Development of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Agility Model using an Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student, Industrial Management Departmen, Faculty of Management and Economic, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
An agile supply chain can respond quickly and cost-effectively to unexpected changes in the market and increase the levels of environmental turmoil regarding both volume and variety. This study aims to present a model for the interactions of pharmaceutical supply chain agility (SCA) factors. In this study, the interactions of variables influencing pharmaceutical SCA were determined using the interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. The variables affecting SCA were extracted through library research and thematic literature, and the final variables were entered into the model using experts' views. These variables were classified according to their strength and dependence into 10 levels and 17 variables, and the relationships were determined at different levels. The results show that the indices of information technology, information sharing and organization integrity are the foundation of the supply chain agility and are the most influential indicators. MicMac analysis and the DEMATEL technique were used to test and confirm the model. ISM provides a way by which order can be imposed on the complexity of such variables. This insight from the model helps strategic planning managers to improve the SCA.
Introduction
The supply chain (SC) aims to deliver the right product, in the right quantity, under the right conditions, at the right time and place for the right cost. In recent years, the production field has moved to a new paradigm called agile manufacturing. The agile manufacturing paradigm was presented as a solution to management problems and environmental changes and strategies that keep organizations competitive (Landaran et a.l, 2014). Supply chain management (SCM) is also of strategic importance in healthcare. Inequality in health care delivery and complexities persist in healthcare systems worldwide. This highlights the need for efficient healthcare SCM. The pharmaceutical supply chain (PSC) represents the path through which good quality pharmaceutical products are delivered to the final consumer at the right place and time (Pitta & Laric, 2004). Managing such an SC is so sensitive that no activity less than 100 percent of the customer service level is acceptable, as it will directly influence the health and safety of the community (Zheng et al., 2006). This study, considering the importance of SC in the pharmaceutical industry, identified the factors affecting the agility of the PSC. Using the ISM technique, a map of relationships between different elements, concepts, or dimensions with different levels was drawn. Then, after reviewing the theoretical foundations and literature, we present the research methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusion.
Case study
This study was conducted to provide a model for agile SC in the pharmaceutical industry.
Theoretical foundations
In recent years, organizational agility has been derived from the organizations' needs to complement the earlier paradigms (Ghorani et al., 2016). The SCA is widely considered an essential element affecting corporate competition because companies with agile SC perform better in response to unforeseen events (Tse et al., 2016). Agility is a significant paradigm for progress and survival in today's business. In recent decades, marketing companies have focused only on money, but companies have also had to increase speed, quality, and resilience. Companies are looking to improve their agility in order to increase these factors. Agility is the ability of a system to establish an appropriate response mechanism in the event of uncertainty (Jain & Gupta, 2016). It can be claimed that SCA is a tool that helps the company achieve a competitive advantage at the firm level (wu et al., 2017). The pharmaceutical SC is the means through which critical medicines are distributed and delivered to the final consumer in the right quantity, at the right place, and at the right time (Mehralian et al., 2012). PSC is so sensitive that no activity less than 100 percent of the customer service level is acceptable, as it will be directly related to patients' health and safety. Therefore, most pharmaceutical companies try to store a large volume of inventory to ensure 100% accountability (Chandrasekaran & Kumar, 2003).
Methodology
This study aims to present a model for the interactions of pharmaceutical SCA factors. By exploring the thematic literature, the factors affecting SCA were extracted, and then, based on nine experts' views, the pharmaceutical SCA factors were determined. Since this study seeks to develop knowledge and help managers apply agile SCM in the pharmaceutical industry, it is methodologically applied and developmental research conducted through a survey study with a hybrid (qualitative and quantitative) approach. The purposive or judgmental sampling method was used according to experts' knowledge of the pharmaceutical industry. Then, using the ISM method and the relevant experts' views, the factors were extracted and classified, and their relationship was determined. The population consisted of academic and pharmaceutical experts with good experience. This study used library and field research methods for data collection. The library research method from internal and external sources in journal articles, books, and dissertations on SCA formulated theoretical foundations and literature reviews. The field research method was also used in interviews with experts.
