The Framework of whistle-blowing in Iran's Government Organizations with the Approach of Grounded Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student in public administration, human resources management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

3 ..PhD student of public administration, human resources management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Organizational whistleblowing is a process used to report ethical and legal violations within an organization or work environment. On the other hand, ethical and legal violations in government organizations may occur in the form of corruption, abuse of power, and violations of laws. Therefore, organizational whistle-blowing in this area can play a very important role in identifying and dealing with these violations. This research is qualitative, developmental, interpretive and inductive, which was implemented with the foundation's data approach. The statistical population of the research consists of twelve university experts and participants who were whistleblowers themselves and were selected by a judgmental method. After selecting the participants, the research questions were answered through semi-structured interviews. After reviewing and analyzing the obtained interviews, 350 initial codes were obtained, of which 175 abstract concepts, 42 sub-categories and 17 main categories were obtained. In this way, the factors; individual and punitive policies as causal conditions; micro contextual factors, macro contextual factors and norming as contextual factors; Role players, incentives for whistle-blowing and disruptors as intervening factors, triple support, soft strategies, hard strategies, whistle-blowing protection policies, and regulatory bodies as strategies. Social-economic, individual-moral and organizational-legal consequences were identified as the consequences of whistle-blowing in Iran's government organizations. The presented model can be a basis for planning organizations to re-use the experiences, knowledge, expertise and skills of retirees in professional and non-professional jobs. Adopting organizational whistleblowing and creating a legal mechanism to manage reports is also critical. These include establishing a legal process for investigating and following up on reports, protecting whistleblowers, and imposing legal consequences for ethical and legal violations.
Introduction
Organizational whistle-blowing is a process used to report ethical and legal violations within an organization or work environment. The main goal of this action is to promote transparency and ethical behavior within the organization. People who blow the whistle are known as "whistleblowers". Organizational whistle-blowing plays a very vital role in government organizations. Here, public property and government authority are managed, so transparency and maintaining ethics are vital. On the other hand, ethical and legal violations in government organizations may occur in the form of corruption, abuse of power, and violations of laws. Therefore, organizational whistleblowing in this area can play a very important role in identifying and dealing with these violations.
Case study
The case study of the current research is to present the framework of whistle-blowing in Iran's government organizations from the perspective of academic experts and active whistle-blowers as experts in this field.
Materials and Methods
This research is qualitative, developmental, interpretive and inductive, which was implemented with the foundation's data approach. The statistical population of the research consists of twelve university experts and participants who were whistleblowers themselves and were selected by a judgmental method. After selecting the participants, the research questions were answered through semi-structured interviews.
Discussion and Results
After reviewing and analyzing the obtained interviews, 350 initial codes were obtained, of which 175 abstract concepts, 42 sub-categories and 17 main categories were obtained. In this way, the factors; individual and punitive policies as causal conditions; micro contextual factors, macro contextual factors and norming as contextual factors; Role players, incentives for whistle-blowing and disruptors as intervening factors, triple support, soft strategies, hard strategies, whistle-blowing protection policies, and regulatory bodies as strategies. Social-economic, individual-moral and organizational-legal consequences were identified as the consequences of whistle-blowing in Iran's government organizations.
 
 
Conclusion
Whistle-blowing in the Islamic Republic of Iran is an emerging phenomenon and is still in its initial stages both in the field of research and in the field of implementation. Many countries have formulated their own whistle-blowing laws and approved them in their parliaments, and our country should also legalize this phenomenon faster in order to support whistle-blowing. The presented model can be a basis for planning organizations to re-use the experiences, knowledge, expertise and skills of retirees in professional and non-professional jobs. Adopting organizational whistleblowing and creating a legal mechanism to manage reports is also critical. These include establishing a legal process for investigating and following up on reports, protecting whistleblowers, and imposing legal consequences for ethical and legal violations. The following strategies can be used to increase whistle-blowing in Iran's government organizations: Awareness: For the success of the whistle-blowing program, make sure that all employees are familiar with this program. And you can use events, awareness sessions, and educational texts to raise awareness; Witness Protection: Ensure that witnesses or reporters are protected. Whistleblower protection laws are important so that people can more confidently report issues; Reporting system: A safe and reliable system for reporting issues, such as a safety deposit box or an online system, is important. This system must ensure confidentiality and trustworthiness.

Keywords


منابع فارسی
افضلی، عبدالرحمن. (1390). فساد اداری و تأثیر آن بر توسعه علل، پیامدها و راهکارهای برون رفت، مجله حقوقی بین­المللی، نشریه مرکز امور حقوقی بین المللی ریاست جمهوری، سال بیست­وهشتم، دوره 45، شماره اول.
ایزدپناه، نوروز.، رزمان، علی.، صبوحی لکی، بهروز. (1395). بررسی پدیده سوت زنی افشاگری در سازمانها با تاکید بر آموزه های دینی، اولین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت و اقتصاد جهانی.
الوانی، سیدمهدی. (1385). نقدی بر شیوه­های شناخت در مدیریت. مطالعات مدیریت (بهبود و تحول), 13(50)، 47–63.
جلیلوند، محمدرضا.، نصرالهی وسطی، سیمین.، یاسینی، علی. (1401). عوامل انگیزشی تعیین‌کنندة پدیدة سوت‌زنی در سازمان‌های دولتی- خدماتی در ایران. مجله ایرانی مطالعات مدیریت، 10(2), 385–408.
حسین­­پور، داوود؛ الوانی، سیدمهدی؛ شریف­زاده؛ فتاح؛ باقری، ندا (1402). الگوی خط­مشی­گذاری اشتغال با رویکرد داده­بنیاد، پژوهش­های مدیریت عمومی. (61) 16، 36-1.
رحیمیان، نرگس. (1393). بررسی فساد اقتصادی و راههای مبارزه با آن. مجله اقتصادی شماره 8 دوره 43.
فرهادی نژاد، محسن.، و جعفری، سکینه. (1398). شناسایی علل سوت‌زنی سازمانی و دلایل عدم تمایل به سوت‌زنی در سازمان‌های دولتی. فصلنامه علمی مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی, 7(شماره 4 (پیاپی 28), 71–84.
فقیهی، ابوالحسن.، بامدادصوفی, جهانیار. (1378). کثرت­گرایی روش تحقیق در پژوهش­های سازمانی. مطالعات مدیریت (بهبود و تحول)، شماره 5، 1-15.
 
References
Afzali, A. (2011). Administrative corruption and its effect on the development of the causes, consequences and solutions, International Legal Journal, Publication of the Center for International Legal Affairs of the Presidency, Year 28, Volume 45, Number 1. (In Persian)
Al-Haidar, F. (2018). Whistleblowing in Kuwait and UK against corruption and misconduct. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(4), 1020–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2017-0119
Çeti̇nkaya, F. F., & Altintaş, M. (2021). The relationship between whistleblowing and mushroom management. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / Journal of Social Sciences, 31(2), 781-793.
Elwani, S. M. (2006). A critique on the ways of knowing in management. Management Studies (Improvement and Transformation), 13(50), 47-63. (In Persian)
Faqihi, A., Bamdadsofi, J. (1996). Pluralism of research method in organizational research. Management Studies (Improvement and Transformation), No. 5, 1-15. (In Persian)
Farhadinejad, M., and Jafari, S. (2019). Identifying the causes of organizational whistle-blowing and the reasons for reluctance to whistle-blowing in government organizations. Scientific Quarterly of Government Organizations Management, 7(No. 4 (Sequential 28), 71-84. (In Persian)
Gottschalk, P., & Solli‐Sæther, H. (2011). Financial crime in business organizations: an empirical study. Journal of Financial Crime.
Gupta, K. P., & Chaudhary, N. S. (2017a). Prioritizing the factors influencing whistle blowing intentions of teachers in higher education institutes in India. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 25–32.
Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Glasgow: John Wiley & Sons.
Hoekstra, A., & Talsma, J. (2021). Introducing a new key player in internal whistleblowing procedures: Examining the position of confidential advisers. Public Integrity, 23,52-67.
Hosseinpour, D., Alvani, S.M., Sharifzadeh, F., & Bagheri, N. (2023). Occupation Policy Model with Grounded Theory Approach. Public Management Researches, 16 (61), 1-36. (In Persian).
Izadpanah, N., Razman, A. Sabohi Leki, b. (2015). Investigating the phenomenon of whistle-blowing in organizations with an emphasis on religious teachings, the first national conference on management and global economy. (In Persian)
Jalilvand, M., Nasralahi Esti, S., Yasini, A. (2017). Motivational factors that determine the phenomenon of whistle-blowing in government-service organizations in Iran. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 10(2), 385-408. (In Persian)
Kaptein, M. (2022). How much you see is how you respond: The curvilinear relationship between the frequency of observed unethical behavior and the whistleblowing intention. Journal of Business Ethics: JBE, 175(4), 857-875. https://doi.org/10.1007s10551-020-04663-6.
Lee, H. (2020). The implications of organizational structure, political control, and internal system responsiveness on whistleblowing behavior. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 155-177.
 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18792054
Lee, J., Ramamoorti, S., & Zelazny, L. (2021). Whistleblowing intentions for internal auditors: Why psychological safety is critically important. The CPA Journal, 91(8/9), 46-51.
Mrowiec, D. (2022). Factors influencing internal whistleblowing. A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Economics & Management, 44, 142-186.
Nisar, T. M., Prabhakar, G., & Torchia, M. (2019). Whistleblowing: When do employees act to ‘blow the whistle’? Organizational Dynamics, 48(1), 44–49.
Powell, M. (2020a). Whistleblowing: still not an issue of social policy, but an issue for social policy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 45 (2), 25-35.
Powell, M. (2020b). Whistleblowing: still not an issue of social policy, but an issue for social policy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.
Puni, A., & Hilton, S. K. (2020). Power distance culture and whistleblowing intentions: the moderating effect of gender. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. 12 (3), 1-20.
Rahimian, N. (2013). Investigating economic corruption and ways to fight it. Economic Journal. No. 8, Volume 43. (In Persian)
Rajeevan, S. (2019). Building a bulletproof whistleblowing environment: an accountant’s perspective. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 5(1), 15–31.
Soni, F., Maroun, W., & Padia, N. (2015). Perceptions of justice as a catalyst for whistle-blowing by trainee auditors in South Africa. Meditari Accountancy Research. 1 (2), 1-25.
Stolowy, H., Gendron, Y., Moll, J., & Paugam, L. (2019a). Building the Legitimacy of Whistleblowers: A Multi-Case Discourse Analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 7–49.
STUBBEN, S. R., & WELCH, K. T. (2020). Evidence on the Use and Efficacy of Internal Whistleblowing Systems. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2), 473–518.
Verschuuren, P. (2020b). Whistleblowing determinants and the effectiveness of reporting channels in the international sports sector. Sport Management Review, 23(1), 142–154.
Vian, T. (2020). Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Global Health Action, 13(sup1), 1694744.
Zakaria, M., Rozak, I., Nurmala Sari, E., & Nawi, N. (2020). Predicting Internal and External Whistleblowing Intentions: A Comparative Study between Malaysian and Indonesian Police Forces.12 (4), 1-18.(In Persian).