Designing a Development Diplomacy Policymaking Model for the Islamic Republic of Iran with a Multidimensional Policy Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Public Administration, Specializing in Comparative and Development Administration, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran

2 Professor, Faculty of Public Administration and Organizational Sciences, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran

3 Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research University, Tehran

10.22111/jmr.2026.52473.6407

Abstract

Abstract
Development diplomacy, as one of the strategic instruments of foreign policy, plays a fundamental role in linking national development objectives with countries’ international engagement. Despite the importance of this concept, the Islamic Republic of Iran still lacks a comprehensive, indigenous, and multidimensional framework for development diplomacy policymaking. The present study aims to design an integrated model for development diplomacy policymaking in the Islamic Republic of Iran using a multidimensional policy approach. The research is developmental–applied in orientation and qualitative in methodology, and it is conducted using the systematic grounded theory approach developed by Strauss and Corbin. The research population consists of experts in diplomacy, international relations, and public policymaking. Using purposive sampling, twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding, yielding 81 concepts and 17 categories organized within the components of the paradigm model. The findings indicate that development diplomacy policymaking is the result of the interaction of causal, contextual, and intervening conditions. Through strategies such as economic diplomacy, scientific–cultural diplomacy, security diplomacy, multilateralism, and the smartization of diplomacy, these interactions lead to economic, political–security, cultural, and institutional outcomes. The main innovation of this study lies in proposing an indigenous, multi-level, and systematic model that can provide a scientific basis for enhancing the quality of policymaking and strategic decision-making in the development diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Introduction
The Islamic Republic of Iran, given its distinctive geopolitical position and multifaceted national capacities, requires a scientific and multidimensional approach to development diplomacy policymaking. The design of a comprehensive policy model in this domain necessitates the identification of key components, institutional mechanisms, and coordination frameworks among policymaking and implementing bodies. Recent domestic and international studies have addressed various dimensions of development diplomacy, such as scientific, cultural, economic, and public diplomacy. However, most of these studies have adopted a sectoral or single-dimensional perspective and have failed to provide a holistic, indigenous, and integrated policymaking framework. Accordingly, the main research problem addressed in this study is how a comprehensive and context-sensitive model for development diplomacy policymaking in Iran can be designed through a multidimensional policy approach. The study seeks to bridge the theoretical and practical gaps in the literature by proposing a systematic and integrated model tailored to Iran’s specific political, economic, cultural, and institutional conditions.
Case Study
The empirical context of this study is the Islamic Republic of Iran, examined as a case characterized by unique geopolitical constraints, international pressures, developmental needs, and rich cultural and civilizational resources. Iran’s experience with sanctions, regional security challenges, and efforts to diversify its economy and enhance non-oil exports provides a distinctive setting for analyzing development diplomacy as a strategic policy domain.
Materials and Methods
This study adopts a qualitative research design and utilizes the systematic grounded theory methodology developed by Strauss and Corbin. The research is developmental–applied in nature, aiming to produce an indigenous and operational model for policymaking in development diplomacy. The research population consisted of experts in diplomacy, international relations, and public policymaking, including diplomats, policymakers, and academic specialists. Participants were selected through purposive and judgmental sampling, and data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, which occurred after twelve semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was conducted through three main stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, using MAXQDA software. To ensure reliability, inter-coder agreement was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient, which yielded a value of 0.83, indicating a high level of coding consistency and analytical rigor.
Discussion and Results
Open coding yielded 153 initial codes, which were consolidated into 81 concepts and 17 categories. The findings reveal that development diplomacy policymaking in Iran is a multidimensional and dynamic process shaped by the interaction of causal, contextual, and intervening conditions. Causal conditions include the need to enhance Iran’s international standing, manage international pressures and sanctions, and address domestic development priorities such as economic resilience and diversification. Contextual conditions encompass Iran’s geopolitical and regional environment, domestic institutional and legal frameworks, and cultural and civilizational capacities. Intervening conditions include the level of institutional coordination, human and technological capacities, and the participation of the private sector and civil society. Based on these conditions, strategic responses are formulated in four main domains: economic and financial diplomacy; scientific, cultural, and media diplomacy; security diplomacy and multilateral engagement; and the smartization and digitalization of diplomacy. The implementation of these strategies leads to multidimensional outcomes, including economic growth and investment, enhanced national and regional security, improved international image and soft power, and strengthened institutional governance and policymaking capacity. Several concepts appear both as conditions and as outcomes, indicating the cyclical and self-reinforcing nature of the model.
Conclusion
This study proposes an indigenous, comprehensive, and multidimensional model for development diplomacy policymaking in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The model demonstrates that effective development diplomacy requires the systematic integration of causal, contextual, and intervening factors within a coherent policy framework. The main theoretical contribution of this research lies in conceptualizing development diplomacy as a multidimensional and network-based policymaking process rather than a set of isolated diplomatic activities. From a practical perspective, the proposed model provides a scientific foundation for strategic decision-making, institutional reform, and policy coordination in Iran’s foreign policy and development planning. The findings suggest that the institutionalization of development diplomacy within Iran’s policymaking architecture, investment in human and technological capacities, and the activation of cultural and civilizational resources are essential for enhancing the effectiveness of development-oriented diplomacy. Future research may employ quantitative or mixed-method approaches to empirically test the relationships among the model’s components and conduct comparative studies with other developing countries to further validate and refine the proposed framework.

Keywords


منابع فارسی
اسدی، آرمان. (1399). ارائه الگوی پارادایمی دیپلماسی توسعه میزبانی رویدادهای ورزشی بین‌المللی در مناطق آزاد تجاری: با تأکید بر منطقه آزاد کیش. پژوهش‌های کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی، ۹(۲)، ۱۱۵–۱۲۶. doi: 10.30473/arsm.2021.45083.2897
اکبرزاده، امین؛ پهلوانی، مصیب و میرجلیلی، سید حسین. (1397). مدیریت توسعه و رشد اقتصادی در ایران؛ تحلیلی بر تنگناهای رشد با رویکرد داده‌بنیاد. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، ۱۱(۴۲)، ۲۴۷–۲۷۰. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2019.4524
امیدی، علی و مرادی‌فر، سعیده. (1400). روایت راهبردی دیپلماسی دیجیتال آمریکا علیه چین در پاندمی کرونا. سیاست، ۵۱(۲)، ۳۳۵–۳۶۲. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2021.83350
بخشی چناری، امین‌رضا؛ گودرزی، محمود؛ سجادی، سید نصرالله و جلالی فراهانی، مجید. (1400). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه دیپلماسی ورزشی در سیاست خارجی. مدیریت و توسعه ورزش، ۱۰(۱)، ۱۳۰–۱۴۰. doi: 10.22124/jsmd.2021.5046
تسلیمی، محمدسعید؛ نوروزی، خلیل؛ مخدومی، احمد و هاجری، مهدی. (1396). ارائه چارچوب توسعه دیپلماسی علمی جمهوری اسلامی ایران از منظر خبرگان و مسئولان علمی و دیپلماسی کشور. راهبرد، ۲۶(۸۳)، ۱۶۵–۱۸۶.
داودی، کامل؛ فقیهی، ابوالحسن؛ میرسپاسی، ناصر و آذر، عادل. (1399). طراحی مدل مدیریت توسعه در ایران با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، ۱۳(۴۹)، ۵۹–۸۲. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2021.24700.3915
فرجی دیزجی، سجاد و پورسلیمی، حمیدرضا. (1398). نقش اقتصادی نمایندگی‌های دیپلماتیک در توسعه صادرات. پژوهش‌های بازرگانی، ۲۴(۹۴)، ۲۰۵–۲۳۰.
فرهنگی، علی‌اکبر؛ قرائتی، علیرضا و کربلایی حاجی‌اوغلی، حسن. (1393). دیپلماسی دیجیتال و روابط میان دولت‌ها در جوامع معاصر. مطالعات رسانه‌ای، ۹(۲۴)، ۸۹–۹۹.
واعظی، رضا؛ اسدی، عاطفه؛ قربانی‌زاده، وجه‌الله و دهقانی فیروزآبادی، سید جلال. (1400). هم‌راستایی مدیریت توسعه ملی و سیاست خارجی. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، ۱۷(۶۵)، ۱۲۵–۱۶۶.
doi: 10.22111/jmr.2024.47368.6118
 
