فراتحلیل تأثیر چابکی زنجیره تأمین بر عملکرد رابطه‌ای و عملیاتی با نقش تعدیلگری نوع صنعت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی-مدیریت بازاریابی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

2 استاد، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

3 دانشیار، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

چکیده

تحقیقات زیادی پیرامون مفهوم چابکی زنجیره تأمین به عنوان یگانه استراتژی مدیریت در دستیابی به مزیت رقابتی در محیط متغیر و ناپایدار کسب و کارها انجام شده است. بخش قابل‌توجهی از این تحقیقات بر تأثیر چابکی زنجیره تأمین بر پیامدهای عملکردی متمرکز است. بررسی مطالعات تجربی نشان می‌دهد که پیامدهای عملکردی چابکی زنجیره تأمین در تحقیقات مختلف، پراکنده بوده و در بسیاری از موارد نتایج متناقضی دارند. در این راستا ضروری است که نتایج این مطالعات تجربی با استفاده از رویکرد فراتحلیل، تجمیع و با هم مقایسه گردد. لذا تحقیق حاضر با هدف تأثیر چابکی زنجیره تأمین بر عملکرد رابطه­ای و عملیاتی با استفاده از رویکرد فراتحلیل انجام گرفت. در این مطالعه تعداد 19 مطالعه نهایی مطابق با پروتکل پریزما شناسایی و اطلاعات آن وارد نرم­افزار CMA2 گردید. نتایج نشان داد که چابکی زنجیره تأمین بر عملکرد رابطه­ای و عملیاتی تأثیر می­گذارد و از بین تأثیر مربوط به اثر چابکی زنجیره تأمین بر عملکرد عملیاتی قوی­تر است. همچنین تجزیه و تحلیل انجام شده منجر به شناسایی متغیر تعدیل­گر نوع صنعت شد که در آن چابکی زنجیره تأمین در صنایع منحصربفرد، اثر چابکی زنجیره تأمین بر عملکرد رابطه­ای و عملیاتی را تقویت می ­کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Meta-analysis of the effect of supply chain agility on relational and operational performance with the moderating role of industry type

نویسندگان [English]

  • Allahyar Beigi Firoozi 1
  • Mohammad Bashokouh Ajirlou 2
  • Naser Seifollahi 2
  • Ghasem Zarei 3
1 PhD candidate, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
3 Associate prof, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
A considerable amount of research has been conducted to explore the concept of supply chain agility as the primary management strategy for achieving a competitive edge in a constantly changing and unstable business environment. Much of this research has focused on understanding the impact of supply chain agility on performance outcomes. However, the findings from empirical studies have been scattered and, in many cases, contradictory in terms of the functional implications of supply chain agility.
To address this, it is crucial to consolidate and compare the results of these experimental studies using a meta-analysis approach. Therefore, the present research aimed to examine the influence of supply chain agility on both relational and operational performance by employing a meta-analysis approach. Nineteen final studies were identified and their information was entered into the CMA2 software based on the Prism protocol.
The results clearly demonstrate that supply chain agility significantly affects relational and operational performance, with a stronger influence observed on relational performance compared to operational performance. Furthermore, the analysis conducted identified the moderating variable of the type of industry, where the agility of the supply chain has a particularly strong impact on relational and operational performance within unique industries.
 
 
Introduction
Extensive research has been conducted since 1993, when agility was first conceptualized by Goldman, to study the impact of supply chain agility on performance. The studies have used different indicators to measure performance, some of which overlap with each other while others do not.
Moreover, the findings regarding the influence of supply chain agility on performance outcomes have been inconsistent and contradictory. Therefore, there is a need for a study that summarizes and compares the results of previous studies, in order to resolve these contradictions and determine the specific consequences associated with supply chain agility. It is important to understand whether supply chain agility is functionally related or has a stronger effect on certain outcomes. A systematic review with meta-analysis is a method that can address this research gap.
Tcurrent study aims to answer the following key questions: What are the functional consequences, both relational and operational, of supply chain agility once the variables are operationalized? How does supply chain agility impact each of these performance outcomes? Additionally, what are the moderator variables that affect the causal relationship between supply chain agility and relational as well as operational performance outcomes?
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review through meta-analysis to investigate how supply chain agility affects performance outcomes. Given the large number of studies conducted in this field since the introduction of agility in 1993 by Goldman et al., up until 2023, it is clear that a secondary study is necessary. Therefore, we performed this present meta-analysis study using the Prism protocol to identify high-quality studies related to this topic, with the goal of encompassing all relevant studies conducted until 2023 and resolving any existing contradictions. The Prisma protocol was utilized to identify and select suitable studies for analysis, following a four-stage process of identification, monitoring, eligibility, and inclusion in the analysis dataset.
Throughout the coding process, it became apparent that many studies employed similar scales with different names to measure functional outcomes. When there was a significant overlap in indicators or structures, we compared these studies. To achieve this, we used the MAXQDA software to qualitatively code all functional outcomes from different studies. Overlapping codes were then assigned names and operationalized within a new framework. In order to convert the statistical information into fixed or random effect sizes, the CMA2 software was employed during this systematic review.
 
 
Discussion and Results
The analysis of studies conducted using MAXQDA software revealed that the impact of supply chain agility can be categorized into two main areas: relational and operational performance. The results of a meta-analysis on previous studies confirmed that supply chain agility has a positive effect on operational performance, which was found to be higher than the average level.
Conclusion
In line with the results of the present research, managers and policy makers are suggested to provide the context for the joint use of information and financial resources among supply chain partners. The synergy created in this way increases the speed of the companies' actions in identifying the special needs and demands of the market and provides the possibility of timely response. On the other hand, with the extensive cooperation that the companies will have with each other, they can transform the existing market arena and change the market variables in their favor.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Supply chain agility
  • Relational performance
  • Operational performance
  • Industry type
  • Meta-analysis

مراجع

منابع فارسی
باشکوه، محمد و بیگی فیروزی، الله یار. (1401). بررسی اثرات استراتژی‌های ترفیع رانش پایه ای و کیندر و جنتلر بر یکپارچگی تولیدکننده و اعضای کانال توزیع. بررسی‌های بازرگانی، 20(113)، 108-85.
باشکوه، محمد؛ سیف اللهی، ناصر و بیگی فیروزی، الله یار. (1399). تأثیر روابط مصرف کننده با نام تجاری بر وفاداری برند در بستر تجارت اجتماعی: نقش تعدیلگر ویژگی‌های مرتبط با تعامل شبه اجتماعی. پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، 13(48)، 137-167.
دقتی، عادله و یعقوبی، نورمحمد. (1402). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر استقرار اثربخش حکمرانی شبکه‌ای درکشور. حکمرانی و توسعه، 3(2)، 37-62.
سیف الهی، ناصر؛ شفیعی نیک آبادی، محسن؛ مهاجر، سپیده؛ بیگی فیروزی، الله یار و کریم، محمد حسین. (1398). تاثیرنوآوری باز برعملکرد توسعه محصول جدید با تاکید برتأثیرظرفیت جذب دانش. پژوهش‌های مدیریت عمومی، 12(44)، 55-78.
شریفی، فرهاد. (1399). بررسی تأثیر چابکی زنجیره تأمین بر عملکرد نوآورانه با توجه به نقش میانجی سرمایه اجتماعی در شرکت پتروشیمی ایلام، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد در رشته مدیریت صنعتی به راهنمایی دکتر جهان عبدی، موسسه آموزش عالی باختر ایلام.
عسگرنژاد نوری، باقر؛ ابراهیم پور، حبیب؛ لطفی، شراره و بیگی فیروزی، الله یار. (1400). ارتباط بین آوای سازمانی و توسعه حرفه‌ای کارکنان؛ واسطه‌گری سرمایه روان‌شناختی. حکمرانی و توسعه، 1(3)، 103-128.
عسگرنژاد نوری، باقر؛ سلطانی، میلاد و بیگی فیروزی، الله یار. (1400). عوامل موثر بر پذیرش فناوری بانکداری الکترونیک: رویکرد فراتحلیل. پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران، 25(1)، 184-214.
 
References
Abdelilah, B., el Korchi, A., & Amine Balambo, M. (2021). Agility as a combination of lean and supply chain integration: how to achieve a better performance. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1972949.
Abeysekara, N., Wang, H., & Kuruppuarachchi, D. (2019). Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage: A study of the Sri Lankan apparel industry. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), 1673–1695. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2018-0241.
Afshardoost, M., & Eshaghi, M. S. (2020). Destination image and tourist behavioural intentions: A meta-analysis. Tourism Management, 81, 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104154.
Agarwal, A., Shankar, R. and Tiwari, M.K. (2007),“Modelingagility of supply chain”,Industrial Marketing Management,Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 443-457.
Aggrey, G. A. B., Kusi, L. Y., Afum, E., Osei-Ahenkan, V. Y., Norman, C., Boateng, K. B., & Amponsah Owusu, J. (2022). Firm performance implications of supply chain integration, agility and innovation in agri-businesses: evidence from an emergent economy. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 12(2), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-03-2021-0078.
Al Humdan, E., Shi, Y., & Behnia, M. (2020). Supply chain agility: a systematic review of definitions, enablers and performance implications. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 50(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2019-0192.
Asgarnezhad Nouri, B., Ebrahimpour, H., Lotfi, S., & Beigi Firoozi, A. (2021). The Relationship between Organizational Voice and Professional Development of Employees; Psychological Capital Mediation. Governance and Development Journal, 1(3), 103-128. doi: 10.22111/jipaa.2021.153773.
Bargshady, G., Chegeni, A., Kamranvand, S., & Zahraee, S. M. (2016). A relational study of supply chain agility and firms’ performance in the services providers. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), 38–42.
Bashokouh, M., & beigi firoozi, A. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Base and Kinder and Gentler Push Promotion Strategies on Manufacturer Integration and Distribution Channel Members. Commercial Surveys, 20(113), 85-108. doi: 10.22034/bs.2022.247023. (In Persian).
Bashokouh, M., Seifollahi, N., & beigi firoozi, A. (2020). The Impact of Brand Consumer Relationships on Brand Loyalty in Social Business: The Modifying Role of Characteristics Related to parasocial Interaction. Public Management Researches, 13(48), 137-167. (In Persian).
 doi: 10.22111/jmr.2020.33162.4976.
Beigi Firoozi, A., Bashokouh, M., Seifollahi, N., & Zarei, G. (2024). A systematic review with meta-analysis of supply chain agility antecedents and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2022-0256
 
Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006.
Cadden, T., McIvor, R., Cao, G., Treacy, R., Yang, Y., Gupta, M., & Onofrei, G. (2022). Unlocking supply chain agility and supply chain performance through the development of intangible supply chain analytical capabilities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 42(9), 1329–1355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2021-0383.
Çağlar Kalkan, M. B., & Aydın, K. (2020). The role of 4PL provider as a mediation and supply chain agility. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 2(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-09-2019-0019.
Cai, Z., Liu, H., Huang, Q., Liang, L., & Shen, X. L. (2014). Relational capital and performance: Assessing the mediating role of supply chain agility and the moderating role of environmental contexts. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4229–4238. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.522.
Chan, A. T. L., Ngai, E. W. T., & Moon, K. K. L. (2017). The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.006.
Chen, C. J. (2019). Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage. Management Decision, 57(7), 1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2017-1236.
Christopher, M. (2001), “The agile supply chain – competing in volatile markets”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 37-44.
Civelek, M. E., & Çemberci, M. (2020). The Effects of Trust and Capability in Supply Chain on Firm Performance through Supply Chain Agility and Collaborative Advantage. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 12(1), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2020.854.
Deghati, A., & Yaghoubi, N. (2023). Identifying Factors Affecting the Effective       Establishment of Network Governance in the Country. Governance and Development Journal, 3(2), 37-62. doi: 10.22111/jipaa.2023.413209.1134.
Dekkers, R., Carey, L., & Langhorne, P. (2022). Making Literature Reviews Work: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Systematic Approaches. Making Literature Reviews Work: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Systematic Approaches. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90025-0.
Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028–3046. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970707.
Feizabadi, J., Gligor, D.M., & Alibakhshi, S. (2021). Examining the synergistic effect of supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: a complementarity perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(4), 514–531.
Fernandez-Giordano, M., Stevenson, M., Gutierrez, L., & Llorens-Montes, J. (2022). Antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility: the roles of a transactive memory system and supply network flexibility. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(5), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2020-0379.
García-Alcaraz, J. L., Martínez-Loya, V., Díaz-Reza, J. R., Blanco-Fernández, J., Jiménez-Macías, E., & López, A. J. G. (2020). Effect of ICT integration on SC flexibility, agility and company’ performance: the Mexican maquiladora experience. Wireless Networks, 26(7), 4805–4818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02068-6.
Ghareche, M., Alamtabriz, A., and Karampour, A. (2011). Designing a Model for the Determinants of Export Performance Based on Differentiation Strategy in Non Metal Mineral industry; Resource_ Based Approach. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 2(6), 119-140. (In Persian).
Girdwichai, L., & Somjai, S. (2019). Exploring the nexus between demand and supply side competence, supply chain agility, process compliances and operational performance. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 335–345.
Gligor, D. M. (2016). The Role of Supply Chain Agility in Achieving Supply Chain Fit. Decision Sciences, 47(3), 524–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12205.
Gligor, D. M., & Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: A systematic literature review. In Supply Chain Management, 17(4), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246594.
Gligor, D. M., Stank, T. P., Gligor, N., Ogden, J. A., Nowicki, D. R., Farris, T., Idug, Y., Rana, R., Porchia, J., & Kiran, P. (2022). Examining the rigor of SCM research: the case of supply chain agility. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2021-0575.
Gligor, D.M., Esmark, C.L., & Holcomb, M.C. (2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33, 71-82.
Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., & Preiss, K. 1995. Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Golgeci, I., & Gligor, D. M. (2017). The interplay between key marketing and supply chain management capabilities: the role of integrative mechanisms. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 32(3), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2016-0102.
Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Literature reviews of qualitative accounting research: challenges and opportunities. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-12-2021-0222.
Hwang, T., & Kim, S. T. (2019). Balancing in-house and outsourced logistics services: effects on supply chain agility and firm performance. Service Business, 13(3), 531–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-018-00394-x.
Iftikhar, A., Purvis, L., & Giannoccaro, I. (2021). A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience. Journal of Business Research, 135, 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.048.
Irfan, M., Wang, M., & Akhtar, N. (2020). Enabling supply chain agility through process integration and supply flexibility: Evidence from the fashion industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(2), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0122.
Ismail, H. S., & Sharifi, H. (2006). A balanced approach to building agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36(6), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030610677384.
Khan, A. K., & Pillania, R. K. (2008). Strategic sourcing for supply chain agility and firms’ performance: A study of Indian manufacturing sector. Management Decision, 46(10), 1508–1530. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810920010.
Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., & Hua, Z. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016.
Mandal, S. (2016). An empirical investigation on integrated logistics capabilities, supply chain agility and firm performance. In Int. J. Services and Operations Management, 24(Issue 4).
Manzoor, U., Baig, S. A., Hashim, M., Sami, A., Rehman, H. U., & Sajjad, I. (2021). The effect of supply chain agility and lean practices on operational performance: a resource-based view and dynamic capabilities perspective. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2021-0006.
Martinez-Sanchez, A., & Lahoz-Leo, F. (2018). Supply chain agility: a mediator for absorptive capacity. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(2), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-10-2017-0304.
Nagel, R., and Dove, R. 1991. 21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy—An Industry Led Review, Vols. 1 and 2. Bethlehem, PA: Iacocca Institute, Lehigh University.
Nazempour, R., Yang, J., & Javaid, Z. (2019). Effect of supply chain agility dimensions on supply chain performance: A case of Iranian SMEs. PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1145/3358528.3358538.
Ngai, E.W.T., Chau, D.C.K. and Chan, T.L.A. (2011), “Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: findings from case studies”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 232-249.
Panigrahi, R. R., Jena, D., Meher, J. R., & Shrivastava, A. K. (2023). Assessing the impact of supply chain agility on operational performances-a PLS-SEM approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 27(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2021-0073.
Patel, B.S. and Sambasivan, M. (2022), "A systematic review of the literature on supply chain agility". Management Research Review, 45(2), 236-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2020-0574.
Ramos, E., Patrucco, A.S. and Chavez, M. (2023), "Dynamic capabilities in the new normal”: a study of organizational flexibility, integration and agility in the Peruvian coffee supply chain". Supply Chain Management, 28(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2020-0620.
Riquelme-Medina, M., Stevenson, M., Barrales-Molina, V., & Llorens-Montes, F. J. (2022). Coopetition in business Ecosystems: The key role of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Journal of Business Research, 146, 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2022.03.071
Schmidt FL, Oh I-S, Hayes TL (2009) Fixed-versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. Br J Math Stat Psychol, 62(1):97–128. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711007X255327.
Seifollahi, N., Shafiei Nikabadi., M., Mohajer,. S, Beigi Firoozi, A. and Karim, M.H. (2020). The Impact of Open Innovation on new Product Development Performance with Emphasis on Knowledge Acquisition Capacity. Public Management Researches, 12(44), 55-78. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2019.24775.3921. (In Persian).
Shaikh, A., & Ahmed, W. (2022). Understanding influence of supply chain relationships in retail channels on risk management. DECISION, 49(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40622-022-00308-X.
Sharifi, F. (2019). Investigating the impact of supply chain agility on innovative performance with regard to the mediating role of social capital in Ilam Petrochemical Company, Master's thesis in the field of industrial management under the guidance of Dr. Jahan Abdi, Bakhtar Institute of Higher Education, Ilam. (In Persian).
Sharma, N., Sahay, B. S., Shankar, R., & Sarma, P. R. S. (2017). Supply chain agility: review, classification and synthesis. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(6), 532–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1335296.
Sharp, J.M., Irani, Z., and Desai, S. 1999. “Working Towards Agile Manufacturing in the UK Industry.” International Journal of Production Economics 62(1/2):155–69.
Sheel, A. and Vishnu, N. (2019), “Effect of blockchain technology adoption on supply chain adaptability, agility, alignment and performance”, Management Research Review, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 1353-1364, doi: 10.1108/MRR-12-2018-0490.
Sheel, A., & Nath, V. (2019). Effect of blockchain technology adoption on supply chain adaptability, agility, alignment and performance. Management Research Review, 42(12), 1353–1374. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2018-0490.
Patel, S., Samuel, C. and Sharma, S.K. (2017), "Evaluation of agility in supply chains: a case study of an Indian manufacturing organization". Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(2), 212-231. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2016-0125.
Seifollahi, N., Shafie Nikabadi, M., Mohajer, S., & Beigi Firoozi. (2019). The Impact of Open Innovation on new Product Development Performance with Emphasis on Knowledge Acquisition Capacity. Public Management Researches, 12 (44), 55-78. (In Persian).
Singh, R., Charan, P. and Chattopadhyay, M. (2020), “Relational capabilities and performance: examining the moderation-mediation effect of organization structures and dynamic capability”, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(15), doi: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1843984.
Singh, Y. P., & Nath, V. (2020). Managing agility in the downstream petroleum supply chain. In Int. J. Business Excellence (Vol. 20, Issue 2).
Srinivasan, M., Srivastava, P., & Iyer, K. N. S. (2020). Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance. European Management Journal, 38(6), 900–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.003.
Sturm, S., Hohenstein, N.-O., Birkel, H., Kaiser, G., & Hartmann, E. (2021). Empirical research on the relationships between demand- and supply-side risk management practices and their impact on business performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2020-0403.
Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.002.
Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319-1350.
Tse, Y. K., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P., & MacBryde, J. (2016). Embracing supply chain agility: an investigation in the electronics industry. Supply Chain Management, 21(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0237.
Weigel, C. and Hiebl, M.R.W. (2022), "Accountants and small businesses: toward a resource-based view", Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-03-2022-0044.
Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(10), 887–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211281411.
Yang, J. (2021). Unleashing the dynamics of triple-A capabilities: a dynamic ambidexterity view. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 121(12), 2595–2613. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0086.
Zhu, M., & Gao, H. (2021). The antecedents of supply chain agility and their effect on business performance: an organizational strategy perspective. Operations Management Research, 14(1–2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-020-00174-9.
 
پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی
دوره 17، شماره 64 - شماره پیاپی 64
(علمی -پژوهشی)
تیر 1403
صفحه 219-252

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار