فهم تأثیر خودسانسوری منابع انسانی بر سکوت سازمانی: تبیین نقش میانجی خاموشی هوشیارانه‌ی منابع انسانی(مورد مطالعه: استانداری چهارمحال و بختیاری)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.

2 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیر خودسانسوری منابع انسانی بر سکوت سازمانی با تبیین نقش میانجی خاموشی هوشیارانه‌ی منابع انسانی است. این پژوهش بر اساس هدف کاربردی و به لحاظ روش، توصیفی پیمایشی است. جامعه‌ی آماری پژوهش، 355 نفر از کارکنان استانداری چهارمحال و بختیاری هستند و با توجه به اینکه حجم جامعه‌ی آماری محدود و مشخص است، از جدول مورگان و در سطح اطمینان ۹۵ درصد حجم نمونه 260 نفر تعیین و به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شد. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته سکوت سازمانی، خودسانسوری سازمانی و خاموشی هوشیارانه استفاده گردیده که روایی و پایایی آن‌ها با روش اعتبار محتوا، آلفای کرونباخ و نظرسنجی از متخصصان و مشاوران تـأیید شد. برای آزمون فرضیات و تحلیل داده‌ها از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزارهایSPSS ، PLS استفاده گردید. بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش، خودسانسوری منابع انسانی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر سکوت سازمانی دارد. همچنین خودسانسوری منابع انسانی تأثیر مثبت و معنادار بر خاموشی هوشیارانه دارد. در نتیجه می‌توان گفت، مدیران سازمان‌های دولتی با آگاهی از موضوع سکوت سازمانی و عوامل تأثیرگذار بر آن، باید تدابیری اندیشیده تا از پیامدها و آثار جبران‌ناپذیر آن جلوگیری نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Understanding the Effect of Self-Censorship of Human Resources on Organizational Silence: Clarifying of the Mediating Role of Mum Effect of Human Resources(Case of study: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Provincial Governorate)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Najmeddin Mousavi 1
  • Ali Shariat Nejad 2
  • Amir Houshang Nazarpouri 1
  • Marzieh Darvishzadeh Borujeni 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
2 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
3 Phd student of Human Resource Management, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of self-censorship of human resources on organizational silence by explaining the mediating role of conscious silence of human resources. This research is based on practical purpose and in terms of method is descriptive survey. The statistical population of the research is 355 employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari governorates, considering that the size of the statistical population is limited and specific, from Morgan table at the 95% confidence level was determined  260 people and it was selected by available sampling method. To collect information, researcher-made questionnaires of organizational silence, organizational self-censorship, and conscious silence were used, whose validity and reliability were confirmed by content validity and Cronbach's alpha, and a survey of experts and consultants. Structural equation modeling method and SPSS, PLS software were used to test hypotheses and analyze data. The research findings showed that the self-censorship human resources has a positive and significant effect on organizational silence. Also, self-censorship of human resources has a positive and significant effect on mum effect. As a result, it can be said that managers of government organizations, being aware of the issue of organizational silence and the factors affecting it, must take measures to identify its irreparable messages and effects.
Introduction
In a situation where modern organizations seek and share information and knowledge management, neglecting organizational silence will become a problem. Considering the importance and necessity of understanding the phenomenon of organizational silence and taking into account the influence of various factors on organizational silence, the present research seeks to express its role in creating organizational silence while studying and investigating organizational self-censorship. Regarding the role of the two variables of self-censorship and mum effect of human resources in the direction of helping organizations, no significant efforts have been made yet, therefore, considering the gap in academic research, this research seeks to answer the question of what is the self-censorship of human resources with regard to mum effect. It will have an impact on organizational silence, and finally, taking into account the role and position of the governorate, which is one of the vital organizations of the country, a simple model will be presented in this regard, so that managers of government organizations, with sufficient knowledge of organizational silence and the factors affecting it, can think of measures. to prevent its irreparable consequences and effects such as reducing citizen satisfaction, reducing organizational performance, inflexibility in front of organizational issues, etc.
Case study
Considering the role and position of the governorate, which is one of the vital organizations of the country, the statistical population of the research is the employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari governorates. Due to the specific and limited size of the statistical population, the sample size was determined and selected as 260 people using available sampling method.
Materials and Methods
The current research is a part of applied research in terms of its purpose and descriptive survey in terms of data collection method. This research is among quantitative researches and the size of the statistical population of the research was determined and selected from Chrissy Morgan's table formula to calculate the sample size of 260 people. To collect information, a researcher-made questionnaire containing 30 questions was used. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were assessed through Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis and three types of validity including convergent, divergent and content validity were used . To test the research hypotheses, the structural equation modeling method in Smart Pls3 software has been used .
Discussion and Results
Self-censorship is defined as follows: failure to express one's true opinion in front of audiences who are against that opinion. Types of self-censorship include self-censorship of actions, information and opinions. Organizational silence is a conscious action that employees choose not to share their beliefs, thoughts, information, ideas and experiences related to their work with others, and its types are: obedient or satisfactory or useless, defensive or silent and altruistic, opportunistic silence. , protective and unobtrusive. Mum effect is also a situation where one or more people together decide to hide information. Even though knowingly doing such a thing is unethical. Mum effect in the organization can be addressed from three aspects: the communicator's concern about himself, the communicator's concern about others, and the communicator's concern about legal norms and principles. Based on the above variables and their dimensions, the structural equation model was presented and the hypotheses of the research were proved.
In this research, four hypotheses were presented and the results confirmed the hypotheses proposed in this research.1) Self-censorship has a positive and significant effect on employees' organizational silence. 2) Organizational self-censorship has a positive and significant effect on employees' mum effect. 3) Mum effect has a positive and significant effect on the organizational silence of employees. 4) Mum effect plays a mediating role in the organizational self-censorship on organizational silence.
Conclusion
Finally, the results of this study shows that  the self-censorship of human resources  has effect on mum effect and organizational silence. Quantitative method was used in this article, it is suggested to use mixed or qualitative methods in future researches and to study the antecedent and consequent factors of organizational silence, mum effect and self-censorship. Suggest that managers of government organizations aware of the issue of these 3 variables and provide strategies and solutions to eliminate them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • self-censorship human resources
  • silence
  • organizational silence
  • mum effect
منابع فارسی
دانایی‌فرد، حسن؛ قاسمی بنابری، حمیدرضا. (1397). استراتژی‌های مدیران در واداری کارکنان به سکوت سازمانی در سازمان‌های دولتی. پژوهش‌های مدیریت منابع سازمانی، 8 (4)، 72-88.
سیدنقوی، میرعلی؛ دین‌محمّدی، طیبه؛ خاقانی‌زاده، عین‌الله. (1400). طراحی الگوی خودسانسوری در سازمان‌های دولتی براساس نظریه‌ی داده بنیاد. مطالعات رفتاری در مدیریت، 10 (20)، 101-118.
عرفانیان خان‌زاده، حمید. (1399). واکاوی مفهومی مؤلفه‌‌های سکوت سازمانی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن (رویکرد آمیخته). پژوهشنامه‌ی مدیریت تحول. 12 (24)، 229-262.
کرمی، محمدرضا؛ میرکمالی، سیدمحمد؛ پورکریمی، جواد. (1396). واکاوی سکوت سازمانی و ابعاد آن (مورد مطالعه: کارکنان دانشگاه تهران).  فصلنامه‌ی علمی-پژوهشی تحقیقات مدیریت آموزشی، 9(1)، 83-108.
فرهادی‌نژاد، محسن؛ عین‌علی، محسن؛ باقری قره‌بلاغ، هوشمند. (1398). تأملی بر خاموشی هوشیارانه: واکاوی نقش فرهنگ بر عملکرد کارکنان و ارتباطات سازمانی (مورد مطالعه: سازمان‌های دولتی شهر سمنان). فصلنامه‌ی علمی مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی، 8 (2)، 10-24.
فرهمند، مهناز و دشتی‌زاد، سعید. (1400). ارائه‌ی الگوی پارادایمی خودسانسوری در نهادهای حاکمیتّی ایران. دو فصل‌نامه‌ی جامعه‌شناسی نهادهای اجتماعی، 8(18)، 321-347.
لطفی دهخوارقانی، لیلا و مهارتی، یعقوب (1401). احصاء مدل سکوت سازمانی زنان در دانشگاه‌ها. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 15(57)، 85-112.
موسوی، سیدنجم‌الدین؛ ساعدی، عیسی، مؤمنی‌فرد، معصومه. (1399). شناسایی و تبیین پیشایندها و پسایندهای خاموشی هوشیارانه‌ی منابع انسانی با استفاده از رویکرد دلفی فازی. فصلنامه‌ی مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، 9 (1)، 57-82.
نیکخو، بهمن؛ جعفری‌نیا، سعید؛ حسن‌پور، اکبر؛ عباسیان، حسین. (1397). تدوین مدل عوامل مؤثر بر سکوت سازمانی با استفاده از رویکرد ترکیبی ARAS  و  AH. مطالعات راهبردی ورزش و جوانان، 17 (41)، 187-214.
References
Bar-Tal, D., Nets-Zehngut, R., & Keren, S. (2022). Self-censorship in contexts of conflict: Theory and research. Springer.
Bhagat, P., Virk, A., Saiyad, SM.& Mahajan, R. (2021). Failing to fail: MUM effect and its implications in education, Adesh University Journal of Medical Sciences & Research. 3:59-63.
Beakley, J. (2015). Organizational leadership awareness of the hierarchical mum effect: A modified Delphi study. Unpulished Doctoral dissertation, University of  Phoenix, 1-206.
Bhagat, P.,Virk, A., Saiyad, S.M., & Mahajan, R. (2021). Failing to fail: Mum effect and its implications in education. Medical Sciences & Research Licence, 3(2), 59-63.
Bisel, R., S, Messersmith, A.S. & Kelley, K. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication: hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. Journal of Business Communication, 49 (2), 128-147.
Bodrunova, S.S., Litvinenko, A. & Nigmatullina, K. (2020). Who is the censor? Self-censorship of Russian journalists in professional routines and social networking. Journalism, 1-19.
Brinsfield, C.T. (2013). Employee silence motives: Investigation of dimensionality and development of measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(5), 671-697.
Danaeifard, H., & Ghasemi Banabri, H. (2017). Managers' strategies in forcing employees to organizational silence in government organizations. Organizational Resource Management Research, 8 (4), 72-88. (In Persian).
Dyne, L.V., Ang, S., & Botero, I.C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
Deniz, N., Noyan, A., & Ertosun, Ö.G. (2013). The relationship between employee silence and organizational commitment in a private healthcare company. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 691-700.
Dibble, J. L., & Levine, T.R. (2010). Breaking good and bad news: Direction of the Mum effect and senders’ cognitive representations of news valence. Communication Research, 37(5), 703-722.
Dibble, J.L. (2016). Mum effect. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication. 1- 5.
Dunaetz, D. (2019). Evangelism, social media, and the mum effect. Evangelical Review of Theology. 43(2), 138-151.
Durnali, M., Sait, A., & Okan, Dis. (2020). School sdministrators’ communication skills as a Predictor of organizationa silence. Digital Commons@NLU, i.e:inquiry in education: 12(1), Article 7(1-21).
Erfanian Khanzadeh, H. (2021). Conceptual analysis of the components of organizational silence and factors affecting it (mixed approach). Change management research paper. 12 (24), 229-262. (In Persian).
Farhadi Nejad, M., Ain Ali, M., Ain Ali, M., & Bagheri Qarabalag, H. (2020). A reflection on conscious silence: analysis of the role of culture on employee performance and organizational communication (case study: government organizations of Semnan city). Scientific Quarterly of Government Organizations Management, 8 (2), 10-24. (In Persian).
Farahmand, M., & Dashtizad, S. (2022). Presenting a paradigmatic model of self-censorship in Iran's governing institutions. Two Quarterly Sociology of Social Institutions, 8(18), 321-347. (In Persian).
Lehner, C. (2022). The phenomenon of organizational silence: A lirerature review, Institute of Leadership and Change Management. Master’s Thesis, Johannes kepler university linz, 1-95.
Lotfi Dehkhavarghani, L & Maharti, Y. (2022). Statistics of the organizational silence model of women in universities. Public Management Researches, 15(57), 112-85. (In Persian).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 5-39.
Karami, M. R., Mirkamali, S. M., & Pourkrimi, J. (2017). Analyzing organizational silence and its dimensions (case study: University of Tehran employees). Educational Management Research Quarterly, 9(1), 83-108. (In Persian).
Knoll, M., & Van Dick, R. (2013). Do I hear the whistle...? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates. Journal of Business Ethic, 113(2), 1151-1165.
Lin, B., Mainemelis, C., & Kark, R. (2016). Leaders' responses to creative deviance: Differential effects on subsequent creative deviance and creative performance, The Leadership Quarterly. 27, 537–556.
Morrison, E.W., & Milliken, F.J. (2000). Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Reviwe. 25 (4), 706- 725.
Morrison, ,E.W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.
Mousavi, S. N., Saedi, A., & Momeni Mofard, M. (2020). Identifying and explaining the antecedents and consequences of human resources conscious shutdown using the fuzzy Delphi approach. Quarterly Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies, 9(1), 57-82. (In Persian).
Nets-Zehngut, R., Pliskin, R., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). Self-censorship in conlficts: Israel and the 1948 Palestinian Exodus. Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(3): 479-499.
Nikkho, B., Jafarinia, S., Hassanpour, A., & Abbasian, H. (2018). Developing a model of factors affecting organizational silence using the combined approach of ARAS and AH. Strategic studies of sport and youth, 17 (41), 187-214. (In Persian).
Ramingwong, S., & Snansieng, S. (2013). A survey on mum effect and its influencing factors. Procedia Technology, 9, 618-626.
Seyyed Naghavi, M.A., Dinmohammadi, I., & Khaganizadeh, A. (2020). Designing a model of self-censorship in government organizations based on foundational data theory. Behavioral Studies in Management, 10(20), 101-118. (In Persian).
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004), A global goodness-offit index for PLS structural equation modeling, Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, Vol. Contributed Papers, CLEUP, Padova,