References
Adams, B., Albacete, A., Best, K., Blaikie, W. A., Blaney, R., Diop, G., Duderija, A., Gazan, L., Jaramillo, C., & Karam, A. (2021). Religious soft diplomacy and the United Nations: Religious engagement as loyal opposition. Rowman & Littlefield.
Akbarzadeh, A., Pahlavani, M., & Mirjalili, S. H. (2019). Growth and development management in Iran, an analysis of growth constraints: Grounded theory approach. Public Management Researches, 11(42), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2019.4524 (In Persian)
Asadi, A. (2020). Presenting a paradigmatic pattern of enhancement diplomacy of international sports events hosting in free trade zone: With emphasis on the Kish Free Zone. Applied Research of Sport Management, 9(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.2021.45083.2897 (In Persian)
Assessor, F., Dede, Ç., & Wieland, J. W. (2022). China’s development diplomacy: An analysis of when so-called win-win transactions between China and the African continent bring development.
Bakhshi Chenari, A. R., Godarzi, M., Sajjadi, S. N., & Jalali Farahani, M. (2021). Identify and prioritize the effective factors of sport diplomacy development in Islamic Republic of Iran’s foreign policy. Journal of Sport Management and Development, 10(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.22124/jsmd.2021.5046 (In Persian)
Bhattarai, D. (2023). Diplomacy for development: Key to sustaining democratic transformation. NCWA Annual Journal, 19–30.
Bokhan, A., & Zalizniuk, V. (2022). Economic diplomacy in new projections of activation. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(4), 19–25.
Chin, G. (2013). The economic diplomacy of the rising powers.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.
Cooper, A. F., Antkiewicz, A., & Shaw, T. M. (2007). Lessons from/for BRICSAM about South–North relations at the start of the 21st century: Economic size trumps all else? International Studies Review, 9(4), 673–689.
David, J. O. (2024). The 3Ds (development, diplomacy, and defense) in Nigerian counterinsurgency: Lessons from Uruzgan. Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 1283237.
Davoodi, K., Faghihi, A., Mirsepasi, N., & Azar, A. (2020). Design of development management model in Iran using structural equation modeling method. Public Management Researches, 13(49), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2021.24700.3915 (In Persian)
Faraji Dizaji, S., & Poursalimi, H. R. (2020). The economic role of diplomatic representation in promoting exports. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 24(94), 205–229. (In Persian)
Farhangi, A. A., Gheraati, A., & Karbalaei Hajiooghli, H. (2014). Digital diplomacy and intergovernmental relations in contemporary societies. Journal of Media Studies, 9(24), 89–99. (In Persian)
Gulrajani, N., Mawdsley, E., & Roychoudhury, S. (2020). The new development diplomacy in middle-income countries.
Hajdukiewicz, A., & Pera, B. (2021). Factors affecting the choice of Incoterms: The case of companies operating in Poland. International Entrepreneurship Review, 7(4), 35–50.
Hayhurst, L. M. C. (2009). The power to shape policy: Charting sport for development and peace policy discourses. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 1(2), 203–227.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
Khanal, G. (2023). Navigating political landscapes: Overcoming geopolitical adversaries in Nepal’s development diplomacy. NCWA Annual Journal, 104–113.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Landsberg, C., & Georghiou, C. (2015). The foreign policy and diplomatic attributes of a developmental state: South Africa as case study. South African Journal of International Affairs, 22(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2015.1124805
Lohani, M. P. (2023). Nepal’s development diplomacy: Road to prosperity. NCWA Annual Journal, 11–18.
Mabee, W., & Liu, Y. (2023). Normalizing Canada−China relations through development diplomacy: A case study of Canadian legacies from the first IFAD-funded international development-aid project in China, 1981–1988. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 44(3), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2022.2161489
Martín García, Ó. J. (2023). Nudging the ship in the right direction: United States public diplomacy and development in 1960s Spain. Journal of Contemporary History, 58(3), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094231166603
Molajan, M., Pourezzat, A. A., Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J., & Asghari, H. (2025). Proposing a framework for development diplomacy policy: Antecedents and consequences. Digital Transformation and Administration Innovation, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61838/dtai.3.1.4
Omidi, A., & Moradifar, S. (2021). Strategic narrative of U.S. digital diplomacy against China in the COVID-19 pandemic. Political Quarterly, 51(2), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2021.83350 (In Persian)
Peternel, I., & Grešš, M. (2021). Economic diplomacy: Concept for economic prosperity in Croatia. Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 109–121.
Pigman, G. A. (2014). Towards a sustainable development diplomacy: A case study of freedom, politics, policy and communication in South Africa.
Regmi, B. (2019). Development diplomacy: Learning from the Chinese aid in building a road in Nepal. Research Nepal Journal of Development Studies, 2(1), 112–125.
Rozental, A., & Buenrostro, A. (2013). Bilateral diplomacy.
Saner, R., & Sapienza, E. (2012). Development diplomacy and partnerships for social policy at the time of PRSPs: The case of decent work. Journal of Poverty Alleviation & International Development, 3(2).
Shrestha, S. B. (2023). The relationship between Nepal and Japan: Diplomacy and development. NCWA Annual Journal, 71–78.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Taslimi, M. S., Norouzi, K., Mokhdoumi, A., & Hajari, M. (2017). A framework for the development of scientific diplomacy in the Islamic Republic of Iran from the perspective of experts and officials in science and diplomacy. Strategy, 26(83), 165–186. (In Persian)
Tkachenko, S. L. (2020). Development diplomacy of the Russian Federation. In A. A. Velikaya & G. Simons (Eds.), Russia’s public diplomacy: Evolution and practice (pp. 61–77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12874-6_4
Upadhyaya, L. (2023). Federalism: New avenue for Nepal’s development diplomacy. NCWA Annual Journal, 145–154.
Vaezi, R., Asadi, A., Ghorbanizadeh, V., & Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J. (2024). An alignment between national development administration and foreign policy. Public Management Researches, 17(65), 125–166. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2024.47368.6118 (In Persian)
Wu, Y. (2024). Constructing Chinese firms as development catalysts: State-firm public diplomacy collaboration in Kenya. Journal of Contemporary China, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2024.2388174
Zemanová, Š. (2020). Adapting economic diplomacy to the e-commerce era. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 279–302.
Zielińska, K. (2016). Development diplomacy. Development aid as a part of public diplomacy in the pursuit of foreign policy aims: Theoretical and practical considerations. Historia i Polityka, 23(16), 9–26.