Explaining the Causes of Employee Turnover in Iranian Knowledge-Based Organization and Providing solutions: An Examination of the Role of Compensation System

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify the reasons for employee’s turnover of Iranian knowledge companies in the field of compensation system and providing constructive strategies to reduce the rate of turnover. The methodology of the present study is mixed method. The statistical population of the study in qualitative and quantitative parts consisted of 220 knowledge workers in knowledge-based organizations of Sharif University of Technology who left their organizations. Sample size in the quantitative section consisted of 138 persons who were selected by random sampling. Sample size in the qualitative section consisted of 30 persons selected by snowball method. Data were collected through a questionnaire in the quantitative section and interviews in the qualitative section. Friedman and t-test were used to analyze the data in quantitative part and the thematic analysis was used in the qualitative part. The results show that all of eighteen components of compensation system were below average and they are main reasons for leaving knowledge workers. Proposed solutions presented in seven process, human, financial, cultural, technological, structural and legal-political themes. The results of this study can help improve compensation policies in order to maintain key forces in knowledge based organizations.
Introduction
One of the main concerns of managers and owners of knowledge-based companies in recent years are reducing the efficiency of personnel and increasing of voluntary creative, efficient and elit worker’s turnover (Nelson & McCann, 2010). Most studies on employee turnover have focused on the demographic and monetary and economic aspects of this phenomenon (Afkhami Thibalult et al., 2017), while one of the main causes of employee turnover is their dissatisfaction with the compensation system in organization (Nemati et al., 2014; Clark, 2013).
Employees' dissatisfaction with the compensation system will lead to a decrease in the efficiency of the organization and in the long time will lead to employees' turnover (Berger & Berger, 2015, p. 15). Accordingly, identifying all aspects and components of compensation that are effective in employee turnover can provide the basis for identifying and meeting the needs of knowledge workers and their growth and development, reducing the dissatisfaction of the forces and ultimately minimizing employee turnover rate. The purpose of the present study was to identify the components of compensation system affecting on staff turnover and to provide solutions to reduce the turnover rate of knowledge workers.
Case study
The statistical population of the study in the qualitative and quantitative part consisted of 220 employees of knowledge-based organizations of Sharif University of Technology who left their organizations.
Theoretical framework
Employee turnover is a common issue in domestic and foreign research. Leaving a job is a conscious and largely planned tendency to look for opportunities and career options in other organizations (Lambert et al, 2010). Despite the positive and negative views about quitting, the overwhelming aspect of the comments emphasizes on detrimental impact of knowledge-based worker’s turnover due to the difficulty of replacement and the likelihood of transferring capabilities to competing organizations (Stypinska & Turek, 2017). The results of the studies show that many of the components of employee turnover are related to the components of compensation system.
Different theories and models have been put forward during the formation of compensation system. The first models were called compensation of economic and financial services. Then human-economic models emerged and finally explained to improve the efficiency of total compensation models and consideration of total aspects of compensation, total compensation model introduced (Thibalult et al., 2017). Hay group model is one of the best models which used in this study.
Methodology
The research methodology is mixed method. Sample size in the quantitative section consisted of 138 persons who were selected by random sampling. Sample size in the qualitative section consisted of 30 persons selected by snowball method. Data gathering tool are questionnaire and interview. Data analysis was done in quantitative section using t-test and Friedman tests using SPSS software. Data analysis was done in the qualitative part of the study by thematic analysis and using open coding.
Discussion and Results
The results of the quantitative section of the present study show that all of the eighteen components related to the compensation system are below average and thus are among the reasons for leaving the staff of Iranian knowledge companies. Qualitative results, based on coding interviews, provide solutions to improve compensation policies and reduce employee turnover in seven areas of finance, technology, process, structural, cultural, legal-political and human.
Conclusion
The results indicate that through flexible work, effective communication, providing a framework for human resources development, needs assessment and training, knowledge management, clarifying organizational practices, paying attention to knowledge culture factors, paying attention to fair pay, organization, design and enrichment of knowledge jobs, talent management, standard performance management and improvement of recruitment structure in line with the nature of the knowledge organization can reduce the rate knowledge worker’s turnover and prevent not only leaving and low work rating of forces, but also improve satisfaction and ultimately productivity of organizations.

