ارزیابی اثرات عملکرد ویترینی در پایداری یادگیری دوبُعدی با بکارگیری تحلیل فازی شهودی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار مدعو، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار مدعو، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش ارزیابی اثرات عملکرد ویترینی در پایداری یادگیری دوبعدی می‌باشد. پژوهش از نظر+هدف توسعه‌ای-کاربردی، و از نظر روش جمع‌آوری داده‌ها اکتشافی است. در بخش کیفی براساس فرآیندهای تحلیل فراترکیب تلاش شد تا ابتدا پژوهش‌های مرتبط با دو مفهوم عملکرد ویترینی و یادگیری دوبُعدی مشخص شوند و سپس مولفه‌ها و مضامین پژوهش براساس مقیاس ارزیابی انتقادی تعیین گردند. همچنین در ادامه بخش کیفی از تحلیل دلفی برای تعیین حدِ اجماع نظری مولفه‌ها و مضامین استفاده شد. در‌بخش کمی نیز باهدف تعیین تأثیرپذیرترین مولفه‌ی یادگیری دوبُعدی از مضامین اثرات عملکرد ویترینی، ارزیابی فازی شهودی بکار رفت. در بخش کیفی پژوهش، ۱۴ نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی و اجرایی مشارکت نمودند و ۲۴ نفر از مدیران شرکت آب و فاضلاب استان البرز در بخش کمی اقدام به پُرنمودن پرسشنامه‌های ماتریسی نمودند که داده‌ها با اکسل تحلیل شد. نتایج بخش کیفی از وجودِ ۴ مضمونِ اثرات منفی مدیریت ویترینی و ۵ مولفه یادگیری دو بُعدی حکایت دارد. نتایج بخش کمی براساس تحلیلِ ویکور فازی نشان داد، سرخوردگی منابع انسانی به عنوان تاثیرگذارترین مضمونِ اثر منفی عملکرد ویترینی در شرکت آب و فاضلاب استان البرز تلقی می‌شود که می‌تواند باعث تداخل در پایداری یادگیری دوبُعدی گردد. همچنین، اولویت اصلی مشخص شده با سرخوردگی منابع انسانی، نوآوری و خلاقیت شرکت آب و فاضلاب استان البرز می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting the Model of Showcase Performance Drivers in Government Organizations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Youkabed valizadeh 1
  • Alireza koushki jahromi 2
  • Mohamadreza Saadi 3
1 PhD student, Department of public Administration, School of Management and Economics, Research and Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor Department of Public Administration, School of Management and Economics, Research and Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor Department of Public Administration, School of Management and Economics, Research and Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Abstract
The aim of this research is to evaluate the effects of showcase performance in the stability of two-dimensional learning. The research is mixed in terms of developmental-applied goal, and in terms of data collection method. In the qualitative part, based on meta-composite analysis processes, an attempt was made to identify the research related to the two concepts of showcase performance and two-dimensional learning. And then the components and themes of the research are determined based on the critical evaluation scale. Also, in the continuation of the qualitative part, Delphi analysis was used to determine the level of theoretical consensus of the components and themes. In the quantitative part, with the aim of determining the most effective two-dimensional learning component of the effects of showcase performance, intuitive fuzzy evaluation was used. In the qualitative part of the research, 14 people from the research experts in the field of public administration participated and 24 people from the managers of Alborz water and sewage company filled in the matrix questionnaires in the quantitative part. The data was analyzed with Excel software. The results of the qualitative part indicate the existence of 4 themes of negative effects of showcase management and 5 components of two-dimensional learning. The results of the quantitative part based on the fuzzy VICOR analysis showed that the frustration of human resources is considered as the most influential theme of the negative effect of showcase performance in Alborz Water and Sewerage Company, which can cause interference in the sustainability of two-dimensional learning. Also, the most important influential component of the negative effects of showcase performance, especially the frustration of human resources, innovation and creativity is the water and sewage company of Alborz province.
Introduction
Today's era, in terms of management, is in a glass and fluid world, because every process of managers' performance can be observed. In this situation, it is not an easy task to separate the show behavior from the real behavior of the managers, because the managers try to convince others by understanding the current situation. This type of behavior is interpreted as "showcase performance". Expanding on the concept of showcase performance, it should be said that this management style focuses on displaying performance instead of focusing on actual performance and productivity. Promoting the showcase management style is considered a factor for promoting problems such as flattery and administrative corruption. Many people think that showcase performance has negative effects in the organization; But it is possible that such an assumption is not true. Showcase performance can be constructive or destructive for an organization. On the other hand, two-dimensional learning is a theoretical approach related to the development of human resource capabilities, which has placed the functions of organizational learning between the two spectrums of exploration and exploitation. Exploration refers to the diversity of environmental characteristics and the utilization of the inherent characteristics of the internal environment in organizational learning. In other words, exploitation includes the pursuit of learning, above the usual knowledge areas of the organization, while exploitation is defined as the exploitation and deepening of the existing knowledge reserves of the organization. The aim of this research is to evaluate the effects of showcase performance in the stability of two-dimensional learning.
Materials and Methods
This research is developmental-applicative in terms of its purpose and is mixed in terms of data collection method. The current research is considered a development since it seeks to develop a theoretical framework to determine the causes of mutual learning and the sub-factors of the effects of showcase performance. Also, it is practical because its results can be used to improve the performance of managers in Alborz Water and Wastewater Company. In the present study, firstly, meta-composite analysis method was used to analyze the textual data with an inductive approach to examine the related concepts of the research variables, and then Delphi method was used to confirm the validity and finalize the themes and components. Then, in the quantitative part, intuitive fuzzy analysis was used to determine the priority of the components. After the meta-combination stage, Delphi questionnaire was used to evaluate the themes of showcase management and two-dimensional learning components by experts. At this stage, 14 public administration specialists and experts at the university level were consulted. These people were selected through purposive sampling. Also, in the quantitative stage, the intuitive fuzzy Vicor method and the questionnaire tool were used to determine the most important dimension of two-dimensional learning based on the themes of the negative effects of showcase performance. The target population was in a small part the managers of water and sewage company of Alborz province. The sample size of this stage was 24 people and the sample size was based on the principle of adequacy.
Discussion and Results
The aim of this research is to evaluate the negative effects of showcase management in mutual learning. In the qualitative part, to identify the dimensions of the components and themes of the research variables to enter the intuitive fuzzy matrix analysis. Therefore, by screening 19 primary researches, a content analysis of the approved researches was carried out to determine the components (two-dimensional learning) and themes (negative effects of showcase performance) and to determine its reliability based on the Delphi analysis process. The results in the qualitative part indicate the determination of 5 two-dimensional learning components and 4 themes of negative effects of showcase performance. Then, with the aim of determining the most influential theme of the negative effect of showcase performance on two-dimensional learning, the research entered into intuitive fuzzy analysis. The results in this section showed that the most important parameter of the research themes (negative effects of showcase performance) is the frustration of human resources, which according to the obtained fuzzy weights, has the highest importance rate compared to other research themes. On the other hand, based on the results of the research, it was determined that the most important influential component of the negative effects of showcase performance (especially the frustration of human resources) is the innovation and creativity of Alborz water and sewage company as a two-dimensional learning component.
Conclusion
The obtained result shows the fact that due to the performance of the showcase, human resources are exhausted; Because usually, communication in these organizations is based on some kind of outward performance, and in this situation, human resources will not have the necessary motivation to be more effective in organizational activities due to their lack of trust in the organization. In fact, human resources experience a kind of conflict in the attitude and operational realities of the organization. On the other hand, the frustration of human resources due to the performance of the showcase causes the level of knowledge and learning of the organization to decline drastically based on the creativity of human resources. This issue makes the level of learning in the water and sewage company based on exploration and profit due to the reduction of their ideas a serious challenge.
Based on the obtained results, it is suggested that Alborz Water and Sewerage Company, in order to maintain the sustainability of two-dimensional learning as an effective mechanism in gaining the trust and confidence of citizens, instead of focusing on presenting its statistics and documentary and functional reports, should strengthen the motivations of human resources. Therefore, Alborz province water and sewage company should use higher interactive capacities by choosing younger and more motivated managers in order to create vertical confidence in its structures. In this way, by changing management methods and approaches, human resources create a more appropriate level of perception and attitude with organizational realities. Also, cognitive heterogeneity caused by behavioral discrimination inside and outside the organization is reduced. On the other hand, based on the specified result regarding the decline of innovation and creativity of Alborz water and sewage company as a component of two-dimensional learning, it is suggested that in order to maintain organizational values, the feedback of the flow of information should be expanded to dominate the structure of the organization so that the level of individual motivations in presenting ideas To strengthen the organization even more. This work makes human resources have the necessary motivation to develop knowledge and share information in organizational structures based on satisfying the material and spiritual needs of intra-organizational competition functions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • showcase performance
  • two-dimensional learning
  • Intuitive fuzzy analysis
منابع فارسی
اشگرف، رضا؛ امیری، علی­نقی. (1397). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر بروز رفتارهای ریاکارانه در شرکت‌های دولتی ایران و ارائۀ راهکارهای مبتنی بر متون اسلامی. فرهنگ سازمانی، دوره شانزدهم، شماره 2، 305-325.
پورغفاری، سیدرضا؛ منظری توکلی، علیرضا؛ سالجقه، سنجر؛ دهقانی سلطانی، مهدی؛ ابراهیمی نژاد، مهدی(1401).  موشکافی ابعاد آوای کارکنان در بانکهای دولتی) مورد مطالعه: ستاد مرکزی بانک کشاورزی و شعب آن بانک در تهران بزرگ( پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، (15)58، 232-209
جبلی، محمد؛ شیری، اردشیر؛ تابان، محمد. (1395). الگوی تملک شغلی مدیران. مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، دوره پنجم، شماره 19، 137-162.
حسن پور، اکبر؛ یوسفی، رضا؛ قربانی، مریم. (1399). شناسایی و اولویت­بندی عوامل موثر بر دوسوتوانی کارکنان. مدیریت منابع انسانی پایدار، دوره دوم، شماره 3، 175-194.
فولادی، حسام؛ سرلک، محمدعلی؛ حضوری، محمدجواد. (1399). پیامدهای بکارگیری سبک عملکرد ویترینی در سازمانهای دولتی. مدیریت سازمان­های دولتی، دوره نهم، شماره 1، 91-106.
سیدنقوی، میرعلی؛ قربانی زاده، وجه الله؛ حسین­پور، داوود؛ کوشکی جهرمی، علیرضا. (1395). الگوی توسعه یادگیری دوجانبه برای سازمان­ها. مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول، دوره بیست و پنجم، شماره 80، 1-21.
 سلطانی­نژاد، جواد؛ سلاجقه، سنجر؛ شیخی، ایوب؛ (1400) بررسی تاثیر پذیری فرسودگی شغلی بر توانمندسازی ساختاری با نقش میانجی رفتار شهروندی سازمانی و نقش تعدیلگرجنسیت (مطالعه موردی: اعضاء هیئت علمی دانشگاه های دولتی ایران)؛ پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، 14(54)، 169-95
کوشکی جهرمی، علیرضا؛ سیدنقوی، میرعلی؛ حسین پور، داوود؛ قربانی زاده، وجه الله. (1393).  الگوی       توسعه یادگیری دوجانبه گرایانه در سرمایه فکری: صنعت دارویی کشور. پژوهش های مدیریت منابع سازمانی، دوره چهارم، شماره 3، 151-173.
صلاحی پور، وحیده و ضیالدینی، محمد(1401) شناسایی و رتبه بندی عوامل موثر بر ظهور مدیریت ویترینی در مجتمع مس سرچشمه. منابع انسانی تحول آفرین، دوره اول، شماره3
صدرائی، سحر؛ ذوالفقاری، زعفرانی رشید؛ ودادی، احمد. (1398). مد‌ل شایستگی‌‌های ارتباطی مد‌یران منابع انسانی د‌ر صنعت بانکد‌اری. فرایند مدیریت و توسعه، دوره سی ودوم، شماره 4، 59-91.
قربانی، علی. (1397). ارائه یک چارچوب مفهومی برای پردازش نظریه مدیریت ویترینی. مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی, دوره ششم، شماره 4، 151-164.
مهدی، محمد؛ حسینی، سیدحسن؛ حاجیپور، ابراهیم؛ عظمی، امجد(1402) شناسایی و احصاء مکانیزمهای استقرار نظام جانشین پروری در سازمان­های دولتی، پژوهش­های مدیریت عمومی. 16(59 ،)216-193.
نایب زاده، شهناز، اشرف، اسما و معین­الدین، محمود (1392). بررسی روابط بین گرایشات استراتژیک، قابلیت­های سازمانی و عملکرد با توجه به نقش تغییرات سیستم­های کنترل و حسابداری مدیریت. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، دوره دوم، شماره 8، 71-82.
 
References
Anand, J., Mesquita, L. F., & Vassolo, R. S. (2009). The dynamics of multimarket competition in exploration and exploitation activities. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 802–821
Asif, M. (2020). Strategic leadership and ambidextrous learning: Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities and intellectual capital. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2019-0034
Bui, H, T, M., Shoaib, Sh., Tran, V, H. (2020). Career ambition and employee performance behaviour: The presence of ideological development. Journal of General Management, 46(4), 100-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307020983239
Chang, D. R., Jang, J., Lee, E. Y., Lee, H., Chang, B. (2017). When a good company transgresses: A study of the influences of CSR, moral decoupling, and ethnocentrism. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 8(1), 40–53. 
Coser, A. (2012). Modelo para análise da influência do capital intelectual sobre a performance dos projetos de software, 220f, Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.
Davison, H.K., Braddy, P.W., Meriac, J.P., Gigliotti, R., Detwiler, D.J. and Bing, M.N. (2022). Ambition: a deterrent to workplace deviance among narcissistic leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2021-0137
Farias, B., Rapôso, O., Penna, T, J, P., Girardi, D. (2021). The Peter Principle and learning: A safer way to promote workers, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 576(16), 126-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126023
Fouladi, H., Sarlak, M., Hozoori, M. (2020). Consequences of Using Showcase Performance Style in Public Organizations. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 9(1), 91-106. (In Persian).
Ghorbani, A. (2018). Introducing a Conceptual Framework to Processing Theory of Showcase Management Style. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 6(4), 151-164. (In Persian).
Goswami, S., Ha-Brookshire, J., Bonifay, W. (2018). Measuring perceived corporate hypocrisy. Sustainability, 10(12), 4756.
Gürlek, M. (2021). Shedding light on the relationships between Machiavellianism, career ambition, and unethical behavior intention. Ethics & Behavior, 31(1), 38-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1764846
Hassanpoor, A., Yosefi Zenouz, R., Ghorbani, M. (2020). Identify and prioritize the factors affecting employees' ambidexterity. Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management, 2(3), 194-175. (In Persian).
Hattab, S., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Daswati, D. and Niswaty, R. (2022). The effect of toxic leadership on turnover intention and counterproductive work behaviour in Indonesia public organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0142
Hirschi, A., Spurk, D. (2021). Ambitious employees: Why and when ambition relates to performance and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127(2), 98-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103576
Hughes, M. (2019). Organizational Ambidexterity and Firm Performance. Burning Research Questions for Marketing Scholars, https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175
Jackson, M., Grace, D. (2013). Machiavelli's echo in management. Management & Organizational History, 8(4), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2013.831737
Jackson, N.C. and Leung, O.M.C. (2020). Evidence-based management for today’s “ambidextrous” organizations. Strategy & Leadership, 46(4), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-03-2018-0027
Jebeli, M., Shiri, A., Taban, M. (2016). The Model of Managers' Job Ownership. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 5(3), 137-162. (In Persian)
Kim, A. (2019). Human resource strategies for organizational ambidexterity. Employee Relations, 41(4), 678-693. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2017-0228
Lischinsky, A. (2008). Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature. Discourse & Communication, 2(3), 209-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481308091907
Liu, M. and Rao, P. (2015). A comparative perspective of knowledge management via social media: India and China. The Learning Organization, 22(2), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2014-0010
Maranto, R., Teodoro, M, P., Carroll, K., Cheng, A. (2019). Gendered Ambition: Men’s and Women’s Career Advancement in Public Administration, 49(4), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804564
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(2), 71-87
Mehdi, M., Hosseini, S.H., Hajipor, E., & Ozma, A. (2023). Discovering and Counting the Mechanisms of Establishing a Succession Planning System in Governmental Organizations. Public Management Researches, 16 (59), 193-216. (In Persian)
Moreno Luzon, M.D. and Valls Pasola, J. (2011). Ambidexterity and total quality management: towards a research agenda. Management Decision, 49(6), 927-947. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111143612
Nayebzadeh, S., Ashraf ganjouie, A., Moeinaddin, M. (2013). The relationship between strategic orientations, organizational capabilities and performance with respect to the role of the control and management accounting systems changes. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 2(8), 71-82. (In Persian).
Nobakht M, Hejazi S R, Akbari M, Sakhdari K. (2018). A Review of Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance. Strategic Studies in the Oil and Energy industry, 10(37), 35-66.
O‘Reilly, C. A., Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator‘s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 185-206.
Park, S., Westphal, J., & Stern, I. (2012). Set upfora Fall: The. Administrative Science Quarterly Effects of Flattery and Opinion Confornnity toward Corporate Leaders, 257-302.
Peters, K., Buijs, P. (2022). Strategic ambidexterity in green product innovation: Obstacles and implications. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2881
Poon, W, Ch., Mohamad, O., Yusoff, W, F, W. (2018). Examining the Antecedents of Ambidextrous Behaviours in Promoting Creativity among SMEs in Malaysia. Golbal Business Review, 21(3), 154-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918779267
Popadiuk, S. (2012). Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous. International Journal of Information Management, 32(2), 75– 87.
Pourghafari, S.R., Manzari Tavakoli, A.R., Salajeghe, S., Dehghani Soltani, M., & Ebrahiminejad, M. (2023). A Study on the Dimensions of Employee Voice in GovernmentOwned Banks (Case Study: Headquarters of Agricultural Bank and its Branches in Tehran). Public Management Researches, 15 (58), 209-232. (In Persian)
Prieto-Pastor, I., Martin-Perez, V. (2015). Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(5), 589-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.938682
Puhan, T-X. (2008). Balancing exploration and exploitation by creating organizational think tanks. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler Edition Wissenschaft.
Rohn, U., Rimscha, B, V. (2017). A showcase of recent member work from the European Media Management Association. Journal of Media Business Studies, 14(2), 79-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2017.1299491
Roszkowska, P., Melé, D. (2021). Organizational Factors in the Individual Ethical Behaviour. The Notion of the “Organizational Moral Structure”. Humanistic Management Journal, 6(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-020-00080-z
Salman, A. (2015). Europe: a global showcase of coastal management failure. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19, 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0366-4
Senaratne, C. and Wang, C.L. (2018). Organizational ambidexterity in UK high-tech SMEs: An exploratory study of key drivers and barriers. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(6), 1025-1050. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2018-0110
Seyyednaghvi, M., Ghorbanizadeh, V., Hosseinpoor, D., Koushkie Jahromi, A. (2016). A Model for Developing Ambidextrous Organizational Learning. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 25(80), 1-26. (In Persian).
Seyyednaghvi, M., Koushkie Jahromi, A. (2014). Simulated Rank Model of Intellectual Capital with Organizational Ambidextrous Learning: Case of Pharmaceutical Industry. ORMR, 4(3), 151-173 (In Persian).
Sollander, K., Engström, A. (2021). Unplanned managerial work: an ambidextrous learning potential. Studies in Continuing Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2021.1874903
Soltaninejad, J; Salajeghe, S; Sheikhy, A. (2022). Investigating the Effect of Structural Empowerment on Burnout with Mediating the Role of Organizational and the Role of Gender Moderator (Case Study:Faculty Members of Iranian Public Universities), Public Management Researches, 14 (54), 169-195. (In Persian)
Stelzl, K., Röglinger, M. & Wyrtki, K. (2020). Building an ambidextrous organization: a maturity model for organizational ambidexterity. Business Research, 13(2), 1203–1230 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00117-x
Tesfamariam, S., Sadiq, R. (2006). Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 21(2), 35–50.
Tiwari, M. and Jha, R. (2022). Narcissism, toxic work culture and abusive supervision: a double-edged sword escalating organizational deviance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2020-2187
Vanhaverbeke, W., Gilsing, V., Beerkens, B., & Duysters, G. (2009). The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and noncore technologies. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 215–244.
Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T, N., Kumar, M., Upadhyayula, R, S. (2019). Strengthening organizational ambidexterity with top management team mechanisms and processes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 586-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1277369
Wang, H., Qian, G., Feng, X. (2011). An intuitionistic fuzzy AHP based on synthesis of eigenvectors and its application. Information technology journal, 10(3), 1850-1866.
Weiss, L., K., Kanbach, D. (2021). Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambidexterity as a dynamic capability. Management Review Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00223-y
Wolff, D., Duffy, A. (2021). Development and demonstration of an uncertainty management methodology for life cycle assessment in a tiered-hybrid case study of an Irish apartment development. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(2), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01872-7
Wu, D. D., Zhang, Y., Wu, D. and Olson, D. L. (2010). Fuzzy Multi-objective Programming for Supplier Selection and Risk Modeling: A Possibility Approach. European Journal of Operations Research, 200(3), 774–787.
Yuan, Ch., Xue, D., He, X. (2022). A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism. Technovation, 103(2), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102225
Zabiegalski, E. and Marquardt, M.J. (2022). Action learning and the ambidextrous organization. Journal of Work-Applied Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-11-2021-0062