بررسی تأثیر اعتماد سازمانی بر تعهد سازمانی از طریق متغیر میانجی مشارکت سازمانی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

2 دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

10.22111/jmr.2019.23818.3788

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین اعتماد و تعهد سازمانی از طریق متغیر میانجی مشارکت سازمانی انجام گرفت. روش پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری آن کلیه کارکنان سازمان آموزش و پرورش شهر زاهدان در سال تحصیلی 97-1396 بودند که به شیوه نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای-تصادفی تعداد 208 نفر از طریق سه پرسشنامه: اعتماد سازمانی کاناواتاناچای و یو (2002)، مشارکت سازمانی ناستی‌زایی (2015) و تعهد سازمانی دهمرده و ناستی‌زایی (1396) مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون مدل معادلات ساختاری با کمک نرم افزار لیزرل استفاده شد. بر اساس یافته‌ها اعتماد سازمانی بر تعهد و مشارکت سازمانی اثر مثبت و معنی‌داری دارد. همچنین اعتماد سازمانی از طریق متغیر مشارکت سازمانی بر تعهد سازمانی اثر مثبت و معنی‌داری دارد. بنابراین مدیران ‌می‌توانند با افزایش اعتماد سازمانی موجبات افزایش مشارکت سازمانی کارکنان و در نتیجه افزایش تعهد سازمانی آنان را فراهم کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Organizational Trust on Organizational Commitment Through the Mediating Variable of Organizational Participation

نویسندگان [English]

  • MohebAli Dahmardeh 1
  • naser nastiezaie 2
1 MSc. Student of educational administration, Departmenet of educational administration and planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
2 Associate professor of Educational Administration, Departmenet of educational administration and planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The objective of the present study was to examine the impact of organizational trust on organizational commitment through the mediating variable of organizational participation. This descriptive-correlational study followed a correlation design. The population was employees of Zahedan educatin organization in the academic year 2017-2018. Using stratified convenience sampling method, 208 employees were selected and studied through applying three questionnaires: organizational trust (Kanawattanachai & Yoo, 2002), organizational participation (Nastiezaie, 2015) and organizational commitment (Dahmarde & nastiezaie, 2017). To analyze the data, test structural equation modeling using LISREL software were used. According to the findings, organizational trust has a positive and significant effect on organizational commitment and participation. Also, organizational trust has a positive and significant effect on organizational commitment through organizational participation variable. Therefore, managers can increase their organizational commitment by increasing organizational trust and organizational participation.
Introduction
One of the most important attitudes about human capital is an organizational commitment (Nastiezaie et al., 2015). Organizational commitment can be defined as believing in the values ​​and goals of the organization, the sense of loyalty to the organization, the moral obligation, the heart's desire, and the sense of the need to stay in the organization (Weng et al., 2010). Organizational commitment of employees can be affected by several factors such as organizational trust. Trust is defined as a level of individual confidence in another’s competency and expecting him to act fairly and morally (Dai et al., 2013). Trust as a multilevel concept relates to the interactions of various levels of colleagues, teams, and levels within an organization (Dennis, 2004). Other variables affecting organizational commitment of employees can be their level of participation in the organization. Participation is a process in which employees of an organization engage voluntarily in their affairs and activities, provided they have the potential and motivation for effective intervention (Nastiezaie, 2014). The researcher has been working as an administrative officer in the Zahedan Education Organization for many years. During this period ,he has encountered closely issues such as the desire to leave, delayed work, absence, unwillingness to continue to serve in the organization, low quality of work, lack of loyalty to the organization, avoidance of activities outside the scope of responsibilities , Illegal activities against the organization, negative results of denunciation, and misconduct of the organization, limited control of the organization on employees, which indicates a low level of organizational commitment of the staff of education. It has also been closely observed over the years of service that managers are not welcome the employee participation, and that more employees are involved in superficial matters. In addition to the aforementioned, rumors, pessimism and false fears caused by a low level of organizational trust are prevalent in the education organization. Hence, he seeks to identify factors that can affect the organizational commitment of employees, which, according to organizational evidence and documents, has sought to investigate the role of organizational trust and organizational participation in order to be able to find suitable solutions based on the findings of this study to improve the organizational commitment of the staff to the top managers of education. Hence, the main issue of this research is: what is the relationship between organizational trust and organizational commitment through the intermediary variable of organizational participation?
Case study
The purpose of the current Study, according to the applied purpose and methodology, according to the main purpose of the research is a descriptive-correlational study based on the use of structural equation modeling. The statistical population of the study was all the administrative staff of the educational organization of Zahedan in the academic year of 1396-97 with 453 people (392 men and 61 women). A stratified random sampling method was used to determine the size of the sample and 208 people (180 men and 28 women) were selected as sample based on the Cochran sampling formula.
Materials and Methods
To collect information, three questionnaires of Nastiezaie were used: Organizational trust questionnaire (Kanawattanachai & Yoo, 2002), and Organizational commitment questionnaire of researcher made questionnaire (1393). In the Likert scale of the questionnaire it was set from’ I totally disagree with to the of ’I fully agree with’.  The scoring method was set from’ I totally disagree with =1, I fully agree with = 5. The content validity method was used to determine the validity of the questionnaires. In this regard, the questionnaires were approved by the faculty members of the educational management group of Sistan and Baluchestan University and verified that the questionnaires would measure the same characteristic of the researcher and have credibility. To determine the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for organizational participation, organizational trust and organizational commitment were 0.87, 0.91, and 0.83, respectively. To analyze the data, the structural equation modeling was used with the help of Lisrel software.
Discussion and Results
The results showed: 1. Organizational trust has a positive impact on organizational commitment. 2. Organizational participation has a positive impact on organizational commitment. 3. Organizational trust has a positive impact on organizational participation. 4. Organizational trust has a positive effect through participation in organizational commitment.
According to the findings of this study (the effect of organizational trust on organizational commitment through organizational participation), if managers of organizations are demanding committed employees, they should be able to provide the conditions that actualize the potential forces of employees, thereby improving the performance of these organizations. Executives can raise organizational effectiveness, once the employees feel that their managers are trustworthy. When there is mutual trust between the manager and the staff, managers participate staff in decision making, which, in turn, makes employees feel more committed to organizational commitment and are more careful to make better and more accurate decisions, and develop  their knowledge and to fulfill tasks and duties . One of the most important limitations of the present study is that the current study can not accurately identify the various dimensions of the problem. Therefore, it is recommended to other researchers to do such studies in combination (quantitative and qualitative) and with regard to demographic characteristics. Also, considering that this study was carried out on employees of Zahedan Education Organization, the results of it should be cautiously generalized to other groups.
Conclusion
Managers can increase their organizational commitment by increasing organizational trust and organizational participation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational Trust
  • Organizational Commitment
  • Organizational Participation
2-Abili, K., Naderi, A., Yazdani, B., Nastiezaie, N. (2014). Designing a model of organizational participation (Case study: Zahedan schools). Management Researches; 6(21), 101-122. (In Persian)

3-Adabi, H., & Yektayar, M. (2015). The Relationship between Organizational climate and Organizational trust with rate of Managers Participation in decision-making in Sport and Youth Administration. Applied Research in Sport Management; 4(13), 81-91. (In Persian)

4-Akbarzadeh, M., & Rezghi Shirsavar, H. (2014). Reviewing the Relationship between the organizational Trust and Organizational Commitment in the Employees of Science and Research Branch in Islamic Azad University. 25(101), 1-12. (In Persian)

5-Allen, N., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective continuance and normative commitment to the organizations. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1(63), 1-18.

6-Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: an examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3):252-276.

7-Bahrami, A., & Sarihi Asfestani, R. (2015). The Relationship between Organizational Trust, Organizational Commitment and Perceived Organizational Support at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance. Management Studies in Development and Evolution; 24(87), 1-16. (In Persian)

8-Bair, A., & Amand, R. (1995). Trust within the organization. Monograph, (1):415-425.

9-Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1996). Organizational commitment: antecedants and outcomes in public organizations, Public Productivity Managemant Review, 19, 256-277.

10-Butler, J. K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory. Journal of Management, 17(3):643-663.

11-Celep, C., & Eler, O. Y. (2012). The Relationship among Organizational Trust, Multidimensional Organizational Commitment and Perceived Organizational Support in Educational Organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; 46(2012):5763–5776.

12-Deconinck, J. (2010). The Effect of Organizational Justice, Perceived Organizational Support, and Perceived Supervisor Support on Marketing Employees’ Level of Trust'. Journal of Business Research, 63(2010):1349-1355.

13-Dennis, R.S. (2004). Servant leadership theory: Development of the servant leadership theory assessment instrument. A Dissertation presented in Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy.

14-Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2008). The role of trust in organizational innovatveness. European Journal of Innovation Management; 11(2), 160-181.

15-Erat, S., Erdil, O., Kitapçı, H., & Çömlek, O. (2012). The effect of the perception of organizational trust and organizational support on intention to quit and individual performance: An empirical study of the Turkish state universities. African Journal of Business Management, 6(30), 8853-8861.

16-Fakhariyan, J., ShahMt, N., & Amiriyanzade, M. An Investigation into the Relationship of Participatory Management to Organizational Commitment and Mental health of High School Teachers. A New Approach to Educational Administration, 5(17), 221-234. (In Persian)

17-Ghanbari, S., & Erfanizadeh, F. (2017). The Role of Organizational Trust in Reducing Organizational Cynicism. Organizational Behavior Studies; 6(2), 126-150. (In Persian)

18-Ghasemipouya, A. (2001). Public Participation in Education. Tehran: Educational Research Institute Publications. (In Persian)

19-Gholipour, A., Pourezzat, A. A., & Hazrati, M. (2009). The investigation of Servant Leadership on Organizational Trust and Empowerment in Public Organizations. Journal of Public Administration; 1(2), 103-118. (In Persian)

20-Golparvar, M., Oreyzi, H. (2007). The Role of Citizenship Participation, Meritocracy and Organizational Structure on Personnel's Behavior and Attitudes in Organizations. Social Welfare, 6 (23), 251-276. (In Persian)

21-Gollan, P. J, Budd, J. W., & Wilkinson, A. (2010). New approaches to employee voice and participation in organizations. Human Relations, 63(3):303-310.

22-Herscovitch, L., & Meyer J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: extension of a threecomponent model, Journal of applied psychology, 87(3):474.

23-Isik, M., & Aliyev, Y. (2015). The Relationship between Teamwork and Organizational Trust. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 4(1):133.

24-Javanmard, H., & Afzali, H. (2016). Investigating the effects of organizational silence and sound on the staff's participation and manager’s performance (case study: Arak governmental organization). Journal of Human Resources management, 6(19), 46-67. (In Persian)

25-Jiang, Y., & Chen, W. K. (2017). Effects of Organizational Trust on Organizational Learning and Creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(6), 2057-2068.

26-Kanawattanachai, P., Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic Nature of Trust in Virtual Teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 187-213.

27-Kane-Urrabazo, C. (2006). Management's role in shaping organizational culture. Journal of nursing management, 14(3):188-194.

29-Korsgaard, M. A., Brodt, S. E., Whitener, E. M. (2002). Trust in the face of conflict: the role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 312-319.

30-Kuppelwieser, V. G., Grafrath, R., & Dziuk, A. (2011).A classification of Brand pride using trust and commitment. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3): 36-45.

31-Maume, D. J. (2006). Gender difference in taking vacation time. Work and Occupations; 2(33): 161-190.

32-Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwartz, G., & Xu, L. (2014). Servant Leadership, trust, and the organizational commitment of public sector employees in China. Public Administration, 92(3):727–743.

33-Musavi, S. R. (2013). The Impact of Organizational Transparency on Organizational Trust by Explaining the Role of Organizational Atmosphere: A Case Study of Tehran Province Guidance Office. M.Sc., Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran. (In Persian)

34-Nastiezaie, N. (2015). Designing Participatory Model for Zahedan Schools. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Studies Office in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Administration, University of Tehran. (In Persian)

35-Nastiezaie, N., Salimi, S., & Najafi, M. (2015). Assess the Relationship between Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Commitment of Administrative Staff of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Tolooe Behdasht; 14(2), 79-89. (In Persian)

36-Noah, Y. (2008). A Study of Worker Participation in Management Decision Making Within Selected Establishments in Lagos, Nigerian Journal of Social Sciences; 17(1):31-39.

37-Oktug, Z. (2012). The Effects of Organizational Trust on Employee Decision Making Styles. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 9(1), 79-88.

38-Oreyzi Samani, S. H., Ali Mohammadi, S., & Golparvar, M. (2015). The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and its Components with Organizational Variables Based on Path Analysis. Psychology; 19(75), 235-251.

39-Price, B. (2008). The intelligent workforce. Nursing Management, 15(5): 28-33.

40-Sadeghifard, N., & Naghavi, M. A. (2003). Participatory Management. Tehran: Iran Industrial Research & Training Center. (In Persian)

41-Sani, A., & Maharani, V. (2012). The impacts of transformational leadership and organizational commitment on job performance with among lecturers of faculty in the Islamic Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang University: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Academic Research, 4(4):102-106.

42-Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S., & Peng, A. (2011). Cognition-Based and Affect-Based Trust as Mediators of Leader Behavior Influences on Team Performance. The Journal of applied psychology, 96(4), 863-871.

43-Shamian, J. & El-Jardali, F. (2007). Healthy workplaces for health workers in Canada: knowledge transfer and uptake in policy and practice, Healthcare Papers, 7(Sp). Available in: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17478996.

44-Sheykhmohammadi, M., & Toliyatzavare, M. R. (2001). Partnership Management Based on Recommendations System. Tehran: IZ Iran Institute.

45-Smith, P. B., & Peterson, M. F. (1988). Leadership, organizations, and culture, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing Company.

46-Soltani, Sh. (2017). The relationship between different aspects of organizational trust and employees′ organizational commitment (case study: Employees of Mahabad Educational Office). Modern Thoughts in Education; 12(1), 93-108. (In Persian)

47-Tingle, JK. (2011). The relationship between organizational trust and mindfulness: An exploration of NCAA Division III athletic departments.thesis of the University of Texas at San Antonio.

48-Top, M., Tarcan, M., Tekingunduz, S., & Hikmet, N. (2013). An analysis of relationships among transformational leadership, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust in two Turkish hospitals. The International journal of health planning and management, 28(3), 217-241.

49-Tyler, T.R. (2003). Trust within organisations. Personnel Review, 32(5), 556-568.

50-Vakola M, Nikolaou I. (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: what is the role of employees, stress and commitment?. Journal of Employee Relation, 2(27), 160-174.

51-Vanhala, M, Heilmann, P, & Salminen, H. (2016). Organizational trust dimensions as antecedents of organizational commitment, Knowledge and Process Management; 23(1), 46-61.

52-Vineburgh, JH. (2010). A study of organizational trust and related variables among faculty members at HBCUs, PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa.

53-Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership: managing participation to organization, Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

54-Weng Q, Mcelroy JC, Morrow PC, Liu R. (2010). The relationship between career growth and organizational commitment, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3(77): 391-400.

55-Weng, R. H., Huang, C. Y., Tsai, W. C., Chang, L. Y., Lin, S. E., Lee,  M. Y. (2010). Exploring the impact of mentoring functions on job satisfaction and organizational commitment of new staff nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 10(240):1-9.

56-Yang, FH, Chang, CC. (2008). Emotional labour, job satisfaction and organizational commitment amongst clinical nurses: A questionnaire survey, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(6):879-887.

57-Yang, J. (2005). The Role of Trust in Organizations: Do Foci and Bases Matter? Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Interdepartmental Program in Business Administration (Management) by Jixia Yang BA, Nanjing University, China, 1999.

58-Yilmaz, A, Atalay, C. (2009). A theoretical analyze on the concept of trust in organizational life, European Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2009):341-352.

59-Yilmaz, K. (2008). The Relationship between Organizational Trust and Organizational Commitment in Turkish Primary Schools. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(12), 2293-2299.