Keywords


Afjeh, A.A., & Ghafari, A. (2013). Factor affecting the maintenance & quitting of knowledge worker. Strategy of Culture, 21(2), pp. 79-112. (In Persian)
Afkhami Ardakani, M., & Farahi, R. (2011). Culture, organizational commitment, and desire to quitting knowledge staff, Model designing and explaining in the Oil Industry Research Institute. Journal of Management Science, 24(3), pp. 1-24. (In Persian)
Ahmadi, A., & Ghodratian, A. (2012). Investigating the factors affecting the maintenance of knowledge workers and elite human resource and providing an operational model to increase its coefficient. Quarterly Journal of Human Resource Management in Oil Industry, 4(14), pp. 185-210. (In Persian)
Alnaqbi, W. (2011). The relationship between human resource practices and employee retention. Doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University, USA.
Armstrong, M., Brown, D., & Reilly, P. (2010). Evidence-based reward management: Creating measurable business impact from your pay and reward practices. Kogan Page Publisher (UK).  
Armstrong, M., & Murlis, H. (2007). Reward management: A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy and Practice. Kogan Page Publishers (USA).
Asili, GH., & Ghadirian, A. (2015). Managing elite employees; challenges for quitting and maintenance in knowledge organizations. 4th International Management Conference, Tehran. (In Persian)
Bahrami, M.A., Bidoki Seyyed, S., Shafie, M., Sharghi, F., & Bahariniya, S. (2017). Study of the relationship of nurses' perception from organizational justice and revenge behavior in Yazd teaching hospitals. Journal of Health Management, 3(7), pp. 35-44. (In Persian)
Braun, A., & Armstrong, M. (2007). Human capital management: achieving added value through people. Kogan Page Publishers (USA).
Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2007). Knowledge workers: what keeps them committed; what turns them away? Work, Employment and Society, 21(1), 121-141.
Berger, L. & Berger, D. (2015). The compensation handbook: A state-of-the-art guide to compensation strategy and design. EPub and Kindle publication (UK).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Burbach, R., & Royle, T. (2010). Talent on demand? Talent management in the German and Irish subsidiaries of a US multinational corporation. Personnel Review, 39(4), 414-431.
Chen, L., & Wang, J. (2017). Business strategy, compensation policy and innovation performance: A behavioral perspective. Compensation & Benefits Review, 49(4), 189-205.
Clark D. B. (2013). Employee Commitment and Other Factors That Affect Attraction and Retention of Employees in Organizations: The Examination of Research and OPM Practices. Doctoral dissertation of Management. University of Maryland University, USA.
Clemens, M. A., Montenegro, C., & Pritchett, L. (2017). The place premium: Bounding the price equivalent of migration barriers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2(5), 52-75.
Clissett, P. (2008). Evaluating qualitative research. Orthopetic Nurses Journal, 12 (2), 99-105.
Darchen, S., Tremblay, D.G. (2010). What attracts and retains knowledge workers/ students: The quality of place or career opportunities? The cases of Montreal and Ottawa. Cities, 27(3), 225-233.
Davari, A. (2018). Why aren't talent in organizations lasting?
"An analysis of the reasons for leaving or leaving the best job
", Conference on Human Resource Management,      Tehran. (In Persian)
Dehban, B., & Heydari, A. (2016). Explanation of a knowledge worker’s maintenance and retention model in Mapna electric and control, engineering and manufacturing company (MECO). Modern Applied Science, 10(9), pp. 253-262. (In Persian)
Dixon, W. E., Flannery, T. P. (2018). Retention incentives: An emerging strategy in today’s tax-exempt organization. Compensation & Benefits Review, 50(2), 114-118.
Dupre, K. E., & Day, A. (2017). The effects of supportive management and job quality on the turnover intentions and health of military personnel. Human Resource Management, 46(2), 185-201.
Fudge, J. (2018). Why labour lawyers should care about the modern slavery act. King's Law Journal, 29(3), 377-406.
Ghapanchi, A. H., & Aurum, A. (2011). Antecedents to IT personnel's intentions to leave: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(2), 238-249.
Gibbs, M. (2016). Past, present and future compensation research: Economist perspectives. Compensation & Benefits Review, 48(1-2), 3-16.
Gholipour, R., Amiri, A., Mehdizadeh, M., & Zamanifar, M. (2013). Identifying the effective factors on the survivability of knowledge workers in Iran's Oil Refining and Distribution Company. Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 11(2), pp. 133-161. (In Persian)
Jabari, K. (2012). Providing a model for the development and maintenance of knowledge workers in knowledge based organizations: MAPNA electrical engineering & control company (MCU), MSc Thesis, Tehran University. (In Persian)
Karimi, A., & Parsafar, E. (2016). Relationship between the HRM system and employee organizational commitment: A case study of a private bank. Scientific Journal of Research and Information Management, 12(190), pp. 110-119. (In Persian)
Kilgour, J. G. (2019). Mental health and substance use disorder benefits parity. Compensation & Benefits Review, 50(2), 95-106.
Kheirandish, M., Seyed Naghavi, M. A. (2017). Pattern of driving factors in intention of quitting of Elite from managers' perspectives at the National Oil Distribution Company. Human Resource Management in Oil Industry Journal, 8(13), pp. 41-71. (In Persian)
Lafta, R. K., & Falah, N. (2018). Violence against health-care workers in a conflict affected city. Medicine, conflict and survival, 35(1), 65-71.
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Jiang, S. (2010). A preliminary examination of the relationship between organisational structure and emotional burnout among correctional staff. The Howard Journal, 49(2), 125–146.
Madhani, P. M. (2017). Enhancing return on salesforce investment: reallocating incentives and training resources with intrinsic valuation approach.  Compensation & Benefits Review, 49(3), 135-152.
Mojibian, F., Fartookzadeh, H. R., Rajabi, M., & Mostafai, K. (2015). Investigating the causes of existing of Knowledge workers from knowledge based organizations with the dynamic system approach. Journal of Management Science, 10(37), pp. 23-49. (In Persian)
Morrell, D. L., Abston, K. A. (2019). Millennial motivation issues related to compensation and benefits: Suggestions for improved retention. Compensation & Benefits Review, 50(2), 107-113.
Nelson, K., & McCann, J. E. (2010). Designing for knowledge worker retention & organization performance. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 3(1), 1-18.
Nemati, S., Khaefelahi, A., & Momeni, N. (2014). Designing a compensation system in knowledge based organizations with a structural-interpretative modeling approach. Quarterly Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 3(2), pp. 131-151. (In Persian)
Rahman, W., Nas, Z. (2013). Employee development and turnover intention: theory validation. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(6),
Shoaib, M., Noor, A., Tirmizi, S.R., & Sajid B. (2009). Determinants of employee retention in Telecom sector of Pakistan. Proceedings 2nd CBRC, Lahore, Pakistan.
Stadler, K. (2011). Talent reviews: the key to effective succession management. Business Strategy Series, 12(5), 264-271.
Stypinska, J., & Turek, K. (2017). Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination. European Journal of Ageing, 14(1), 49-61.
Tavakolinezhad, H., Memarzadeh, G.H., & Afshar Kazemi, M. (2016). Identification and prioritization of effective factors for employee maintenance. Quarterly Journal of Human Resource Management Researches, 8(4), pp. 158-188. (In Persian)
Thibault, A., Schweyer, A., & Whillans, A. (2017). Winning the war for talent: Modern Motivational methods for attracting and retaining employees. Compensation & Benefits Review, 49(4), 230-246.
Tsang, E. Y. H. (2018). Finding hope as a tempting girl” in China: Sex work, indentured mobility, and cosmopolitan individuals. Deviant Behavior, 39(7), 896-909.
World at Work. (2015). The worldatwork handbook of compensation, benefits and total rewards: A comprehensive guide for HR professionals. Hoboken (New Jersey).