Designing Strategic Model of Entrepreneurial University Based on Approach future Studies in Higher Education

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD in Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

4 Professor of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
The mission of universities in the context of time, in line with global developments and transformations and in line with the goal of responding to the contingent needs of societies is moving towards participation in the entrepreneurial Paradigm. according to this The main purpose of the research was to design and explain a Strategic model of the entrepreneurial university with Futures Studies approach. This study was conducted using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. In this study, Meta-synthesismethods, fuzzy Delphi were used for data analysis. In the first step, a Meta-synthesisapproach was used to analyze the research literature on entrepreneurial university and its related models. The dimensions and codes related to entrepreneurial university were extracted. Also, in a separate section, the dimensions and codes related to the key factors of future studies in higher education were extracted. In the second step, the fuzzy Delphi questionnaire was designed in two separate questionnaires to identify the components related to the "entrepreneurial university " and "Factors shaping the ideal future of the university" and distributed in two rounds among experts in that field. In this section, experts in the field of management, entrepreneurship, and futures studies in higher education participated in the Delphi Fuzzy panel. The members of the fuzzy Delphi panel were determined by the judging and snowballing sampling method. Then, the last components of the research were extracted, the output of the entrepreneurial university section included 16 main categories, 51 concepts and in the future key factors' future studies in higher education section included 4 main categories, 8 concepts. Finally, the strategic model of the futuristic entrepreneurial university was designed.
Introduction
Once education and research were themissions of universities. But today, university gradually moves away from its traditional role and participates in socioeconomic development to take on a new mission and roledue to the developments and also based on its mission and commitment to society as well as its survival and growth. Universities that have been able to adapt to the new conditions are known as third-generation universities (entrepreneurial universities), which are the evolvedversion of first- and second-generation universities. According to Clark, the entrepreneurial university means one in which all the activities of its members, such as education, research, etc., are managed and executed in such a way that the university is considered as an economic institution or quasi-corporation.That is, these activities are directed to gain profit and competitive economic advantages. Most of our universities are in the first generation and a limited number of them are in the second generation. The third generation of universities has not been seriously raisedin Iran. Most of the researches conducted in the field of Futures Studies and screenwriting in Iran are focused on technology and then policy-making, and this has reduced the use of Futures Studies methods specific to higher education in Iran. However, despite the great importance of the application of concepts related to Futures Studies in higher education, this science is considered nascent in the field of higher education and needs special and deep attention from higher education practitioners. Researches done in the field of entrepreneurial university lack the comprehensiveness of the present research model and each has addressed the issue in a specific way. Presenting all the effective internal and external components together in a strategic and futuristic perspective is one of the salient features of this research that can be one of the distinctive aspects of this research. This study triesto design a comprehensive and futuristic model of the entrepreneurial university, which helps the universities in their future challenges. However, the main question of the present study is what strategic model the entrepreneurial university with a Futures Studies approach in higher educationhas.
Case study
For basic information, articles, dissertations and books during 2000-2020 were analyzed in domestic and Futures Studies sources. After extracting the sources, the articles were analyzed by a meta-synthesis qualitative method. Out of a total of 3,856 extracted sources, 114 were used for analysis in this research. Then the fuzzy Delphi method was selected to proceed the work and its output was analyzed by experts. Non-probabilistic sampling methods including judgmental and snowball sampling methods were used to select samples and form a panel of experts. A total of 17 experts in the field of management and entrepreneurship were selected. Also, the key factors of Futures Studies in higher education were separately extracted by document and content analysis methods and were examined and analyzed by fuzzy Delphi panel method. In this section, 14 Futures Studies experts in the field of higher education were selected.
Materials and Methods
The present study is both fundamental and applied in terms of purpose. It is a descriptive research in terms of data collectionthat has been carried out in two parts of model design (survey research by meta-synthesisand Delphi method). The methodology of the present study is pluralism in the research method, which is a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods.The following tools have been used to collect data: a) desk studies, b) meta-synthesis, c) content analysis, d) fuzzy Delphi (panel of experts).
Discussion and Results
In this research, a systemic model has been used to design the model. That is, it is designed based on input, process and output. The strategic model of entrepreneurial university in this research includes 16 main categories and 51 concepts. The main categories include: 1) Entrepreneurial organizational structure; 2) Entrepreneurial management; 3) Entrepreneurial vision and mission; 4) Entrepreneurial educational system; 5) Entrepreneurial research system; 6) Entrepreneurial human resource management; 7) Entrepreneurial financial resource management; 8) Culture of entrepreneurship and sustainability; 9) New ICT; 10) Role models and reward systems; 11) Entrepreneurship centers; 12) Government support; 13) Economic factors; 14) Socio-cultural factors; 15) Committed relationship of industry and university; 16) Internationalization. As mentioned earlier, in this study, in order to complete the discussion of foresight, in addition to gathering the factors affecting the entrepreneurial university, the factors that shape the favorable future of the university were separately collected and discussed. In order to build a futuristic entrepreneurial university, in addition to the factors affecting the entrepreneurial university, the factors affecting the future university must also be considered. Given this in mind, the concepts of foresight institutionalization and strategic thinking should be applied in all university activities, especially in the vision and mission of the university. In the process section, in order to build a foresight entrepreneurial university, foresight planning factors, discovery of internal and external trends, bedrock and structural reforms in the educational and research system, organizational structure, organizational culture, role models and reward system, information and communication technologies should be considered. In the output section, in order to build a futuristic entrepreneurial university, the factors of entrepreneurial university scenarios, science and technology foresight should also be highly considered.

