واکاوی سه دهه ارتباط پیچیده نهادها و کارآفرینی منطقه‌ای(یک مرور نظام‌مند مبتنی بر چارچوب ترکیبی ADO-TCM)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه کارآفرینی سازمانی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه پیام نور تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف مرور نظام‌مند رابطه بین کارآفرینی منطقه‌ای و نهادها، با استفاده از چارچوب  «پیشینیان، تصمیمات، نتایج -تئوری‌ها، زمینه و روش‌شناسی» و روش تحقیق نظام‌مند مبتنی بر دامنه، به تحلیل ساختاری مقالات حوزه کارآفرینی منطقه‌ای و نهادها در پایگاه علمی اسکوپوس پرداخته است. نتایج نشان داد که پیشینیان در سه سطح ارتباط نهادها، سطح نهادی و نوع نهادهای مؤثر قابل دسته‌بندی بودند. چارچوب نظری مطالعات عمدتاً بر نظریه نهادگرایی و ۹ نظریه تکمیلی دیگر استوار بود. تحلیل جغرافیایی مطالعات، تمرکز پژوهش‌ها را در کشورهای توسعه‌یافته، به‌ویژه بریتانیا، ایالات متحده و چین نشان داد. از منظر روش‌شناختی، غلبه رویکرد ترکیبی و مطالعات طولی در پژوهش‌های این حوزه مشهود بود. یافته‌های کلیدی پژوهش، چهار روند اصلی را در مطالعات حوزه کارآفرینی منطقه‌ای و نهادها شناسایی کرد: ۱- توجه فزاینده به نقش اکوسیستم‌های کارآفرینی در توسعه منطقه‌ای؛ ۲- اهمیت روزافزون همکاری‌های بین‌نهادی؛ ۳- تمرکز بر نقش آموزش و پرورش کارآفرینی؛ ۴- اهمیت نقش نهادهای دانشگاهی در توسعه نوآوری منطقه‌ای. این یافته‌ها با ارائه تصویری جامع از رابطه بین کارآفرینی منطقه‌ای و نهادها، می‌توانستند به سیاست‌گذاران، مدیران و پژوهشگران در جهت توسعه و تقویت کارآفرینی منطقه‌ای کمک کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploring three Decades of the Complex Relationship Between Institutions and Regional Entrepreneurship (A Systematic Review Based on the Combined ADO-TCM framework)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bahman khodapanah 1
  • Hamid Padash 2
  • Allahyar Beigi Firoozi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Corporate Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The present research aims to systematically review the relationship between regional entrepreneurship and institutions, using the ADO-TCM framework (Antecedents, Decisions, Outcomes-Theories, Context, and Methodology) and a domain-based systematic research method to analyze the structural components of articles in the field of regional entrepreneurship and institutions in the Scopus scientific database. Results showed that antecedents could be categorized into three levels: institutional relationships, institutional level, and types of influential institutions. The theoretical framework of the studies was primarily based on institutional theory and 9 other complementary theories. Geographical analysis of the studies revealed a concentration of research in developed countries, particularly Britain, the United States, and China. From a methodological perspective, the predominance of mixed approaches and longitudinal studies in research in this field was evident. The key findings of the research identified four main trends in studies of regional entrepreneurship and institutions: 1- Increasing attention to the role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in regional development; 2- The growing importance of inter-institutional collaborations; 3- Focus on the role of entrepreneurship education; 4- The importance of academic institutions in regional innovation development. These findings, by providing a comprehensive picture of the relationship between regional entrepreneurship and institutions, could assist policymakers, managers, and researchers in developing and strengthening regional entrepreneurship.
Introduction
Institutions help the growth and development of entrepreneurship by providing suitable conditions for economic activities, reducing risks, improving access to information, and decreasing transaction costs. These institutions are significant not only at the national level but also at the regional level. Studies show that not only formal institutions such as laws and regulations but also informal institutions such as culture, tradition, and history play a vital role in entrepreneurial success. Culture, as one of the most important institutional components, plays a significant role in shaping entrepreneurial attitudes. The interaction between formal and informal institutions is a key factor in regional entrepreneurship development, and in cases where there is asymmetry between these two types of institutions, entrepreneurial activity can be strengthened. Research in the field of the relationship between regional entrepreneurship and institutions is important for three reasons: first, it helps understand why the level of entrepreneurial activities is higher in some regions compared to others; second, it is useful in identifying institutional factors that promote or destroy entrepreneurial activities; and third, it assists policymakers in designing interventions that support entrepreneurial activities. This systematic review, utilizing the comprehensive ADO-TCM framework, analyzes the structured levels of different institutions and their predictors and identifies the key trends governing research in this field. The main objective of this research is to identify and analyze institutions that contribute to the development of entrepreneurial activities and also to examine the mutual relationship between institutions and entrepreneurship at the level of different regions
Case study
The statistical population of the present research includes all articles published in the field of regional entrepreneurship and institutions in the Scopus scientific database during the time period 1990-2024.
Materials and Methods
The present research employs a framework-based systematic review method. The main approach is using the integrated ADO-TCM framework, which enables structured content analysis and comprehensive synthesis of studies. The central research question focuses on what and how institutions and regional entrepreneurship are related.
Discussion and Results
This research is one of the first studies conducted in Persian focusing on the integrated ADO-TCM framework in the field of regional entrepreneurship. After searching for selected keywords (along with applied restrictions) in the Scopus scientific database, 627 articles were identified, and finally, with the application of a fundamental restriction (the presence of the words "institution" and "regional entrepreneurship" in the title, abstract, or keywords), the number of analyzable articles was reduced to 29, and the research framework was identified. The analysis of selected articles was conducted using the combined ADO-TCM framework, and articles were critically examined from various dimensions such as antecedents or predictors; decisions; outcomes; theories; context; and methodology. The identified antecedents were categorized into 3 levels: (1) institutional relationships; (2) institutional level; and (3) type of effective (functional) institutions. These antecedents lead to decisions based on (1) beliefs and norms and (2) institutional structure, and the decisions made in turn have consequences for (1) entrepreneurship and (2) institutions. From a theoretical perspective, articles related to regional entrepreneurship and institutions consist of institutional theory as the main theoretical body of studies and 9 other theories including: agency theory; market-supporting federalism theory; cluster theory; process theory; resource dependency theory; ecofeminism theory; knowledge spillover theory; growth regime theory; and endogenous growth theory. In terms of the context under study, the selected articles are distributed across regions in the UK (n=7); United States (n=4); China (n=3); Austria (n=2); Germany (n=2); Russia (n=2); Switzerland (n=2); Belgium (n=1); Indonesia (n=1); and others (n=4). Also, in terms of methodology, the research was analyzed from two dimensions of research method and time framework, which indicates the dominance of the mixed approach in terms of research method as well as longitudinal studies in terms of time framework. Institutional quality at the regional level has a direct impact on spatial patterns of entrepreneurship and the geographical distribution of innovative activities. Regions with efficient institutions, high transparency in administrative processes, and strong institutional support typically experience higher rates of entrepreneurship and success of startups.
Conclusion
The analyses conducted using the ADO-TCM framework show that antecedent factors affecting regional entrepreneurship can be categorized into three main levels: institutional relationships, institutional level, and types of functional institutions. These antecedent factors lead to decisions that are primarily based on two axes: decisions based on beliefs and norms, and decisions based on institutional structures. The outcomes of these decisions are also manifested in two main areas: outcomes that directly affect entrepreneurial activities and outcomes that influence institutional structures. From a theoretical perspective, institutional theory was identified as the main framework for studies in this field, but 9 other theories including agency theory, market-supporting federalism, cluster theory, process theory, resource dependency theory, ecofeminism, knowledge spillover theory, growth regime theory, and endogenous growth theory have also played roles in explaining the complex relationships between institutions and regional entrepreneurship. The geographical distribution of studies shows that most research has been conducted in Britain (7 cases), the United States (4 cases), and China (3 cases), which may indicate the importance of the topic in advanced and emerging economies. From a methodological perspective, mixed approaches and longitudinal studies have been dominant in this field, demonstrating the complexity of relationships and the need for multidimensional and long-term investigations. The findings of this research confirm that institutional quality at the regional level has a direct impact on spatial patterns of entrepreneurship and the geographical distribution of innovative activities. Regions with efficient institutions, high transparency in administrative processes, and strong institutional support typically experience higher rates of entrepreneurship and success of startups. Additionally, the dynamic interaction between local institutions, universities, research and development centers, and the private sector leads to the creation of dynamic entrepreneurial ecosystems in which regional competitive advantages are strengthened and technological innovations are facilitated. Finally, this study shows that regional entrepreneurship and institutions interact in a complex and multidimensional relationship. As new institutionalists like Douglas North argue, institutions as the "rules of the game" in society form structural constraints that can act as both facilitators and barriers to entrepreneurial activities. Formal institutions such as tax laws, business regulations, property rights, and government support policies provide a defining legal framework for the formation and development of entrepreneurial activities at the regional level. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Regional entrepreneurship
  • institutional economics
  • ADO-TCM framework
  • systematic review
منابع فارسی
شیبانی‌امین، عیسی و بیگی فیروزی، الله‌یار. (1401). نقش مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات در رسیدن به حکمروایی خوب شهری با تأکید بر مشارکت شهروندان(مطالعه موردی: شهر زاهدان)، حکمرانی و توسعه، 2(1)، 129-144.
عسگرنژاد نوری,باقر؛ ابراهیم پور، حبیب؛ لطفی، شراره و بیگی فیروزی,الله یار . (1400). ارتباط بین آوای سازمانی و توسعه حرفه‌ای کارکنان؛ واسطه‌گری سرمایه روان‌شناختی. حکمرانی و توسعه، 1(3)، 103-128.
ابراهیم‌پور، حبیب؛ زرجو، شبنم و بابیانی,بهنام. (1403). شناسایی سازکارهای توسعه شرکت‌های کارآفرین در زیست‌بوم کارآفرینی. حکمرانی و توسعه، 4(3), 151-179.
Refrences
Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2015). Phishing for phools: The economics of manipulation and deception. Princeton University Press.
Ansell, C. (2021). Institutionalism. The Palgrave handbook of EU crises, 135-152.
Araki, M., Bennett, D., & Wagner, G. (2024). Regional innovation networks & high-growth entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 53(1), 104900.
Asgarnezhad Nouri, B., Ebrahimpour,H., Lotfi,S. and Beigi Firoozi, A. (2021). The Relationship between Organizational Voice and Professional Development of Employees; Psychological Capital Mediation. Governance and Development Journal, 1(3), 103-128. doi: 10.22111/jipaa.2021.153773. (In Persian).
Audretsch, D., Belitski, M., Eichler, G., & Schwarz, E. (2024). Entrepreneurial ecosystems, institutional quality, and the unexpected role of the sustainability orientation of entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 62(2), 503-522.
Baptista, R., Escária, V., & Madruga, P. (2008). Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal. Small business economics, 30, 49-58.
Bates, R. (2014). The new institutionalism. Institutions, property rights, and economic growth: the legacy of Douglass North. Journal of Economic Issues, 29(2), 50-65.
Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of business venturing, 11(1), 3-22.
Belitski, M., Cherkas, N., & Khlystova, O. (2024). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in conflict regions: evidence from Ukraine. The Annals of Regional Science, 72(2), 355-376.
Bichler, B., Kallmuenzer, A., Peters, M., Petry, T., & Clauss, T. (2022). Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: how family firm embeddedness triggers ecosystem development. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), 15-44.
Bulmer, S. (2023). Institutionalism. In The Elgar Companion to the European Union . Edward Elgar Publishing, 27-36.
Demirdag, I. (2024).  COVID 19 and regional entrepreneurship: which regional features can mitigate the devastating effects of COVID-19? European Planning Studies,  32, 1400-1377, (6).
Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2017). The effect of entrepreneurship on economic development—an empirical analysis using regional entrepreneurship culture. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(1), 157-189.
Herold, D., & Marzantowicz, Ł. (2024). Neo-institutionalism in supply chain management: from supply chain susceptibility to supply chain resilience. Management Research Review.
Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2016). Socio-spatial culture and entrepreneurship: some theoretical and empirical observations. Economic Geography, 92(3), 269-300.
Kalfas, D., Kalogiannidis, S., Ambas, V., & Chatzitheo, F. (2024). Contribution of the Cultural and Creative Industries to Regional Development and Revitalization: A European Perspective. Urban Science, 8(2), 39.
Khatri, B., Arora, S., Magd, H., & Khan, S. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. In International Perspectives on Value Creation and Sustainability Through Social Entrepreneurship . . IGI Global, 46-60.
Khoury, T., & Prasad, A. (2016). Entrepreneurship amid concurrent institutional constraints in less developed countries. Business & Society, 55(7), 934-969.
Khoury, T., Junkunc, M., & Mingo, S. (2015). Navigating Political Hazard Risks and Legal System Quality: Venture Capital Investments in Latin America". Journal of Management, 41(3), 808-840.
Kotey , B. (2006). Entrepreneurship and regional development: A theoretical framework.‏. Small Enterprise Research, 14(2), 20-45.
Kraus, S., McDowell, W., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Rodríguez-García, M. (2021). The role of innovation and knowledge for entrepreneurship and regional development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 33(3-4), 175-184.
Lim, W., Yap, S., & Makkar, M. (2021). Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading? Journal of Business Research, 122, 534-566.
Mair, J., Marti, I., & Ventresca, M. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819-850.
Morris, M., Kuratko, D., Santos, S., & Soleimanof, S. (2024). Fear and the poverty entrepreneur: The paradox of failure and success. Business Horizons, 67(1), 41-54.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
O’Connor, A., & Audretsch, D. (2023). Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: learning from forest ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 60(3), 1051-1079.
Osei-Tutu, P., Pregernig, M., & Pokorny, B. (2015). Interactions between formal and informal institutions in community, private and state forest contexts in Ghana‏. Forest Policy and Economics, 54, 26-35.
Paul, J., & Benito, G. (2018). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1), 90-115.
Paul, J., Khatri, P., & Kaur Duggal, H. (2024). Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 537-550.
Paul, J., Lim, A., O'Cass, A., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies 45, no., 1–16.
Ragmoun, W. (2023). Institutional quality, unemployment, economic growth and entrepreneurial activity in developed countries: a dynamic and sustainable approach. Review of International Business and Strategy, 33(3), 345-370.
Rodríguez-Pose , A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional studies, 47(7), 1034-1047.
Sheibani Amin, I. and Beigi firoozi, A. (2022). The Role of Information Technology Management in Achieving Good Urban Governance With an Emphasis on Citizens Participation. Governance and Development, 2(1), 129-144. doi: 10.22111/jipaa.2022.323619.1038. (In Persian).
Tham, W., Lim, W., & Vieceli, J. (2023). Foundations of consumption and production in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(4), 2979-3002.
Tunio, M., Shaikh, E., Katper, N., & Brahmi, M. (2023). Nascent entrepreneurs and challenges in the digital market in developing countries. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 12(1-2), 140-153.
Xie, Z., Wang, X., Xie, L., & Duan, K. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and the quality and quantity of regional entrepreneurship: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Research, 128, 499-509.
Ebrahim Pour, H., Zarjou,S., & Babiani, B. (2024). Identifying the Mechanisms for Developing Entrepreneurial Companies in the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Governance and Development Journal, 4(3), 151-179. doi: 10.22111/jipaa.2025.494338.1234. (In Persian).