Discussion and findings
The SCA prerequisite is to find the leading and influential factors and establish a relationship between them. Therefore, in this study, with an extensive review of the literature, the factors affecting the SCA were presented in Table 2, and according to experts, 17 dimensions affecting the SCA were determined. This study sought to present a model for the interactions of pharmaceutical SCA factors. The ISM approach was used to classify and level the SCA components. A model with 10 levels and 17 dimensions was presented following its steps. According to Fig.1, the study results showed that the dimensions of "IT utilization," "information integrity (knowledge sharing)," and "integrated processes (organizational integrity)" are at the bottom of the ISM model, respectively, which indicates a significant impact on other dimensions. In other words, the pharmaceutical SCA prerequisites are the dimensions that should be given more attention. "IT utilization," "skills development," and "competency building" are the most influential dimensions, and "increased customer trust and satisfaction" are the most dependent elements in the PSC. The MicMac analysis also confirms the results.
Conclusion
This study showed that pharmaceutical SCA depended on customer satisfaction, new product launch, continuous improvement, cost reduction, increased trust, and reduced uncertainty. These indicators are highly dependent on other indicators to provide the necessary capabilities for agility, of which IT utilization is one of these capabilities. Another requirement is to establish systems that can be used to be aware of changes in consumer tastes. Utilizing manufacturing technologies that provide the flexibility needed by the organization is another requirement for agility. On the other hand, holding continuous training courses needed by employees to develop their skills and competencies is an essential requirement for agility. Also, integrated planning must be done for the entire SC. In this way, all SC parts should move towards a common goal to create sufficient interaction, and differences between different parts do not slow down customer response. A combination of dimensions such as integrated processes, non-dependence on a supplier, and proper planning has a driving force and moderate dependence requiring careful management attention to increase SCA, as minor changes in the level of these indicators may severely affect SCA.

Keywords


Abdelkafi, C., Beck, B. H., David, B., Druck, C., & Horoho, M. (2009). Balancing risk and costs to optimize the clinical supply chain—a step beyond simulation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 4(3), 96-106.
Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial marketing management, 36(4), 443-457.
Al-Shboul, M.D.A. (2017). Infrastructure framework and manufacturing supply chain agility: the role of delivery dependability and time to market. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(2), 172-185.
Amaro, A.C.S., & Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P.F. (2008). Planning and scheduling of industrial supply chains with reverse flows: A real pharmaceutical case study. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(11), 2606-2625.
Arndt, H. (2008). Supply chain management. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Azar, A., Tizro, A., Moqbel Ba Ard, A., & Navari Rostami, A.A. (2011), "Designing agility model of supply chain, interpretive-structural modeling approach", Management Research in Iran, 14 (69), 1-25. (in persian)
Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V., & Grilo, F. (2010, September). The influence of agile and resilient practices on supply chain performance: an innovative conceptual model proposal. In Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (pp. 273-281).
Azevedo, S. G., Machado, V. H., Barroso, A. P., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2008). Supply chain vulnerability: environment changes and dependencies.  International journal of logistics and transport, 2(1), 41-55.
Bahrami, K., & Karimi, M. (2019). Developing a Model for Agility in Overhaul through Interpretive Structural Modeling (Case Study: Defensive Overhaul Center). Industrial Management Journal, 11(2), 255-272. (in persian)
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of management journal, 45(5), 875-893.
Chandrasekaran, N., & Kumar, S. M. (2003). Pharmaceutical supply chain challenges and best practices. CII–Institute of Logistics.
Chaudhary, T. K., & Trzcieliński, S. (2018, July). Impact of Agility on Enterprise Performance in SMEs of Pakistan. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 492-499). Springer, Cham.
Choi, S. B., Min, H., Joo, H. Y., & Choi, H. B. (2018). Assessing the impact of green supply chain practices on firm performance in the Korean manufacturing industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(2), 129-145.
Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management.
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain.
Dastyar, H., Mohammadi, A., & Mohamadlou, M. A. (2018, February). Designing a Model for Supply Chain Agility (SCA) Indexes Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). In International Conference on Dynamics in Logistics (pp. 58-66). Springer, Cham.
Dehgani, R., & Navimipour, N. J. (2019). The impact of information technology and communication systems on the agility of supply chain management systems. Kybernetes.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Childe, S. J. (2019). Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility. Management Decision.
Enyinda, C. I., Mbah, C. H., & Ogbuehi, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain: A developing‐country perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(1), 45-54.
Farhadi, F., Taghizadeh Yazdi, M., Momeni, M., Sajadi, S. (2018). Providing Sustainable Supply Chain Agility Model in the Brick Industry of Isfahan province. Industrial Management Journal, 10(3), 335-352. (in persian)
Farzadfar, Forough and Hassan Dehghan Dehnavi, (2016), "Modeling the agility of supply chain agility using interpretive structural equations", International Conference on Management and Accounting, Tehran. (in persian)
Ghorani, S., Amiri, M., Olfat, L., Kazazi, A. (2016). Developing a Supply Chain Agility Model and Analysis of its Effects on Supply Chain Performance. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 5(Issue 4, winter 2016), 9-39. (in persian)
Jain, P., & Gupta, N. (2016). Role of Agility in Green Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Science Technology and Management, 5(9), 482-488.
Jetly G., Rossetti C. L., & Handfield R.,(2012), "A multi-agent simulation of the pharmaceutical supply chain," Journal of Simulation, vol. 6, pp. 215-226.
Laínez, J. M., Schaefer, E., & Reklaitis, G. V. (2012). Challenges and opportunities in enterprise-wide optimization in the pharmaceutical industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 47, 19-28.
Landaran, S., Forghani, M. H., Hamidi, V., & Dehaghi, M. R. (2014). Studying the relationship between organizational learning & dimension of organizational agility: a case studi-university of Isfahan. Journal of social issues & humanities, 2(2), 146-151.
Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard business review, 82(10), 102-113.
Levis, A. A., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2004). A hierarchical solution approach for multi-site capacity planning under uncertainty in the pharmaceutical industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28(5), 707-725.
Masoumi, A. H., Yu, M., & Nagurney, A. (2012). A supply chain generalized network oligopoly model for pharmaceuticals under brand differentiation and perishability. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(4), 762-780.
Mehralian, G., Gatari, A. R., Morakabati, M., & Vatanpour, H. (2012). Developing a suitable model for supplier selection based on supply chain risks: an empirical study from Iranian pharmaceutical companies. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research: IJPR, 11(1), 209.
Mohamamdi, A., Alimohammadloo, M., & Dastyar, H. (2015). Proposing a Model of Agility in Supply Chain using Interpretive Structural Modeling. Applied mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology, 3(2), 192-205.
Narayana, S. A., Pati, R. K., & Vrat, P. (2014). Managerial research on the pharmaceutical supply chain–A critical review and some insights for future directions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(1), 18-40.
Parast, M. M., & Shekarian, M. (2019). The impact of supply chain disruptions on organizational performance: A literature review. In Revisiting Supply Chain Risk (pp. 367-389). Springer, Cham.
Pitta, D. A., & Laric, M. V. (2004). Value chains in health care. Journal of Consumer Marketing.
Potdar, P. K., & Routroy, S. (2019). Analysis of agile manufacturing enablers: a case study. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(2), 4008-4015.
Ramezani, Y., Esmaeilian, Gh.R. (2016), "Presenting the agility model of supply chain for companies producing auto parts with an interpretive-structural modeling approach", 4th National Conference on Management, Economics and Accounting, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Industrial Management Organization, University Tabriz. (in persian)
Rossetti, C. L., Handfield, R., & Dooley, K. J. (2011). Forces, trends, and decisions in pharmaceutical supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
Rotstein, G. E., Papageorgiou, L. G., Shah, N., Murphy, D. C., & Mustafa, R. (1999). A product portfolio approach in the pharmaceutical industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23, S883-S886.
Shah, N. (2004). Pharmaceutical supply chains: key issues and strategies for optimisation. Computers & chemical engineering, 28(6-7), 929-941.
Shah, N. (2005). Process industry supply chains: Advances and challenges. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 29(6), 1225-1235.
Sousa, R. T., Liu, S., Papageorgiou, L. G., & Shah, N. (2011). Global supply chain planning for pharmaceuticals. Chemical engineering research and design, 89(11), 2396-2409.
Sousa, R. T., Shah, N., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2005). Global supply chain network optimisation for pharmaceuticals. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 20, 1189-1194.
Tse, Y. K., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P., & MacBryde, J. (2016). Embracing supply chain agility: an investigation in the electronics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
Wu, H. H., & Chang, S. Y. (2015). A case study of using DEMATEL method to identify critical factors in green supply chain management. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 256, 394-403.
Wu, K. J., Liao, C. J., Tseng, M. L., Lim, M. K., Hu, J., & Tan, K. (2017). Toward sustainability: using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 663-676.
Yusuf, Y., Menhat, M. S., Abubakar, T., & Ogbuke, N. J. (2020). Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107501.
Zheng, J., Bakker, E., Knight, L., Gilhespy, H., Harland, C., & Walker, H. (2006). A strategic case for e-adoption in healthcare supply chains. International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 290-301.