Keywords


 
منابع فارسی
 شریف‌زاده، فتاح، رضوی، سید مصطفی، زاهدی، شمس‌السادات، نجاری، رضا (1388). طراحی و تبیین الگوی عوامل مؤثر بر کارآفرینی دانشگاهی (مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه پیام نور). توسعه کارآفرینی، 2 (4): 38-11.
فراستخواه (1394). سناریو نگاری آینده ارزشیابی آموزش عالی و نظام علمی در ایران. پنل میز هشتم آینده‌پژوهی. مؤسسه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی.
مهدی، رضا، شفیعی، مسعود (1399). الگو و چارچوب راهنما برای دانشگاه نوآور و ارزش افرین. نوآوری و ارزش افرینی، 17 (9): 14-1.
مهدی، رضا (1394). آینده‌شناسی آموزش عالی: راهبردها و پیامدهای سازگاری دانشگاه با محیط و جامعه. فرایند مدیریت توسعه، 28 (1): 53-31.
نیازآذری، کیومرث، تقوایی یزدی، مریم، فدایی، صمد (1396). بررسی ارتباط دانشگاه کارآفرین با ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های آینده‌نگاری و تولید علم. نوآوری‌های مدیریت آموزشی، 13(1): 124-87.
References
Allahar, H., Sookram, R. (2019). Emergence of university-centred entrepreneurial ecosystems in the Caribbean. Industry and Higher Education, 33(4), 246-259.
Albulescu, V. L., Litra, M., & Neagu, C. (2014). The “third mission” of universities and some implications. UPB Science Bulletin, Series D, 76(2), 301-312.
Aranha, E.A., & Garcia, N.P.  (2014). Dimensions of a Metamodel of an Entrepreneurial University. African Journal of Business  Management, 8(10), 336-349.
Berggren, E. (2017). Researchers as enablers of commercialization at an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Management Development, 36(2), 217-232.
Bikse, V., Lusena-Ezera, I., Rivza, B., & Volkova, T. (2016). The transformation of traditional universities into entrepreneurial universities to ensure sustainable higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 75-88.
Budyldina, N. (2018). Entrepreneurial Universities and Regional Contribution. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 14(2), 265-277.
Carayannis, E.G., Cherepovitsyn, A.Y. & Ilinova, A.A. (2016). Technology commercialization in entrepreneurial universities: the US and Russian experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41 (5), 1135–1147.
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., & Shashi, K. (2018). Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 141(C), 172-194.
Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier Science.
Clark, B., R (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education. 17 (4): 355–370.
Dabic, M., Gonzalez-Loureiro, M., & Daim, T.U. (2015). Unraveling the Attitudes on Entrepreneurial Universities: The Case of Croatian and Spanish Universities. Technology in Society, 42, 167-178.
Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., & Blois, G.V. (2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 99-111.
Errasti, N., Bezanilla, M., García-Olalla, A., Auzmendi, E., & Paños, J. (2018). Factors and maturity level of entrepreneurial universities in Spain. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(1), 71-91.
Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123: 122–129.
Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M., Dzisah, J. (2012). Whither the university? The novum trivium and the transition from industrial to knowledge society. Social Science Information, 51(2),143-164.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3): 293-337.
EU/OECD, (2019a). Introduction to HEINNOVATE and its seven dimensions.  www.heinnovate.eu.
EU/OECD, (2019b). Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in The Italy. OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris/EU, Brussels.
EU/OECD, (2019c). Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in the Croatia. OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris/EU, Brussels.
Faraskhah (2015), The scenario of the future evaluation of higher education and the scientific system in Iran. Eighth Panel Future Research. Higher Education Research and Planning Institute. (In Persian)
Farastkhah, M. (2012). Higher education planning and interdisciplinary challenges. Educational Planning Studies, 1 (1): 55-79. (in Persian)
Fayolle, A., Redford, D. T. (2014). Hand book on entrepreneurial university. Edward Elgar publishing, Inc.
Guenther, J., & Wagner, K. (2008). Getting out of the Ivory Tower: New Perspectives on the Entrepreneurial University. European Journal of International Management, 2(4): 400-417
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Gajón, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial university ecosystems and graduates' career patterns: do entrepreneurship education programmes and university business incubators matter? Journal of Management Development, 39 (5), 753-775.
Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities Activities: an Exploratory Study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44 (3), 748-764.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Organ, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial Universities in Two European Regions: a Case Study Comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 415-434.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The Development of an Entrepreneurial University. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43-74.
Goldstein, P. J. (2006). The Future of Higher Education: A View from CHEMA. Washington, DC: Council of Higher Education Management Associations.
Graham, R. (2014). Creating University-Based Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Evidence from Emerging World Leaders. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hayter, C. S., Rasmussen, E., & Rooksby, J. H. (2018). Beyond formal university technology transfer: Innovative pathways for knowledge exchange. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 1–8.
Herrera, F., Guerrero, M. & Urbano, D. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem’s drivers: The role of higher education organizations. In Entrepreneurial, innovative and sustainable ecosystems, (pp. 109-128). DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-71014-3_6.
Jakab, F., Čižmár, P., Kainz, O., Lavrin, A., & Michalko, M. (2019). Innovation Universities Ecosystem: Acceleration of Innovative Entrepreneurship in the University Environment. In 2019 17th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) (pp. 291-295). IEEE.
Kirby, D.A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). Making Universities more Entrepreneurial: Development of a Model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(3), 302-316.
Kirs, M., Karo, E., & Lumi, P. (2017). Strategic behaviour of research groups within the entrepreneurial university policy rhetoric: the Estonian biotechnology sector. Science and Public Policy, 44(6), 802-820.
Lahikainen, K., Kolhinen, J., Ruskovaara, E., & Pihkala, T. (2019). Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: The case of a Finnish university campus. Industry and Higher Education, 33(2),  96-107.
Meng, D., Li, X., & Rong, K. (2019). Industry-to-university knowledge transfer in ecosystem-based academic entrepreneurship: Case study of automotive dynamics & control group in Tsinghua University. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 249-262.
Mehdi, Reza, Shafiei, Massoud (2020). Guide template and framework for an innovative and value-added university. Innovation and Value Creation, 17 (9): 14-1. (In Persian)
 Mehdi, R. (2015). Higher Education Futur studies: Strategies and Consequences of University Adaptation to the Environment and Society. Development Management Process, 28 (1): 53-31. (In Persian)
Morris, M.H., Shirokova, G. & Tsukanova, T. (2017). Student entrepreneurship and the university ecosystem: A multi-country empirical exploration. European Journal of International Management, 11(1), 65-85.
Niaz Azari, K., Taghvaei Yazdi, M., & Fadaei, p. (2017). Investigating the Relationship between Entrepreneurial University and Dimensions and Components of Science Production Foresight, Educational Management Innovations, 13 (1), 87-124. (In Persian)
Novita, M., Ritonga, A. H., & Jalaludin, J. (2020). The Role of University-Based Entrepreneurship Ecosystems in Facing the Challenges of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. In 4th Asian Education Symposium (AES 2019) (pp. 220-223). Atlantis Press.
O’Brien, E., Cooney, T.M., & Blenker, P. (2019). Expanding university entrepreneurial ecosystems to under-represented communities. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 8(3), 384-407.
Ratten, V. (2017). Entrepreneurial universities: the role of communities, people and places. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(03), 310-315.
Reyes, C. N. (2016). Framing the entrepreneurial university: the case of the National University of Singapore. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 8(2). 134-161.

