طراحی الگوی حکمرانی شهری باز در شهرهای هوشمند با رویکرد فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

2 استاد مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

چکیده

در سال‌های اخیر، شهرهای هوشمند به‌عنوان رویکردی جامع برای توسعه پایدار شهری و حل مشکلات پیچیده شهری مورد توجه قرار گرفته‌اند. حکمرانی هوشمند و حکمرانی شهری باز دو مدل کلیدی برای بهره‌گیری از فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در مدیریت شهری و ارتقای مشارکت شهروندان هستند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش حکمرانی شهری باز در تحقق اهداف شهر هوشمند و ارائه مدلی در این زمینه، با روش فراترکیب انجام شده است. این پژوهش کاربردی و ماهیت آن اکتشافی است. جامعه آماری شامل مقالات منتشرشده در پایگاه‌های علمی خارجی (Scopus, Emerald, Web of Science) طی سال‌های ۲۰۱۴ تا ۲۰۲۴ بود که درنهایت ۴۱ پژوهش مرتبط انتخاب و با تحلیل محتوای آنها، ابعاد و کدهای الگوی موردنظر استخراج شدند بر اساس یافته‌ها، ۲۶ مؤلفه در هفت دسته (شفافیت و پاسخگویی، مشارکت فعال و فراگیر، عدالت اجتماعی و پایداری، نوآوری و تحول دیجیتال، امنیت و مدیریت ریسک، چشم‌انداز استراتژیک، کارآمدی) به‌عنوان ابعاد اصلی حکمرانی شهری باز شناسایی و برچسب‌گذاری شدند. نتایج نشان داد این مدل ابزاری کاربردی برای پایش عملکرد دستگاه‌ها، تدوین راهبردهای شفافیت، بهبود تعاملات شهروندی و ارتقای اشتراک‌گذاری داده‌ها است. بدین ترتیب، با ارائه این مدل یکپارچه، دولت­ها قادر خواهند بود که ضمن اطمینان از روند رو به پیشرفت استقرار حکمرانی شهری باز، به ارزیابی عملکرد بخش های وابسته به خـود اقدام کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Model of Open Urban Governance in Global Smart Cities Using a Meta-Synthesis Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Khajedad 1
  • Habibollah Salarzehi 2
  • Aboobakr Raeesi 1
  • Elnaz Lari Yazdi 1
1 PhD Candidate, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
2 Professor of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
In recent years, smart cities have emerged as a comprehensive and effective approach to urban development and addressing complex urban challenges, gaining significant attention from researchers. In this context, smart governance and open urban governance have been introduced as two key models leveraging information and communication technology (ICT) for urban management and enhancing citizen participation. This study aims to examine the role of open urban governance in achieving the objectives of smart cities and to propose a model in this regard using the meta-synthesis method.
Introduction
Today, smart cities have emerged as a holistic strategy and a potential approach for effective urban development, attracting significant attention worldwide. This concept offers solutions to a wide range of urban challenges, including population growth, efficient land use, infrastructure development, traffic congestion, and governance issues (Khoa et al., 2021). In recent years, the rapid advancement of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has played a crucial role in driving smart city initiatives. Since 2005, the integration of ICT has expanded across various urban domains, including infrastructure, energy and water supply, and social security (Townsend, 2013; Sun et al., 2016). However, the realization of a smart city is not solely dependent on technology adoption; rather, it necessitates a governance model capable of leveraging technological capacities in an intelligent and coordinated manner (Tan & Taeihagh, 2020). In this context, the concept of "smart governance" has been introduced, integrating ICT-based tools with participatory governance to enhance decision-making and urban management. Smart governance facilitates a transition in social governance through technological advancements, aiming to create inclusive, integrated, and sustainable smart cities (Liu et al., 2022). In parallel with smart governance, "open governance" has emerged as a transformative approach emphasizing transparency, citizen engagement, and open data, playing a critical role in enhancing accountability and urban efficiency (Janssen & Estevez, 2013). By enabling widespread citizen participation in decision-making processes, open governance fosters public trust and facilitates collaborative solutions for urban challenges (Sáez Martín et al., 2020). This approach lays the foundation for "open urban governance," which specifically focuses on managing urban affairs through open data and participatory platforms (Meijer et al., 2019). In this model, open urban data, digital tools, and participatory platforms empower citizens to directly engage in urban planning, policymaking, and service delivery (Jansson et al., 2020). Nevertheless, integrating smart governance and open urban governance within smart cities presents several challenges, including data security concerns, privacy issues, and technical constraints. Additionally, the absence of a comprehensive and cohesive framework for implementing this governance model has resulted in fragmented and inconsistent adoption across different cities. Therefore, designing a unified framework for implementing open urban governance in smart cities—one that strengthens citizen participation while upholding the principles of smart governance—is imperative. Consequently, this study, utilizing a meta-synthesis approach, seeks to develop a comprehensive model for open urban governance in smart cities to address existing challenges and maximize the potential benefits of this governance paradigm.
Case study
The statistical population of this study included all articles published in the international databases Scopus, Emerald, and Web of Science from 2014 to 2024. Relevant documents were identified based on specified keywords and reviewed, with the most relevant studies selected using purposeful sampling.
Materials and Methods
This research is applied in nature and exploratory in essence, employing the meta-synthesis method for data collection. The study utilized the seven-step method of Sandelowski and Barroso for conducting the meta-synthesis. A systematic review of all relevant sources on open urban governance and its critical components was performed, covering 1,196 articles, books, and theses from reputable international scientific databases.
 
Discussion and Results
A review of the existing literature on open urban governance reveals that, despite numerous studies in this area, only partial aspects and indicators of open urban governance and smart governance have been addressed. None of the existing studies has comprehensively examined the dimensions and components of open urban governance. This study systematically reviewed all foreign research conducted on open urban governance from 2014 to 2024 and identified the influential factors in open urban governance. After assessing their relevance to the research topic, primary sources were filtered, and 41 studies were selected for concept extraction and coding. In total, based on the results of the systematic review and meta-synthesis approach, seven final codes (transparency and accountability, active and inclusive participation, social justice and sustainability, innovation and digital transformation, security and risk management, strategic vision, and efficiency) and 26 secondary codes were extracted. These secondary codes included transparency and data accessibility, data-driven governance, accountability in governance, public trust, open innovation, co-creation and multilateral collaboration, inclusive virtual social networks, crowdsourcing, stakeholder interaction and collaboration, internationalization, sustainable urban development, social justice and inequality reduction, rule of law, smart transportation, mobile government and digital public organizations, smart living and smart citizens, development of online and digital businesses, the fourth industrial revolution and data-driven cities, data security and privacy, sustainable governance, multilayered governance, risk and crisis management, holistic management and comprehensive development, resource optimization, e-public services, and remote work.
Conclusion
The results indicate that the majority of studies focused on transparency and data accessibility, open innovation, co-creation and multilateral collaboration, sustainable urban development, social justice, rule of law, accountability in governance, and stakeholder interaction and collaboration. The least attention was given to multilayered governance, resource optimization, remote work, and e-public services. The reliability and quality control of the findings were measured using the kappa coefficient method, with the calculated kappa index for open urban governance factors showing a high level of agreement. The assessment of actions taken by governmental and executive bodies for establishing open urban governance requires the precise identification of key components and sub-components for evaluating the various dimensions of this approach. By providing an evaluation model for open urban governance through the meta-synthesis method, including its dimensions and components, governments and executive bodies can ensure the effectiveness of actions taken in the path of open urban governance and identify areas for improvement. This model, as a practical tool, enables urban managers to monitor organizational performance, develop strategies for enhancing transparency, improve citizen interactions, and promote data sharing. Consequently, with the introduction of this integrated model, the precise evaluation and continuous improvement of open urban governance are facilitated.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Open urban governance
  • open governance
  • smart governance
  • smart city
  • E-government

مراجع

Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2018). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of science and technology policy management, 9(2), 146-169.
Alsaid, L. A. Z. A. (2021). Performance measurement in smart city governance: A case study of an Egyptian city council. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(3), 395-430.
Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2015). Understanding e-government research: A perspective from the information and library science field of knowledge. Internet Research, 25(4), 633-673.
Allam, Z. (2019). Cities and the digital revolution: Aligning technology and humanity. Springer Nature.
Allam, Z., Sharifi, A., Bibri, S. E., & Chabaud, D. (2022). Emerging trends and knowledge structures of smart urban governance. Sustainability, 14(9), 5275.
Árvai, A. (2022). Az okos város fogalom megjelenése a magyar közép- és nagyvárosok fejlesztési dokumentumaiban. Földrajzi Közlemények.
Babić, A., Sokolić, D., & Antonić, J. J. (2022). Development of smart governance in Croatian cities-the size of a city as a determinant of smart governance. Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews-Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, 35(2), 315-335.
Bolívar, M. P. R. (2018). Creative citizenship: The new wave for collaborative environments in smart cities. Academia revista latinoamericana de administración, 31(1), 277-302.
Bokolo, A. J. (2023). Data driven approaches for smart city planning and design: a case scenario on urban data management. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(4), 351-367.
Caprotti, F., & Liu, D. (2020). Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119690.
Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information polity, 15(1-2), 1-9.
Coelho, V. N., Oliveira, T. A., Tavares, W., & Coelho, I. M. (2021). Smart accounts for decentralized governance on smart cities. Smart Cities, 4(2), 881-893.
Da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1-19.
De Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Júnior, L. A. F., Da Costa, W. P. L. B., & Salmoria, F. T. (2020). Governance and quality of life in smart cities: Towards sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119926.
Demirel, D., & Mülazımoğlu, M. E. (2022). How the smart governance model shapes cities? Cases from Europe. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(1), 8-25.
Dongmei, Y. ( 2015).  Research on the Challenges and Countermeasures of Government Smart Governance in the Era of Big Data. Theoretical Discussion.
da Silva, A. O., & Fernandes, R. A. S. (2020). Smart governance based on multipurpose territorial cadastre and geographic information system: An analysis of geoinformation, transparency and collaborative participation for Brazilian capitals. Land use policy, 97, 104752.
Dong, L., & Liu, Y. (2023). Frontiers of policy and governance research in a smart city and artificial intelligence: an advanced review based on natural language processing. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 1199041.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16(3), 467-494.
Ebadi, F. (2015). Electronic Governance: Requirements and Necessities, First National Smart City Conference. Qom, https://civilica.com/doc/565719. (In Persian)
Estevez, E., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (Eds.). (2021). Smart cities and smart governance: towards the 22nd century sustainable city (Vol. 37). Springer Nature.
Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Digital participatory platforms for co-production in urban development: A systematic review. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 7(3), 52-79.
Faraji, S. J., Jafari Nozar, M., & Arash, M. (2021). The analysis of smart governance scenarios of the urban culture in multicultural cities based on two concepts of “cultural intelligence” and “smart governance”. GeoJournal, 86, 357-377.
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., & Meijers, E. (2007). City-ranking of European medium-sized cities. Cent. Reg. Sci. Vienna UT, 9(1), 1-12.
Grace, M., Scott, A. J., Sadler, J. P., Proverbs, D. G., & Grayson, N. (2023). Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance. Emerald Open Research, 1(5).
Giuliodori, A., Berrone, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2023). Where smart meets sustainability: The role of Smart Governance in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in cities. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 27-44.
Gohari, S., Ahlers, D., F. Nielsen, B., & Junker, E. (2020). The governance approach of smart city initiatives. evidence from trondheim, bergen, and bodø. Infrastructures, 5(4), 31.
Gloerich, I., De Waal, M., Ferri, G., Cila, N., & Karpinski, T. (2020). The city as a license. Implications of blockchain and distributed ledgers for urban governance. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2, 534942.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524-534.
Gil, O., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Cantador, I. (2019). Citizen participation and the rise of digital media platforms in smart governance and smart cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 8(1), 19-34.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524-534.
Greutter-Gregus, É., & Greutter, Z. G. (2024). The connection between the smart city concept and human resource management, with a special focus on the role of competences and corporate competitiveness. Studia Mundi–Economica, 11(1), 55-67.
Hasbini, M. A., Eldabi, T., & Aldallal, A. (2018). Investigating the information security management role in smart city organisations. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(1), 86-98.
Hartley, K. (2023). Public perceptions about smart cities: Governance and quality-of-life in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 166(3), 731-753.
Jalali, A. (2016). Electronic City, Publishing Center of Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran. (In Persian)
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1-S8.
Jansson, M., Fors, H., Sundevall, E. P., Bengtsson, A., Lerstrup, I., Hurley, P., & Randrup, T. B. (2020). User-oriented urban open space governance and management. In Urban Open Space Governance and Management (pp. 68-92). Routledge.
Jiang, H. (2021). Smart urban governance in the ‘smart’era: Why is it urgently needed?. Cities, 111, 103004.
Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2022). Smart urban governance: An alternative to technocratic “smartness”. GeoJournal, 87(3), 1639-1655.
Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2020). A sociotechnical framework for smart urban governance: Urban technological innovation and urban governance in the realm of smart cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 9(1), 1-19.
Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2019). Smart urban governance: An urgent symbiosis?. Information Polity, 24(3), 245-269.
KHOA, H. V. B. (2021). Study on Smart City Development in Vietnam Medium-Sized Cities: Stakeholder Approach (Doctoral dissertation, 서울대학교 대학원).
Kim, N., & Yang, S. (2023). Conceptually Related Smart Cities Services from the Perspectives of Governance and Sociotechnical Systems in Europe. Systems, 11(4), 166.
Kuzior, A., Pakhnenko, O., Tiutiunyk, I., & Lyeonov, S. (2023). E-governance in smart cities: Global trends and key enablers. Smart Cities, 6(4), 1663-1689.
Kang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). The organizational structure and operational logic of an urban smart governance information platform: Discussion on the background of urban governance transformation in China. Complexity, 2020(1), 6638958.
Furtado, L. S., da Silva, T. L. C., Ferreira, M. G. F., de Macedo, J. A. F., & Cavalcanti, J. K. D. M. L. (2023). A framework for Digital Transformation towards Smart Governance: using big data tools to target SDGs in Ceará, Brazil. Journal of Urban Management, 12(1), 74-87.
Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A., Luterek, M., Azeroual, O., Ukpabi, D., Valtenbergs, V., & Machova, R. (2022). Transparency of open data ecosystems in smart cities: Definition and assessment of the maturity of transparency in 22 smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 82, 103906.
Lim, Y., Edelenbos, J., & Gianoli, A. (2023). Dynamics in the governance of smart cities: insights from South Korean smart cities. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup1), 183-205.
Lee, R. S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in daily life (pp. 1-394). Singapore:: Springer.
Liu, D., & Qi, X. (2022). Smart governance: The era requirements and realization path of the modernization of the basic government governance ability. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 674-680.
McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401-413.
Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public administration review, 73(3), 429-439.
Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: connecting vision and voice. International review of administrative sciences, 78(1), 10-29.
Marsal-Llacuna, M. L. (2020). The people's smart city dashboard (PSCD): Delivering on community-led governance with blockchain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120150.
McGuirk, P., Dowling, R., Maalsen, S., & Baker, T. (2021). Urban governance innovation and COVID‐19. Geographical Research, 59(2), 188-195.
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International review of administrative sciences, 82(2), 392-408.
Meijer, A. J., Lips, M., & Chen, K. (2019). Open governance: A new paradigm for understanding urban governance in an information age. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 1, 3.
Nesti, G. (2020). Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: Insights from four European cases. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 20-37.
Noennig, J. R., Rose, F. M., Stadelhofer, P., Jannack, A., & Kulashri, S. (2024). Agile development for urban digitalisation: insights from the creation of Dresden’s smart city strategy. Measuring Business Excellence, (ahead-of-print).
Noori, N., de Jong, M., & Hoppe, T. (2020). Towards an integrated framework to measure smart city readiness: The case of Iranian cities. Smart Cities, 3(3), 676-704.
Nesti, G., & Graziano, P. R. (2020). The democratic anchorage of governance networks in smart cities: an empirical assessment. Public Management Review, 22(5), 648-667.
Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press.
Ooms, W., Caniëls, M. C., Roijakkers, N., & Cobben, D. (2020). Ecosystems for smart cities: tracing the evolution of governance structures in a dutch smart city initiative. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1225-1258.
Parameswaran, T., Reddy, Y. P., Nagaveni, V., & Sathiyaraj, R. (2022). Era of Computational Big Data Analytics and IoT Techniques in Smart City Applications. IoT and Big Data Analytics for Smart Cities, 1-22.
Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101907.
Park, J., & Yoo, S. (2023). Evolution of the smart city: three extensions to governance, sustainability, and decent urbanisation from an ICT-based urban solution. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup1), 10-28.
Prasad, D., Alizadeh, T., & Dowling, R. (2021). Multiscalar smart city governance in India. Geoforum, 121, 173-180.
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23(2), 143-162.
Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101907.
Potts, L., Seitzinger, J., Jones, D., & Harrison, A. (2011, October). Tweeting disaster: hashtag constructions and collisions. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on Design of communication (pp. 235-240).
Qayrovani, Q.,,  Montazeri, M., &  Zahedi, Sh. (2023). Presenting a smart governance model focusing on human resource development and training in the public sector. Management and Education Perspectives, 5(1), 111-141. (In Persian)
Repette, P., Sabatini-Marques, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Sell, D., & Costa, E. (2021). The evolution of city-as-a-platform: Smart urban development governance with collective knowledge-based platform urbanism. Land, 10(1), 33.
Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., & Hossin, M. A. (2018, May). Smart governance through bigdata: Digital transformation of public agencies. In 2018 international conference on artificial intelligence and big data (ICAIBD) (pp. 62-70). IEEE.
Sauer, S. (2012). Do smart cities produce smart entrepreneurs?. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 7(3), 63-73.
Sun, Y., Song, H., Jara, A. J., & Bie, R. (2016). Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities. IEEE access, 4, 766-773.
Shu, Y., Deng, N., Wu, Y., Bao, S., & Bie, A. (2023). Urban governance and sustainable development: The effect of smart city on carbon emission in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122643.
Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. sustainability, 12(3), 899.
Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. WW Norton & Company.
Träskman, T. (2022). Smartness and thinking infrastructure: an exploration of a city becoming smart. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(5), 665-688.
Tavmen, G. (2019). Open data and smart London governmentality: thinking through discourse, infrastructure and citizenship (Doctoral dissertation, Birkbeck, University of London).
United Nations. (2018). E-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-Government to Support Transformation towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies.
Verma, S., Kawamoto, Y., Fadlullah, Z. M., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2017). A survey on network methodologies for real-time analytics of massive IoT data and open research issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), 1457-1477.
Viale Pereira, G., & Schuch de Azambuja, L. (2021). Smart sustainable city roadmap as a tool for addressing sustainability challenges and building governance capacity. Sustainability, 14(1), 239.
Jinjun, W. (2014). Urban “Smart Governance": The Integration Mechanism of Information Technology, Government Functions and Social Governance. Observation and Thinking.
Wu, Y. (2022). [Retracted] Ecological Smart City Construction Based on Ecological Economy and Network Governance. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), 5682965.
Winters, J. V. (2011). Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of regional science, 51(2), 253-270.
Xu, C., & Chen, C. A. (2023). Open Government Data and Smart Nation in Singapore. In Open Government and Freedom of Information: Policy and Practice in Asia and the Middle East (pp. 163-184). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Yoo, Y. (2021). Toward sustainable governance: Strategic analysis of the smart city Seoul portal in Korea. Sustainability, 13(11), 5886.
Yannoukakou, A., & Araka, I. (2014). Access to government information: Right to information and open government data synergy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147, 332-340.
 
پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی
دوره 18، شماره 69 - شماره پیاپی 69
(علمی - پژوهشی)
مهر 1404
صفحه 31-64

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار