تدوین و اعتباریابی مقیاس سنجش استعداد و شناسایی استعدادهای برتر سازمان: مورد ‌پژوهی در سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار پژوهشگاه مطالعات آموزش و پرورش. تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مدیریت استعداد و جانشین پروری در سطوح بالای بلوغ سازمانی و اغلب در سازمانهای پیشرو مورد توجه قرار می‌گیرد. مدیران سازمانهای پیشرو برای تقویت منابع انسانی، به سنجش استعداد و شناسایی کارکنان مستعد سازمان، اهتمام می‌ورزند. در راستای این تلاش‌ها، پژوهش حاضر برای تدوین و اعتباریابی مقیاس سنجش استعداد کارکنان سازمان طراحی و اجرا شد. پس از مطالعه ادبیات ناظر بر مفهوم مدیریت استعداد در سازمان، شاخص‌های استعدادهای برتر سازمان استخراج شد. شاخص‌های استخراج شده در یک کانون دلفی متشکل از خبرگان مورد بازبینی قرار گرفت. ویرایش سوم ابزار، به مقیاسی حاوی 45 شاخص تبدیل و در میان مدیران و کارشناسان سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار، به‌صورت آزمایشی اجرا شد. برای بررسی روایی مقیاس سنجش استعداد از تحلیل عاملی استفاده شد. تعدادی از مواد پرسشنامه که بارهای عاملی کوچکتری داشتند، حذف شد. 35 ماده باقی مانده در سه مؤلفه یا خرده مقیاس(انگیزش برای یادگیری و عملکرد بالاتر، دلبستگی و تعلق سازمانی، مهارت مدیریت و روحیه رهبری) قرار گرفت. ضرایب پایایی برای سازه‌های «انگیزش برای یادگیری و عملکرد بالاتر»، «دلبستگی و تعلق سازمانی»، «مهارت مدیریت و روحیه رهبری» به ترتیب 94/0، 93/0 و 97/0 بود. در این مقاله، فرایند تدوین، اجرای آزمایشی و اعتباربخشی ابزار موردنظر،گزارش شده و ضمن اشاره به محدودیت‌های کاربرد چنین ابزاری، مزیت‌ها و شرایط اجرای آن مورد بحث قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Developing and Validating of the Talent Assessment Scale (TAS): A case study of the Securities and Stock Exchange Organization (SEO)

نویسنده [English]

  • Ahad Naveedy
Associate Professor, Organization for Educational research and Planning, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
In spite of much attention on Talent management, it should be considered as an "emerging phenomenon." The desire of leading organizations to strengthen human resources by attracting and retaining talented people has led to the adoption of methods for measuring talent and identifying talented people. In line with these efforts, the "Talent Assessment Scale" (TAS) was developed and after conducting an experiment among managers and experts of the Securities and Stock Exchange Organization (SEO), evidence on the validity and reliability of the tool was provided. In this article, the process of compiling, experimental implementation and validation of the mentioned tool is reported with reference to its psychometric properties while pointing out the limitations of using such a tool, the advantages and its limitations are discussed.
Introduction
In the past few decades, "talent management" has been conceptualized in the field of management. Then, it is an "emerging phenomenon". McKenzie Consulting Group mentioned it for the first time in 1990 in a report titled "War for Talent" (Michaels, Handfield-Jones, & Axelrod, 2001). In the knowledge-based economy, traditional resources lose their competitive advantage, while human talent is a renewable resource that is not easily copied or stolen by competitors. Therefore, the presence of talents in sensitive and key jobs is one of the most important factors in gaining competitive advantage (Salehi, Perkan, & Soltani, 2017).
Talent management includes the continuous practice of discovering, developing, using and maintaining those employees of the organization who have potential abilities to solve the practical problems of the organization (Orlova, Afonin, Voronin, 2015). Berger (2004) considers talent to be a small group of people who inspire others to achieve superior success and have a great impact on the current and future performance of the organization.
SEO is one of the organizations that need creative, innovative, active and learning people. For this reason, identifying, attracting, maintaining and improving the human resources of this organization is very important.
The current research was implemented in order to improve talent management. The product of this research is a relatively reliable tool for assessing talent and identifying employees with high potential in the SEO and other similar organizations.
Case study
The population of this study consists of employees of the SEO in Iran, a non-governmental public institution with about 340 employees.
Methodology and Methods
The research process is summarized as follows:

a) Discovering components and indicators (qualitative part of the study): After reviewing the related literature, the top talent indicators were extracted. Interview and Delphi method were used to evaluate the extracted indicators. The initial version of the extracted indicators was discussed in a focus group. The third edition of the indicators, after sufficient discussion, was converted into a questionnaire containing 45-item and prepared for implementation.
b) Implementation of the initial version of the questionnaire (quantitative part of the study): The result of the qualitative part of the present study was a 45-item questionnaire that was administered to 171 people (65% men and 35% women). Exploratory factor analysis was performed with principal component extraction and varimax rotation. The sampling adequacy criterion of Keyser-Meyer-Elkin was 0.96. After the analysis, 10 items of the questionnaire that had smaller factor loadings were removed and the number of factors constituting the talent assessment scale was limited to 3 factors and the questionnaire items were limited to 35.

Results and Discussion
The 35-item scale for assessing the top talents of the organization consists of three components or subscales:1- Organizational Engagement, 2- Management skills and leadership spirit,3- Drive for Learning & High Performance. These 3 factors explain 71% of the total variance. The criteria for retaining the factors were their eigenvalues (values greater than 1 Keyser-Gutman).
Reliability of the TAS was investigated by Cronbach's alpha for each scale and the entire questionnaire. The reliability coefficients are greater than 0.90. The construct validity of the TAS was investigated by factor analysis and the result of the analysis indicates the validity of the instrument.
Talent management and succession are considered at high levels of organizational maturity and often in progressive organizations, and it has a special place in the 34000standard (Gholipour, Mohammad Ismaili & Dabiri, 2016). Despite this, measuring talent management and succession is very difficult due to the complexity of this process. Therefore, the current research was designed and implemented by adopting a pragmatic approach to develop a usable tool that can be used in the SEO and similar organizations.
The three components (Drive for Learning & High Performance, Organizational Engagement, and leadership spirit) constituting the intended tool are compatible with the theoretical foundations and content of the existing literature. Those who are eager to learn and those who seek progress, always have the potential to improve themselves and their organization, and if such people belong and have attachment to their organization, they can play a key role in their organization. Having these people's leadership spirit puts them in the list of managers' successors. Juhdi et al. (2012) reported that high-potential employees were described by high performance, eagerness to learn, and leadership spirit.
Conclusion
The application of the TAS depends on the conditions, including existence of a strong motivation in the managers to move towards high levels of organizational maturity and clear understanding about the concepts of talent management among executives and the stakeholders. By using the TAS, about 71% of the variance of talent can be predicted. This amount of predictive power is satisfactory. In order to go beyond this point, continuous study and evaluation of the process and result of assessing the talented employees in the organization and development of complementary tools are needed. It is recommended to evaluate the criterion validity of the TAS after three implementation periods.
The first step in using the scale to identify employees with superior talent is to form the "Top Talent Evaluation Committee of the Organization". It is recommended to evaluate the top talents of the organization once a year. The initial evaluation of the talent of the organization's employees using the tool introduced by the heads of the units and the first stage candidates are introduced to the evaluation committee for the final evaluation. The main purpose of measuring talent and identifying people with high potential and key employees of the organization is to empower them to improve the level of competence of the organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • securities and exchange organization
  • talent management
  • top talented employees
  • HiPo
منابع فارسی
دلاور، علی. (1387). روش تحقیق در روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، چاپ بیست و چهارم،تهران.
سیف، علی اکبر. (1392). ساختن ابزارهای اندازه گیری متغیرهای پژوهشی در روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی. تهران:دیدار.صص 189-193.
محمدصالحی، جواد.، پرکان، حسین و سلطانی، مرتضی. (1397). “شناسایی و اولویت بندی مولفه های موثر بر جایگاه یابی استعدادها: مطالعه ای اقدام پژوهانه در یک سازمان فرهنگی”. دو فصل نامه علمی و پژوهشی دین و سیاست فرهنگی. شماره 11 صص 81-107.
قلی پور، آرین.، محمد اسماعیلی، ندا و دبیری، افشین. (1396). مدل 34000 منابع انسانی (جایزه استاندارد 34000).موسسه کتاب مهربان نشر.تهران.
گرامی پور، مسعود. (1393). مبانی نظری و کاربرد نظریه های اندازه گیری در علوم رفتاری. تهران: تمدن علمی.
References
Abazeed, R.A.M. (2018). The Impact of Talent Management on Organizational Commitment of the employees of telecommunication companies in Jordan: The Mediating Role of Employee Work Engagement, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting , Finance and Management Sciences. 8 (4): 153-162.
Axelrod, B., Handfield-Jones, H., & Michaels, E. (2002). A new game plan for C players. Harvard Business Review80(1), 80-90.Bagheri, M. Baum, T., Ebrahimi, A., & Abbasi, A.  (2020). Talent Management in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry: Evidence from Iran. An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research. 31(1): 88-98.(In Persian).
Berger, L. A. (2004). Four steps to creating a talent management system. The Talent Management Handbook2.
Betchoo, N. K. (2017). Today’s Challenge of Shaping E-learning in Sub-Saharan Africa. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology (AJAST)1(9), 92-94.
Bhatnagar (2007): Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: key to retention. Employee Relations, Vol. 29 No. 6, 2007, pp. 640-663
Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (2007). Beyond HR: The new science of human capital. Harvard Business Press.
Branham, L. (2005). Planning to become an employer of choice. Journal of organizational Excellence24(3), 57-68.
Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, discover your strengths. Simon and Schuster. New York: Free Press
Buckingham, M., & Vosburgh, R. M. (2001). The 21st century human resources function: It's the talent, stupid!. Human Resource Planning24(4),17-23.
Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent management for the twenty-first century. Harvard Business Review, March, 74 – 81.
Chung-Herrera,B.G., Enz, C. A., & Lankau, M. J. (2003). Grooming future hospitality leaders: A competencies model. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly44(3), 17-25.
Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human resource management review19(4), 304-313.
Delavar,A.(2010).Research Method in Psychology and Educational Sciences,Tehran: Roshd.(In Persian)
Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review23(4), 272-285.
Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2004). The race for talent: Retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human resource planning27(3), 12-25.
Gagné, F. (2007). Ten commandments for academic talent development. Gifted child quarterly51(2), 93-118.
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. F. (2013). What is the meaning of ‘talent’in the world of work?. Human Resource Management Review23(4), 290-300.
Gandz, J. (2006). Talent development: the architecture of a talent pipeline that works. Ivey Business Journal70(3), 1-4.
Gholipour, A., Mohammad Ismaili, N., and Dabiri, A. (2016). Model 34000 Human Resources (Standard Award 34000). Mehraban Book Publishing Institute. Tehran.(In Persian)
Gramipour, M. (2015). Theoretical foundations and application of measurement theories in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Scientific Civilization.(In Persian)
Hartmann, E., Feisel, E., & Schober, H. (2010). Talent management of western MNCs in China: Balancing global integration and local responsiveness. Journal of world business45(2), 169-178.
Huselid, M. A., Beatty, R. W., & Becker, B. E. (2005). A players’ or ‘A positions’: The strategic logic of workforce management.Harvard business review83(12), 110-117.
Iles, P., Chuai, X., & Preece, D. (2010). Talent management and HRM in multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers. Journal of world Business45(2), 179-189.
Juhdi, N., Pa'wan, F., & Hansaram, R. M. S. K. (2012). Examining characteristics of high potential employees from employees’ perspective. International Journal of Arts & Sciences5(7),175–186.
Kay, C., & Moncarz, E. (2007). Lodging management success: Personal antecedents, achievements, KSAs and situational influencers. International Journal of Hospitality Management26(1), 33-48.
Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of management review, 24(1), 31-48.
Luna-Arocas, R., Danvila-Del Valle, I., & Lara, F. J. (2020). Talent management and organizational commitment: the partial mediating role of pay satisfaction. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(4), 863–881.
McCauley, C., & Wakefield, M. (2006). Talent management in the 21st century: Help your company find, develop, and keep its strongest workers. The Journal for Quality and Participation29(4), 4.
Meyers, M. C., van Woerkom, M., Paauwe, J., & Dries, N. (2020). H.R. managers' talent philosophies: prevalence and relationships with perceived talent management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(7), 1-27.
Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston: Harvard, Business School Press.
Morton, L.(2005).Talent management value imperatives: Strategies for successful execution. Res. Rep.
Mohammad Salehi, J., Perkan, H. and Soltani, M., (2017). Identifying and prioritizing the components affecting the positioning of talents: An action research study in a cultural organization.Journal of Science and Research in Religion and Cultural Policy. 11, 81-107.(In Persian)
Narayanan, A., Rajithakumar, S., & Menon, M. (2019). Talent management and employee retention: An integrative research framework. Human Resource Development Review, 18(2), 228–247.
Orlova, L. V., Afonin, Y. A., & Voronin, V. V. (2015). Talent management and knowledge: theory, methodology, models. Rev. Eur. Stud.7, 75.
Phillips, D. R. & Roper, K. O. (2009). A framework for talent management in real estate. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(1), 7–18.
Sariwulan T, Thamrim S, Suyatni M, Agung I, Widiputera F, Susanto A.B, Capnary M.C (2021), Impact of Employee Talent Management, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(5),184-200.
Schweyer, A. (2004). Talent management systems: Best practices in technology solutions for recruitment, retention and workforce planning.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Seif, A. (2014). Development of tools for measuring research variables in psychology and educational sciences. Tehran: Didar.(In Persian)
Shani, N., & Senthilkumar, U. S. (2020). Employee perception towards the retention strategy of I.T. industry in Coimbatore. International Journal of Services and Operations Management.36 )1(,94 – 109.
Shet, S. V. (2020). Strategic talent management–contemporary issues in international context. Human Resource Development International23(1), 98-102.
Silzer, R., & Dowell, B. E. (2010). Strategic talent management matters. Strategy-driven talent management: A leadership imperative, 3-72.
Singh R.P (2021), Talent management literature review, Journal of Human Resource 1(1), 43-48.
Slan‐Jerusalim, R., & Hausdorf, P. A. (2007). Managers' justice perceptions of high potential identification practices. Journal of Management Development.
Son, J., Park, O., Bae, J., & Ok, C. (2020). Double-edged effect of talent management on organizational performance: The moderating role of HRM investments. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(17), 2188–2216.
Sparrow, P., Brewster, C., & Harris, H. (2004). Globalizing human resource management.London: Routledge.
Walker, J. W., & LaRocco, J. M. (2002). Talent pools: The best and the rest.(Perspectives). Human Resource Planning25(3), 12-15.
Williams, M. R. (2000). The war for talent: Getting the best from the best. CIPD Publishing.
Wu,W.W.(2009).Exploring core competencies for R&D technical professionals. Expert systems with applications36(5), 9574-9579.
Younas, M., & Bari, M. W. (2020). The relationship between talent management practices and retention of generation 'Y' employees: mediating role of competency development. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja . 33(1), 1330–1353.