Salamzadeh, A., Kawamorita, H., & Salamzadeh, Y. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and branding: A conceptual model proposal. World Review of Science Technology and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 300-315.

Salamzadeh, A., Farsi, J.Y., Motavaseli, M., Markovic, M.R. & Kesim, H.K. (2015). Institutional factors affecting the transformation of entrepreneurial universities. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 14(3), 271-291.
Schmitz, A., Urbano, D., Dandolini, G., Artur de Souza, J.,  & Guerrero, M. (2017). Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Academic Setting: a Systematic Litrature Review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2). 369-395.
Secundo, G., Mele, G., Del Vecchio, P., & Degennaro, G. (2020). Knowledge spillover creation in university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem: the role of the Italian “Contamination Labs”. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 30, 1-15.
Secundo, G., Perez, S. E., Martinaitis, Ž., & Leitner, K. H. (2017). An Intellectual Capital framework to measure universities' third mission activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 229-239.
Shah, S. I., Shahjehan, A., & Afsar, B. (2018). Determinants of Entrepreneurial University Culture under Unfavorable Conditions: Findings from a Developing Country. Higher Education Policy, 32 (3), 249–271.
Sharifzadeh, F., Razavi, S.M., Zahedi, Sh., & Najari, R. (2009). Designing and Explaining the Model of Factors Affecting Academic Entrepreneurship (Case Study: Payame Noor University), Entrepreneurship Development, 2 (4), 11-38. (In Persian)
Shil, M., Shahriar, M. S., Sultana, S., Rahman, S. N., & Zayed, N. M. (2020). Introduction to University Based Entrepreneurship Ecosystem (U-Bee): A Model Case Study from Bangladesh. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(1): 1-9.
Thomsen, B., Muurlink, O, & Best, T. (2018). The political ecology of universitybased social entrepreneurship ecosystems. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 12(2), 199-219.
Williams, D., & Kluev, A. (2014). The entrepreneurial university: evidence of the changing role of universities in modern Russia. Industry and Higher Education, 28(4), 271-280.
Wynn, M., & Jones, P. (2017). Knowledge Transfer Partnerships and the entrepreneurial university. Industry and Higher Education, 31(4), 267-278.