities–case studies from Europe, America, and Australia. Public Management Review, 22(5), 701-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1718189
Seng Wong, M., Hideki, N., & George, P. (2011). The use of importance-performance analysis (IPA) in evaluating Japan’s e-government services. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 6(2), 17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762011000200003
Salehi Noudz, A., & Yaghoubi, N. M. (2023). Designing an open government model using a meta-synthesis approach. Governance and Development, 3(3), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.22111/jipaa.2024.425717.1144(In Persian)
Tan, G. K. S. (2022). Citizens go digital: A discursive examination of digital payments in Singapore’s Smart Nation project. Urban Studies, 59(12), 2582-2598. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211039407
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
Taghva, M. R., Taghavi Fard, M. T., Raeisi Vanani, I., Yaghoobi, N. M., & Kord, H. (2023). Identification of driving forces of mobile government service quality. Organizational Resource Management Research, 13(2), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.48309/jopm.2023.234625.2191 (In Persian)
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2019). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). United Nations. https://population.un.org/wup/
Usurelu, C. C., & Pop, C. (2017). My city dashboard: Real-time data processing platform for smart cities. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology. DOI: 10.26636/jtit.2017.1.655
Ullah, F., Qayyum, S., Thaheem, M. J., Al-Turjman, F., & Sepasgozar, S. M. (2021). Risk management in sustainable smart cities governance: A TOE framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120743.
      DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120743
Vanli, T., & Akan, T. (2023). Mapping synergies and trade-offs between smart city dimensions: A network analysis. Cities, 142, 104527.
      DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104527
Wolniak, R., & Stecuła, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities—Applications, Barriers, and Future Directions: A Review. Smart Cities, 7(3), 1346-1389. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities7030057
Wolniak, R., & Stecuła, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities—Applications, Barriers, and Future Directions: A Review. Smart Cities, 7(3), 1346-1389. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities7030057
Wang, R., Xu, C. K., & Wu, X. (2024). Open Government Data (OGD) as a catalyst for smart city development: Empirical evidence from Chinese cities. Government Information Quarterly, 41(4), 101983. DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101983
Yin, Q., & Liu, G. (2020). Resource scheduling and strategic management of smart cities under the background of digital economy. Complexity, 2020(1), 6624307. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6624307
Yaghoubi, M., & Salehi Noudz, A. (2026). Designing a digital governance deployment model for Iranian public organizations using a meta-synthesis approach. Governance and Development, 6(1), 135–152.
      https://doi.org/10.22111/jipaa.2025.52061.1051(In Persian)
Zhu, Y. Q., & Kindarto, A. (2016). A garbage can model of government IT project failures in developing countries: The effects of leadership, decision structure and team competence. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 629-637.
      DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.002
Zhou, M., Liu, H., & Wang, Z. (2022). Can smart city construction promote the level of public services? Quantitative evidence from China. IEEE Access, 10, 120923-120935. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3221759
Zhang, J., Bates, J., & Abbott, P. (2022). State-steered smartmentality in Chinese smart urbanism. Urban Studies, 59(14), 2933-2950.
      https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211062888
Zhu, Y. Q., & Alamsyah, N. (2022). Citizen empowerment and satisfaction with smart city app: Findings from Jakarta. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121304

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics