طراحی و ارزیابی مدل مربی گری در محیط کار(مطالعه موردی: شرکت فولاد مبارکه اصفهان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، گرایش رفتار سازمانی و مدیریت منابع انسانی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

مربی­گری یکی از رویکرد­های مهم در توسعه منابع انسانی و نیازمند آشنایی مربیان با اصول مربی­گری جهت بکارگیری الگوهای آموزشی متناسب با محتوی و سبک یادگیری فرد است. لذا این مطالعه با هدف طراحی و ارزیابی مدل مربی­گری در محیط کار با بهره­­­گیری از رویکرد ترکیبی-اکتشافی و استفاده از طرح نظام­مند نظریه داده بنیاد دربخش کیفی انجام شده است. به این منظور ضمن انجام مصاحبه باز با 22 خبره دانشگاهی و اجرایی، مجموعه­ای ازمضامین اولیه طی فرآیند کد گذاری باز، گردآوری شدند و از دل آن­ها مقوله­هایی استخراج گردید. سپس در مرحله کدگذاری محوری، پیوند میان این مقوله­ها درقالب عناوین ( شرایط علی، پدیده محوری، راهبردها، شرایط مداخله­­­ ­گر، شرایط زمینه­ای و پیامدها ) در قالب پارادایم کدگذاری تعیین شد. در ادامه و در مرحله کدگذاری انتخابی، یکایک اجزای پارادایم کدگذاری تشریح و نظریه خلق شد. در بخش کمی نیز پرسشنامه­ محقق ساخته برگرفته از بخش کیفی پژوهش در میان مدیران و کارشناسان شرکت فولاد مبارکه اصفهان به روش نمونه­گیری طبقه­ای- تصادفی توزیع گردید. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول تباچنیک و فیدل، 282 نفر محاسبه گردید برای اطمینان از حصول داده­های معتبر مورد نیاز، تعداد 499 پرسشنامه توزیع شد که از این تعداد372 پرسشنامه برگشت داده شد و مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. با استفاده از الگوی معادلات ساختاری توسط نرم افزار Amos24  روابط حاکم و برازش تمامی شرایط اصلی الگوی کیفی طراحی شده، مورد سنجش و تایید نهایی قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and Evaluation of Coaching Model in the Workplace(Case study: Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Parisa Kashani 1
  • Ali Shaemi Barzoki 2
  • Hadi Teimouri 2
1 Ph.D. Student in Business Administration (Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management), Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Associate Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
Coaching is one of the significant approaches in human resource development and the coach needs to get familiar with principles and rules of coaching to apply the appropriate educational patterns according to personal learning content and style. Therefore, this study has been conducted with the aim of designing and evaluating the coaching model in the workplace using a combined-exploratory approach and using a systematic design of grounded theory in the qualitative section. For this purpose, while conducting open interviews with 22 academic and executive experts, a set of basic topics were collected during the open coding process, and categories were extracted from them. Then, in the axial coding stage, the relationship between these categories in the form of titles (causal conditions, axial phenomena, strategies, intervening conditions, contextual conditions and consequences) was determined in the form of coding paradigm. Then, in the selective coding stage, each component of the coding paradigm was described and a theory was created. In the quantitative part, a researcher-made questionnaire taken from the qualitative part of the research was distributed among the managers and experts of Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company by stratified-random sampling method. The sample size was calculated 282 with using of the Tabachnik and Fidell formulas. To ensure that the required valid data is obtained, 499 questionnaires were distributed, of which, 372 questionnaires were returned and analyzed. Using the structural equation model by Amos24 software, the governing relations and fitting of all the main conditions of the designed quality model were evaluated and finally approved.
Introduction
Human resource development is one of the main strategies to achieve human capital and coaching is one of the staff training methods which results in human resource development with continuous learning upgrade. Coaching is a process of practical learning to create executive knowledge, ability, focus, and commitment for more effective achievement of professional and organizational goals .Coaching style has an optimistic view of individuals. It is a method based on optimism, self-efficacy, positive emotions, and learning. Its focus is on the employees who want to develop their potentials and to become the best. In the coaching process, the interaction between the coach and trainees is embedded in an organizational system, and the coach must be fully aware of the relevant cultural norms and be able to facilitate learning and internalize these norms. The coach must create and develop a learning environment based on trust and effective relationships and, thus, create learning through the reflection of experiences
Case study
This study aims to designing and evaluation of coaching model in the workplace in Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company
Materials and Methods
The present study in terms of purpose is developmental and practical, in terms of method, it is a combination (qualitative-quantitative) and in terms of data collection time, it is cross-sectional. The library method has been used to compile the theoretical foundations and research literature. In the qualitative part of the study, grounded theory has been used, and the statistical population includes managers and supervisors with coaching experience in Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company, as well as academic experts in the field of human resource management. The samples in this research were 22 people, and a semi-structured interview was used to collect the data. In the quantitative part of the study, the paradigm model presented in the qualitative part, through a 57-item questionnaire designed by the researcher, have been distributed among the managers and experts of Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company by stratified-random sampling method.
The sample size was estimated to be 282 people based on Tebachnik and Fidel's formula, to ensure that the required valid data was obtained, 499 questionnaires were distributed, of which, 372 questionnaires were returned and analyzed. The questionnaire is designed in the form of a 5-point Likert scale. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by both content and structural methods using structural equation model and SPSS24 and Amos24 software. The reliability of the questionnaire was also confirmed by Cronbach's alpha method.
Discussion and Results
The present study, while using the literature and theoretical framework and adopting a new approach to the subject, has opened a new window on the research problem. This research with a combined approach (qualitative and quantitative) in compare with other researches in the background has a good comprehensiveness and by reviewing previous models and analyzing the content of the participants' opinions in the present study, it plays an important role in explaining the model for establishing coaching and knowledge acquisition. Also, considering that the present study was tested through the structural equation model and confirmed with a reliability of 0.95, it can be a roadmap for the members of the organization. Researchers in future research can evaluate and critique the efficiency and effectiveness of the designed model in other organizations of the country with a comparative approach. However, the guidelines derived from this study, while having practical aspects, have provided an appropriate response to the current and future needs of the organization under study (Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company).
Conclusion
The results of the interview in the qualitative stage were explained in the form of six core categories: 1) phenomenon, 2) causal conditions, 3) context, 4) intervening conditions, 5) strategies, and 6) consequences and in the quantitative stage, the findings confirmed the accuracy of the proposed model. The results showed that the core category with an impact factor of 80% has the most impact and the contexts with an impact factor of 47% have the least impact on the strategies of the coaching model in the organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Coaching
  • Coaching in workplace
  • Isfahan Mobarakeh Steel Company
منابع فارسی
چناری، زهره، رضایی زاده، مرتضی، محمدی الیاسی، قنبر و بندعلی، بهار(1399)، "شناسایی و تبیین راه حل های ارتقای فرایند مربیگری سازمانی،" فصلنامه مشاوره شغلی و سازمانی، دوره12، شماره45: 177-200.
عباس­زادگان، محمد، ترک­زاده، جعفر، (1388)، نیازسنجی آموزشی در سازمان­ها، شرکت سهامی انتشار.
عزیزی، محمد، وکیلی، یوسف، حسین­لو، حمید (1399). "طراحی برنامه مربی­گری کارآفرینانه در شرکتهای کوچک و متوسط،" فصلنامه مشاوره شغلی و سازمانی، 12(43)،  173-198.
فتحی واجارگاه، کورش؛ خراسانی ، اباصلت و  دانشمندی،  سمیه(1394)، "بررسی شرایط و حوزه­های استقرار مربی‌گری در فعالیت­های آموزش و بهسازی منابع انسانی،" مدیریت و برنامه­ریزی در نظام­های آموزشی، 8(2)، 27- 48.
محمدی صدر، محمد (2017)، طراحی و اعتبار سنجی الگوهای مهارت­های مربیگری و نگرش­های کمیته علمی دانشگاه­های دولتی اصفهان. رساله دکتری دانشگاه اصفهان، گروه علوم تربیتی.
یوسفی، حمیدرضا؛ مشعلی، بهزاد و منتی، حسین (1396)، "بررسی امکان اجرای الگوی مربی­گری در آموزش منابع انسانی بر اساس نظریه داده­ بنیاد (مطالعه موردی سازمان امور مالیاتی کشور)،" پژوهشنامه مالیات، 34، 257-23

References

Aas, M., & Vavik, M. (2015). Group coaching: A new way of constructing leadership identity? School Leadership & Management35(3), 251-265.
Abbas Zadegan, M. and Torkazadeh, J. (2000) Assessing Educational Needs in Organizations,  Tehran: Enteshar co.(In Persian)
Acheson, K. and Schneider-Bean, S. (2019). Representing the intercultural development continuum as a pendulum: addressing the lived experiences of intercultural competence development and maintenance, European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management5(1), 42-61.
Adamu, M. (2019). The impact of training effectiveness among potential entrepreneurs in business organizations: A mediation of opportunity for participation in Bauchi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Business Excellence17(3), 384-396.
Anne Millard, J., & Korotov, K. (2014). Do mental health stigma and gender influence MBAs’ willingness to engage in coaching? International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3(3), 277-292.
Azizi, M., Vakili, Y. and HosseinLoo, H. (2020). Entrepreneurial coaching model in small & medium enterprises (case study: Pharmaceutical industry), Career and Organizational Counseling, 12(43), 173-198.(In Persian)
Batt, E. G. (2010). Cognitive coaching: A critical phase in professional development to implement sheltered instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education26(4), 997-1005.
Beer, H. A., & Micheli, P. (2017). How performance measurement influences stakeholders in not-for-profit organizations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(3), doi:10.1108/IJOPM-08-2015-0481
Bennett, J. L., & Bush, M. W. (2013). Coaching for change. Routledge.
Boak, G., & Crabbe, S. (2019). Evaluating the impact of coaching skills training on individual and corporate behavior. European Journal of Training and Development, 43(1/2), 153- 165.
Bozer, G., & Joo, B. K. (2015). The effects of coachee characteristics and coaching relationships on feedback receptivity and self-awareness in executive coaching. International Leadership Journal7(3).
Campone, F. (2014). At the border: Coaching a client with dissociative identity disorder. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring12(1), 1-13.
Campone, F. (2015). Executive coaching practices in the adult workplace. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education2015(148), 59-67.
Carter, I. (2017). Human behavior in the social environment: A social systems approach. Routledge.
Chenari, Z, Rezaeizadeh, M, Mohammadi Eliassy, G., &  Bandali, B. (2020).  Identifying and explaining solutions to improve the organizational coaching process, Quarterly Journal of Job and Organizational Counseling, 45(12), 177-200. (In Persian)
Connor, M., & Pokora, J. (2017). Coaching and Mentoring at Work: Developing Effective Practice: Developing Effective Practice. McGraw-Hill Education (UK)
Divya Darshini, J. and Gomathi, S. (2018). A study on emotional intelligence well-being and emotional baggage perspective, International Journal of Business Excellence, 15(4), 425-444.
Eaton, J., Heller, R., & Johnson, R. (2001). DK Essential Managers: Coaching Successfully. Penguin.
Fathi Vajargah, K., Khorasani, A., & Daneshmandi, S.) 2015(. Study of the conditions and areas of establishing coaching in training and human resource improvement activities, Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 8(2), 27-48. (In Persian).
Gallant, A., & Gilham, V. (2014). Differentiated coaching: developmental needs of coachees. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3(3), 237-254
Gigante, N. A., & Firestone, W. A. (2008). Administrative support and teacher leadership in schools implementing reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(3), 302-331.
Graßmann, C., Schölmerich, F., & Schermuly, C. C. (2020). The relationship between working alliance and client outcomes in coaching: A meta-analysis. Human relations73(1), 35-58.‏‏
Graen, G., Canedo, J. C., & Grace, M. (2020). Team coaching can enhance psychological safety and drive organizational effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics49(2), 100697.
Hattie, J. (2015). What works best in education: The politics of collaborative expertise? British Columbia Teachers' Federation.
Horstmeyer, A. (2018). Four ways mind–body infused coaching approaches sharpen executives’ performance. Strategic HR Review, 17(6), 282-289.
Houchens, G. W., Stewart, T. A., & Jennings, S. (2017). Enhancing instructional leadership through collaborative coaching: A multi-case study. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 6(1), 34-49.
Karlsen, J. T. and Berg, M. E. (2020). Coaching leadership style: A learning process’, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 13(4), 356-368.
Kim, S., Egan, T. M., & Moon, M. J. (2014). Managerial coaching efficacy, work-related attitudes, and performance in public organizations: A comparative international study. Review of public personnel administration34(3), 237-262.
Lin, W., Wang, L., Bamberger, P. A., Zhang, Q., Wang, H., Guo, W. & Zhang, T. (2016). Leading future orientations for current effectiveness: The role of engagement and supervisor coaching in linking future work self-salience to job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior92, 145-156
Matsuo, M. (2018). How does managerial coaching affect individual learning? The mediating roles of team and individual reflexivity. Personnel Review, 47(1), 118-132.
Mohammadi Sadr, M. (2017).  Designing and validating models of coaching skills and attitudes of the Scientific Committee of Isfahan State Universities. PhD Thesis, University of Isfahan, Department of Educational Sciences. (in Persian).
Netolicky, D. M. (2016). Coaching for professional growth in one Australian school:“oil in water”. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 5(2), 66-86.
O'Broin, A., & Palmer, S. (2010). Exploring key aspects in the formation of coaching relationships: Initial indicators from the perspective of the coachee and the coach. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice3(2), 124-143.
Ofili, O. U. (2019). Novice entrepreneurs' experiences with business coaching: The case of Nigeria, International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 10(2), 157-176.
Rosha, A., & Lobanova, L. (2014). Identifying conditions to promote organizational coaching in Latvia and Lithuania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences156, 183-185.
Salter, T. (2015). Equality of mentoring and coaching opportunity: making both available to pre-service teachers. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(1), 69-82.
Sarsur, A. M., & Parente, C. (2019). The coaching process seen from the daily (and controversial) perspective of experts and coaches. Revista de Gestão, 26(2), 126-142.
Shultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2020). Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises. Routledge.
Sider, S. (2019). Peer coaching in a school in Cairo, Egypt: Implementation, barriers, and pathways to effective adoption. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-04-2018-0016
Silva, P., & Yarlagadda, P. K. (2014). Complete and competent engineers: A coaching model to developing holistic graduates. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences116, 1367-1372.
Steinmetz, J. N. (2012). Life coach as midwife: Reflections on a Socratic metaphor. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5(1), 43-54.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. John Wiley & Sons
Whipp, P. R., & Pengelley, R. (2017). Confidence building through Peer Observation of Teaching and Peer Coaching in University Departments: a Good Investment for some and not others. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 6(2), 99-115.
Widianto, S. (2021). Empowering leadership to performance excellence: the role of knowledge sharing and self-efficacy. International Journal of Business Excellence23(3), 297-311.
Woo, H. R. (2017). Exploratory study examining the joint impacts of mentoring and managerial coaching on organizational commitment. Sustainability9(2), 181-196.
Yee, L. W. (2016). Peer coaching for improvement of teaching and learning. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE) ISSN2232, 0180.
Yousefi, H. R., Mashali, B., & Manti, H. (2017). Investigating the possibility of implementing a coaching model in human resource training based on foundation data theory. Tax Research Journal25(34), 233-257. (In Persian)